World Affairs Brief, September 15, 2017 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.

Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).

This Week’s Analysis:
9/11 Revisited—The Latest Analysis
Trump Sells Out on Immigration
China Warns Trump Against Preemptive Strike on NK

9/11 REVISITED–THE LATEST ANALYSIS

As another anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks passes, the official version continues to be drummed into the American psyche, even though it is almost totally untrue. The attack on 9/11 was a carefully planned government black operation, with a corresponding cover-up of the mountains of evidence that only point to government control and involvement throughout the attack. Fortunately, the 9/11 truth movement is now led intellectually by scientists and other professionals, as shown by the emergence of various organizations, including Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice (which includes scientists), Veterans for 9/11 Truth, and the Scientific Panel to Investigate 9/11. The movement also includes several former intelligence officers. Thanks to these professionals, the evidence that the official story is false is now overwhelming. The only problem is to get people to look at the evidence. Once they are willing to do this, they quickly see that the official story simply cannot be true. This week, I’ll review the latest evidence and analysis in the hopes that it will provide you with the means of convincing others about how powerful and dangerous the Deep State really is. Of course, the Deep State is still with us, despite having elected Donald Trump who promised to “drain the swamp,” so this isn’t some past or idle threat.

About 3340 people died in this attack, including 343 firefighters and police who were trapped in the buildings when they were demolished by explosives. Many firefighters are angry that Mayor Rudolph Giuliani knew the towers was going to collapse and didn’t warn those inside to get out. He claimed “no one can possible expect that airplanes would hit the towers,” which wasn’t true at all. The level of death was more than the 2400 that died at Pearl Harbor, another government-created attack, induced by a six point plan by the Roosevelt Administration to provoke Japan into attacking the US (see Robert Stinnett’s book: Day of Deceit).

The more you learn about the 9/11 attack, the more you will be astounded by the level of conspiracy and coordination it took to pull this off and silence witnesses and participants. None of these things could have been done by foreign terrorists, or anyone else except people with access to government power, including:

●          Radio-controlled demolition charges loaded into the 3 WTC buildings in the months prior

●          Military exercises planned to make sure fighter interceptors were not available and to confuse military radar operators with tens of simulated planes on their screens

●          Planes were swapped for highly modified airline drones

●          Radio transmissions by “hijackers” not on planes were created to confuse ATC

●          Passenger and flight attendant cell phone calls were staged after planes landed.

●          Photographic evidence of passengers boarding the planes were hidden and faked tapes created of terrorists going through security.

●          Warnings were given to select insiders to avoid flying on that day.

●          Certain insiders with advance knowledge shorted airline stocks.

●          All private security camera footage of the Pentagon attack were confiscated within minutes and the Pentagon parking lot video was edited before being leaked.

●          Passengers from the each flight were ultimately taken away and eliminated.

●          All of the aircraft themselves continued to fly in the airline system after the attack.

●          Black boxes were hidden away and replacements falsified to create false recordings data.

●          No aircraft part or black box serial numbers were used to track provenance of crash parts

●          Replacement photo I.D’s and passports of hijackers were planted at crash sites.

While I don’t have the space go through all the evidence of government cover-up and involvement in 9/11 again, I will cover some of the new information that clarifies the above bullet points. Some of the most dramatic evidence comes from the explosives used in the demolition of each of the WTC buildings, I and II and VII.

Jim Hoffman has compiled a comprehensive chemical analysis detailing the telltale signs of thermate compounds found in the World Trade Center debris dust including research from Prof. Steven Jones summarizing proof that this steel melting chemical compound was used for demolition purposes. The Open Chemical Physics Journal presents the long-awaited formal publication of the findings of red/grey chips in the WTC dust, which Steven Jones first presented in 2007 in Boston, and details the extensive analyses conducted to conclude that active thermitic [Thermate explosives] material was in the dust.

Thermite or Thermate is an extremely hot burning compound with its own oxygen supply that causes large bodies of metal to melt. The main central columns of WTC 1 and 2 were over 4 feet across and almost 2 feet thick composed of 5″ thick steel vertical slabs welded together. Conventional explosives would have been so massive to cut all 48 columns simultaneously that it would have been obvious the building had been exploded from the basement, rather than from where the aircraft hit. So, by using thermite charges surrounding the columns they would have melted rather than exploded, setting the stage for cutting charges to blow the outer building facade sequentially to mimic a collapse.

There was a smaller explosion to start the thermite charges burning in the basement. William Rodriguez, the janitor, documents that there was a blast in the basement of the north tower before the airplane struck. Also, firefighters who entered the tower before it collapsed said that there had been a blast there too from the basement and all the lobby windows were blown out and there was black smoke residue at the top of the lobby ceiling. This could not have been burning jet fuel coming down the elevator shafts as the debunkers say, because it happened before the crash.

Whoever was in charge of triggering the demolition of the outside walls waited until he saw the antennas (which were over the core pillars) start descending downward. On all of the videos of the collapse, you can see the antenna towers start to descend first. Additional proof that the core columns were compromised first is that the outer walls are being pulled in (buckling inward) as the core descends. The trusses which connect the outer walls to the central core were pulling the outer walls inward and down as the core started down.

Both high rise towers 1 and 2 were designed to withstand a collision and subsequent fire from an airliner, and no steel framed structure has ever collapsed from fire before or after 9/11. Indeed, both WTC 1 and 2 did survive the crash and the fires were small and subsiding when the collapse began. The demolition of WTC buildings 1 and 2, hit by airplanes, was done by a sophisticated form of sequentially controlled demolition to collapse each floor below before it would stop or slow down the rubble from above. This automatic collapse caused the lower portions of the building to fail sequentially and look like the top portion was crushing the lower part.

Physically it is impossible for the top portion to crush the entire bottom portion. As scientists from Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth have pointed out, even if every piece of falling building had impacted on the building below, the laws of physics show that at most an equal portion of the collapsing top and the resisting bottom portion of the building should have been destroyed and then the energy of the falling top would be used up (all crushed) and the collapse of the remaining bottom portion should have stopped.

However, both buildings showed the same crucial signs of explosive demolition of the lower part during the fall: little or no resistance from the floors below, sounds of explosions triggering the fall, and multiple explosions going off on the way down so as to make it appear as if the top were crushing each floor below.

Additional proof is in the collapse of the South Tower, which happened first. Because the damage from flight 175 was only to one corner the initial charge started the collapse going and the top of the tower starts to tilt to one side. That tilt continues because the explosive charge sequence below the initial explosion is too slow and the building is resisting the crush from above. Without explosive charges, the lower part of the building would have continued resisting (even as it is sustaining some damage) the top portion would continue its tilt until it falls off to the side.

But in the video recordings of the event, we see the tilt gets to about 20 degrees and suddenly it stops tilting and starts falling straight down. This proves that the resistance from the bottom part of the building had been completely removed . All of this was accomplished using explosives set every few floors, triggered sequentially to match the speed of the fall as it is descending.

As I said before, everyone can observe the antenna array on top of the north building descending slightly before the building itself begins to fall—a sign that the central core columns had been compromised—and not by the plane. Only a few of the columns on one side could have been damaged directly by the plane—not nearly enough to cause all 48 to fail simultaneously.
In fact, the core columns were already melting down in the basement. These columns at the base were too massive for conventional cutting charges. Someone with access to the building cut holes into the hollow columns and loaded them with thermite—capable of melting any metal with white hot heat once ignited. The collapse of the central core, which took several hours, was probably the sign to the demolition crew to trigger the charges at the point of damage.

The use of thermite to slowly melt the columns is also the only thing that explains the presence of all the huge pools of melted metal at the base of the Twin Towers that continued putting out smoke and heat for months. The witness testimonies of seeing molten metal pouring out of the building at higher levels indicates that thermite burning charges were also used higher up on the columns as well. Jet fuel and office debris does not burn anywhere near hot enough to melt steel.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have produced a couple of videos that will convince almost all but the most hardened skeptics. The first is a must see, the second gives an even wider spectrum of the experts who agree that only controlled demolition explains the uniform fall of this building. These presentations are some of the best to share with others.

The Airplanes and Hijackers: As has been widely reported, six of the “hijackers” were still alive after 9/11. To excuse this embarrassing error, the FBI came out and admitted that some ID’s may have been stolen, but in order not to discredit the “official version” the government has never removed their names and pictures from the official lists.

I was skeptical of the government claims when they admitted they already had all these persons of interest in the FBI terrorist database before the hijacking, and that their history of drinking, gambling and carousing with women didn’t match the profile of Muslim religious extremists. When the government refused to allow the surveillance footage of passengers boarding the planes to be released to the public, I suspected they were hiding the identity of the real hijackers, trained to fly big jets (if they were ever present at all—which became a question later).

As criticism mounted, the FBI produced a video of Mohammed Atta going through security gates, hoping the public would now accept the official list. But it was quickly pointed out by critics that this particular video was a smooth continuous video—unlike real surveillance footage which takes photos every other second or so. More importantly, all official surveillance footage has a rolling date/time stamp visible, and this had none. It had clearly been faked.

The pristine passports of two of the hijackers in the WTC rubble were clearly planted. No other passports or similar identifications were found, let alone in pristine condition. Strangely, the government claims none of the 4 black boxes pertaining to these hijacked airplanes were found in the rubble even though it was all sifted twice. But one witness said he saw the FBI recover one of the orange painted Black boxes. Obviously, the government has something big to hide about the identification of the real aircraft that hit the towers.

It was also suspicious that the hijackers would use credit cards to purchase tickets and drive their own vehicle to Boston Logan airport, leaving behind telltale evidence like airplane technical manuals and Muslim tape recordings. Real hijackers use cash and take a taxi to the airport.

And then there’s the FBI claim about flight training they took in Cessna style small aircraft. And they didn’t qualify for a pilots license or even to solo. I think this was all done to help make it believable that they could hijack an airliner with some kind of flight training, but that is impossible. Even an experienced Cessna pilot wouldn’t know how to change the autopilot or turn off the transponder in major airliner. There are hundreds of switches in a big airline cockpit.

The San Diego group of hijackers’ housing was paid for by Saudi Arabia, leading to charges that the Saudis were backing the 911 hijackers. In reality, they were doing it at the behest of the dark side of the CIA, and that is why the US government is resisting sanctioning the Saudis.

The Aircraft Swaps: In earlier years, I hypothesized that the listing of the phony 19 hijackers was done to cover for the identity of the real hijackers who had been trained on real airliners in order to carry out this sophisticated attack. I further assumed that the real hijackers had received such high level training in Saudi Arabia or some other complicit ally. Now, I’m not so sure any real hijackers were necessary as more evidence emerges that all of the cell phone calls and airphone calls by flight attendants were staged, as I will shortly discuss.

More importantly, we have powerful evidence that all of the airliners that crashed into the WTC and Pentagon were specially modified Boeing aircraft being remote controlled, and not the actual airliners pertaining to the hijacked flights as stated in the official story:

1) Aircraft radar tracks show all the “hijacked” aircraft exceeding the speed limitations for those Boeing aircraft by over 100 mph—at low altitude where the air resistance is very high—which almost always ends up in the aircraft being damaged or losing wings or tail surfaces. It is documented by Boeing flight tests that the aircraft become uncontrollable and unstable at speeds even mildly exceeding max operating speed (VMO), let alone at hundreds of mph over VMO.

2) The engine parts to the single engine found within the Pentagon crash debris belonged to a 747 engine, and do not correspond to the less powerful 767 engines, which may explain why it could do such a high speed turn exceeding the airplanes’ G limit and achieve a speed of over 500 mph. In fact, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) which is normally a stickler for matching all crash part serial numbers with the aircraft logs failed to require any part match up for the 9/11 investigation. Obviously, someone in government didn’t want any evidence that the aircraft that crashed don’t match the aircraft with passengers on that day.

3) FAA records also show that all four of the United Airline aircraft were still flying in the airline system two years afterward, proving that they weren’t destroyed in the 9/11 attacks. Of course the debunkers say this was simply a clerical error, but there is other evidence. Greg Szymanski wrote that “FAA records for four years listed both 9/11 United jetliners as still on the ‘active’ list. Now the planes were only ‘deregistered’ in September (2004) after snoopy researchers questioned FAA officials a month earlier. Two of the 9/11 airliners were never ‘deregistered’ and remained on the ‘active’ flight list until Sept. 28. 2005, the classification officially changing only a month after two inquisitive flight researchers made repeated calls to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), inquiring about the strange irregularity.”

Need more proof? Pilots for 9/11 Truth found that Flight 11 was still broadcasting its “Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) data to ground stations in Pennsylvania after it was supposed to have struck the North Tower. How can messages be routed through such remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier?” Read the entire article here:

4) The 767 aircraft that flew into the South Tower (second WTC attack) had a very visible bulging modification on the fuselage under and behind the wing. That couldn’t have been flight 175 because the pilot must do a walk around and inspect the aircraft prior to flight and no pilot would have not seen and questioned this massive modification to his aircraft. The debunkers claim that this is the landing gear bulge but it is not. It’s much larger than that and only on one side. I called Boeing to ask who did the modification, knowing as I did that all “major modifications” have to be approved by the manufacturer, even for government. Without denying that there was an odd bulge on the aircraft, the spokesperson told me, “it wasn’t us.”

5) The aircraft that hit the Pentagon has a missile under the wing, which creates the smoke trail on the Pentagon Video just before it crashes. This blast creates the bright white signature of high explosives that you also see on the video, and creates the deep hole through 3 rings of this newly reinforced building. The aircraft is also loaded with so many explosives throughout that it blows the aircraft into tiny pieces, creating the illusion for many that “no airplane hit the Pentagon,” which isn’t true. Terrorist couldn’t have done that to a civilian airliner. More on that shortly.

When you combine with the research of Pilots For 911 Truth who uncovered how some of the radar tracks show other radar blips merging with these flights, it explains how the real passenger planes could have been replaced with drone aircraft that did the actual attack.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth, of which I am a member, have brought to light the case of the RADES radar tracks (from Hill AFB) which show where each airplane involved in 9/11 is during the attack. In a couple of cases radar tracks show a deliberate rendezvous with another aircraft in flight, coming from the West, whereupon one aircraft turns and assumes the other’s course heading back to the East Coast.

That’s an indication of a swap. Airliners cross paths with others all the time on the radar screen, but they almost never make a 180 degree circling turn at that very point and head off into a new direction. If it happened to only one aircraft, that would be one thing. But it happened to two of the supposed hijacked liners, and that indicates that there was coordination between other drone aircraft.

This “Aircraft Swap” theory which is gaining credibility since it alone explains why Flight 93’s supposed crash in rural Pennsylvania has almost no debris field (indicating no airline-size crash). Even though radar tracks don’t show swaps for Flight 175 and Flight 11, which hit the towers, they had to have occurred because the aircraft seen hitting the South Tower weren’t the ones that took off from Logan. Aircraft could still have rendezvoused with them at some point. Primary radar targets of aircraft with their transponders turned off don’t show up very well on controller’s scopes. The below testimony by the Senior Flight Attendant explains why Flight 11 couldn’t have hit the tower either and was flown off to a different destination.

Senior Flight Attendant analysis : Video of George Noory of Coast to Coast AM interviewing Rebecca Roth who reveals much about how those who were running this attack diverted the real aircraft to somewhere in Ohio (probably Cleveland, where there is a large NASA hangar to get the aircraft out of sight) and deployed other aircraft to take their place. Her book is Methodical Illusion. I think she really understands how this happened from a flight attendant point of view. I highly recommend listening to her testimony since she is the first one to explain what happened to the passengers and planes that were supposedly hijacked. Here are excerpts of the interview:

She first mentions something I had not been aware of: even though I knew the US military had perfected turning aircraft into drones, I did not know there is a software modification available for purchase by the airlines that can turn any Boeing aircraft into a remote controlled aircraft, using existing computer control of the autopilot. The program is called the Flight Termination Program—which allows the company to remotely take control of the aircraft from the pilot and land it safely somewhere, thus thwarting the hijacking. It’s pretty hard to find any mention of it on the net, but I found this at 21st Century Wire, about Boeing’s “uninterruptible Autopilot” system:

The Boeing 777 along with other Boeing models, can in fact be flown remotely through the use of independent embedded software and satellite communication. Once this advanced system is engaged, it can disallow any pilot or potential hijacker from controlling a plane, as the rooted setup uses digital signals that communicate with air traffic control, satellite links, as well as other government entities for the remainder of a flight’s journey.

She believes that there never was an actual hijacking, and that this program, initiated by government operators, remotely took control away from the pilots and landed it somewhere else. She also explained that the program takes control of the radios and can turn off the transponder, which would explain why ATC never got any hijack warning from the pilots and why the transponders were not showing the hijack code. As a pilot, I always wondered about that too. You can’t break into a cockpit so quickly that the pilots can’t get off some kind of verbal warning to ATC. Their transmitter switch is right on the control yoke.

This may seem a bit far fetched, but she has some very good reasons for thinking this way. First, she says that as a professional Flight Attendant and supervisor for 30 years, the supposed phone calls by the two Flight Attendants on Flight 11 (the first “hijacked” plane) had all the signs of being recorded on the ground. I noticed that too, that there was no aircraft noise in either recording.

She said their training is to delay, dalay, delay the hijackers. Both flight attendants were on the phone for a total of 27 minutes talking—a violation of policy, and would have been noticed by the hijackers. If it were a real hijacking, that’s the last thing one would be doing, let alone two attendants, she said. Neither flight attendant said how the hijackers got into the cockpit, which was strange. She also confirmed that cellphones don’t work at those altitudes and that Airphones were horrible—they could only use two at the same time, maybe—and those would not likely have been able to stay connected for a long time.

She said that the claims of the two flight attendants were contradictory and didn’t match what would really happen on an airliner. One attendant said, “He had sprayed pepper spray in business class and we can’t breathe up there.” But her voice showed no signs of coughing and the pepper spray would have quickly spread throughout the cabin. Everyone would be feeling the effects. It could not have been contained in business class—unless they weren’t flying and this was all scripted on the ground once the plane landed at its secret location.

She added that the other attendant’s call said the hijacker “stood upstairs,” but there are no stairs on a 767—only a 747. So Roth suspects she was recording this in a hangar, which had an upstairs mezzanine floor, as many do.

To explain these anomalies, Roth hypothesizes that all four aircraft were taken to the same location, and that there was a government official on board “handling” them. She presents a very reasonable scenario that explains how the crew could have been talked into going along with all this, once the plane had been taken over by the Flight Termination program.

She thinks the government handlers had credentials and told the crew that it was part of the war game drill. And there were many separate war games going on that day. And, as part of this drill, certain passengers and flight attendants would be chosen to act out and record scripted scenarios, including calling their relatives and telling them they were hijacked, or “storming the cockpit.”

This is plausible because none of those staged calls seemed to be under duress during their recording, and it was the voice of the real person. Telling the passengers and crew they are in a war drill does make a lot of sense to me, and clears up many of my prior questions about how the government could have faked all these cell phone calls. In fact, they weren’t faked, they were staged.

Here are some of the indications that the calls were staged. In one call the attendant says, “We are the first” to be hijacked. This is true, but how would she have known there were to be others? Perhaps the handler was explaining to them before the recording how this drill was going to play out and the attendant mistakenly mentions something out of sequence.

Roth says, “she kept saying, we’re up in the air,” but that would have been obvious to the supervisor on the ground if this were a real call. Why tell her we are up in the air, unless she’s not and being told to fake it? There were also contradictions with the call from one flight attendant, who was saying that the person in seat 9b had been stabbed and a medical doctor was attending to him. The other told the airline base that there were “no medical issues” on board.

But most telling is the fact that on each tape recording there are whispered hints at the end of the recording, barely audible. One says, “It’s a frame.” and on the other you hear, “good job, good job,” as if someone is coaching her.

One former Naval aviator pilot who was chosen to make a call to his mother, told her he was “being hijacked.” When she asks where, he responds, “I think we are over Ohio.” That might have been true if the planes were flown to the NASA hangar at Cleveland. As a pilot, he might very well have known the terrain. Then he is prompted to say that he thinks there are some guys who are going to take over the aircraft. But, this is NOT flight 93, so Roth thinks this may have been a canned scenario thought up by the handler that applied to more than one flight—but only used on Flight 93.

Flight 93: There is evidence for Roth’s idea of staged scenarios in Todd Beamer’s “let’s roll” cell phone call about taking over flight 93. First, the tape recording played for one or two family representatives doesn’t match the black box voice recorder the government says came out of that fake crash site in Pennsylvania. The voice recorder version has lots of violent sounds, including breaking glass, banging and clanging—as if Beamer and crew are breaking into the cockpit to take control, but there are no voices during the fight for control—none at all. Yet, on the government created tape they played for the relatives, there is plenty of yelling. Something doesn’t match here. In addition, the recovered data recorder (faked by government) shows the airplane inverted and coming in at a steep angle. No one could be standing and fighting in the cockpit under those conditions.

By the way, from prior Google earth photos of the Shanksville area, that big groove in the earth where Flight 93 supposedly crashed has been visible since 1996. The government claims the hard quarry ground swallowed up the entire aircraft, wings and fuselage, but that’s impossible. Parts would have been bouncing off in all directions.

So, what did happen to flight 93? Cleveland Center lost radio contact with the plane over Ohio, but a United Flight was able to see the aircraft and relay the one radio communication they assumed was from the plane where the hijackers talked to the passengers about a bomb being aboard, keying the transmit button instead of the intercom. However, anyone with an aircraft band transmitter could have made those calls on Cleveland Center’s frequency—so that isn’t conclusive that the transmission was from flight 93.

However, the United Flight did see an explosion on board, and one engine and some luggage were found miles from the Shanksville false crash site. That is the only confirmation we have consistent with evidence that two F-16s were vectored to intercept the flight and that they fired upon it. ATC controllers in New Hampshire have told others they vectored a pair of F-16s to Flight 93. The Nashua controller said that an F-16 fighter stayed in hot pursuit of the hijacked airliner until it crashed in Pennsylvania and made 360-degree turns to remain close. ”He must’ve seen the whole thing,” the employee said, not knowing about the shoot down. Witnesses on the ground saw a least one of the fighters in the sky near Flight 93, and one saw the missile attack.

Pieces of the wreckage, including suitcases and an engine, were found miles from the crash site—consistent with an at-altitude explosion rather than an explosion on impact with the ground. But the plane still couldn’t have crashed in Shanksville, due to the utter lack of wreckage, until the government trucked in some stuff. If it was damaged, it made it to an airport.

Incidentally, the smoke bomb they set off at Shanksville to make it look like a real crash consisted of one big round black plume floating upward. This is identical to an explosive cloud but not at all like a crash from an airliner full of fuel which burns for quite a while with a continual stream of black smoke. The government claimed to dig out of the ground half a dumpster full of wreckage but as with the Pentagon crash, they refused to match any parts with aircraft serial numbers—leading many to believe the wreckage that was retrieved was planted. They never did provide any serial numbers for the engine they said they found either, so we really don’t know if the plane lost an engine at the time the aircraft experienced some kind of explosion seen by witnesses.

Flight 77: The crash into the Pentagon is the one fraught most with contradictions and intrigue—from theories about “no plane”, two planes, a missile, and a high speed 360 degree attack turn that is impossible for a normal Boeing jetliner. This was also the plane supposedly flown by the guy who instructors said failed every attempt to teach him to fly. Virtually every professional airline pilot, including those with time in military fighters say they couldn’t have flown that profile without the plane cracking up.

There are two crucial pieces of evidence that prove that a specially modified airliner did hit the Pentagon that day, and that it wasn’t the only thing to impact. I’m convinced a missile was fired by that remote controlled airliner. That had to be government. Terrorists couldn’t have done this modification on an airliner in service.

As a former fighter pilot I’ve seen lots of missile shoots from aircraft and the “swooshing” white trail you see from under the approaching aircraft on the Pentagon parking lot video is clearly a missile trail [compare to Video 1 — incoming in one frame at 01:26 – ed]. The bright white explosive signature you see as the plane first hits the Pentagon is also proof that high explosives were involved in the initial contact with the wall. As for the crash itself, plane crashes only exhibit black smoke and red flames, and the black and red that follows the white flash indicate this plane didn’t have much fuel left in it—as the real flight 77 would have. Military men with combat experience testified upon coming out of the building nearby that they smelled the unmistakable smell of cordite—military grade explosives.

But the biggest proof of a missile strike is the big round hole that penetrated 3 rings of the Pentagon—that’s the equivalent of something solid going through 3 separate buildings. An aluminum aircraft couldn’t have done that, as one key witness explains shortly.

An additional proof that it had to be a missile is found in one special piece of debris from the aircraft crash found deep inside the Pentagon—a very large section of the radome (which is made of fiberglass and forms the nose of the airplane). Had the newly rebuilt and reinforced Pentagon wall been intact when that nose hit it at 500 mph, the radome would have been smashed to smithereens. The only way half a radome could have ended up inside is if there was already a hole in that building—the same large hole we see blasted through each of the 3 rings—that’s six exterior walls and the hole is still round and some 12 feet across. No airplane nor part of a plane can account for that. Even a normal explosive missile warhead couldn’t have done that (although it would have done more damage to the front wall). But a missile with a penetrating warhead could explain the damage.

Here’s the witness statement of Vin Narayanan who was sitting in traffic adjacent to the Pentagon when the plane flew overhead. He said “the tail of the plane clipped the overhanging exit sign above me as it headed straight at the Pentagon. The windows were dark on American Airlines Flight 77 as it streaked toward its target, only 50 yards away. The hijacked jet slammed into the Pentagon at a ferocious speed. But the Pentagon’s wall held up like a champ. It barely budged as the nose of the plane curled upwards and crumpled before exploding into a massive fireball.”

For him to say, “the wall held up like a champ” it had to mean that the explosion didn’t take place immediately. Remember that the Pentagon video above is a cut and edited version, not an actual presentation of exactly what happened. The fact that he could see it “crumple up” against the wall proves some small time lapse, which isn’t present in the edited Pentagon video. It is possible that the white flash of high explosive is not, in fact, the signature of the missile (which might have been edited out, or not visible in the case of a depleted Uranium non-explosive warhead). That white signature may have been the explosives going off inside all parts of the plane which turned the aircraft into confetti sized pieces, that were seen littering the parking lot.

Yes, a plane did hit the Pentagon, but it was blown to bits by explosives. It couldn’t have been a terrorist bomb in the baggage hold as that would have left major parts of the wing and fuselage visible. Only a plane fully loaded with explosives distributed all around, including the massive wings with their huge spars could account for the tiny pieces everywhere. I think the reason for the explosives was to destroy the evidence so the plane wouldn’t be traced.

What about the government’s claim to having traced the DNA of some passengers on Flight 77 to the Pentagon? I think, like other aspects of this crime, that evidence was planted. How do you know there’s a DNA match for survivors without an original sample? How were those samples collected by government? As Rebecca Roth clearly states in her book, the passengers were killed somewhere else by government. They certainly aren’t alive anymore. Thus the government could have access to their DNA, but it doesn’t mean they were killed at the Pentagon crash.

Evidence of Government Cover-up: The evidence is massive, from the falsified data from black boxes to the staged passenger and crew cell phone calls. But even from what we can prove the government showed tremendous obstruction of standard justice investigative procedures.

1) The federal government ordered police to restrict access to the WTC collapse site—especially to investigators and photographers. It also ordered the immediate destruction of the evidence and had all steel cut up and sold as scrap with the stipulation that it be shipped outside the country. None of the scrap steel was to be left in the US for analysis. This was essential as the steel would have clearly shown evidence of the cutting charges used for demolition. Still some of the few pictures of the rubble do show signs of cutting charges. The molten steel at the bottom would have also shown the chemical traces of thermite burning charges.

2) Rescue workers confirmed seeing the FBI find and remove black box voice and data recorders from the WTC site, but the FBI claimed they were never found.

3) Fire fighters and all other first responders were threatened and told to keep quiet about anything they saw or observed—especially about hearing explosions prior to the collapse of the twin towers. Edited versions of non-controversial accounts were released only years later.

4) An FAA supervisor destroyed the taped recording of the ATC controllers retelling what they saw and heard. The FAA colluded with the FBI to produce selectively edited snips of FAA telephone conversations, which consisted of FAA superiors talking about the attack to justify the official version, while withholding all original recordings from public airing. FAA flight recordings with hijacked aircraft were also kept secret—only selected portions have been transcribed and published.

5) FBI agents arrived “within minutes” at the CITGO service station across from the Pentagon to confiscate the station’s surveillance video of the crash. How did they know so soon about this video if there was no government foreknowledge of the attack or plans for a cover-up? The Sheraton Hotel camera tape and Virginia DOT tapes were all confiscated by the FBI as well.

6) NTSB never recorded nor cross checked any serial numbers from recovered aircraft parts as is standard procedure in any accident investigation.

7) President Bush and VP Cheney personally called Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle urging him not to conduct an investigation. Then, when pressured, they started playing with the terror alert warnings, raising them for any false threat they could concoct. Later, Bush relied on “Executive Privilege” to deny commissioners access to crucial documents, and required that the White House control what was kept secret.

8) The 9/11 Commission was rigged. After the initial controversy of trying to appoint insider-in-chief Henry Kissinger as chair of the panel, Bush opted for a reliable yes-man, Gov. Kean, and other former elected officials who wouldn’t cause waves when the cover-up became evident. The commission was plagued by the apparent conflicts of interest and excessive former relationships with government of the commissioners, who should have been probed more completely. Bush chose as chief counsel for the Commission another artful dodger/lawyer, Richard Ben Veniste—who treated all government witnesses as celebrities. Philip Zelikow, a former adviser to the pre-9/11 Bush administration, chose which evidence and witnesses to bring to their attention in a blatant conflict of interest.

Commission report flaws: Huge portions of the report were classified, including the whole chapter on Saudi Arabia involvement. The report disavowed and misrepresented the entire Able Danger testimony about the secret government data mining operation that had identified and tracked several of the alleged hijackers prior to 9/11. It evaded any interviews, discussions or investigations of issues like the molten steel in the basement, plane modifications, and the government’s refusal to turn over the Pentagon videos. The commission falsified the time Dick Cheney entered the command bunker in the basement of the White House to take charge, as if he came after the Pentagon Crash. In fact, he was there to direct that no planes intercept this attacking aircraft. They deleted Transportation Secretary Leon Mineta’s testimony of Dick Cheney refusing to rescind the order to NOT shoot down the approaching aircraft. The White house had armed anti-aircraft missiles on the roof and the Secret Service was ordered not to shoot. It’s like the charges of government conspiracy didn’t exist.

Can this big a conspiracy be kept a secret? That’s the big argument the debunkers pose. I say, yes it can. As an example, there are about 10- 18,000 civilian and military workers that travel out to Area 51 in Nevada each day, and this has been going on since the end of WWII with ever increasing manpower. None have ever broken their vow of secrecy. It is highly unlikely that the morally compromised small teams of dark side workers who set the charges in the World Trade Center will ever become whistle blowers, though one hopes at least one will talk someday. But let’s not be naive to think government can’t keep ugly secrets. They have to power to make good on powerful threats.

In summary, I hope that none of my readers can doubt that there is a dangerous and powerful conspiracy which controls the deepest parts of government—the Deep State, if you will. These kinds of conspiracies and their cover-ups are the biggest evidence of that.

As the brief analysis shows, a group of Muslim terrorists would never have been capable of pulling off this range of attacks, including the controlled demolition of these major buildings. The attacks had to have been planned and implemented from within a select cadre of black operators within the CIA and other secret agencies. The huge cover-up by a wide variety of US government agencies, and politicians, working in direct collusion with the White House, is the strongest evidence for government complicity in these attacks. Why would they be trying to keep all the details secret if the evidence didn’t point to government involvement?

Even so, I don’t believe that Pres. Bush himself directed this. He just reads the scripts given him. It is my conclusion that this was a black operation led by the globalist controllers of the US government, in conjunction with terrorists aided and funded by Saudi Arabia, and other allies of the US dark side. 9/11 opened us up to the false world of government-controlled terror, which in turn has led to endless wars of intervention, and the loss of essential liberties at home—all in the name of securing us against what our own government has wrought. Of course, there is no security from government-sponsored terror.
Sure, there are other motives too, like controlling oil and future pipelines, and keeping the military industrial complex flush with more orders from weapons, but I believe the main long-term agenda of the globalists controlling every US administration is the destruction of American sovereignty through conflict creation. The solution will always be illusions of peace through the siren call of a global government.

Some other time, when you are refreshed, I recommend you sit down and watch the 5 hour documentary film on 911- A New Pearl Harbor by the Italian director Massimo Mazucco. It doesn’t cover some of the unique details that I’ve written here, but he does give you the best overview of the entire conspiracy and takes on the insidious debunkers of 9/11 conspiracy facts head on. Highly recommended.