I thought I’d post this Facebook conversation I just had with a friend who has done some serious exposés on the globalists.
I thought it would be good to put online my findings about the Pentagon security camera footage showing a 757-sized object hitting the building, not a missile as many are saying.
Jeff Fenske LOL! Hey, ____, I actually looked into that. There is damage the length of an airplane on the Kevlar reinforced wall of the building, but the aluminum shattered into tiny pieces when it hit, so the only holes are where the fuselage and the engines were.
The landing gear and the shafts of the engines were the toughest aircraft parts. And the landing gear found inside does match a 757 airplane’s gear. I used to work with 757s, and I compared the picture myself.
Jeff Fenske They are. Before I had my blog I had an email list, and send out links for it. There are photos in which they show the facade of the building close up, and there was one in which they lined showed where the holes from the engines were and how they lined up exactly with where the 757 engines were. | The light poles knocked down were also the width of a 757.
Jeff Fenske I also looked at the fullscreen version of the released security footage from the Pentagon that they released, and did some measurements.
People thought the incoming object was too small to be an airplane, but the lens was wide angle. I’m a photographer. That makes the building look much bigger near the camera, and objects far away very tiny.
I found the known height of the Pentagon online and the actual diameter of a 757 fuselage. I think the front section was something like 12 feet.
I measured on my TV the height of the building in the foreground, and then where the plane/missile hit, and compared that ratio with the measurement I took of the incoming object on my TV. And it turned out to be within about 2 feet of what would be expected for the size of a 757 fuselage.
_____ ______ i spent some time examining these photographs as well … and rthe testimony of at least TWO eye witnesses to the “jet” who said it was a “SMALL COMMUTER JET” … the photogrqaphs I saw early on in this event …. showed NO damage to the exterior walls where the wings should have entered the building … so that leaves me puzzled …
Jeff Fenske Joel Skousen had also been thinking it was a missile because there was a white flash (I think it was white. Not sure). But there were also flashes when the planes hit the twin towers.
There may have been something explosive in the nose of the airplanes, or near the nose.
A really good audio report on what happened is here; though, this guy doesn’t understand that jet fuel can’t take down the towers. I totally believe that thermite or something took down all three towers. There is no way sooty black burning jet fuel can melt fireproof steel. You know all of that. I just wanted you to know that I’m probably with you on everything else regarding 9/11.
Bummer, the YouTube audio doesn’t work on this anymore. But if you can get the audio if you sign up for “Coast’s” Streamlink. Or maybe it’s still online elsewhere for free. This link is from my blog. I have some links here to some other significant posts too:
Airline Captain Philip Marshall with John B. Wells on ‘Coast to Coast AM’ 9/8/12: “The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror” — Fasten your seatbelt — the sad truth is that all of the solid evidence points to a dark collaboration between members of the Bush Administration and a covert group of Saudi government officials. The hijackers were trained at a CIA-operated airport in Arizona.
Jeff Fenske I just found this. Looks like a good analysis. It looks like they changed their mind after they wrote the original article. Not sure. The photo I saw was much bigger, which showed the wall damage even more clearly.http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pentagon/conclusion.html
Jeff Fenske Regarding eyewitness testimony. None of us have ever seen a 757 fly at 500mph near the ground. That would be so fast, and sound so radically loud that they probably only saw it for a second, maybe.
Top architect explains why 9/11 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and Al Qaeda didn’t have the technology or access to do it. Who did? Two months before the ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION PROJECT, Nick ROCKEFELLER predicted a 9/11-like event to trigger war!
Airline Captain Philip Marshall with John B. Wells on ‘Coast to Coast AM’ 9/8/12: “The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror” — Fasten your seatbelt — the sad truth is that all of the solid evidence points to a dark collaboration between members of the Bush Administration and a covert group of Saudi government officials. The hijackers weretrained at a CIA-operated airport in Arizona.
God is a 9-11 Truther — “It is past time for Christian leaders and pastors and churches get on the side of TRUTH regarding the 9/11 attacks because God is there. God is on the side of the TRUTH, and deception was the intent of the US 9/11 Commission Report.”
Architect Richard Gage on 9/11 truth: “98% of those who watch this presentation end up agreeing with us…. We really only get called conspiracy theorists and kooks by those who are UNWILLING TO LOOK at the evidence.”
All of my 9/11 truth posts in reverse chronological order (latest posts appear first, 10 posts per page)