(audio) Pit Bull dogs kill more people than all other dog breeds combined — unpredictable and dangerous – intentionally bred to fight and kill!

antipit.org
https://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-fatalities-2017.php

Statistical information gathered by DogsBite.org is verifiable through news reports and other criteria.1 Our Fatality Citations section documents sources used in our dog bite fatality research.

2017 dog bite fatality statistics2

2017 dog bite fatality chart



Continue reading “(audio) Pit Bull dogs kill more people than all other dog breeds combined — unpredictable and dangerous – intentionally bred to fight and kill!”

(vid) DUTY To Protect: A Lesson For Those At Soft Targets Like Churches — Van Wyk saved 1,000 lives facing down 4 terrorists spraying the church members with fully automatic fire & grenades

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHYm_shQero
Continue reading “(vid) DUTY To Protect: A Lesson For Those At Soft Targets Like Churches — Van Wyk saved 1,000 lives facing down 4 terrorists spraying the church members with fully automatic fire & grenades”

(video) Infiltrating Bohemian Grove 2017 – “The annual Cremation of Care ceremony took place last night, July 15, 2017 in Monte Rio California. By now, it is likely that several wealthy elites have already engaged in acts of hedonistic sexual abuse while many others have fallen over drunk amidst the ferns lining the paths betwixt the mighty Redwoods”

“The annual Cremation of Care ceremony took place last night, July 15, 2017 in Monte Rio California. By now, it is likely that several wealthy elites have already engaged in acts of hedonistic sexual abuse while many others have fallen over drunk amidst the ferns lining the paths betwixt the mighty redwoods.” (source)

– –

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD497SyrCxY

Infiltrating the Bohemian Grove 2017 – Investigative Documentary

Published on Jul 16, 2017

In 2000, filmmaker Alex Jones infiltrated the Grove and recorded footage of the infamous “Cremation of Care” ceremony. Since then, security has been tightened tremendously and the Grove is now brimming with barbwire, video cameras, motion detectors, K-9 units and men with guns.

Can the Grove still be infiltrated with such heightened security? And if so, how might it be done? You’ll find ideas in this mockumentary by Jake Morphonios.

FEMINIST: ALLOWING WOMEN TO CARRY ON CAMPUS “DEVALUES SEXUAL ASSAULT” — Ever since the CIA and other establishment figures hijacked the feminist movement in the 1960s, it has increasingly been used to promote socialism instead of genuine women’s rights issues

From: Infowars

FEMINIST: ALLOWING WOMEN TO CARRY ON CAMPUS “DEVALUES SEXUAL ASSAULT”

Women are not individuals with inalienable rights but are merely statistics, according to her argument

KIT DANIELS | INFOWARS.COM | FEBRUARY 20, 2015

Female students shouldn’t be allowed to carry concealed handguns on campus because it “devalues sexual assault,” according to a Vox contributor.

In the article entitled No, giving college students guns won’t stop sexual assault published yesterday, Vox’s Libby Nelson claimed that women should be denied their individual right to self-defense because it won’t collectively stop every sexual assault on campus, such as those committed against drunk women at parties.

“The argument that guns could help turn the tide on campus sexual assaults implicitly devalues sexual assaults without physical force as not part of the problem,” she wrote, seemingly more concerned with pushing a feminist agenda than stopping the violent rapes that do occur.

Her entire article is based on the premise that people are not individuals with inalienable rights but are merely statistics, a premise which has received universal condemnation throughout social media after the article was published.

“Apparently, they need to address the ‘root causes’ of assault before women can defend themselves,” Twitter user DjWeideman wrote regarding the article.

And Twitchy, a social media analyst site, called the article absurd.

“Denying women their rights because allowing them to exercise them is not a panacea? That’s pretty offensive,” Twitchy commented.

But that’s unfortunately the true motive behind the current feminist movement: to reject individual rights in favor of the collective.

“…American individualism is dead and global solidarity is alive and on the rise,” top feminist activist Eve Ensler declared at a speech Feb. 7.

Ever since the CIA and other establishment figures hijacked the feminist movement in the 1960s, it has increasingly been used to promote socialism instead of genuine women’s rights issues.

For one thing, when it comes to women in the Middle East who are treated as second-class citizens, western feminists are largely silent.

Follow on Twitter:
@RealAlexJones | @KitDaniels1776

Entire Article Here

(video) Gayle Trotter: Guns are the great equalizer for women

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybOhbQtqjfI]Gayle Trotter: Guns are the great equalizer for women

nomorcocktails

Published on Feb 25, 2013

Gayle Trotter of the Independent Women’s Forum spoke yesterday at the Senate gun violence hearings. She talked about how firearms are the great equalizer for women who are in imminent physical danger. 90% of violent crime occurs without a gun. The attacker uses size and strength to attack women. She is an advocate for concealed carry. With a concealed women reverse the inequality when a women is in danger.

(video) The Desecration of Charlton Heston — "I just don't understand the SPIRIT OF PATHETICNESS that is taking everything over" – Alex Jones

After seeing Alex talk about it, when I first saw Jim Carrey’s satirical music video, “Cold Dead Hand,” I shuddered! I thought this was so despicable that I didn’t even post it. It really is a desecration of Charlton Heston. But a ‘Christian’ said how much she likes Jim Carrey, and wasn’t even phased after I showed her this video, so I decided to address this subject more. I just now posted more Carrey exposé videos (linked below), and now this one, with the disgusting link above.
Those of you who are ‘Christians’ and think guns are evil should realize that Jesus told his disciples to buy swords, which at least two of them did carry. Total pacifism is not Christian (neither is warmongering, the other extreme). Also, the 2nd Amendment isn’t about hunting. It’s about protecting the United States from becoming a tyranny, like what happened in England. Without the 2nd Amendment, we would probably already be fully in the NWO, with Satan in charge.
America is on its last leg.
– –

“I just don’t understand the spirit of patheticness that is taking everything over.”

– Alex Jones

* * *

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFgPHRvQfOE]The Desecration of Charlton Heston

<a href="/channel/UCvsye7V9psc-APX6wV1twLg" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-sessionlink="ei=coqcVKDxJaqv-APtvYHYDQ" data-ytid="UCvsye7V9psc-APX6wV1twLg" data-name="">TheAlexJonesChannel</a>

TheAlexJonesChannel

Published on Mar 26, 2013

legendary guitarist and devoted NRA supporter Ted Nugent joins [actually, Ted is in another video discussing this with Alex – editor] Alex in discussing firearm phobe Jim Carrey’s anti-Second Amendment music video, which blasts millions of law-abiding gun owners while also desecrating American hero Charlton Heston’s memory.
http://www.tednugent.com/

[TWITTER]
https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
[FACEBOOK]
https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme…

Related:
(VC video) Jim Carrey “I’m a Senior Member of the Illuminati” – Dressed as Baphomet on SNL !!!

(VC video) Jim Carrey Admits He is Illuminati on Jimmy Kimmel with Comedic Truth Hidden in Plain Sight

(video) Jim Carrey Jokes about Illuminati and Bohemian Grove on Jimmy Kimmel “I’m blowing the lid off it”

(video) Jim Carrey “I’m a Senior Member of the Illuminati” – Dressed as Baphomet Hosting Saturday Night Live

Stefan Molyneux: Liberals are Very Pro-Gun — "You [liberals] just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous…) should be allowed to have guns … centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small, political elite and their minions"

“If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it’s not that you are anti-gun. You’ll need the police’s guns to take away other people’s guns. So you’re very Pro-Gun, you just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous…) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small, political elite and their minions.”

– Stefan Molyneux

GunControlStefanMolyneux

FACT: EVEN GANDHI OPPOSED GUN BANS — “Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest” (When law-abiding citizens are stripped of their right to carry a weapon they become defenseless, and ruthless tyrants can take over) | 'Normalcy Bias' Explained

From: StoryLeak

FACT: EVEN GANDHI OPPOSED GUN BANS

In a major reality blast to those who tote gun bans in the name of Mahatma Gandhi and other famous leaders, it is actually a little-known fact that Gandhi himself was openly opposed to gun bans. In fact, he proclaimed a nationwide gun disarmament to be the ‘blackest’ deed of the entire British ruling period in India.

If you haven’t heard about this information, I am not surprised. In the past, merely posting Gandhi’s exact quote on this subject without any additional information has led to major Facebook accounts with hundreds of thousands of fans to be swiftly banned. The first of which was the Facebook page of Mike Adam’s NaturalNews, who shared an image of Gandhi’s quote verbatim only to receive the ban hammer from Facebook administrators. So watch out, this information might get you clubbed from the largest social media network in the world for even sharing it.

But what is this quote exactly and did Gandhi really write it? Well, the quote comes from an autobiography by Gandhi, entitled “Mohandas Gandhi, an Autobiography.” On page 446, you will find this very serious quote regarding the way in which British rulers disarmed the entire population that Gandhi had crusaded for. Ultimately, this action led to the governmental ability to control this populace due to their inability to defend themselves.Gandhi writes:

“Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.”

[…]

GANDHI KNEW GUNS IN THE HANDS OF CITIZENS MADE THE NATION SAFER

Gandhi knew something that has been lost in modern day society due to what’s known as normalcy bias, which is prevalent in most first world nations. Normalcy bias is, essentially, the assumption that nothing drastically bad will ever happen — a mindset brought upon thanks to a cushy lifestyle. Commonly seen in places like the United States, living circumstances condition an individual into assuming that everything will continue to be just fine. Gandhi knew about the effects of widespread normalcy bias.

Gandhi also knew that when law-abiding citizens are stripped of their right to carry a weapon that they become defenseless, and ruthless tyrants can take over. Sound familiar? That’s right, Gandhi’s principals here echo the very principals in which the Constitution was constructed on. Gandhi had highlighted the British ban on firearms an absolute tragedy and warned against its implications just as the founding fathers of the United States escaped such regulation and formulated a plan to prevent it here in the distant future.

Not the same Gandhi you know? Gandhi has actually advocated the use of firearms in defense time and time again. Here we see it once more:

“Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor,” Gandhi wrote in his work The Doctrine of the Sword.

He continues to break down how self-defense is actually rooted in bravery:

“When violence] is offered in self-defence or for the defence of the defenceless, it is an act of bravery far better than cowardly submission.”

Entire Article Here
Related:
Gandhi advocated the right to bear arms; use of ‘violence’ to defend innocents against bullying, oppression

[videos] A Great Sheriff!: David Clarke vs Piers Morgan | Sheriff Clarke on the Alex Jones Show!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB0lJzNloyA]SHERIFF DAVID CLARKE vs PIERS MORGAN

 MOXNEWSd0tC0M

Published on Jan 29, 2013

January 29, 2013 CNN
http://MOXNews.com

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQZpp7AdtV8]Sheriff Says We’re Going to See 2nd American Revolution

 TheAlexJonesChannel

Published on Feb 18, 2013

Alex welcomes Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke who recently urged the citizens he serves to consider learning firearm safety because of “a duty to protect yourself and your family.” http://county.milwaukee.gov/Officeoft…

JESUS and the 2ND AMENDMENT: "Buy swords" but "Turn the other cheek??" — A slap on the right cheek is a back-handed slap, not a serious threat to life and limb. This says nothing about true self-defense, when one's life is in danger.

The sword, or guns, are not the weapons of the kingdom of God. But that still doesn’t take away their legitimate use for self-defense, any more than God’s word being the true spiritual food takes away our need for eating regular food daily.

* * *

From: Why Did Jesus Tell His Disciples to Buy Swords? by Ryan Healy
The author states:

Most Christians I have encountered believe strongly that Jesus advocates the use of violence for self-defense. To bolster their position, they often quote Luke 22:36, which says:

And He said to them, “But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one.”

At first glance, it may seem as if Jesus was indeed instructing his followers to buy swords for self-defense against the people who were about to arrive at the Garden of Gethsemane.

And some have extrapolated this to mean that Christians are also to have weapons for self-defense (including guns) in order to resist a tyrannical government.

[…]

In Matthew 5:38-44, Jesus instructs his listeners:

You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.” But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.

If anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, let him have your coat also. Whoever forces you to go one mile, go with him two. Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you.

You have heard it said, “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.” But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.

This clear teaching seems diametrically opposed to the view that Jesus advocates violent self-defense. Because here Jesus says that we should not resist a violent man, and that we ought to “turn the other cheek.”

Riley responds:

Riley January 20, 2013 at 4:01 am

The sword, or guns, are not the weapons of the kingdom of God. But that still doesn’t take away their legitimate use for self-defense, any more than God’s word being the true spiritual food takes away our need for eating regular food daily.

The biblical duty of self-defense is not contradicted by Matthew 5. In that passage, Jesus does not take away legitimate self defense, he counsels against a requiting of insults which produce no serious physical injury. A slap on the right cheek is to be understood as coming from a right-hander. It’s a back-handed slap, not a serious threat to life and limb. In that case a Christian is to “turn the other cheek.” This says nothing about true self-defense, when ones life is in danger.

In the Luke passage, Jesus says “it is enough” because two swords were all that was needed for the moment. But his counsel for each disciple to carry a sword is a more general instruction for the times to come, times of persecution when the disciples will have to think about defending their lives from aggression. In this passage Jesus further legitimizes the self-defense principles found in the Old Testament.

[3-minute video] Ben Swann Reality Check: The Very Politically Incorrect Truth About The Second Amendment — ~"The 2nd Amendment is about making sure the population would not be controlled, dominated or oppressed by a government. It had nothing with the kind of weapon. It was simply about matching force."

The 2nd Amendment:

“A well regulated* militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State,

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed.”

* * *

“The 2nd Amendment was not about guaranteeing the right to a musket. It was about citizens of a sovereign state matching force with military.”

“The 2nd Amendment was put in place to guarantee the rights of the individual to be equally armed as military, both foreign, and domestic, in the event that the citizenry might actually at some point have to fight their own government.”

“The 2nd Amendment is about making sure the population would not be controlled, dominated or oppressed by a government. … The principle of what [the founders] put in place had nothing with the kind of weapon they were guaranteeing. It was simply about matching force.”

– Ben Swann

Transcribed by Jeff Fenske

* [The entire point of guaranteeing the freedom to bear arms and be “well regulated” is that the federal government can’t limit or prevent the organization, training, and equipping of a militia. (source)]

* * *

From: fox19.com… (Fox 19 is independent from Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News, which is disinformation central)

The discussion over gun control is something making headlines all over the country.

Throughout this week Reality Check has looked at the numbers behind gun control and crime rates.

Tonight, we are looking at the second amendment, the intention behind it and what the founders might think about the gun debate today.

This is a reality check you won’t see anywhere else.

* * *

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igerQd0dpHY]The Very Politically Incorrect Truth About The Second Amendment

TheAwakenedMedia

Published on Dec 21, 2012

Related:

Joel Skousen: Newtown Shooting — Anatomy of a Planned Massacre / The Gun Control Agenda http://tobefree.press/2012/12/22/joel-skousen-newtown-shooting
2nd Amendment Quotes — Whoever said that the founding fathers didn’t think that all citizens should have guns is living in their own little world
Stewart Rhodes: The Whole Point of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military capacity of the people to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. It is not about hunting, and is not really even about self-defense…
[5-minute video] Suzanne Gratia-Hupp on the 2nd Amendment — We need more women (and men) like this. Aren’t we supposed to be “the land of the FREE and the home of the BRAVE?”
[media bias exposed video] Reverse-Christian Piers Morgan Blows Up on Larry Pratt Over Gun Rights – 12/18/12
Larry Pratt responds to being personally attacked by CNN’s presstitute of the day, Piers Morgan
[9-minute video] Sandy Hook 2nd Shooter Cover-Up
Newtown school shooting story already being changed by the media to eliminate eyewitness reports of a SECOND SHOOTER — Shouldn’t we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these shootings all seem to fit a COMMON PATTERN of multiple mind-controlled shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?
Sandy Hook Elementary: 3 Shooters (A CLOSE LOOK) — These aren’t just some ‘lone nut-men’
In China, school mass murderers use knives, not guns
[10-minute video] Dr. Nick Begich: The Technologies of Mind Control — MK-Ultra Continues — Mass Shootings etc.
[10-minute video] Mike Adams (The Health Ranger): Do Guns Kill People?
An Inmate Claims that ‘Batman Shooter’ James Holmes Confessed that he was “Programmed to Kill” by an “Evil Therapist”
Congressman Ron Paul Introduced Legislation in 2011 to Protect School Children from Mass Murderers
Gandhi advocated the right to bear arms; use of ‘violence’ to defend innocents against bullying, oppression
Creepy Illuminati Message in Batman Movie Hints at Sandy Hook School — In this movie scene (1:58 into the movie) from Dark Knight Rises, “Sandy Hook” is about the only legible text on the whole map (look left of the walkie talkie in the screenshot above), and a guy puts his fingers on it
Fritz Springmeier: The Mass Shootings are Created Events — “The new Batman movie that came out BEFORE the shootings had in the background Aurora and Sandy Hook, the proof that the elite is creating these shootings”
Will Obama Cry For Children He Has Killed With Drones?
[6-minute video] Amish Grace — Bill Moyers showcases the book that describes the extraordinary grace of the families of the Amish school shooting victims. They forgave the shooter, comforted his family and attended his funeral because of their deep faith and the grace it gives them.

Stewart Rhodes: The Whole Point of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military capacity of the people to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. It is not about hunting, and is not really even about self-defense…

This is exactly what needs to be said and known across the land — especially these days, when our government is so corrupt, pushing the globalist agenda.
– –
From: BeforeItsNews

Stewart Rhodes Hit His 2nd Amendment “Line in the Sand”

The whole point of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military capacity of the American people – to preserve the ability of the people, who are the militia, to provide for their own security as individuals, as neighborhoods, towns, counties, and states, during any emergency, man-made or natural; to preserve the military capacity of the American people to resist tyranny and violations of their rights by oath breakers within government; and to preserve the military capacity of the people to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, including those oath breaking domestic enemies within government.  It is not about hunting, and at its core, the Second Amendment is not really even about self-defense against private criminals.   It is about self-defense against public criminals – against tyrants, usurpers, and foreign invaders. …

Protecting the keeping and bearing of such arms of military utility is the heart and soul of the Second Amendment.  Thus, any attempt to ban their possession, sale, purchase, or transfer, is an attempt to disarm the American people.

Entire Article Here
Related:
[5-minute video] Suzanne Gratia-Hupp on the 2nd Amendment — We need more women (and men) like this. Aren’t we supposed to be “the land of the FREE and the home of the BRAVE?”

[5-minute video] Suzanne Gratia-Hupp on the 2nd Amendment — We need more women (and men) like this. Aren't we supposed to be "the land of the FREE and the home of the BRAVE?"

The real reason for the 2nd Amendment!

– –

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AvBliA3q4E]Suzanne Gratia-Hupp on the 2nd Amendment

Uploaded on Sep 8, 2009

Hupp is recognized as a leading advocate for the Second Amendment and an individual’s right to carry a concealed weapon. On October 16, 1991, Hupp and her parents were having lunch at the Luby’s Cafeteria in Killeen, TX. She had left her handgun in her car to comply with Texas state law. Gunman George Hennard drove his truck into the cafeteria and opened fire on the patrons. Both of Suzanne’s parents were killed because laws obstructed her ability to defend herself and family

Related:
Congressman Ron Paul Introduced Legislation in 2011 to Protect School Children from Mass Murderers
Gandhi advocated the right to bear arms; use of ‘violence’ to defend innocents against bullying, oppression

[media bias exposed video] Reverse-Christian Piers Morgan Blows Up on Larry Pratt Over Gun Rights – 12/18/12

Could Piers be any worse?
This shows how bad our media is. Piers calls Larry Pratt and ‘idiot’ twice. Larry, head of Gun Owners of America, is VERY careful with the facts, and he’s very intelligent. He’s been studying and speaking on this subject for years.
Larry does a great job, but he’s still not bringing up the main reason for the 2nd Amendment. The NRA has consistently not educated the American people as to what the real reason of the 2nd Amendment is. Perhaps we should pray for people to tell the real historical truth regardless of how they’re put down. The 2nd Amendment may be the only thing that is keeping America free right now.
It’s not about hunting or even self-defense; though, that is important. The real reason for the 2nd Amendment was to keep our government from becoming tyrannical. The fact that the public is armed is to keep the government in their place without anyone having to fire a shot.
The globalists are using these crisis (even manufacturing many, including 9/11) to advance their one-world-government agenda. Piers is paid big bucks to be one of their key hatchet men, pushing the globalists’ reverse-freedom agenda in a reverse-Christian way. Here is what Jesus says about those who call people ‘idiots.’
Matthew 5:21-24

You have heard that it was said to the ancient ones, ‘You shall not murder;’ and ‘Whoever shall murder shall be in danger of the judgment.’ But I tell you, that everyone who is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment; and whoever shall say to his brother, ‘Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council; and whoever shall say, ‘YOU FOOL!‘ shall be in danger of the fire of Gehenna [Hell].

“If therefore you are offering your gift at the altar, and there remember that your brother has anything against you, leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.

Piers is clearly disgusting. You can even even tell by the way he purses his lips and by some things known about him.
America doesn’t have much time left when people allow fact twisting, reverse-Christian deceivers like Piers into their homes.
– –

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avOV6_42xe4]Piers Morgan Blows Up on Larry Pratt Over Gun Rights – 12/18/2012

Published on Dec 18, 2012

CNN. Aired 12/182012.

Related:
Larry Pratt responds to being personally attacked by CNN’s presstitute of the day, Piers Morgan
Piers Morgan Calls Pro-Gun Advocate ‘Unbelievably Stupid,’ ‘Dangerous’: ‘You Shame Your Country’
In China, school mass murderers use knives, not guns
Newtown school shooting story already being changed by the media to eliminate eyewitness reports of a SECOND SHOOTER — Shouldn’t we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these shootings all seem to fit a COMMON PATTERN of multiple mind-controlled shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?
Sandy Hook Elementary: 3 Shooters (A CLOSE LOOK) — These aren’t just some ‘lone nut-men’
[10-minute video] Dr. Nick Begich: The Technologies of Mind Control — MK-Ultra Continues — Mass Shootings etc.
[10-minute video] Mike Adams (The Health Ranger): Do Guns Kill People?
An Inmate Claims that ‘Batman Shooter’ James Holmes Confessed that he was “Programmed to Kill” by an “Evil Therapist”
Congressman Ron Paul Introduced Legislation in 2011 to Protect School Children from Mass Murderers
Gandhi advocated the right to bear arms; use of ‘violence’ to defend innocents against bullying, oppression
Creepy Illuminati Message in Batman Movie Hints at Sandy Hook School — In this movie scene (1:58 into the movie) from Dark Knight Rises, “Sandy Hook” is about the only legible text on the whole map (look left of the walkie talkie in the screenshot above), and a guy puts his fingers on it
Fritz Springmeier: The Mass Shootings are Created Events — “The new Batman movie that came out BEFORE the shootings had in the background Aurora and Sandy Hook, the proof that the elite is creating these shootings”
Will Obama Cry For Children He Has Killed With Drones?
[6-minute video] Amish Grace — Bill Moyers showcases the book that describes the extraordinary grace of the families of the Amish school shooting victims. They forgave the shooter, comforted his family and attended his funeral because of their deep faith and the grace it gives them.

Gandhi advocated the right to bear arms; use of 'violence' to defend innocents against bullying, oppression

From: Natural News

Gandhi advocated the right to bear arms;
use of ‘violence’ to defend innocents
against bullying, oppression

Monday, December 17, 2012

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles…)

Gandhi is known around the world as the master of “nonviolence.” And yet, in the face of being threatened with bullying attacks, even Gandhi directly advocated the use of violence in the defense of the innocent. Had Gandhi been alive today and witnessed the senseless loss of life at Sandy Hook Elementary school, he would have advocated arming the principal and giving her a chance to protect innocent lives through the use of defensive violent action.

Don’t believe me? Read his own words…

“I do believe that where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence I would advise violence,” Gandhi wrote in his famous work, Doctrine of the Sword.

He continues:

…When my eldest son asked me what he should have done, had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908, whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defended me, I told him that it was his duty to defend me even by using violence.

Gandhi advocated “training in arms” to defend liberty

Gandhi also advocated justified violence over the “cowardice” of submission. Again, this is in his own words:

…Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. – M.K. Gandhi, The Doctrine of the Sword.

Gandhi also explains that someone who cannot use violence to defend themselves or their family is a helpless coward and a “worm.”

In his own words from the text Between Cowardice And Violence

…He who cannot protect himself or his nearest and dearest or their honour by non-violently facing death may and ought to do so by violently dealing with the oppressor. He who can do neither of the two is a burden. He has no business to be the head of a family. He must either hide himself, or must rest content to live for ever in helplessness and be prepared to crawl like a worm at the bidding of a bully …

[When violence] is offered in self-defence or for the defence of the defenceless, it is an act of bravery far better than cowardly submission.

In his own words, Gandhi advocated facing danger with measured violence (i.e. shooting back)

Also from Gandhi’s text Between Cowardice And Violence

…A man who, when faced by danger, behaves like a mouse, is rightly called a coward.

Not knowing the stuff of which nonviolence is made, many have honestly believed that running away from danger every time was a virtue compared to offering resistance, especially when it was fraught with danger to one’s life. As a teacher of nonviolence I must, so far as it is possible for me, guard against such an unmanly belief.

Self-defence … is the only honourable course where there is unreadiness for self-immolation.

You got that? Even Gandshi advocated self defense, even if it involved acts of violence. This is why, if Gandhi were alive today, he would have advocated arming school principals to defend innocent life (the children) against psychopathic killers.

Obama wants Americans to be cowards; Gandhi wanted people to act with courage

Entire Article Here
Related:
FACT: EVEN GANDHI OPPOSED GUN BANS — “Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest” (When law-abiding citizens are stripped of their right to carry a weapon they become defenseless, and ruthless tyrants can take over) | ‘Normalcy Bias’ Explained
Brother Gregory Williams: Do Christians Have a Right to Self Defense, Part 1

Congressman Ron Paul Introduced Legislation in 2011 to Protect School Children from Mass Murderers

From: http://gunowners.org/a07262011.htm

Congressman Ron Paul Introduces Legislation to Protect School Children from Mass Murderers

Tuesday, 26 July 2011 21:18
Last Updated on Sunday, 07 August 2011 21:58
Written by Gun Owners of America

Columbine.

Virginia Tech.

Fort Hood.

What do all of these shootings have in common?

The answer is they all occurred in government facilities where the private possession of firearms was prohibited.

In Washington, unconstitutional legislation is commonplace. But sometimes unconstitutional laws can have deadly consequences. The so-called “gun free school zones act,” written by radical anti-gun Senator Heb Kohl, is one such law.

Slammed through in 1996 as an amendment to a giant last-minute must-pass appropriations bill, the legislation disarmed school staff and other adults – leaving elementary and secondary school children defenseless to serial killers.

It also made it virtually impossible to drive your car down the street with your gun inside without violating the law by creating a 1000-foot so-called “gun-free zone” around every public and private school in the country.

“Gun free,” that is, except for the criminals.

No one – including politicians, the police, or the individual citizen – can predict where the next deranged serial killer will attack. And yet politicians continue to create “criminal safe zones” such as schools, churches, parks, restaurants that serve alcohol, etc., where the law-abiding are disarmed.

The net impact of turning schools, in particular, into defenseless targets for serial killers has been dramatic.

When many people over the age of 40 were growing up, ROTC students would march up-and-down high school campuses with their semi-automatic M1’s – and no one would think anything of it. Shooting clubs on school grounds were also not uncommon.

But within a couple a years of the enactment of the Kohl amendment, two disaffected teenagers walked into Columbine High Schoolsecure in the knowledge that they would be the only ones in the school who were armed.

And, of course, Columbine triggered a slew of copycat episodes – laying a mounting string of innocent casualties at the feet of Herb Kohl and his misbegotten legislation.

It’s time to say NO to criminal safe zones. And a great place to start is the blatantly unconstitutional gun free school zones act.

Thankfully, Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) agrees and has introduced legislation to do just that.

Rep. Paul recently introduced the “Citizens Protection Act of 2011” (H.R. 2613), which will repeal the Kohl amendment and thus remove the federally created criminal safety zones.

Rep. Paul is one of the few members of Congress who respects the Constitution and who actually introduces legislation to restore federalism. And, unlike some legislators, Paul has a history of forcing the House to vote on his pro-gun proposals, thus putting other congressmen on record.

GOA is proud to stand with Rep. Paul in the effort to repeal the unconstitutional gun free zones law. For anyone who cares about liberty, now is the time to work on getting the 218 votes we need to pass this important piece of legislation.

ACTION: Contact you congressman. Urge him or her to cosponsor Ron Paul’s Citizens Protection Act of 2011, H.R. 2613.

[audio/video] Sheriff Richard Mack: "If the media supports you on anything, you can get away with anything." Issues covered: Trevon Martin • gun control • self-defense • Barack Obama's illegitimacy & Sheriff Arpaio • fast and furious • media bias

“If the media supports you on anything, you can get away with anything.”

– Sheriff Richard Mack

* * *

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12I3FOCNJxw]“Brandishing a Weapon will Bring a Tense Situation to a Complete Halt” Sheriff Mack

Uploaded by TheAlexJonesChannel on Apr 6, 2012

Aaron Dykes Interviews Sheriff Richard Mack about what will it take to get big government out of our lives.
http://sheriffmackforcongress.com/
http://www.sheriffmack.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://twitter.com/#!/RealAlexJones
http://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmerikJones

Stewart Rhodes: UK Should Allow Women to be Armed for Self-Defense — “England is where we’re going”

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMIuNu7K59w]Stewart Rhodes: UK Should Allow Women to be Armed for Self-Defense 1/2

Uploaded by on Aug 9, 2011

Alex also talks with Stewart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers about Quartzite, Arizona, Chief of Police Jeff Gilbert calling the Oath Keepers, the Greater Phoenix Tea Party, and the Sons of Liberty Riders “terrorists” during a public meeting.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEAQYyCeyvM]

Alex Sums Up the Shooting and Now Politicians Call for End of 1st & 2nd Amendments

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4T1opE_GIg]Emergency: Politicians Call for End of 1st & 2nd Amendments

TheAlexJonesChannel | January 11, 2011 | 751 likes, 25 dislikes

Alex Jones issues an alert as certain factions in Congress are moving very quickly to seize upon the tragic shooting in Arizona
to pass both gun control laws and controls on free speech under the guise of protecting political servants.

Alex dissects the emerging background and possible motives of Jared Lee Loughner, by all appearances deeply mentally disturbed, while the mainstream corporate media pose as the Left and demand draconian restrictions on the Bill of Rights.

The rush is on prey upon sentiments and use this tragedy to usher in an agenda the Obama Administration couldn’t otherwise advance, but have planned since the beginning of Obama entered office. Holder and Obama heralded the return of the assault weapon ban early on in 2009, but the focus has always been on the available political currency. Rep. McCarthy also commented on ‘seeing what she could pass.’

Congressman Robert Brady plans openly to ride on the backs of Giffords’ attempted assassination and the murder of 5 others as well, with plans to “criminalize” threatening language or symbols against members of Congress. In the name of protecting our elected officials, Brady will help chill political speech, starting with the banning of over-zealous rhetoric like Sarah Palin’s map which placed a “target” over a number of districts including that of Rep. Giffords.

Pima County Sheriff Dupniks and plenty of others, including Mark Potok of the SPLC, implicitly blaming the actions of the suspected shooter on a cocktail of angry ‘rightwing’ sentiment that has risen to the surface during the 2010 midterm elections.

Sheriff Dupnik lead the demands to reign in speech and tone down the rhetoric, lambasting the “vitriol” of pundits and politicians, openly challenging their right to express and defend their views and stating in his press conference that those who talk for a living ‘have free speech,’ but that such speech bears ‘consequences.’

“When the rhetoric about hatred, about mistrust of government, about paranoia of how government operates, and to try to inflame the public on a daily basis, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, it has impact on people especially who are unbalanced personalities,” Dupniks said.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/…
Those in Congress, however, have already reciprocated with immediate legislation. The overtones are reminiscent of the rushed and pressured passing of the Constitution-shredding PATRIOT Act in the wake of 9/11. Now, as the War on Terror supposedly justified by the September 11 attacks has shifted into the war of suspicion on the American people, returning veterans, political dissidents and ‘lone wolf nuts’, certain factions in Congress now want to cut again at the Constitution and Bill of Rights, imposing the burden for the malicious and evil actions of one individual on the free speech and 2nd Amendment of everyone in the national conversation and political discourse.

Now, a decade after all Americans gave up a number of their rights in turn for the auspices of ‘security’ following 9/11, some of the most ‘vitriolic’ and supposedly ‘angry’ voices in politics, along with the others, will be asked to give up their freedom to words and expression so we can again feel a little bit “safer.” But it won’t work. Bad people and criminals will still get guns; insulating politicians will only advance tyranny’s shadowy ascent; and chilling free speech will only bring martial law control over the people closer still.

As Benjamin Franklin wisely warned in the founding era, “Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither (and will obtain neither).”

Why Switzerland Has The Lowest Crime Rate In The World / Why No One Invades Switzerland

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nf1OgV449g]Why Switzerland Has The Lowest Crime Rate In The World

When thinking about the mass extermination camps of a holocaust think..

The key to freedom is to be able to have the ability to defend yourself &, if you dont have the tools to do that, then youre going to be at the mercy of whomever wants to put you away.

Guns are deeply rooted within Swiss culture – but the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept.

The country has a population of six million, but there are estimated to be at least two million publicly-owned firearms, including about 600,000 automatic rifles and 500,000 pistols.

This is in a very large part due to Switzerland’s unique system of national defence, developed over the centuries.

Instead of a standing, full-time army, the country requires every man to undergo some form of military training for a few days or weeks a year throughout most of their lives.

Between the ages of 21 and 32 men serve as frontline troops. They are given an M-57 assault rifle and 24 rounds of ammunition which they are required to keep at home.

Once discharged, men serve in the Swiss equivalent of the US National Guard, but still have to train occasionally and are given bolt rifles. Women do not have to own firearms, but are encouraged to.

President Obama appeals to just-WAR doctrine while accepting PEACE Prize (Full text of Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize speech)

“The concept of a “just war” emerged, suggesting that war is justified only when certain conditions were met:  if it is waged as a last resort or in self-defense; if the force used is proportional; and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared from violence.”

In today’s wars, many more civilians are killed than soldiers; the seeds of future conflict are sown, economies are wrecked, civil societies torn asunder, refugees amassed, children scarred.”

— President Barack Obama

From: The White House

Note: I highlighted some of the key points, as well as some points that aren’t true at all — if one knows the true history of wars.

Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize

Oslo City Hall
Oslo, Norway

1:44 P.M. CET

THE PRESIDENT:  Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, distinguished members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, citizens of America, and citizens of the world:

I receive this honor with deep gratitude and great humility.  It is an award that speaks to our highest aspirations — that for all the cruelty and hardship of our world, we are not mere prisoners of fate.  Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice.

And yet I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the considerable controversy that your generous decision has generated.  (Laughter.)  In part, this is because I am at the beginning, and not the end, of my labors on the world stage.  Compared to some of the giants of history who’ve received this prize — Schweitzer and King; Marshall and Mandela — my accomplishments are slight.  And then there are the men and women around the world who have been jailed and beaten in the pursuit of justice; those who toil in humanitarian organizations to relieve suffering; the unrecognized millions whose quiet acts of courage and compassion inspire even the most hardened cynics.  I cannot argue with those who find these men and women — some known, some obscure to all but those they help — to be far more deserving of this honor than I.

But perhaps the most profound issue surrounding my receipt of this prize is the fact that I am the Commander-in-Chief of the military of a nation in the midst of two wars.  One of these wars is winding down.  The other is a conflict that America did not seek; one in which we are joined by 42 other countries — including Norway — in an effort to defend ourselves and all nations from further attacks.

Still, we are at war, and I’m responsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle in a distant land.  Some will kill, and some will be killed. Continue reading “President Obama appeals to just-WAR doctrine while accepting PEACE Prize (Full text of Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize speech)”

Brother Gregory Williams: Do Christians Have a Right to Self Defense, Part 1

There has been a lot of talk about government usurpation, declarations of independence, sovereign states, rights of citizens, and even references to revolution and armed rebellion in America, but such talk is not only foolish, but unwarranted. You have the government you deserve.

From: News with Views

Does a modern Christian have a right to self defense? With every right there is a correlative responsibility. The ancient right to bear arms has been described in antiquity as the obligation to bear arms in defense of your community. In those ancient times if you would not arm yourself to defend your community you were often shunned if not run out of town all together.

Chuck Baldwin in and article published by NewsWithViews.com quoted the statistic that “as of 2004, 50% of the adults in the United States own one or more firearms.” My first reaction was, why so few? As someone who once wore a badge and a gun to protect the property and lives of citizens I can testify that my biggest disappointment was the apathy and even cowardice of the people I was often expected to protect.

To refuse to come to the aid of others has been considered a crime and good Samaritan laws have prosecuted citizens who failed to assist and aid people in need of assistance or protection.

Yet, I have heard many people say they would not own a gun or they did not believe in guns. On further inquiry everyone of these purveyors of pseudo-pacifism confirmed that if someone was breaking into their house they would call the police, who will come with guns. The truth is they do believe in guns, but they are either to lazy, to cheap, to cowardly, or just to irresponsible to own one.

One of the last things Christ said to His apostles before His crucifixion was to go and buy a sword, even if they had to sell their garment to do so.[1] When armed men came “with swords and staves for to take” Jesus, one of His disciples, realizing what was coming, asked if they should “smite [them] with the sword.”[2]

Jesus chose not to fight that day. He told Peter to “put up thy sword into the sheath”.[3] Jesus did not tell Peter to throw his sword away. He simply had a better strategy to free the people from the exercising authority of the corrupt government set up by the people who were “making the word of God to none effect.”

The apostles were armed men, but they were also men of peace. They were “gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy.”[4] They supported the weak, patient toward all men,[5] with “love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, [of] faith,”[6] but they were armed.

Jesus never came to disarm or weaken the people. That would only tempt brutes of the “world”. Had Peter, the apostles and their thousands of supporters began armed conflict to establish their liberty under God there would have been disastrous and fruitless bloodshed. The people needed to learn first hand the courage and sacrifice needed to sustain a truly free society.

There has been a lot of talk about government usurpation, declarations of independence, sovereign states, rights of citizens, and even references to revolution and armed rebellion in America, but such talk is not only foolish, but unwarranted. You have the government you deserve.

The diminishing rights of people are the direct result of personal neglect, abdication or the waiving of rights in exchange for peace, security, and bountiful benefits. The decline of liberty is always due the failure to retain rights. The failure to retain rights is always linked to the failure to put your hand to the responsibilities of the individual to society. The secrets of a free society belong to the diligent, humble, and wise.

There were no greater revolutionists than John the Baptist, Christ, and His apostles. Their call to repentance, was a call for change. The way of John and Jesus was also truly one of hope. It changed the course of history by changing the ways of the people. If the people were to be ruled by God they had to pursue the righteousness of God.

With this renewed spirit of liberty early Christians tended to what Jesus called the “weightier matters of law, justice, mercy and faith” by loving one another in a international network of faith, hope, and charity under the perfect law of liberty. They did not create a socialist state which exercised authority one over the other. That was forbidden by Christ and Moses before Him.

Entire Article Here

Fort Hood is a Gun-Free Zone! — The folly of “gun-free zones,” which attract and assist people bent on mass murder

From: Reason.com

When Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan started shooting up the Soldier Readiness Processing Center at Fort Hood, Pfc. Marquest Smith dove under a desk. A.P. reports that “he lay low for several minutes, waiting for the shooter to run out of ammunition and wishing he, too, had a gun.”

Neither Smith nor the other victims of Hasan’s assault had guns because soldiers on military bases within the United States generally are not allowed to carry them. Last week’s shootings, which killed 13 people and wounded more than 30, demonstrated once again the folly of “gun-free zones,” which attract and assist people bent on mass murder instead of deterring them. …

The first people with guns to confront Hasan, two local police officers, were the ones who put a stop to his rampage. And while Sgt. Kim Munley and Sgt. Mark Todd acted heroically, they did not arrive on the scene until a crucial 10 minutes or so had elapsed and Hasan had fired more than 100 rounds.

Entire Article Here

Schwarzenegger’s Ammo Law: Nazis Fear an Armed People

Related: “The Terminator” Schwarzenegger signs ammunition sales bill that requires thumbprint

_______

From: Infowars

Nazis Fear an Armed People: Schwarzenegger’s Ammo Law

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
October 13, 2009

Second Amendment advocates and other defenders of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are outraged by California Gov. Schwarzenegger’s scheme to force all law-abiding gun owners in the state to submit data to be inserted in a database when they purchase ammunition.

featured stories   Nazis Fear an Armed People: Schwarzeneggers Ammo Law
jefferson
Schwarzenegger’s SS Totenkopf death’s head belt buckle displayed on the cover of Time Magazine.

It makes sense California would enact such a law. The state is lorded over by an avowed Nazi.

”I admired Hitler, for instance, because he came from being a little man with almost no formal education up to power. And I admire him for being such a good public speaker,” Arnie said in the documentary Pumping Iron. The producer of the film, George Butler, considers Schwarzenegger a ”flagrant, outspoken admirer of Hitler.”

In a book proposal, according to the New York Times, Butler also said he had seen Mr. Schwarzenegger playing ”Nazi marching songs from long-playing records in his collection at home” and said that the actor ”frequently clicked his heels and pretended to be an S.S. officer.”

In response to Butler’s accusation, Schwarzenegger told the newspaper in 2003 that he despises Hitler.

He does? If so, why does Schwarzenegger wear a belt buckle bearing the SS Totenkopf, a Nazi SS insignia? Schwarzenegger appeared on the cover of Time Magazine on June 25, 2007, with Michael Bloomberg — who also has contempt for the Second Amendment — wearing the death’s head belt buckle. He wore it again nine months later in the March 2008 issue of Esquire Magazine.

Schwarzenegger proudly displayed the death’s head buckle a few months ago at the CeBIT 2009 IT conference in Hanover, Germany.

Schwarzenegger’s late father, Gustav, voluntarily applied to join the Nazi Party in 1938 when it was still illegal in Austria. He also voluntarily applied to become a member of the Sturmabteilung, the Nazi paramilitary wing, on May 1, 1939. He was a Hitler-worshiping brownshirt.

Arnie invited Austrian president Kurt Waldheim to his wedding in 1986 after it emerged that the former UN secretary general had long concealed that he fought in a German army commando accused of atrocities.

All of this may be incidental to Arnie’s signing of AB962, the California ammo bill. But then, considering Arnie’s flagrant display of an SS insignia, it does not seem likely.

Nazis feared an armed public. Soon after grabbing power in 1933, the Nazis conducted massive searches and seizures of firearms from political opponents. “After five years of repression and eradication of dissidents, Hitler signed a new gun control law in 1938, which benefited Nazi party members and entities, but denied firearm ownership to enemies of the state,” writes Stephen P. Halbrook.

“History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing,” Hitler said.

“The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 replaced a Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928,” writes Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership. “The 1928 law was enacted by a center-right, freely elected German government that wanted to curb ‘gang activity,’ violent street fights between Nazi party and Communist party thugs. All firearm owners and their firearms had to be registered. Sound familiar? ‘Gun control’ did not save democracy in Germany. It helped to make sure that the toughest criminals, the Nazis, prevailed.

In California it is much the same — the state, the toughest criminal on the block, will now have a monopoly on gun possession while the law-abiding citizens will be forced to jump through hoops in order to realize the constitutional right to own a firearm.

It is ironic that Schwarzenegger signed this bill. He is an avowed Nazi that takes pride in wearing the same insignia as the Schutzstaffel or the SS. It is a symbol representing not only the secret police and naked totalitarian power, but the Nazi death cult responsible for killing tens of millions of innocent humans.

Millions of them would have lived a lot longer if they had firearms and fought back against the people Arnold Schwarzenegger worships.