And we knew Japan was trying to surrender!
Unbiblical, Catholic Mary ideas at the end.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceFJ6I5awms]The Secret of Nagasaki
From: radicalpress.com/?p=9097 (where Arthur has a DONATE button to this worthy cause!)
February 28, 2016
Editor’s Note: With the exception of the final Charge to the Jury by B.C.S.C. Justice Butler the full transcript of the trial proceedings in the case of R V ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM from October 26, 2015 to November 12, 2015 are contained in the following pdf files.
It is suggested that these files be downloaded for future reference and in the interest of securing a permanent record of this important free speech trial in Canada.
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
Arthur Topham trial @ 28 • True perspective @ 54:30[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKF8Ekh3Rqk]The Martinez Perspective (02/18/16): A Conversation with Paul Fromm
Published on Feb 8, 2016
On this episode of the Martinez Perspective I am joined by Paul Fromm, a long-time free speech activist, White preservationist and director of the Canadian Association of Free Expression. We discussed Paul’s recent run-in with the “thought police” at the Toronto airport, who, on the orders of the most likely Zionist influence peddlers higher up in the Canadian government, harassed and finagled him in a clear act of state-sanctioned intimidation. Then we touched on some of the finer details of the Arthur Topham thought crime trial in BC, where Zionist hate mongers are seeking to send an elderly blogger to jail for publishing books that are already widely available online.
MP3 of the show: http://nonalignedmedia.com/AUDIO/Mart…
Stefan Molyneux does some excellent work, but he turns into Mr. Spin on 9/11 and Holocaust truth, all of a sudden saying “facts don’t matter” — discussed at minute-10:00 here.
Many truthers absolutely do idolize Putin, whitewashing anything he does, while being appropriately skeptical of those in our own government.
Originally posted at youtube.com/watch?v=jbcZ_uLmSk4
The Martinez Perspective (01/11/16): Ziocon Infiltration of Alt-Media & Putin Worship
Published on Jan 11, 2016
I talk about the disinfo tactics of Alex Jones and Stefan Molyneux as well as some issues involving Russia and Putin worship in alt-media.
Molyneux’s deflection of Holocaust truth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw78Q…
Molyneux’s deflection of 9/11 truth: http://911blogger.com/news/2010-12-24…
(video) Stefan Molyneux admits he’s Jewish. Stefan Molyneux is a Jew! (Christopher Bollyn has proven they were the architects of 9/11 & they protect the Holocaust sympathy card at all costs)
Israel allowed to get away with murder, because…??
From: Radical Press
Anti-BDS Motion – Why Does Canada Sanction Other Countries for Human Rights Violations but Not Israel? By Julie Lévesque Global Research
There are currently 22 states targeted by Canadian sanctions, several of them for human rights violations. And Israel, being Canada’s “friend”, is not one of them, even if the sanctioned countries’ misdeeds pale in comparison to the death and destruction Israel has imposed on Palestinians for decades.
While not one sanction has been imposed on Israel for its war crimes and crimes against humanity, some countries have been sanctioned by Canada simply for “misappropriating state funds.”
There are no words to describe the scale of this hypocrisy, but, we don’t need any since the facts speak for themselves.
“Even though, I think he was a controlled justice, just like Roberts, etc., as pointed out by the way that he refused to hear the case on the murder/suicide of Vince Foster, proving that it was a murder, rather than a suicide. Nevertheless, he was the deciding vote on many, many important cases that went our way.
And I don’t think, frankly, that we’ll ever win another major Supreme court case for the conservative side again, period, even if we have a Republican president. I don’t believe we’ll ever get a jurist coming close to Antonin Scalia.”
– Joel Skousen
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske from:
Jeff Rense Show, February 23 Hour 3 – Joel Skousen – The NV Primary Caucus (subscription only)
Skousen: Scalia Death a Major Setback for Liberty — “Before Antonin Scalia’s suspicious death in Texas this week, there was a somewhat tenuous but often conservative majority in the Supreme Court leading to many 5-4 decisions that blocked executive actions that threatened liberty. It wasn’t a solid majority by any means, as demonstrated by the actions of unreliable conservatives like John Roberts, who betrayed conservatives on Obamacare, and Anthony Kennedy, who betrayed religious traditions and rights on the issue of gay marriage” • “There are no justices on the Supreme Court, including conservatives, that the establishment doesn’t control to one degree or another through blackmail”
(audio) Texe Marrs: Justice Scalia’s Betrayal of Christianity – “The Talmudic infiltration of America’s legal system” — Scalia turns out to be a secretive member of the Opus Dei secret society and an aggressive Zionist agent. An avid student of the Babylonian Talmud, Scalia was a ticking time bomb on the Supreme Court, ready to explode in favor of the Jews. The Jews had FIVE pro-Israel Zionists on the Supreme Court with Scalia’s vote. That is 5 of 9 Judges! Was he murdered? • “All of these pastors out there are worried about Sharia law of the Moslims, but how about the Rabbinic law of the Talmud?”
The documents Mike refers to:
“Natural born” @ Minute-27:45[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBFSs5Koff4]What Really Happened Show: Michael Rivero Friday 2/26/2016: (Commercial Free Video)
Published on Feb 26, 2016
— Check Out http://whatreallyhappened.com
Donald Trump Is Right to Retweet that Marco Rubio Is Not a Natural Born Citizen
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
February 22, 2016
Donald Trump retweeted that both Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are not natural born citizens. See https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/701045567783219201 . …
A natural born citizen is a citizen by virtue of birth and birth alone. But birth does not exist in a vacuum. There are circumstances that exist at the time of birth. Those circumstances are, among many, the parents to whom one is born and the place where one is born. In order to have a valid definition of the natural born citizen, it is necessary that we take these birth circumstances and make them part of a definition.
There does, indeed, exist a definition that contains the necessary and sufficient birth circumstances that must exist in order for one to be a natural born citizen. The historical and legal record demonstrates that in order to be a citizen by virtue of birth alone, one must be born in the country to parents who were its citizen at the time of the child’s birth. Indeed, a natural born citizen is a child born or reputed born in the country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child’s birth. See Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Sections 212 to 217 (1758) (1797) (“The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens”); Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875) (“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class, there have been doubts, but never as to the first”); accord U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 665 (1898) (“The child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle”). All other birth circumstances, i.e., either not being born in the country or not being born to two citizen parents, do not produce citizenship by virtue of birth alone.
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United
Philadelphia, 9 December, 1775.
“…I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed,) has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author. Your manuscript “Idee sur le Gouvernement et la Royaute” is also well relished, and may, in time, have its effect. I thank you, likewise, for the other smaller pieces, which accompanied Vattel…”
The letter addresses other matters concerning employment of colleagues, and translations of the proceedings of the Congress.
Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at § 212:
§ 212: The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
There is more, concerning ordinary citizens, inhabitants, naturalization, duties and responsibilities of citizenship, renouncing citizenship once you become of age, children born of foreigners, or at sea, it is a complex subject and a big book. Read it all here if you wish: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2246#lfVattel_label_1642
July 25, 1787
“Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”
In Sep., 1787, the “Committee of Eleven,” chosen at the Constitutional Convention to work out details on numerous occasions, changed the presidential requirement from citizen to natural born citizen, after receiving Jay’s letter. The Convention accepted the changes, hence the wording we have today.
From: American Thinker
February 5, 2016
Bernie Sanders’s 1963 stay at a Stalinist kibbutz
By Thomas Lifson
Kibbutz Sha’ar Ha’amakim was, in fact, part of the communist organizational support system, dedicated to the triumph of communism under the leadership of the Soviet Union.
Its founder, Ya’akov Hazan, described the USSR as a second homeland and eulogized Stalin, writing how shocked he and his comrades were, “to hear of the terrible tragedy that has befallen the nations of the Soviet Union, the world proletariat and all of progressive mankind, upon the death of the great leader and extolled commander, Josef Vissarionovich Stalin. We lower our flag in grief in memory of the great revolutionary fighter, architect of socialist construction, and leader of the world’s peace movement. His huge historical achievements will guide generations in their march towards the reign of socialism and communism the world over.”
Al Hamishmar, the movement’s paper, had a headline which read, “The Progressive World Mourns the Death of J.V. Stalin”
This sojourn in Israeli communist kibbutz is fully consistent with Sanders’s honeymoon visit to the Soviet Union (where, Rand Paul quipped, he stayed), his visit to Nicaragua’s Sandinista revolutionary leader Daniel Ortega as the first U.S. elected official when he became the mayor of Burlington, and his 1980s visit to Cuba where he met with the mayor of Havana.
So far as I know, Bernie Sanders has never repudiated his Stalinist inclinations.
At the end, it’s clear that Pears and Ed don’t understand the significance of German real-history; otherwise, pretty good.
Donald Trump covered during these minutes:
1.09:55-1.18 Trump and Roger Stone
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yimddIBERgA]Pearse Redmond : Porkins Policy – Jeffrey Epstein Updates _ OJ Simpson Theories – TOR
Published on Jan 1, 2016
Pearse Redmond is an independent researcher and podcast producer who hails from New York City. He is the host of Porkins Policy Radio, and also the co-host, with Christoph Germann, of Porkins Great Game, as well as producer of The CIA and Hollywood , which he co-hosts with Tom Secker. His podcasts address a variety of topics, and frequently focus on the geopolitics of Central Asia and the Caucacus region, and the complex relationship between the entertainment industry and the national security state. Pearse holds a B.A. in Political Science (with a concentration in the Middle East and South Asia) from Purchase College
Pearse Redmond is an independent researcher and podcast producer who hails from New York City. He is the host of Porkins Policy Radio, and also the co-host, with Christoph Germann, of Porkins Great Game, as well as producer of The CIA and Hollywood , which he co-hosts with Tom Secker. His podcasts address a variety of topics, and frequently focus on the geopolitics of Central Asia and the Caucacus region, and the complex relationship between the entertainment industry and the national security state. Pearse holds a B.A. in Political Science (with a concentration in the Middle East and South Asia) from Purchase College.
World Affairs Brief, February 26, 2016 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
This Week’s Analysis:
Is Trump Unstoppable Now?
The Real Rubio
The Syrian Cease-Fire that Isn’t
Brexit: Why The UK won’t be Allowed to Leave
War Against Grant County Sheriff
Why I am Against a Constitutional Convention
WHY I AM AGAINST A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION
27 states have an active petition before Congress calling for an Article V convention to amend the constitution. All are aiming at a Balanced Budget Amendment. Popular conservative radio talk show commentator Mark Levin is at the forefront calling for a convention. Texas governor Gregg Abbott is joining in the call, but for a much larger agenda:
The plan lays out nine specific proposed amendments that would:
Prohibit congress from regulating activity that occurs wholly within one state.
Require Congress to balance its budget.
Prohibit administrative agencies from creating federal law.
Prohibit administrative agencies from pre-empting state law.
Allow a two-thirds majority of the states to override a U.S. Supreme Court decision.
Require a seven-justice super-majority vote for U.S. Supreme Court decisions that invalidate a democratically enacted law
Restore the balance of power between the federal and state governments by limiting the former to the powers expressly delegated to it in the Constitution.
Give state officials the power to sue in federal court when federal officials overstep their bounds.
Allow a two-thirds majority of the states to override a federal law or regulation.
I actually like the scope of Abbott’s proposal since it would actually halt much of the unconstitutional use of federal power we are faced with, but there is no way a convention would back those proposals given the establishment control that exists in almost all state legislatures.
The definitive work on the legal and constitutional issues is by constitutional scholar John Eidsmoe, who also opposes a convention. Read it here. Since current calls for a convention are limited to a single Balanced Budget Amendment, I will simplify my arguments to the following two key points:
1) It is absolutely foolish to think that such a convention could bring us back to adherence to the intent of the founders—or stop the abuse of the constitution. There’s not a chance in hell that state legislatures, even conservative ones like Utah, Idaho or Oklahoma would send any true constitutionalists to represent the state. They will all be establishment politicians and lawyers, and will only do us damage. (This point does relate directly to gov. Abbott’s proposal.)
2) The stated purpose of a balanced budget amendment (BBA) is a trap and, at best, useless given the current state of Congress and its control by the Powers that Be. The Congress has proven for decades that they do not have the will to cut spending in light of the skewed manner in which the Executive is allowed to hold the nation hostage to a selective government shutdown—shutting off those services that hurt the public the most.
Most importantly, we already have a de facto Balanced Budget requirement in the debt ceiling limitation vote and it only takes 51% to stop more deficit spending. But most representatives fear being voted out of office by the benefit-corrupted majority if the cut entitlements. Because of the threat to the political careers of politicians in cutting spending to the degree it would take to balance the budget, all that a BBA would do is force Congress to raise taxes to balance the budget. Most politicians desperately fear offending those whose favorite programs are cut. There are too many votes connected with special interests for many congressmen to risk cutting deeply.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFpZDO_cfK8]Porkins Policy Radio episode 36 Ed Opperman on Jeffery Epstein Case
In this episode, we are joined by private investigator and host of The Opperman Report, Ed Opperman. Ed and I explore the mysterious case of billionaire pedophile Jeffery Epstein. We discuss the basics of the case: how the investigation was started down in Palm Beach, how Epstein evaded serious jail time and charges, and the way in which the media has portrayed his brave victims. Ed examines the strange background of Epstein. He explains how this poor kid from Coney Island was somehow able to rise to opulent wealth and power. Focusing on Epstein’s connections, from Bear Stearns to ponzi-schemer Steven Hoffenberg, Ed breaks down his meteoric rise to protected pedophile and blackmailer of the elite. Ed and I also analyze the reality of the ongoing civil lawsuit against Epstein, and how the victims in this lawsuit are actually winning! Later we discuss the various movers and shakers that remain in Epstein’s orbit, including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Chris Tucker, Jean Luc-Brunel, Ghislaine Maxwell and many more.
We then consider how the Epstein case fits into the larger narrative of pedophile rings and professional blackmail. Ed and I take a look at the Franklin Cover-Up and Henry Vinson’s case as earlier examples. We end by reviewing how the alternative media has covered the Epstein case, and how it has really dropped the ball in its investigation. We point out the serious lack of respect and dignity given to victims such as Virginia Roberts, who has been shamed and attacked by the alt-media in much the same way that the mainstream media has, and how these sorts of cases are covered in an exploitative way, designed to titillate, rather than in a mature, investigative way.
This is a long episode with a lot of detail on a case that both us feel very strongly about — a case that has not received the scrutiny it deserves form the media in general. I strongly encourage listeners to go through the documents linked in the show notes and explore this case for yourselves.
For show notes and mp3 download please visit: http://porkinspolicyreview.com/2015/0…
Obama’s ‘father’ was born June 18th 1936. WW2 was from 1939 to 1945.
His real father is Frank Marshall Davis, whom Mike Rivero today said did serve in WWII.
Joel Gilbert: The True Origins of Obama’s Life and Politics Revealed — At age 18, Barack Obama arrived at Occidental College a committed revolutionary Marxist. “Dreams of My REAL Father” DVD reveals the source of Obama’s foundation in Marxism that is destroying America!
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv4jnlkxOaw]Obama says his father served in World War II
(videos) Mia Pope: Barry Soetoro (Obama) The Pathological Liar – Gay, Druggie In Hawaii High School — “Keep an eye out for the darkening of the lips…. Cocaine is a vasoconstricter. … He should be on Jerry Springer’s Show, not in the White House”
Chuck Baldwin: Who Killed Joan Rivers? – No one will ever call Michelle Obama a ‘tranny’ again — I realize that my good Christian brethren don’t like to think about this, but there is absolutely no doubt that our federal government assassinates untold numbers of people all of the time
Narcissistic Personality Disorder Symptoms — Grandiose self-importance, exaggerates, power hungry, requires excessive admiration, strong sense of entitlement, exploitative, lacks empathy, envious, arrogant, haughty, disdainful…
Clive Boddy: Corporate Psychopaths Rule Over Us — The key thing about psychopaths is they’ve got no conscience. If you caught them lying, they wouldn’t be flustered. They come across as almost better than everybody else, and they can make you feel as if you’ve just met your next best friend. By the time that you realize who they really are…
Is Trump blackmailable, unable to save US?
Blackmail is the main way Presidents have been controlled to take down America, while our regime changes take out nations that would oppose the one-world government and carry out Israel’s “Greater Israel” plan.
Cut to the chase @ 11:45!
Meet the Billionaire Pedophile Pal of Trump, Clinton, Prince Andrew
Published on Feb 26, 2016
SUPPORT THE NEWSBUD KICKSTARTER: kck.st/1WkQuTe
SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=17988
From underage prostitutes on orgy island to political royalty and the “Lolita Express,” the Jeffrey Epstein case continues to unfold. Today Pearse Redmond of Porkins Policy Review joins us to give us the latest on the ongoing court cases surrounding the case that might still ensnare Epstein and his rich and powerful friends in an even bigger scandal.
‘Let Us Be ONE’ Prophecy Continues 10/8/08: “It’s TOO LATE to REVERSE what’s been done for MY MEN have been REJECTED … Now is the Time to OVERCOME and GET RIGHT With ALL … FREEeeeeeeeeeeeee———DOM at last … Your HEART will SWELL with LOVE and it will be EASY to REMAIN In Me when others are On The BOAT With You”
FREE FALLIN’ starring BUILDING 7
Published on Feb 23, 2016
The FREE FALLIN’ Campaign: Between now and September 11, 2016, send your version of “FREE FALLIN’ starring BUILDING 7” to freefallin@AE911Truth.org, and we’ll post or share it here. Use our lyrics or write your own. Let’s post as many videos as we can!
Sign the Petition. Share our Materials. Support our Work. http://AE911Truth.org
“FREE FALLIN’ starring BUILDING 7” is a riff on the classic Tom Petty song Free Fallin’. Twenty-seven years after the release of this beautiful song, it provides a perfect platform to bring attention to the troubling destruction of World Trade Center Building 7, which came down in free fall late in the afternoon on September 11, 2001. According to the official account of 9/11, Building 7 collapsed due to normal office fires ignited by falling debris from WTC 1 (structural damage and diesel fuel fires did not contribute to the collapse, according to the government). However, scientific and circumstantial evidence strongly contradicts that explanation.
The fact that Building 7 instantaneously entered free fall – the acceleration of gravity – for a period of 2.25 seconds over a distance of eight stories is very strong evidence of controlled demolition. Free fall can only be achieved when there is no resistance provided by the structure below. A free-fall drop of eight stories indicates that all 81 columns in Building 7 were simultaneously severed over eight stories. Only explosives can account for this kind of structural failure. Indeed, fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise, let alone in the manner of a classic controlled demolition.
The infinitely small chance of a fire-induced failure bringing down the entire building – in particular, through the improbable series of structural failures which the government alleges caused the collapse – cannot be reconciled with the strong foreknowledge on the part of local authorities that Building 7 would eventually collapse (which the video highlights prominently). If Building 7 actually collapsed from fire, the authorities’ prediction of Building 7’s collapse would be analogous to confidently and correctly predicting one specific lottery ticket to win the lottery.
The inexplicable foreknowledge on the part of authorities is made all the more apparent by the inability of the engineering community to explain it after the fact. Nine months after the collapse, FEMA would state, “The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time…. [T]he best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence.” More than four years after the collapse, the government’s lead investigator would state, “[T]ruthfully, we don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.”
In reality, the warnings of Building 7’s imminent demise must have originated from someone who knew that Building 7 was going to be brought down in a controlled demolition. Beyond that, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which represents over 2,400 architectural and engineering professionals, does not speculate on who brought down Building 7 or why. Instead, we are dedicated to educating the public about the destruction of all three World Trade Center buildings with the expectation that others with the responsibility and authority to conduct a proper investigation will do so.
Please share this video widely through social media – if you’re already on Facebook, share our posted version of the video from our Official page at https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth/and visit http://AE911Truth.org for more information on how you can help advance the cause of truth!
(video) A&E for 9/11 Truth Architect Richard Gage on C-SPAN 8/1/14 — “The ends of the BEAMS were partially EVAPORATED! That takes 4000 DEGREE temperatures. The only thing we’re aware of that can create that is thermite”
(video) Top architect explains why 9/11 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and Al Qaeda didn’t have the technology or access to do it. Who did? Two months before the ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION PROJECT, Nick ROCKEFELLER predicted a 9/11-like event to trigger war!
(video) Richard Gage on Judy Wood: “When somebody comes forth with their own theory, which has very little evidence, if any, and denies the most basic evidence, that is very well documented, forensic, scientific evidence, I can only presume that what she is purveying is disinformation” • “These cooling, falling, molten iron droplets could easily account for the so-called toasted cars” • “We have written a four page paper on this subject”
Book: Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, by Christopher Bollyn (Who-did-9/11 book online — free download!) • Paperback at Amazon
(audio) Airline Captain Philip Marshall with John B. Wells on ‘Coast to Coast AM’ 9/8/12: “The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror” — Fasten your seatbelt — the sad truth is that all of the solid evidence points to a dark collaboration between members of the Bush Administration and a covert group of Saudi government officials. The hijackers were trained at a CIA-operated airport in Arizona.
(audio) The Other 9/11 Suspects: Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. — Insider, Kevin Ryan on ‘Coast to Coast AM’ with John B. Wells, 8/31/13 — WTC was designed to survive an impact of airliners and certified to withstand intense fires!
Architect Richard Gage on 9/11 truth: “98% of those who watch this presentation end up agreeing with us…. We really only get called conspiracy theorists and kooks by those who are UNWILLING TO LOOK at the evidence.”
All of my 9/11 truth posts in reverse chronological order (latest posts appear first, 10 posts per page)
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnKr3ac1CKA]Bradley Smith interview Dec 2015
FEBRUARY 24, 2016
By Richard A. Widmann
Bradley R. Smith was born to a working-class family in South Central Los Angeles on February 18, 1930, where the family remained until 1970. He was a good student on occasion, but was more interested in horses than education. At 18 he joined the army and in 1951 served in the 7th Cavalry in Korea where he was twice wounded. It was in the army hospital at Camp Cooke California where he began to write. […]
Then it happened.
In 1979, when Smith was 49 years old, his life changed forever when he read a leaflet by Robert Faurisson, “The Problem of the Gas Chambers.” The story of this life-changing moment is recounted in his autobiographical work, Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist. Smith writes, “I felt stunned, as if Buck Rogers had somehow come down from the 21st century and zapped me with a beam from his ray gun.” It took him three months to digest the core of the revisionist argument. And then he jumped into the struggle. He knew from the beginning that he was going to address the taboo against publishing revisionist arguments, not the arguments themselves. He would be the “Henry Miller” of the revisionists. Not so good as Miller, not so original, but he would do his best.
Through his efforts in the years that followed, millions of Americans learned for the first time about Holocaust revisionism and the scholarly debate on this chapter of history. In the mid-1980s, he published Prima Facie, a newsletter aimed at journalists and editors, quoting their own writings, that focused on cultism, suppression of free inquiry and censorship on the Holocaust issue.
Smith has had a long association with the Institute for Historical Review – as a contributor to their publications, as a speaker at conferences, and, during the late 1980s, as its Media Project director, a role that generated hundreds of radio and television interviews.
Starting in the late 1980s and on through to the present, he has been active as director of the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH), a group dedicated to defending free speech and free inquiry on the Holocaust issue, to encouraging greater public access to revisionist scholarship, and to promoting awareness of the controversy regarding the Holocaust story.
Since 1990, Smith has published a newsletter, Smith’s Report, which reports on his own activities, those of CODOH, and various articles and news stories about revisionists and revisionism around the world.
Smith is perhaps best known for having published several essay-length advertisements calling for open debate on the Holocaust in student newspapers published at colleges and universities across the United States. In the 1991-92 school year, CODOH advertisements or statements appeared in 17 student newspapers, several at major universities. During the 1993-1994 academic year, his ad – headlined “A Revisionist Challenge to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum” – appeared in at least 35 college and university campus papers, as well as one major metropolitan daily. In 1999 and 2000, Smith created a new publication, The Revisionist, a 24 page pulp-stock publication that was distributed free on campus. The January 2000 issue which featured a story on intellectual freedom and book-burning was itself burned on the campus of St. Cloud University. By the end of the 2000-01 academic year, his ads had appeared in more than 350 student papers.
Smith’s campaign generated news reports and commentary in such prominent periodicals as The New York Times and Time magazine, and editorials in The Washington Post, The New York Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, and the Los Angeles Times.
Deborah Lipstadt, a Jewish academic and a prominent figure in the Holocaust lobby, took aim at Bradley’s efforts in her Denying the Holocaust. One chapter of her book, “The Battle for the Campus,” focuses specifically on Smith’s advertisements. She laments that after seeing the ads many students may assume there is an “other side” [to the Holocaust story.]
Smith has spoken on the subject of intellectual freedom with regard to the Holocaust on more than 400 radio talk shows and news broadcasts, as well as on nationwide television, including an appearance with Michael Shermer (Skeptic Magazine) and David Cole as a guest on the Phil Donahue Show.
Bradley Smith and CODOH were one of the first Holocaust revisionist groups to develop a website in the early ’90s. Since that time he has hosted several sites, blogs, a MySpace page, a Facebook page, and participated in many discussion groups and forums on-line.
He is the author of many articles, and several books. The first, Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist, was praised by Canadian journalist Doug Collins as “fascinating” and as an “amusing walk through the valley of the shadow of doubt.”
Smith’s Break His Bones: The Private Life of a Holocaust Revisionist, is a witty and thoughtful 315-page memoir published in 2002 that looks back on the challenges, disappointments and joys of his years-long battle against taboo and censorship. Break His Bones details the organized campaign to suppress free speech and intellectual freedom on the Holocaust issue, showing how skeptics are blacklisted, and their works banned. Smith provided a human face for the much-maligned “Holocaust deniers.” “It might be said,” he wrote, that Break His Bones “is an exercise revealing the subjective life of a thought criminal.”
In December 2006, Smith was invited and delivered a talk to an international delegation at the Tehran Holocaust Conference, “The Irrational Vocabulary of the American Professorial Class with Regard to the Holocaust Question.”
In 2008, Nine-Banded Books published this third book, The Man Who Saw His Own Liver. Liver was conceived and written as a one-act play. It was performed in Los Angeles in 1983, under the title The Man Who Stopped Paying. A review of the performance labeled Smith “an anarchist libertarian.”
Six years later, in 2014 Smith published a collection of his writing from the 1950s to the 1980s entitled, A Personal History of Moral Decay. Tito Perdue commented on Bradley’s final book calling it “a generous, lapidary, and much appreciated gift.”
Bradley Smith passed away at the VA hospital in San Diego, California, on February 18, 2016, his 86th birthday. He succumbed to lymphoma and congestive heart failure. He left behind his wife, two daughters and three grand children.
Below you can find a number of eulogies by some of his friends:
I have a lot of respect for this articles’ author, Charles Carlson, head of We Hold These Truths, where he exposes “Christian” Zionism as reverse-Christian and unloving.
This is the first article I’ve seen about Bernie that perks my ears. Regarding the banks, though, how much good would it do if he doesn’t mention the Fed, which isn’t Federal or Constitutional, and is the main source of the problem?
NY Times Attacks Bernie Sanders For Not Sounding Jewish Enough
Posted by News Post February 24, 2016
Bernie Sanders is closing in on Hillary Clinton, running adds promising to break up the US monopoly banks, a promise not heard in my lifetime from a major party candidate, and a very tough job. It should be no surprise that the bankers’ pal-media has comes on with an attack on Sanders. This one seem to be a skimpy shot even for the New York Times…they pick on Senator Sanders because he is not painting himself as being Jewish enough!
It seems Sanders rather proudly spoke of his father as a “Polish Immigrant.” But NY Times think he should call dad something more ethnic. I suppose if he would have called his father a “Jewish exile from Poland” this would have made the Times happy. And if Sanders was to emigrate to somewhere else, he should call himself a “Jewish exile” instead of an emigrating American Citizen? The rest of us do not have to put a “Baptist” “Catholic” or “none of the above” after our name, why does Bernie Sanders? The fact is, Sanders is under the skin of Wall Street and its mouthpieces media, The NY Times, which is just beginning to go on the attack as he gains ground and young supporters, and a few older ones too! A clip from this negative story follows to make the point, and a link if you need more evidence that the attack is on! [Ed. – CEC]
New York Times: Bernie Sanders Is Jewish, but He Doesn’t Like to Talk About It
“When Senator Bernie Sanders thanked supporters for his landslide victory in the New Hampshire Democratic primary, he wistfully reminisced about his upbringing as “the son of a Polish immigrant who came to this country speaking no English and having no money.” While the crowd cheered, Rabbi Michael Paley of New York was among many Jews watching the speech who were taken aback. He said he was surprised that the Vermont senator had not explicitly described his father as a “Polish Jewish immigrant,” a significant distinction given Poland’s checkered history with its Jewish population. “Nobody in Poland would have considered Bernie a Pole,” Rabbi Paley said. Two days later, in a debate with Hillary .” to read the whole story click here – NY Times
(video) *JEWISH* TRUTHER Gilad Atzmon on Jewish Power: BERNIE SANDERS is CONTROLLED OPPOSITION, as are Chomsky, Finkelstein, ‘Democracy Now’… • “When Jews accept that something about them is becoming a problem they INVENT THEIR OWN DISSENT” • America becoming a service economy is the “JEWIFICATION OF THE WESTERN WAY OF THINKING” • Rivero: “We call it the ‘Zionification of America’” • Atzmon: ~”When we call it ‘Zionification’ it’s because we are AFRAID TO USE THE ‘J’ WORD. It’s NOT ‘ZIONIFICATION’ because there is no connection between the Jews desiring to move to Palestine and the DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA AS A PRODUCTIVE PLACE” • Rivero: “We’re so focused on making sure that we are not discriminating against other people that WE DON’T RECOGNIZE when we ourselves are being discriminated against” — ‘What Really Happened Show’ 2/2/16
Sounds psychopathic, YET I’m SO GLAD that he told Jeb Bush in front of the WARMONGERS that the IRAQ WAR was a ‘HUGE MISTAKE’ in the SC Republican debate.
I’m still not sure what he’d do. I see some really good and some really bad.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH1NbbdpmpU]Trump Again Says Even ‘Murder’ Wouldn’t Drive His Supporters Away
Published on Feb 23, 2016
Trump Again Says Even ‘Murder’ Wouldn’t Drive His Supporters Away
Remember how Donald Trump famously said that he could literally shoot someone and his supporters wouldn’t leave him? Well, he’s at it again.
During a pre-caucus rally in Nevada today, Trump said that “even the really dishonest press” talks a lot about the incredible loyalty of his supporters.
“Sixty-eight percent,” Trump said, “would not leave under any circumstance. I think that means murder, I think it means anything, okay?”
He also made sure to tell the people in the room “I love you.”
– Cynthia McKinney
• • •
AIPAC pledge @ 12 min[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDqIeB6s4jA]Cynthia Mckinney: AIPAC is in total control of US Government & few Americans know anything about it
Monday, 23 May 2011
Cynthia McKinney Drops Bombshell in Press TV Interview
In an interview which aired on Press TV on Saturday–one day before the AIPAC conference got under way in Washington–former Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney revealed what amounts to some pretty startling news regarding the extent of the Israeli lobby’s influence over Congress.
During her years in Congress, she stated, candidates for both the House and the Senate were requested to sign pledges of support for Israel, documents in which the candidate promised to vote to provide consistent levels of economic aid to the Zionist state. Refusal to sign the pledge meant no funding for the candidate’s campaign.
“You make a commitment that you will vote to support the military superiority of Israel—the economic assistance that Israel wants, that you would vote to provide that,” McKinney, who served in Congress from 1993-2003 and again 2005-2007, tells Press TV interviewer Marzieh Hashemi in the two-part video program below.
According to McKinney, the pledge also included a vow to support Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel.
“Every candidate for Congress at that time had a pledge, they were given a pledge to sign…” she said. “If you don’t sign the pledge, you don’t get money. For example, it was almost like water torture for me. My parents observed this. I would get a call and the person on the other end of the phone would say ‘I want to do a fundraiser for you.’ And then we would get into the planning. I would get really excited, because of course you have to have money in order to run a campaign. And then two weeks, three weeks into the planning, they would say, ‘Did you sign the pledge?’ And then I would say, ‘No, I didn’t sign the pledge.’ And then my fundraiser would go kaput.”
During her years in Congress, McKinney opposed U.S. involvement in foreign wars, questioned the official version of the events of 911, and introduced articles of impeachment against former President George W. Bush. Her final term in Congress came to an end after AIPAC, or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, funneled money into the campaign of her opponent, Hank Johnson.
(audio) Cynthia Mckinney: How AIPAC Controls Congresspersons – “Did you sign the pledge?” — “Every aspect of the political process is in someway controlled or influenced by people who are affiliated with the pro-Israel lobby. So the name of the organization may be the New Jersey Garden Club, but in actuality, IT’S THEM”
“Our civilizations are being dismantled and corrupted and hijacked by these Zionists in high places in our society.”
“The 9/11 movement has been hit by all kinds of what I call red herrings … Judy Wood….”
– Christopher Bollyn
• • •
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr1xZS0jkuA]Christopher Bollyn: “Waking people Up To The Massive Lie of 9/11 Is More Important Than Ever.”
Michael in top form, today!
Many subjects mostly excellently covered. Holocaust hoax @ 1 hr 42 min
Mike still doesn’t understand this:
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItSQTVJ3ba4]What Really Happened Show: Michael Rivero Tuesday 2/23/2016: (Commercial Free Video)
In a discussion on Facebook about the film Hellstorm, a skeptic claimed “there were no Eisenhower death camps,” so I decided to investigate, and am posting here what I’ve found.
(video) HELLSTORM! – Exposing The Real Genocide of Nazi Germany (Full) — CHURCHILL: “German cities will be subjected to an ordeal the like of which has never been experienced by a country in continuity, severity and magnitude. There are no lengths of violence to which we will not go” • US SERGEANT: “We too are considered an army of rapists” • EHRENBURG: “Kill them all, men, old men, children and the women, after you have amused yourself with them! Kill” • AMERICAN CAMP COMMANDER to German POW: “Forget the Convention. You haven’t any rights” • CHURCHILL: “Don’t mind the five or more million Germans. Stalin will see to them. They will cease to exist” • PATTON: “A Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. I can’t see how Americans can sink so low”
Many of us are accustomed to go to Wikipedia for the bottom line, but I’ve been warned that Wikipedia cannot be trusted when it comes to WWII real-history truth. Posts really are carefully monitored by “Jews” to show the Allies in the best light and the Germans in the worst.
(video) Wikipedia – Jewish Biased Website — Most articles having anything to do with Jews or Israel exhibit Jewish bias • Type in the word ‘Bolsheviks,’ and the first entry is Wikipedia, and you won’t find the slightest mention of the fact that it was a Jewish led bloodbath, responsible for the death of countless millions • Moderators openly admit to pro-Jewish bias • Founder & head Jimmy Wales is Jewish
The book that makes the claim for “Eisenhower’s death camps” is Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after World War II. Wikipedia’s article on Other Losses appears to me to intentionally minimize in every way possible this major atrocity committed against the German POWs by US. Compared to what clearly really happened, which is shameful to America, Wikipedia’s article presents the Germans’ experience in the camps as walk in the park.
This quote is an example, of which much evidence not mentioned in the article does seem to contradict:
While harsh treatment of prisoners occurred, no evidence exists that it was part of an organized systematic effort.
The book claims about 1 million German POWs died, most by intentional neglect in the American and French camps, but there could have been as few as 800,000:
Other Losses claimed that “The victims undoubtedly number over 800,000, almost certainly over 900,000 and quite likely over a million. Their deaths were knowingly caused by army officers who had sufficient resources to keep the prisoners alive.”
Wikipedia’s first paragraph that discusses the Soviet POW evidence does seem to indicate that Other Losses author, James Bacques’ numbers may be too high, so perhaps a figure such as 500,000 is possible. But given Wikipedia’s extreme, one-sided bias in this article, I’d like to see a discussion elsewhere in which this is discussed.
Below, I include commentary that gives the other perspective, which actually shows compassion for what the German POWs did experience in these death camps. I still see no reason not to call them that, considering the evidence shown below.
What I did find surprising is the low volume of research done on this topic. If these POWs had been Jewish instead of German, no doubt the information on the subject would be one hundred times as much! Something is seriously wrong when an entire people group is hated and universally maligned, while another is almost worshiped; though, we now know the gas chambers didn’t even exist. Their deaths were not intentional, unlike what too many Americans did here. [From the quotes below, it looks like a couple of Generals did do the right thing once they finally found out.]
Was Eisenhower directly responsible? Evidence in the commentary below points to Ike’s direct involvement, and this article claims General Patton was going to tell Americans about his death camps, and that’s why Ike relieved him of his command. This is serious! [Note the 1.7 million number here]:
Another motive for Patton’s murder was his rather public statements that he was going to report directly to the American people Eisenhower’s murder of what would become 1.7 million men, women, and children in Allied death camps administered by Eisenhower and Smith. Patton had defied the death orders and treated his POWs humanely and quickly released them until Eisenhower stripped him of his command.
Our sanitized version of what our leaders have done is so far from the truth. Michael Rivero said this, yesterday, on What Really Happened:
“At this point, we don’t really know what was going on in WWII. We don’t really know anything that was going on before we were born. We have been lied to that much!”
What follows is detailed analysis by someone who does have a heart for the German people during WWII, as he wrote in his comments here. Thank you, John Wear! [I add some formatting and comments in blue.]
Cell Phones Are Cooking Our Reproductive Organs And Causing An Epidemic Of Cancer
BY MICHAEL · FEBRUARY 22, 2016
Is your cell phone keeping you from having kids and slowly killing you at the same time? Most people have no idea that one of the greatest threats to their health may be something that they are willingly carrying around with them all day long. A brand new study has just come out that shows that men that carry around cell phones in their pockets continually are much less fertile than other men. Of course we have known that cell phone use has some very nasty consequences for our health for a very long time. As you will see below, studies have shown that there is a very clear link between cell phone use and cancer. But even after learning all of these things, most people just continue to use their cell phones normally. Most people believe what they want to believe, and most people don’t want to believe that cell phone use is harmful.
One of the most respected news sources in the UK has reported on the new study that I just mentioned above. The following is an excerpt from that article…
The study – by highly respected specialists – found that sperm levels of men who kept their phones in their pocket during the day were seriously affected in 47 percent of cases compare to just 11 percent in the general population.
Professor Martha Dirnfeld, of the Technion University in Haifa, said: “We analysed the amount of active swimming sperm and the quality and found that it had been reduced.
“We think this is being caused by a heating of the sperm from the phone and by electromagnetic activity.”
It doesn’t take a genius to figure this out.
If you put an electronic device next to your reproductive organs day after day, of course it is going to have an effect.
Other studies that were conducted previously have come up with similar results. Here is just one example…
Men who carry a cellphone in their pants pocket may harm their sperm and reduce their chances of having children, a new review warns.
The research team analyzed the findings of 10 studies that examined how cellphone exposure may affect male fertility. Among men with no exposure to cellphones, 50 percent to 85 percent of their sperm had a normal ability to move towards an egg.
That fell by an average of 8 percent among men exposed to cellphones. Similar effects were seen for sperm viability, which refers to the proportion of sperm that were alive, according to the study published June 9 in the journalEnvironment International.
One study that was headed up by Igor Yakymenko caused quite a stir when it was released in 2015…
Yakymenko’s meta-study — basically a study of hundreds of other studies — reveals many findings of previous researchers into how radiofrequency from your phone can damage DNA.
That damage can add up over time and cause a variety of health problems, like cancer, headaches, fatigue and even skin problems.
For example, using your phone for just 20 minutes a day for five years increased the risk of one type of brain tumor threefold, and using the phone an hour a day for four years upped the risk of some tumors three to five times, Yakymenko said.
Really nice to see Michael Rivero starting to really get it; though, he still doesn’t understand some key, historical and spiritual truths!
I transcribe Michael’s statements and add comments in bracketed blue.
Michael realizes (1 hr 30 min):
“At this point, we don’t really know what was going on in WWII. We don’t really know anything that was going on before we were born. We have been lied to that much!“
Masters of the world (1:25:45):
“Israel isn’t controlled by anybody. Israel sees themselves as masters of the world, and can’t understand why the rest of us just aren’t happy to go along with that.
A propaganda weapon so powerful [The caller said the ‘Holocaust’ is being used “to justify a permanent invasion of Europe.” I’d say it’s global domination through every means possible! Israel plays the ‘Holocaust’ sympathy card so we turn a blind eye to all of the evil, Talmudic machinations they use to destroy western culture, so they can launch their anti-Christ, Antichrist ‘Messiah,’ likely from Jerusalem, who will rule the short-lived, Satanic, NWO dictatorship prophesied in the Bible] (1 hr 26 min):
“The Holocaust story is maintained and protected because that was the entire justification for Israel stealing Palestine. … The founders of Israel needed a propaganda weapon so powerful that the same nations that had driven Nazi Germany back into its own borders would turn a blind eye to the Zionists stealing Palestine and creating the nation of Israel. And that propaganda tool was this horrific story that turned slave labor camps into execution centers, delousing with insecticide into gassing, and you know the rest of it. And that’s the reason why that legend is still being protected so intently, because when that is widely known to have been just more propaganda, like the ‘6 million’ they were using in WWI, then a lot of people will say that Israel’s possession of Palestine is not really legitimate.”
• • •
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baK8BPJrtS0]What Really Happened Show: Michael Rivero Monday 2/22/2016: (Commercial Free Video)
Published on Feb 22, 2016
— Check Out http://whatreallyhappened.com
(video) “Zionism and Christianity: Unholy Alliance” – real-history, full-length film by Ted Pike — “They [pastors] were supposed to be WATCHMEN on the wall, yet they failed to utter even a hint of warning” (God’s covenants require obedience, whom the Talmudic “Jews” were not, but used WWI and WWII, lies and terrorism to illegitimately invade Palestine. Though, God isn’t done with the true Jews)
All of my Holocaust Real-History Truth articles (10 posts per page, latest appear first)
All of my Germany Real-History Truth articles (10 posts per page, latest appear first)
Hillary Clinton Too Sick To Assume Office
Published on Feb 19, 201
The red carpet Hillary thought she walked in on is quickly being rolled back up. An Associated Press-GfK poll shows that 72 percent of registered democratic voters are leaning towards Democratic Candidate , a 21 percent jump since the poll was last taken less than three months ago. Liberal stalwart Salon Magazine is even declaring Hillary’s campaign to be on its last legs. Meanwhile Hillary’s public presence is a slow motion disaster. She was booed during a town hall, claimed she tries not to lie to the American people…whatever that means, and even Brittany Spears deleted her endorsement of the Clinton campaign. While record absentee ballot turnout is clearly showing a major anti establishment surge as South Carolina prepares to vote in Saturday’s primary.
But the real question plaguing Hillary’s now desperate Presidential bid isn’t her giant sham of a platform or her trail of deception. It’s Hillary herself. She may not even be fit to take office.
Jerome Corsi of World Net Daily Reports “ The concussion Hillary Clinton suffered in December 2012 that led to a serious blood clot requiring hospitalization may also have caused her to suffer post-concussion syndrome, with symptoms including confusion, headaches and dizziness, warns a prominent Florida physician.”
Sexual Assault Victim Of Bill Clinton Needs Your Help
Roger Stone talks about the misfortune of Kathleen Willey at the hand of the Clintons and how listeners can help her.