Freedom from Alaska!

9/11 TRUTH: Kevin Ryan Exposes Access for Demolition Crews to WTC Buildings

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_j3Kj0Tlec]9/11 TRUTH: Kevin Ryan Exposes Access for Demolition Crews to WTC Buildings

Federaljacktube4 | December 26, 2010 | 31 likes, 0 dislikes

9 years after the attacks we are finally zeroing in on the people responsible. Kevin Ryan has been kicking ass and taking names, while the pseudo-savior Julian Assange censors cables dealing with Israel and calls 9/11 Truthers “annoying”. Assange staked the reputation of Wikileaks on the public never learning about Building 7. So ask yourself: Who would want to silence the biggest controversy in history? Why is Julian Assange doing this? Who is he?

Resistance Radio Network’s original sound byte used for this video:
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-11-16…

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth Debunk Assange with irrefutable proof of cover up:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/…

Kevin Ryan’s recent article on who had “Demolition access to the WTC Towers”:
Tenants:
http://www.911review.com/articles/rya…
Security:
http://www.911review.com/articles/rya…
Convergence:
http://www.911review.com/articles/rya…
Clean Up:
http://www.911review.com/articles/rya…

Kevin Ryan’s Paper “The Top Ten Connections between NIST and nanothermite”:
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/ni…

Kevin Ryan’s Website:
http://www.ultruth.com/Kevin_Ryan.htm

Some Archives of Stratasec’s Website:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://w…

9/11 Suspects: (Please help us investigate these people!)
Wirt Walker III, Marvin Bush, Jim Pierce, L Paul Bremer, Barry McDaniel, Joseph Kasputys, Jerome Hauer, Stephan Friedman, Craig Stapleton, William Clark, Preston Rahe Jr., Michael Daniel (SAIC), Frank Carlucci, Rudy Giuliani, Bernard Kerik, and probably a few more names we are yet to uncover…

Nanothermite & Science Experts complicit in cover-up of 9/11:

Hratch Semerjian, Shyam Sundar, John Gross, Richard Gann, Andrzej Miziolek
Professor Steve Son:
http://www.reef.ufl.edu/FIRE_WEB/Bio%…

Dr. Michael Zachariah:
http://www.enme.umd.edu/facstaff/fac-…

Other Articles by Kevin Ryan:
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/in…

Thank You! Please help investigate these people and expose this information to everyone you know before they use Wikileaks as an excuse to shut down the Internet! This is the REAL leaking conspiracy, please don’t put too much trust into Julian Assange until his Banking and UFO cables check out. Many of us have suspicions that Assange is part of an intelligence operation to gain control over the internet.

Thanks to http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScie… for the video

Related:

National Geographic Debunked! 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

Previous

More Proof: Skull and Bonesman President George W. Bush is a Reverse-Christian

Next

National Geographic Debunked! 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

3 Comments

  1. Albury

    Kevin Ryan’s a proven liar:
    http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/RyanFraud1.jpg
    If you believe any of his nonsense, how did he come up with 6.5 seconds for WTC 7’s main collapse? NIST timed the top ~242′ of the 610′ building in ~5.4 seconds, so did the rest fall in 1.1 seconds, or can’t SEs with PEs and doctorates do simple subtraction? How could he even come up with a time for the whole collapse, and to the nearest 1/10 second, when no videos show the lower portion of the building?

    • Jeff Fenske

      Albury,

      Regarding the last statement in your linked JPEG, the fact that Silverstein owned all of these buildings harms your argument. It shows how he made a huge amount of money from these demolitions, having just a few weeks before 9/11 taken out a huge terrorist insurance policy. And the buildings had known structural faults that were ridiculously expensive to repair. This was the only way he could make money.

      And regarding Ryan making incorrect statements. Many people do this. This isn’t good, but it doesn’t at all disprove what he says here.

      In what you’ve stated in this post, you are merely attacking the messenger without at addressing the specifics of what he says in this video.

      It looks like you are basically on a character assassination campaign.

      jeff

  2. Albury

    Deliberately altering someone’s statement, and then slandering and libeling him isn’t “engaging in a character assassination campaign,” Jeff? The PANYNJ “owned all of these buildings,” with the exception of WTC 7, and the only “known structural faults” in them were invented by the 9/11 “truth movement,” as was the absurd claim that they had an asbestos problem. Silverstein Properties lost billions because of al Qaeda’s 9/11/01 terrorist attack, despite the insurance settlements, but if you agree with Kevin Ryan’s claim:

    -Why would Larry Silverstein have publicly admitted even to knowing that there were planted explosives in WTC 7 in the first place?
    -What was Silverstein Properties’ and the FDNY’s motive for blowing up a perfectly good, 14 year-old building, losing hundreds of millions of dollars in cash flow from it for eight years and counting, spending ~$700 million, or most of the $861 million insurance settlement, on the replacement of it, and paying ~$500 million back to lenders?
    (note: it was built in 1986-1987, at least 15 years after asbestos was written out of all building codes, and it had no asbestos in its SFRM or elsewhere. There was some on the first 38 floors of the North Tower, most of which had been abated during various tenant fit-outs well before he won the lease by default when Vornado’s deal with the PA fell though, but none in the South Tower, which was built after the code change went into effect)

    -Why would any insurance company have paid him a dime instead of the $4.68 BILLION total he received if he publicly admitted to foreknowledge of or complicity in the alleged secret demolition of his property, but especially those based in Copenhagen, Zurich (2 of them), and London? They all contested his claim of two occurrences based on two separate plane crashes, and he won in court in a few instances based on individual contract wording, but there was never any question relating to the causes of any WTC collapse.

    -How did he or the FDNY know that flaming debris from a much taller collapsing hi-rise across the street would hit WTC 7, start multi-story fires in it, and break the water main to it, disabling the sprinklers and providing a cover story for the alleged controlled demolition?

    -If the explosives were pre-planted, which would have taken weeks or even months in a vacant building and have been completely impossible to do secretly in an occupied one, and Barry Jennings heard some of them go off around 10 AM, why was there any discussion at all in mid-afternoon about whether or not to demolish WTC 7 with the other apparently fireproof explosives allegedly planted a few stories higher?

    -Do controlled demolitions take seven or eight hours to collapse a building?

    -Do they leave no severed columns with copper residue on the ends, or any other evidence in the debris?

    -Do they leave ~12 stories on one corner standing?

    -Is the FDNY in the controlled demolition business? What other buildings, on fire or not, have they demolished before or since 9/11?

    -Please link me to a C/D contractor’s web site, and show me the use of “pull” or “pull it” to refer to building demolition using explosives, not one in which cables are used to pull an already damaged building over, as was done with WTC 6.

    -How does a “terrible loss of life” in the WTC towers affect a later decision to demolish a nearby building with no one in it?

    -A number of FDNY personnel were inside WTC 7 prior to the pullback order, presumably at risk from the alleged explosives, and most of the 343 FDNY fatalities resulted from the tower collapses, so why are there only a few FDNY in the 9/11 “truth movement”? You can count the number in this “truth” organization right here: http://firefightersfor911truth.org/?page_id=469 Are they simply not as astute as you are, or don’t they care what killed so many of their colleagues?

    -There was a pre-existing ConEd substation at the Vesey Street WTC 7 site in 1986, and the building was designed to straddle it, requiring some of the extremely long ~45′ girder and ~52′ beam spans inside that contributed to the 9/11 collapse. It was powered up and in full use on 9/11/01, and the demolition of a 200,000 ton, 47-story building directly on top of it very likely destroyed it completely. Do you know whether ConEd’s insurers just absorbed the loss of tens of millions of dollars in infrastructure damage and restoration and then subrogated Industrial Risk Insurers, since Larry Silverstein’s firm was still the responsible party, especially if he deliberately caused the damage?

    Please feel free to explain how Ryan came up with 6.5 seconds for the main collapse of WTC 7 also.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén