But we had to download the original data from github to see that because they didn’t mention it in the paper. The bottom line: mask are a complete joke with no science to back it up. Pure politics.

Steve Kirsch

The Bangladesh mask study written by scientists from Stanford and Yale is now published in Science!!! So now nobody in mainstream medicine can attack the study.

The nice thing is the study showed that masks don’t work, but you’d never know it from reading the paper. You’d only know it if you saw the actual data. And they don’t show you the actual data. They only want you to see the data that supports the “masks work” narrative. They do NOT want you to see the data that doesn’t.

When you actually look at the data, the study showed masks make NO difference.

We asked the authors for the original data and we plotted the results for purple masks vs. placebo.

Guess what? Yup. NO DIFFERENCE!

Purple cloth masks (shown above) made no difference. Red cloth masks worked really well, better than the surgical masks (see text). The entire Bangladesh study was statistical noise; there was no measurable effect.

They never even mentioned purple cloth masks made no difference whatsoever. It had ZERO effect. ZERO.

Was this graph noted in the paper? Nope. It was NOWHERE TO BE FOUND IN THE PAPER!

This isn’t science folks. This is politics driving the narrative and it couldn’t be any more clear than this paper. It is Exhibit A on how to fool other scientists and the public by hiding the data.

Entire Article