World Affairs Brief, December 2, 2011 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World. Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)

THIS WEEK’S ANALYSIS:

Indefinite Detention Battle Lost

Worldwide Bailout Starting without Congressional Consent

Middle East – Iran War Update

Egyptian Elections: Military Still Holds the Cards

Cell Phone tracking Taken to a New Level

Cain is Toast, Gingrich is the Only Insider Still Standing

More Evidence 9/11 Planes were Switched with other Aircraft

[…]

EVIDENCE 9/11 PLANES WERE SWITCHED WITH OTHER AIRCRAFT

In the following video presentation by Pilots for 9/11 Truth, of which I am a member [Joel is a former Marine fighter jet pilot – ToBeFree editor], the case of the RADES radar tracks is shown where each airplane involved in 9/11 is shown rendezvousing with another aircraft in flight, whereupon one aircraft turns and assumes the other’s course heading back to the East Coast.

Airliners cross paths with others all the time on the radar screen, but they almost never make a circling turn at that very point and head off into a new direction. If it happened to only one aircraft, that would be one thing. But it happened to each of the supposed hijacked liners, and that indicates that there was coordination between twice as many airplanes as struck on 9/11.

This is the “Aircraft Swap” theory which is gaining credibility since it alone explains several anomalies such as 1) Why Flight 93’s supposed crash in rural Pennsylvania has almost no debris (indicating no airliner size crash), 2) Why FAA registration numbers for both United aircraft still persisted in the air traffic system two and three years after 9/11 until someone started to notice, 3) why the 757 that hit the South Tower appeared to have a huge bulging modification on the belly. No regular line pilot could have missed that weird belly mod during his preflight inspection and accepted that craft for flight.

Greg Szymanski wrote that “FAA records for four years listed both 9/11 United jetliners as still on the ‘active’ list. Now the planes were only ‘deregistered’ in September (2004) after snoopy researchers questioned FAA officials a month earlier. Two of the 9/11 airliners were never ‘deregistered’ and remained on the ‘active’ flight list until Sept. 28. 2005, the classification officially changing only a month after two inquisitive flight researchers made repeated calls to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), inquiring about the strange irregularity.

“The two planes in question were Flight 93 and Flight 175, both owned and operated by United Airlines and, according to the official story, both destroyed on 9/11, one in Shanksville, Penn., and the other crashing into the South Tower of the WTC.”

Here’s a short video presentation of the Radar tracks showing one of the converging swaps:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=21411

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iwpBEB2pLs#!]

Just recently, Pilots for 9/11 Truth found additional evidence that at least one of the planes was still in the air after the crash into the WTC. “Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) is a device used to send messages to and from an aircraft. ACARS Messages have been provided through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) which demonstrate that the aircraft received messages through ground stations located in Harrisburg, PA, and then later routed through a ground station in Pittsburgh, 20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted the South Tower in New York. How can messages be routed through such remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier?” Read the entire article here: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ACARS-CONFIRMED-911-AIRCRAFT-AIRBORNE-LONG-AFTER-CRASH.html