Beautifully written overview of what Arthur Topham actually wrote, and how the Talmudists, who own the press and control much of the judiciary, responded — and how we must fight back through truth, so people’s eyes can be opened!
Arthur lives in British Columbia, Canada.
From: Free Speech Monika ~ Exercising My Human Right to Speak Freely! — Monika Schaefer
The Lies They Tell about Arthur Topham: A Thinking Person’s Query
An acquaintance wrote to me the other day genuinely seeking answers regarding her concerns about my support for Arthur Topham, as she had been reading some very disturbing things about him. She wondered if I agreed with Arthur on the things they wrote about him. …
Here is part of my response.
… I would like to address the allegations being made against Arthur Topham. He now has no way of defending himself from these false allegations, because he has been silenced as part of the sentencing in the spurious “hate speech” trial in which he was found ‘guilty’ on one count and ‘not guilty’ on another count for the exact identical charge. One day he was anti-semitic, the next day not.
Yes it is true that the mainstream media (MSM) declares as “fact” that Arthur Topham called for the sterilization of all Jews. Seldom have I seen a better example of how the truth gets turned upside-down and inside-out, on something that I know first-hand. And this is at a time when he has been silenced. So it is up to people like myself to set the record straight. Thank you for the opportunity to do so, for at least one person – yourself. In this war, the psychological war that is being waged against us, it is one by one by one that we resist and fight back by trying to open the eyes of thinking people everywhere. Arthur Topham is a hero in this struggle, and he pays a heavy personal price for his courage.
Okay, so to address the question of what Arthur did or did not say.
In 1941, a Jewish man by the name of Theodore Kaufman from New York wrote and published a book called Germany Must Perish! This book was quite widely acclaimed by various major newspapers of the day, and one can assume from that, that it was widely available at the time. In his book, Kaufman makes the case that German people are so bad, so innately violent and militaristic and evil, that they must be annihilated off the face of this planet forever. He outlined a method which he regarded as more humane than simply killing the Germans by execution or bombs. He proposed that 20,000 surgeons be hired, to sterilize all males up to 60 years of age, and females up to 45 years of age. Within three years, the sterilizations would be complete, and within 2 generations, voilà, no more German people.
Why was the original book not condemned? Why did it receive accolades?
German-hating propaganda had been conducted already since decades before WW2 even started. So the world was already tuned in to hate and fear the Germans.
After the war, the book was largely forgotten and was not talked about much anymore. Until Arthur Topham brought attention to it. What Arthur did was provocative, sure, but sometimes that is what is needed to bring attention to a matter of great injustice. He created a parody, or satire of the book by putting on his website the exact same book (or major portions of it), word for word identical, but with Germany replaced with Israel, and Germans replaced with Jews. That is it. The book titles appeared side-by-side on his website, with some kind of preamble which made it clear to any thinking person that this was a satire to draw attention to the original genocidal screed.
The concept of satire/parody was brought out at length at his trial in Oct 2015 which I attended. It is puzzling to me that the jury still found him “guilty”. But it is not that surprising, given that we have all been subjected to a life-time of mind-contamination by the many many lies and subversive undermining of our culture. The jury members were also heavily influenced by the judge’s concluding remarks, and how the judge was treating the defence versus the prosecution side during the two weeks. He was not at all neutral, and it came across in hundreds of little ways, all adding up to a very skewed trial. The judicial system is quite rigged by the very same group of people who bring us all the deceptions in the first place.
The same group of people own and control the MSM. I used to think the CBC [Canadian Broadcasting Corporation] was fabulous, and that I could learn so much from the CBC. Nonsense! They are among the worst. The characterization of Arthur Topham is a clear example of how they twist the truth. In this case, they simply leave out the context of the parody, and there it is! In black and white. And he cannot speak now to defend himself and set the record straight. And of course the MSM would not give him any ink anyway, just like the Jasper Fitzhugh does not give me the right of response to the vicious attacks against me in that paper.
You might ask, who is that group of people that I am referring to. You could call them the Bankers, or the Israel-Firsters, or Organized Jewry, or the Rothschilds, or the Zionists. I do not include ordinary street-level Jews in this. Most of them have had a double dose of indoctrination and don’t know what is being done in their name. Some of them do actually get very upset when they find out, and write good books. An example is Gerard Menuhin, son of famous violinist Yehudi Menuhin, who wrote Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil.
Topham Gagged & 6 Month Conditional Sentence: One More Victim of Zionist Thought Control
Asked whether he had anything to say before sentencing, Arthur Topham made a statement that will ring through Canadian history about the nature of free speech and the motivations of an extremely moral and honest man. He posted what he had as a critic of Zionism, not out of malice or hatred, but driven by a moral imperative to warn people of a perceived danger. “I felt that I had a duty as a Canadian citizen to alert the general public of an imminent threat … the interests of the Jewish lobby,” said Topham in court March 13, according to the CBC.
Arthur Topham’s 10 year ordeal of harassment for being a strong critic of Zionism, ended in a Quesnel courtroom when he was sentenced, having been convicted in November 2015 on one count of violating Canada’s notorious “hate law” Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code, as a result of postings highly critical of Zionism and organized Jewry. Ironically, the charge revolved around books readily available from mainline online booksellers. The Internet dissident became technically another political prisoner in Canada’s sordid attack on free speech. Amnesty International defines a political prisoner as a person punished solely for the non-violent expression of his political, religious or cultural views.
Judge Bruce Butler sentenced Mr. Topham to a six month suspended sentence during which he must reside at his home, refrain from alcohol, report to his probation officer and not post anything on the Internet. After that, he faces two years of probation. On March 10, he shut down his massive RadicalPress.com website, the contents of which, we assume will be mirrored by others in less repressive lands than Canada.
CAFE Director Paul Fromm with political prisoner Arthur Topham in Quesnel, BC
“In a sense, the thought control freaks got part of what they wanted — the silencing of this dissident,” said Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression which had backed Mr. Topham during the first legal assault by complainant Harry Abrams, a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission under the now repealed Sec. 13. CAFE continued to back him when Abrams, a B’nai Brith spokesman in Victoria, teamed up with chronic Ottawa complainer Richard Warman who complained to the British Columbia “hate squad” which led to the Sec. 319 charges.
In sentencing Mr. Topham, Judge Butler rejected Crown submissions for a stiffer sentence and 200 hours of community work. The judge also rejected allegations that Mr. Topham indirectly advocated violence. The CBC (March 13, 2017) reported: “One piece that Topham called ‘satire’ advocated the forced sterilization of all Jews. ‘He does not call for violence; his views were political satire,’ Butler told the sentencing hearing. ‘It is not his intent to indirectly incite violence.’ Butler ruled that Topham deliberately used the internet to disseminate anti-Semitic information but said the man was not calling for violence.” The satire in question was “Israel Must Perish,” a parody Mr. Topham wrote of a hideous blueprint for genocide “Germany Must Perish,” written in 1941 by an American Jew named Theodore Kaufman, calling for the mass sterilization of Germans after the war, an act which would eliminate the Germans as a people within a few decades.
No one was happy with the sentence. Free speech supporters see the gagging of Arthur Topham as one more atrocity committed under Pierre Trudeau’s fraudulent Charter of minority special rights and diminished Majority freedoms.
Defence lawyer Barclay Johnson sadly observed: “The difference between Canada and the Soviet gulags is only one of degree. The communists put dissidents into a physical prison. The gag order is a psychological prison imposed to enforce a multicultural society. The Charter is little more than a fine document to be hung on an office wall. It looks good. However, judges have repeatedly gutted promised rights like freedom of speech and invented rights not mentioned, like same sex marriage.”
The mainstream media, even in British Columbia, were strangely silent. “The Jewish lobby doesn’t like this sentence,” remarked Dr. James Sears publisher of the satirical “YOUR WARD NEWS,” another target of arch-complainer Richard Warman’s “They were hoping for a harsher sentence, and then the controlled media would have crowed about a ‘Nazi’ tongue-lashed by a judge and sent away for a long prison term.”
Their victory over the former teacher, placer miner and publisher, after a decade of attack seemed like a mouthful of bitter ashes to B’nai Brith. “B’nai Brith Canada, which had alerted the RCMP to Topham’s activities back in 2007, said it was “strongly disappointed” with the sentencing. In a statement, Michael Mostyn, CEO, described the sentence as “a mere slap on the wrist which will do little to protect Canadian Jews or preserve the multicultural mosaic of our society. Mr. Topham is a committed and unrepentant Jew-hater, who persisted in publishing lurid anti-Semitic content on his website throughout this legal process,” Mostyn continued. ‘Canada’s laissez-fair approach to hate crimes continues to fail minority groups and puts them at increased risk of attacks against their lives or property.’ “Mostyn said the timing of the lax sentence was especially disturbing ‘as Canada’s Jewish community reels from a series of bomb threats against our community centres, inspired by the same hateful ideology that drives Mr. Topham.’” (Canadian Jewish News, March 14, 2017)
Arthur just now has been forced to shut down Radical Press because he told too much truth — and Talmudists control the system — while not enough good people stand up. Ughhh!
Anyway, some great photographs of Arthur here:
Nice image! At Begg’s Gulch, along the road to the Matthew River, near Wells, B.C.
• • •
• • •
• • •
• • •
• • •
Arthur Topham wrote this comment under this video:
Boys. You’re not focusing in on the issues deep enough. Canada needs to get rid of Sections 318 to 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code. They are the crux of the issue of freedom of speech in Canada. Anything else is peripheral. I’ve been in the Alternative Media business with RadicalPress.com since 1998 and at midnight tonight I’ll be forced to remove my website from the net because of the Jewish lobby B’nai Brith’s relentless use of Sec. 319(2) of the CCC where they indict those who criticize the Zionist ideology and the state of Israel. Read my last article on the net. http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=10800
• • •
Free Speech May Now Get You Thrown In Prison In Canada (with Dan Dicks)
“The Truth, like the rising sun, cannot be suppressed once it breaks forth.”
– Arthur Topham
(writing under a post he posted on my Facebook timeline)
From: Radical Press
Freedom Of Speech: Topham vs Kay
By Arthur Topham
On February 7th, 2017 Barbara Kay, long time journalist for the pro-Zionist National Post published an article titled, How long until my honest criticism of Islamism constitutes a speech crime in Canada?
What follows is my response to Kay’s veiled yet disingenuously deceptive hate provoking screed; one, that like all Zionist ‘literary’ works, is never what it appears to be on the surface.
Permit me to answer your questions Barbara regarding your criticisms of Islamic practises and law and how and why they may soon constitute “a hate crime in Canada.”
Following the Zionist modus operandi (“By Way of Deception Though Shalt Cause War”) of always inverting the truth I will begin by partially paraphrasing your own words and switching from “Islamism” to “Zionism” in order to make my point as clearly and succinctly as possible.
“I harbour no animus whatsoever for my fellow JEWISH citizens when I write about these issues.” I have merely changed the religion by substituting Muslim (Islam) for Jewish (Judaism) yet in doing so I already have broken Sec. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code because at the present time Canadians are not permitted to criticize either the state of Israel or people of Jewish ethnicity or religion or even the political ideology of the state of Israel which is Zionism lest they be indicted under Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation contained in Sections 318 to 320 of the Code.
I have been fighting and challenging this sec. of the Canadian Criminal Code here in B.C. since May of 2012 when the foreign Jewish lobby organization B’nai Brith Canada filed a Sec. 319(2) “hate crime” complaint against me and my website RadicalPress.com for doing precisely what you and the National Post and the majority of other “mainstream” newspapers across Canada have been doing repeatedly since at least the start of the first Iraq War back in 1990 and, after 911, the vilification and lies have increased with a vengeance and haven’t ceased to this day. In other words you Barbara Kay, as the representative of the Zionist media, have been overtly and unabashedly promoting “hate” toward people of the Islamic religion or Arab ethnicity for the past 25 years and longer without restraint and all the while have been fully aware of what you are doing and why you are doing it. Your own newspaper was one of the first to begin vilifying and slandering me as soon as the indictment came down in November of 2012.
In the fall of 2015 I was found guilty in BC Supreme Court of one count of promoting “hatred” toward “people of Jewish ethnicity”. Since that time I’ve been involved in a Constitutional challenge to this specious section of the Criminal Code and arguing that Sec. 319(2) of said Code violates Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Sec. 2b which, I’m positive, you are well aware of.
The decision on the Charter argument will be handed down this coming March 11th in B.C. Supreme Court. If I lose the challenge I could face up to a 2 year prison term for criticizing Jews.
Like you Barbara I have “critiqued” Zionist Jew organizations with problematic links to genocide of the Palestinian people and links to criminal acts in contravention of International law and theft of Arab territory in order to build illegal settlements in land that doesn’t belong to the state of Israel. I have commented frequently on the blatant murdering of Palestinian children and women and repeatedly expressed aversion for the racist, supremacist, apartheid system of government that Israel follows where Arab citizens of Israel are not given the same rights as Jewish citizens and are treated as second-class citizens.
And, again to paraphrase your own sophistry, there isn’t a single column I would withdraw or redact in light of all the criminal acts and genocide committed against the defenceless Muslim (and Christian) Arabs of Palestine and I most certainly do not believe anyone in his right mind could possibly be incited to violence by reading my critiques of Zionist crimes against humanity.
..I would rather that these “Hate Propaganda” laws were totally repealed and the country left with a level playing field where ALL citizens had the right to express their opinions and viewpoints on any and all religions and ideologies. That would be the right and democratic way to deal with these Orwellian censorship laws. All else is Zionist deceit.
Red Ice Radio – Arthur Topham – Hour 1 – “Hate Propaganda” Legislation in Canada
I’ve gotten to know Arthur fairly well. He’s a good guy standing up for what is right. What they’ve put him through is unconscionable. If you can help Arthur financially, please do.
From: Radical Press
HELP ARTHUR TOPHAM CHALLENGE CANADA’S REPRESSIVE SEC. 319(2) “HATE PROPAGANDA” LAWS AND DEFEND FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN CANADA
• • •
Entire Article Here
Well said, Arthur!
And if there were more country songs like the one Arthur quotes I might actually start to like country music — which unfortunately is a significant part of the NWO distraction — keeping people in the gutter and away from truth and light.
From: Radical Press
Point of Light By Arthur Topham
“There is a point when you cannot walk away
When you have to stand up straight and tall and mean the words you say
There is a point you must decide, just to do it ’cause it’s right
That’s when you become a point of light.”
~ Randy Travis, Point of Light
As the year 2017 begins to unfold we find ourselves living in a time of extreme darkness and evil. Trailing years of wars, bloodshed and acts of terrorism on par with those of the French Revolution, 2016 inevitably culminated – on New Year’s Eve – with yet another act of satanic bloodletting as if to reassure the masses that any hope of peace is not part of the Devil’s equation.
And so it begs the question for those of us, the seekers of real Truth, Light, Justice and Peace who are now treading ever so lightly upon a world overshadowed by fear, insecurity, doubt and a deep and unnerving sense of suspended hope, what course we will and must follow in the days and months ahead.
The Trump card still remains a mystery….
Let the Light continue to spread in 2017 and let it drive back the darkness and the suffering and the injustices that sorely oppress the bulk of Mankind. The time to stand up and speak out is NOW. Share the Truth and spread the Light and help dispel the NWO night!
From: Radical Press
Canada’s illegal witch-hunt: Arthur Topham trial continues Monday
In a shameful display of state hubris, Canada is using illegal concocted provisions of its Criminal Code to prosecute a citizen for innocuous postings on a personal blog (The Radical Press). The provisions allow a maximum 2-year prison sentence, where the state prosecutor (“Crown”) does not need to prove intent to harm or any actual harm to a single person. Intent and actual harm are not even relevant legal considerations in the proceeding. Both harm and intent are presumed.
The said Criminal Code provisions are straight out of the playbook of a totalitarian state.
The show trial was separated into two parts, despite the objections of the accused. In the first part the accused was found criminally guilty, for one blogpost, while not guilty for the other blogpost of the Crown’s charge. In the second part, which is scheduled to start tomorrow Monday October 3rd, the constitutionality of the law is being challenged on limited grounds. Any sentencing will be decided after the ruling on constitutionality.
The process of thus dividing the show trial into two parts is equivalent to first determining that the witch is guilty of blasphemy or worst, followed by a hearing to determine if burning at the stake in the town square is still within the bounds of community standards, rather than evaluating the legitimacy of the law at the same time (and before the same jury) that the nature of the “offense” is evaluated.
Meanwhile, the “defendant” was gagged from identifying the original complainants (the usual crew) but allowed to continue blogging about the process until a conviction is finally secured, and has mounted a funding campaign for the expensive constitutional challenge.
These kinds of show-trial proceedings and the associated media assaults are attempts to create a false impression of a victimized Israel, to shield the apartheid state from international condemnation for its on-going violations of the Geneva Conventions, illegal annexation, constant violations of human rights, and mass-murder “mowing of the grass” in Gaza. Israel wants a free hand to continuously expand by the same criminal methods it has used for decades. Therefore, when successful, the domestic show trials (most prominent in Canada, France, and Germany) are geopolitical in character by virtue of Israel’s leading role in US interference in the Middle East, with Canada and France as lead accompanying sycophant states.
Monika made this heartfelt, honest, short and sweet video, and key people in Jasper, Alberta have made it very difficult for her. She writes a response below.
Holocaustianity, the New Religion – by Monika Schaefer
There is one event in our history which appears to be off-limits to discuss, debate, ask questions, investigate, or ask for evidence. That event is the so-called Holocaust. It has become a belief system, and if you dare to speak something contrary to this belief system, beware! You may encounter “ritual defamation”. You may be viewed as a heretic. Facts become irrelevant; the main objective is that you are punished severely for going against the stream.
I have been experiencing ritual defamation in my home town of Jasper, Canada, population 5000. …
A strange type of response that I get from many people, is that this topic of holocaust is “off limits” for them, even if they tell me they respect my right to freedom of speech. They tell me outright that they will not discuss or debate this issue, end of story. They refuse to look at any evidence, book, video, or hear any argument from me about why and how I have reached my conclusions. Is this reasonable? Is there any other part of our history which is treated in this way? The unique hold of the holocaust narrative on people’s psyche is what causes me to view it as the new religion of the masses. …
It has become perfectly acceptable in our society to denigrate the religions of Christianity or Islam, but going against “the Holocaust” has severe consequences, including incarceration. …
Only lies need to be protected by laws. The truth stands on its own. Is it not possible to have open debate on the holocaust? …
An extremely important court case is coming up soon. Arthur Topham, publisher of radicalpress.com “digging to the root of the issues since 1998”, will be in the Quesnel Court during the week of October 3 to 7, 2016. This case to repeal the Orwellian hate-speech laws is important for all of us, for our freedom of speech. Who decides what is “hate” speech?
(video) Germar Rudolf exposes Auschwitz’s Curated Lies (PowerPoint) — Part 1: How the Auschwitz Museum dupes millions of visitors • Part 2: How the Auschwitz Museum lies about documents in its archives
All of my Holocaust Real-History Truth articles (10 posts per page, latest appear first)
All of my Germany Real-History Truth articles (10 posts per page, latest appear first)
From: Arthur Topham
CANADA: The New Sodom and Gomorrah? By Arthur Topham
June 4, 2016 by
CANADA: The New Sodom and Gomorrah?
On May 17th, 2016, a day recognized by the federal government as “International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia, and Biphobia”, an edict emanated forth from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office (PMO) stating that the Liberal government was planning to make additional changes to the “Hate Propaganda” laws (Sections 318 to 320) of the Criminal Code of Canada in order to “protect” the nation’s sexually deviant members.
The unabashed and strident manner in which the federal government is pushing forward with its controversial agenda of planned perversion and subversion of Canadian society (under the guise of supposed “human rights” for sexual aberrants) is an issue fraught with deep and troubling concern, not only those Canadians of the Christian faith who prefer to rely upon the eternal wisdom of God and Nature but also for millions of other citizens whose moral standards won’t permit them to accept the subversive and sinister hidden aim within the government’s mandate to criminalize public dissent and discussion on moral, ethical and health standards affecting the nation as a whole.
In the words of the PM, “To do its part, the Government of Canada today will introduce legislation that will help ensure transgender and other gender-diverse people can live according to their gender identity, free from discrimination, and protected from hate propaganda and hate crimes.”
The reality that the federal government intends to expand rather than repeal Section 318 – 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code is disconcerting in itself given the excessively subjective nature of this draconian section of the Code. The concept of “Hate Propaganda” as a “criminal offence” is nothing less than a blatant example of government mind control; one that, here in Canada, has proven itself over the last half century of contentious litigation, to be extremely controversial, provocative and unjust and a clear and present danger to freedom of expression or “free speech” as defined by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The alarm bells ought to be ringing across the country at the thought of this new “Liberal” government of Justin Trudeau pulling the Orwellian zipper of censorship even tighter over the mouths of Canada’s citizens than his predecessor Harper. It appears to be a new day but still the same old shit – of increasingly repressive laws and greater restrictions on individual freedoms theoretically guaranteed by our Charter.
In fact the threat of expanding Canada’s “hate” laws to include ‘Tranny’(i.e. transvestite) protection has already angered and incensed Canadian bloggers as we see in the following reaction by Kathy Shaidle, one of the veterans of the previous “Section 13” wars that were ongoing during Harper’s reign.
As I’ve stated numerous times and especially in my essay Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws, these Communist-inspired laws were surreptitiously and deliberately put in place through the mendacious actions of various Jewish lobby organizations such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and, more recently, the newly-formed Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs, all of whom have worked in tandem for decades to ensure that issues to do with Israel and its Zionist ideological political system would ultimately fall within this section of the Code and therefore make any truthful and factual statements about important civil and national issues indictable offences.
What must be clearly understood from the start when discussing the issue of “Hate Propaganda” laws is that the notion of elevating the natural emotional feeling of hatred into a pseudo-legal category wherein it becomes an indictable offence is purely an invention of the Zionist Jews and in certain respects an historical concomitant of the Bolshevik era’s Leninist/Stalinist totalitarian terror regimes. One could rightly state that its essential character is embodied in such classics of “hate” literature as Germany Must Perish!, a book written back in 1941 by the Jewish author Theodore N. Kaufman with the sole purpose of inciting America to hate Germany and then translate that hatred into the USA joining the Allies in their unjust war against the National Socialist government of Germany.
In a previous article entitled Canada: Hypocrite Nation Ruled by Zionist Deception & anti-Free Speech Laws I had the following to say about these despicable, sham legal subterfuges disguised as legitimate jurisprudence:
“The war to silence Canadians and stymie any public speech that the Jewish lobby felt might negatively impact them or Israel in any way (either on or off the internet), gained its foothold back in 1977 when the federal government first implemented the so-called Canadian Human Rights Act and created its attendant enforcement agencies, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Both the commission and the tribunal were quasi-judicial, i.e. “crazy” judicial in that they basically set their own rules and guidelines and consistently changed the “legal” goal posts depending upon whatever case they were dealing with, in order to ensure a conviction. If fact, of the hundreds of Canadians dragged before these Stalinist style “Show Trial” tribunals, EVERYONE was found guilty for the simple reason that all it took was for someone to register a complain against them and that, in itself, sealed their fate. When I describe Section 13 as a “Bolshevik” type law I do so with the full knowledge that under the former Soviet system, Lenin, in one of the regime’s very first acts upon gaining absolute power, was to make “anti-Semitism” a crime punishable by death. Death, that is, without so much as a trial even. All it would take, (just as with the Section 13 “complaints”) was for someone to accuse another of said crime and the Cheka (soviet secret police) had the excuse to liquidate the victim.”
Reporting on this issue in Christian News Heather Clark remarks that apart from the criminal aspects of this proposed legislation there are those like Charles McVety, president of the Institute for Canadian Values and others who consider the bill to be “nebulous and reckless.”
Clark’s article goes on, “Bill C-16 is so vague, it is unenforceable,” he [McVety] said in a statement. “The fluid nature of gender identity is so nebulous that people can change their gender identity moment by moment. In that the bill seeks to change the Criminal Code of Canada, people may be sent to prison for two years over something that is ill-defined, and indeterminable.”
“It is also reckless as the proposed law will establish universal protection for any man who wishes to access women’s bathrooms or girls’ showers with momentary gender fluidity,” McVety continued. “Every Member of Parliament should examine their conscience over the potential of their vote exposing women and girls to male genitalia.”
In the context of our Charter rights Clark says, “There is also uncertainty as to how the law will be applied to free speech. As previously reported, in 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the conviction of activist William Whatcott, who found himself in hot water after distributing flyers regarding the Bible’s prohibitions against homosexuality throughout the Saskatoon and Regina neighborhoods in 2001 and 2002.”
As Charles McVety rightfully stated the proposed Bill C-16 is definitely “nebulous and reckless” but as past convictions in both the cases of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and Section 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code show, simply because it’s “vague” doesn’t mean that it isn’t “enforceable”. All it takes are judges and justices within the Canadian judicial system who will interpret and lend credence to subjective definitions of nebulous terms such as “hatred” so that they may then shapeshift into whatever meaning the Crown wishes in order to fit the charge. No better example currently exists than the latest and most severe case of Whatcott.
Conclusion: What’s coming next?
During the heated Sec. 13 Campaign here in Canada when the Canadian Human Rights Act was being wielded like a club by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and bloggers around the country were being bludgeoned and jailed, fined and nailed to the “hate crime” cross the Zionist element within the Conservative Right finally realized that the Sec. 13 legislation no longer was serving just their purposes but was being turned against them as well. As a result they garnered the support of Canada’s Zionist media monopoly and the lobbying to repeal the specious section of the Act was eventually accomplished back in June of 2012. Unfortunately they weren’t smart enough to realize that the “Hate Propaganda” laws within the Criminal Code were even more insidious than Sec. 13. They figured that as long as Sec. 319(2) of the ccc was there and could be used against critics of Israel and anyone else accused of “anti-Semitism” then that was just fine with them. To hell (or jail) with “freedom of speech” if it meant allowing bloggers to speak openly and frankly about the Jews or the Zionist empire builders.
But the tables appear to be turning once again as the new Liberal government of Justin Trudeau begins forcing their faggot philosophy down the throats of unwilling Canadians and then, on top of that monumental insult, threatens the nation with increased criminal penalties of up to two years in jail for anyone who doesn’t want to go happily and gayly along down the road to Sodom and Gomorrah carrying their little rainbow flag in hand.
Will they eventually start campaigning to repeal these anti-free speech laws contained in Sec. 318 to 320 of the Criminal Code and get rid of the last vestiges of Orwellian censorship in Canada?
Time will soon tell.
The upcoming challenge to this Zionist-created false flag legislation will determine once and for all whether or not Canada will adhere to the spirit and intent of its Charter of Rights and Freedoms or continue to bow down to foreign interests and sacrificing its citizen’s fundamental rights.
Please try to assist in this process by making a small donation to the cause. My GoGetFunding site can be found here: http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/
Standing for Canada and our democratic ideals I remain,
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
If you can help Arthur, please help him fight this important cause!
(video) Arthur Topham’s FREE SPEECH on TRIAL IN CANADA!! w/Brian Ruhe — “All of these so-called ‘HATE CRIME LAWS’ are BASED ON A LIE. That in itself is reason to get rid of them” • The homosexual agenda is used to strengthen the ‘hate crimes’ • “If we had the MONEY they have we could counter them with actual truth” • “TRUTH WILL PREVAIL in the end and LOVE WILL PREVAIL OVER HATE”
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN CANADA STILL UNDER ATTACK! CANADIAN PUBLISHER FACING JAIL FOR POLITICAL WRITINGS NOW PURSUING CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE AND REQUIRES FUNDING FOR AN EXPERT WITNESS
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN CANADA STILL UNDER ATTACK!
CANADIAN PUBLISHER FACING JAIL FOR POLITICAL WRITINGS NOW PURSUING A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE AND REQUIRES FUNDING FOR AN EXPERT WITNESS
Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms under Sec. 2b of the Charter states:
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
Dear Free Speech Supporters,
My name is Arthur Topham and I am the owner, publisher and editor of the online alternative News site RadicalPress.com which has been operating in Canada since 1998. Since 2007 I have been involved in legal battles with the Canadian government – first the Canadian Human Rights Commission (2007) and now the federal legal system (2012) over alleged offences that purportedly violate Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” laws (Sections 318 – 320) of the Canadian Criminal Code (CCC).
On May 16th, 2012 I was charged with a Sec. 319(2) ccc “Hate Propaganda” violation. I was arrested and jailed and my home was entered illegally by the RCMP’s “Hate Crime Team” who proceeded to steal all of my computers and electronic files. Since that date I have been involved in a protracted and onerous legal battle, first with the British Columbia provincial court and now with the British Columbia Supreme Court.
My trial, known as R v Roy Arthur Topham, finally got underway Monday, October 26, 2015 in Quesnel, B.C., twelve hundred and fifty-eight days (1258) after my arrest on May 16, 2012. The Indictment stated that I, Arthur Topham, did “willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, people of the Jewish religion or ethnic origin, contrary to Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”
I was charged on two separate occasions using the same section of the Criminal Code (Sec. 319(2)) and after a 14-day trial ending on November 12th, 2015 – presided over by Supreme Court Justice, Mr. Bruce Butler and consisting of a 12-member jury of my peers (8 women and 4 men) – I was found Guilty on the first charge (Count 1) and Not Guilty on the second charge (Count 2).
Given that both counts were based upon the same section of the Criminal Code, i.e., Sec. 319(2) the dual and conflicting verdicts pose a serious legal problem which will be challenged in the days ahead.
What this now means is that I am moving on to the next stage of the legal battle by challenging the Constitutional legitimacy of the actual section of the Canadian Criminal Code (Sec. 319(2) now containing the infamous “Hate Propaganda” legislation which threatens freedom of expression for all Canadians.
The future of Sec. 319(2) of Canada’s Criminal Code will depend in part on the outcome of the planned Constitutional challenge. On March 29, 2016 I was scheduled to appear in Quesnel Supreme court to “fix a date” for the upcoming legal challenge. I appeared but defence and prosecution counsel couldn’t resolve some secondary issues and a new date was set for April 4, 2016 at 9:45 am. During the session Crown Prosecutor Rodney G. Garson, a special Crown Prosecutor out of the Prosecution Support Unit within the Crown Law Division of the Ministry of Justice stated to presiding S.C. Justice Williams that he felt setting a date for the Charter challenge to be heard by June of 2016 might be somewhat optimistic on my counsel’s part as because Crown has to go through the data on the Expert Witnesses that Defense will be calling. So chances are that the hearing may not occur until late June or even beyond that point in time. In the interim period leading up to that challenge I remain free to publish and carry on with soliciting for funding in order to persevere in my efforts to have this unconstitutional section of Canada’s Criminal Code repealed.
The next crucial step demands additional funding to defray the cost of paying an expert witness to appear (via video) at the planned Constitutional challenge. I must raise an additional $2,000.00 U.S. funds in order for this to happen. This translates into approximately $2,600.00 Canadian. There is also the possibility of a second witness being called but at this time I’m not able to confirm this as fact.
Should the challenge to Sec. 319(2) fail then the next step will be an appeal of the guilty verdict in Count 1.
I continue to have the support of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association. Please see here Ontario Civil Liberties Association and here http://ocla.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/2014-09-24-Letter-OCLA-to-AG-of-BC.pdf and here OCLA writes to Attorney General Anton on September 24, 2014
For the most recent account of the proceedings regarding the trial and future plans to undertake a Constitutional challenge please go here:
I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE STILL IN ORDER TO WIN THIS CASE. The purchasing of the court transcripts of the trial and now carrying on with the Constitutional challenge to the legislation require me to ask for further financial support in order to win this battle to protect Canada’s Constitutional Rights and Freedoms as contained in theCharter.
Please try to donate online using this GoGetFunding site but if you are unable to do so then try helping out by sending either cash, a cheque or a Money Order to the following postal address. Please make sure that all cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:
4633 Barkerville Highway
Thank You so much!
From: radicalpress.com/?p=9097 (where Arthur has a DONATE button to this worthy cause!)
THE TRIAL: REGINA V ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM
February 28, 2016
Editor’s Note: With the exception of the final Charge to the Jury by B.C.S.C. Justice Butler the full transcript of the trial proceedings in the case of R V ROY ARTHUR TOPHAM from October 26, 2015 to November 12, 2015 are contained in the following pdf files.
It is suggested that these files be downloaded for future reference and in the interest of securing a permanent record of this important free speech trial in Canada.
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”