Chomsky is strange. I sat with him and about a dozen other students (including Frank G.) around a table at the University of Alaska Anchorage in the late ’80s. He seemed unrelatable, distant, which may be on purpose. Chomsky was giving us some truth, but he’s so out there in the ozone he was hard to follow.

My linguistic professor thought Chomsky was brilliant as a linguist, and often quoted him. But when it comes to truth telling on anything Israel, perhaps Chomsky goes into spin cycle, using his mastery of the English language to cover up.

– –

From: American Herald Tribune

July 13 ,2016

BY Prof. Tony Hall

9/11 and the Zionist Question: Is Noam Chomsky a Disinfo Agent for Israel?

The Global War on Terror, 2001-2016: Fifteen Years of the 9/11 Cover Up

Part 1

The Kevin Barrett-Chomsky Dispute in Historical Perspective – First part of the series titled “9/11 and the Zionist Question”

Prof. Tony Hall

Editor In Chief, American Herald Tribune

Co-Host, False Flag Weekly News

Dr. Kevin Barrett has characterized the Global War on Terror as a global war on Muslims for Israel. Noam Chomsky disagrees. He has made himself a very significant nemesis to Kevin Barrett. Barrett is one of the most unrelenting researchers and publicists in the 9/11 Truth Movement. So far Chomsky has been quite effective in deploying his enormous prestige to prevent the citizens’ investigation on 9/11 from receiving a fair hearing, but especially in the foundation-funded platforms of progressive, Left, and anti-war activism.

This opening part introduces my essay, “9/11 and the Zionist Question: Is Noam Chomsky a Disinfo Agent for Israel?” In due course the larger paper will be published in its entirety here at American Herald Tribune. This essay explores the antagonisms between Kevin Barrett and Noam Chomsky with particular emphasis on the research and scholarship on false flag terrorism and especially on the contested events of 9/11. The argument is advanced that Prof. Chomsky has quite purposely promoted an agenda of cover up on 9/11, reducing himself to the level of crude propagandists and paid proponents of the dominant 9/11 narrative such as Jonathan Kay and Michael Shermer.

Entire Article