9-11 was an inside job.
April 6, 2009
The following link about the scientific evidence of thermite discovered in the dust from the WTC was immediately deleted after I posted it on Representativepress’ YouTube Page:
“Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen”
My comment about Bhutto and her statement that Osama Bin Laden is dead and the link indicated directly below was also deleted after it was posted on Representativepress’ YouTube page.
Representativepress was making the deduction that Bhutto mispoke when she said Bin Laden was dead. I think Representativepress may be correct in his assessment, and I commented as much. However, I also commented that the assumptions that Bhutto was killed because of this “slip” were moot and completely “missing the point” as to why she was assassinated. Hence, the link to the article:
Representativepress’ video about 9-11:
Representativepress’ video about Benazir Bhutto’s comment that Bin Laden is dead:
From: Pilots for 9-11 Truth:
“Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day based on solid data and facts — since 9/11/2001 is the catalyst for many of the events shaping our world today — and the United States Government doesn’t seem to be very forthcoming with answers or facts.
We stand with the Scholars, Veterans and Architects & Engineers for Truth along side family members of the victims — family members of soldiers who have made the ultimate sacrifice — including the many Ground Zero workers who are now ill or have passed away, when we ask for a true, new independent investigation into the events of 9/11. We do not accept the 9/11 Commission Report and/or “hypothesis” as a satisfactory explanation for the sacrifice every American has made and continues to make — some more than others.”
“Members of the Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-eleven come from a variety of professional backgrounds. Some investigate aspects of the 9/11 attacks, others search the web for useful information, and some write up new material. We have tried to maintain professional standards in both the analysis and presentation of the evidence we have assembled, as well as in the scenarios we have constructed.
The investigative work of the Panel proceeds in the directions that head our list of articles: What Did Not Happen and What May Have Happened. By clicking on the titles of these sections, you may read a brief illustration of the differences required in the two approaches.
The background information section provides important documents and articles related to the attacks on September 11, 2001.
General Statement by the Panel:
“We have found solid scientific grounds on which to question the interpretation put upon the events of September 11, 2001 by the Office of the President of the United States of America and subsequently propagated by the major media of western nations. Our analysis of the detailed evidence implies a staged attack employing a variety of deceptive arrangements. Indeed, every element of the September 11 attacks, including cellphone calls from fast-moving aircraft, has an alternate means of creation.”
Panel members are scientists, engineers, and other professionals. All contribute through search and research.
41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 Official Account of 9/11: Terribly Flawed, Laced with Contradictions, a Joke, a Cover-up