Freedom from Alaska!

Category: States’ Rights

When Americans Understood the Declaration of Independence — a roadmap for opposing a highly centralized, militaristic empire of the sort the U.S. government has become

From: Infowars

When Americans Understood the Declaration of Independence

Thomas J. DiLorenzo
lewrockwell.com
July 4, 2012

The Fourth of July was not always a national celebration of the militarization of American society and of the federal government’s never-ending quest for world domination (disguised as “defending our interests abroad”). Americans did not always attend church services on the Sunday before the Fourth of July to “honor” their “military heroes” and pray that they may kill many more human beings in other countries that have done them no harm. Americans once actually read and understood the Declaration of Independence for what it was: a declaration of secession from the British empire and a roadmap for opposing a highly centralized, militaristic empire of the sort the U.S. government has become.

The Declaration of Independence was the ultimate secessionist or states’ rights document. “Governments are instituted among men,” Thomas Jefferson wrote, for the sole purpose of securing God-given, “unalienable” rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Moreover, governments derive “their just powers from the consent of the governed” and nowhere else. And “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government . . .”

The way in which “the People” were to express their consent (or lack thereof) was through state and local political organizations. Hence, in the final paragraph of the Declaration of Independence Jefferson wrote that: “We . . . the Representatives of the united States of America . . . are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.”

It is important to note that the word “united” is not capitalized but “States” is, and that the individual states are described as “Free and Independent.” Thus, the free, independent, and sovereign states were united in the cause of secession from the British empire. The phrase “united States” did not mean, and does not mean in any of the founding documents, the “United States government,” as is commonly believed today. It is always in the plural to signify that the free and independent states are united in their common cause of protecting life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. To Jefferson and the other signers of the Declaration of Independence, each American state was sovereign in the same sense that Great Britain, France, and Spain were sovereign states.

Entire Article Here

[video] Jerome Corsi: Obama, The Illegitimate President & More On How Deep the Doo Doo Is!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NoTZJYqew4]Obama: The Illegitimate President with Dr. Jerome Corsi 1/3

Uploaded by  on Jan 31, 2012

Alex talks with best selling author Jerome Corsi about a summon issued by a Georgia judge ordering Obama to appear before the court in a lawsuit challenging his eligibility and presence on the March presidential ballot. Obama did not appear and his lawyers said he would ignore the subpoena and not participate in the legal proceedings. Corsi and Alex also talk about the rapidly escalating situation in Iran and the Persian Gulf. Jerome Corsi is the author of The Obama Nation and Unfit for Command.
http://www.jeromecorsi.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChTXiJVzti4]
Related:
Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator – Absolute Proof
[A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY] From A to Z: What’s wrong with Obama’s birth certificate? Examine for yourself…
How To Prove Obama Is Not From America: WATCH THIS VIDEO

[video] Jerome Corsi on Bombing Iran: Through chaos the globalists are creating the world government and Fox News is part of the coverup. Along with war over there will be fighting in the streets here. Some states will secede.

PROBLEM > REACTION > SOLUTION

or

“Order from chaos”

The globalists create the chaos >

people react in fear: “we’ll give up our rights” >

One world government – game over

* * *

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRRkgbURWZo]Dr. Jerome Corsi: World War 3 is About to Begin! 1/2

Uploaded by on Nov 29, 2011

Author and columnist Jerome Corsi talks about Obama and the orchestrated attacks inside Iran….
http://www.jeromecorsi.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://www.infowars.com

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvtZaDSKNNY]

ARE PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONSTITUTIONAL?

I was reading a thread on Facebook, and realized I haven’t yet addressed this important topic.

The discussion is often about whether prayer should be allowed in schools, but to me the bigger issue is whether we should even have federally controlled schools, which is unconstitutional.

And I have long thought that whether public prayer is allowed or not is minor compared to teaching the religious belief in evolution as fact, which can actually be disproved with facts; though, these facts aren’t taught. Teaching evolution as fact teaches children that the book of Genesis is erroneous, and we’re just like animals — so ~“why not just do it like they do it on the Discovery Channel” — which sex education helps happen.

Charlotte Iserbyt goes into detail how our children are being systematically brainwashed on purpose:

[IMPORTANT! 74-minute, real history video] Charlotte Iserbyt: The Secret History of Western Education — The Scientific Destruction of Minds

Charlotte Iserbyt: Exposing the Miseducation of America — She found documents that show the federal government and tax exempt foundations have been changing the education system from fundamental academic study to what amounts to operant conditioning dog training.

Charlotte Iserbyt: Federalizing and Corporatizing All of The Schools

Charlotte Iserbyt: Skull & Bones, The Order at Yale Revealed | More on the Secret History of Western Education & Psychology!

This following article addresses whether we should even have federally controlled schools?

jeff

– –

From: News With Views

ARE PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONSTITUTIONAL?

Lynn M. Stuter
January 20, 2003
NewsWithViews.com

As the war over education reform — Goals 2000, school-to-work, and “outcome-based education” — rages on, the time is more than ripe to ask ourselves, “Are public schools constitutional?”

Looking at the United States Constitution, no provision is made for education, but the Constitution does instruct that … “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (Tenth Amendment) In other words, education is reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Why, then, do we have a cabinet level United States Department of Education (US DOE)? Does this not violate the U.S. Constitution? In a word, “yes.” The US DOE was established under the Carter Administration as a political payoff to the teacher unions for their support of Jimmy Carter for president.

[…]

For example, humanists (Darwinists) believe in evolution while Christians believe in creationism. Is evolution being taught in the public schools? Yes, it is and has been for many years. Is the religion of humanism being taught in the public schools? Humanism is the religious basis of education in the public schools of today.

Entire Article Here

Author Thomas Woods On Nullification, Which Allows States To Reject Unconstitutional Laws

Woods is the author of Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century and Rollback: The Battleplan Against Big Government.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJUVhZ3Pomg]Tom Woods on PressTV: Nullification!

C4Liberty | July 15, 2010

http://TomWoods.com
http://Mises.org

Tom Woods discusses his latest bestseller Nullifcation on Iranian Press TV in New York.

Buy the book here:
http://is.gd/dtl5G

Pastor Chuck Baldwin’s Son, Timothy: States Have Far More Rights Than We’re Being Told

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8ph5G5WWFo]Timothy Baldwin on Alex Jones Tv: CONSTITUTIONAL DE-CONSTRUCTION

Alex also talks with Timothy Baldwin, the son of former presidential candidate Chuck Baldwin. Baldwin is a former prosecutor for the Florida State Attorneys Office who now owns his own private law practice. He is the author of Freedom For A Change.
http://baldwinlandlaw.com/about.html
http://prisonplanet.tv/

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqkVWavByY4]

Mr. Baldwin was born and raised in Pensacola, FL. He attended the University of West Florida, where he received his Bachelors Degree in English (major) and Political Science (minor). From UWF, Mr. Baldwin attended and studied law at Cumberland School of Law located at Samford University in Birmingham, AL from the years 2001 to 2004. There, he specialized in litigation, was heavily involved in the trial programs, was named on the Deans List, and graduated in the top third of his class in the year 2004 when he received his Juris Doctorate Degree.

After graduating law school, Mr. Baldwin passed his bar exam in 2004 and immediately began his career at the State Attorneys Office in Escambia County, FL, where he initially handled misdemeanor cases and was soon after promoted to handle felony cases. During Mr. Baldwins career at the State Attorneys Office, he literally handled thousands of cases and tried over 50 jury trials.

In 2006, Mr. Baldwin opened his law office in Pensacola, FL, where he began focusing his practice on property management representation. This includes handling landlord-tenant and other land-possession actions, such as ejectment, unlawful detainer, foreclosure, and includes preparing rental documents, such as leases, property management agreements, land-use contracts, applications, residential selection criteria, etc. Mr. Baldwin is pleased to represent many notable and successful property management companies, as well as the general public in their property management matters.

Can Alaska Secede If America Ceases to Be the ‘Land of the Free’?

From: Juneau Empire [the article is not dated; though, this is our capitol’s main newspaper]

Parnell trashes petition for Alaska’s independence
By Gregg Erickson

The union of Alaska with the United States is again safe, thanks to the vigilance of Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell and the Alaska Supreme Court. Earlier this month Parnell refused to certify an initiative petition that would have asked Alaska voters whether the state should “seek changes in existing law and constitutional provisions to authorize … independence from the United States.”

Certification would have meant the group could try to gather the roughly 35,000 signatures needed to get their proposition on the ballot. I think they’d have about zero chance of that; but according to Parnell, seeking changes in the U.S. and Alaska constitutions to allow independence is itself unconstitutional, and therefore something that Alaskans can’t be allowed to vote on, or even sign up for.

The petition Parnell trashed was submitted by Scott Kohlhass and 242 others, including Lynette Clark, the chair of the Alaska Independence Party and a disciple of the late Alaska independence advocate Joe Vogler. …

In 2003 Parnell’s predecessor, Loren Leman, threw out a similar petition. Kohlhass sued, taking his case to the Alaska Supreme Court. The justices wrapped themselves in Old Glory before coming down on Kohlhass like a Mt. Roberts avalanche….

The logic of the court’s opinion goes like this: Kohlhass wants Alaska independence; independence is the same as secession, which is unconstitutional; therefore the Kohlhass initiative is unconstitutional. The full opinion uses the words “secede” and “secession” 26 times; read it yourself on the web at www.state.ak.us/courts/ops/sp-6087.pdf.

The hole in the court’s logic is that the initiative does not seek secession; indeed, the proposition Kohlhass wishes to gather signatures for never uses that word. Secession is a unilateral act, like South Carolina’s 1860 withdrawal from the Union. What Kohlhass and his associates seek is a constitutional change, so Alaska – with the consent of the people of Alaska and the U.S. – can become independent.

Read Entire Article

Related:

Chuck Baldwin: Breakup Of U.S. Is Inevitable — State secession is the last best option

Ben Swann: Do States Actually Have The Right To Secede?

Why Texas would flourish as an independent Republic based on liberty, not debt (has interesting comments)

Page 2 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén