After 16 years, significantly, all truth seekers and tellers agree that jet planes did not take down the Twin Towers plus Building 7. It’s been scientifically proven through peer review papers. And the University of Alaska just finished a study concluding the official explanation for Building 7’s free-fall collapse is false.
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have proven the use of nano-thermite at the Twin Towers. Some truthers now claim that mini-nukes were used either instead of, or in addition to — as in Jim Fetzer.
Some even claim that no planes hit the Towers, the “no plane” theory — as in Jim Fetzer.
What’s frustrating to me is how there are too many emotionally charged opinions and not enough discussions, so truthers don’t get on the same page. Mike tells John Stadtmiller (link below) that he and Jim have talked about having a debate, but Mike doesn’t seem to be interested enough for it to happen.
More importantly, a debate, or better yet, a discussion between James Fetzer and Richard Gage (A&E for 911 Truth) could be very fruitful, as long as Jim Fetzer would be open to what the truth really is, instead of emotionally pushing his opinions to win. Truthers need to appreciate each other more.
Also, who did it is more important than how it happened. Few talk show hosts are willing to have Christopher Bollyn on, or everyone would know.
Here is the current feud between Mike and Jim:
– –
Michael Rivero of the “What Really Happened Show” tells his side of the story here:
The National Intel Report with John Stadtmiller, September 27, 2017 Hour 1
Michael Rivero joins John to discuss Jim Fetzer and poisoning the well.
James Fetzer of “The Real Deal” And “The Raw Deal” writes his side here:
Thursday, September 21, 2017
Michael Rivero blows his cover as a 9/11 gatekeeper
When governmentslaves.com published a recent piece on the importance of the alternative on-line media, highlighting the contributions of Matt Drudge, Steve Quayle, Michael Rivero and Jeff Rense, I anticipated that it would not be long before they would come under attack by the truth suppressors:
I did not have long to wait because Media Matters, which is run by David Brock–reported to be the boyfriend of James Alifantis, notorious as the owner of Comet Ping-Pong Pizza and central to the PizzaGate scandal–launched an attack upon Drudge as an instrument of Russian propaganda:
where serious students of current affairs know that RT (Russia Today) and Sputnik News are among the most accurate and reliable news sources in the world today, unlike The Washington Post and The New York Times, which have long since been absorbed as instruments of propaganda by the CIA.
Rivero attacks Me over 9/11
I anticipated that other attacks on Rivero and on Rense, where my show, “The Raw Deal”, is broadcast over renseradio.com, would be forthcoming. But imagine my surprise when I received the following from one of my followers who was reporting that Rivero had been attacking me instead:
Indeed, between 46:40 and 48:40, in response to what I believe to have been a prearranged call, he attacks me in a 2-minute exchange for my positions on the use of holograms and mini nukes in New York, that no plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11 and even (surprisingly) that we did not land on the moon:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGZ84LZgF2g
The caller had no problem with the towers having been destroyed by plane impacts and jet-fuel based fires, which is physically impossible. They were too robust for any real plane to penetrate them, which was why they had to be faked. He called in for expert advice, but Rivero reinforced his ignorance. …
“The Kookification Squad”
According to Rivero, I am part of “that kookifcation squad and their job is to make anybody that’s questioning the official story look bad . . . this idea of no plane at the Pentagon was ginned up out of thin air in order to tarnish the truth movement.”
Leave a Reply