Talmudists push for more laws banning 'Holocaust' truth-telling, citing Alison Chabloz's case in Britain

They’re the masters at spin! However, in many of these articles, some of the truth is really getting out, as in this one:

Holocaust deniers insinuate that the Jews faked their own genocide for self-serving ends, for example to extract money from Germany or to justify the “oppression of the Palestinians”. Their arguments rely upon and promote the idea that the world is controlled by an international Jewish conspiracy.

Alison is absolutely helping to get the word out. Thank you, Alison Chabloz, in case you still get to read social media!
What’s disgusting is that not enough truthers are telling the truth about Alison’s case, while they talk about Tommy Robinson free speech case instead.
Maybe, instead, it should be illegal for the Talmudists to lie about the ‘Holocaust,’ as they blatantly do in this article, now that the official ‘Holocaust’ story has been scientifically disproven. They say:

It is naïve to suggest that Holocaust denial should be allowed so that it can be openly debated. Holocaust denial has persisted despite the fact that the Holocaust is one of the best documented genocides in history, with huge volumes of evidence documenting virtually every aspect of it [Completely false. If that were true they would encourage, instead of silence-by-decree debate – editor]. Holocaust deniers are malicious propagandists who cannot be reasoned with or engaged; they have to be silenced.

– –
From: The Jewish Chronicle (JC)

Why Alison Chabloz’s conviction should be celebrated

There is no other way to deal with Holocaust deniers, argue Daniel Allington and Lesley Klaff

[…]

The right to free speech in a democratic society must be weighed and balanced against other rights, such as the right to be free from religious and racial hatred. Indeed, it is particularly important that the publication of Holocaust denial material should not be tolerated.

This is because Holocaust denial goes beyond mere “offence”.

Holocaust deniers insinuate that the Jews faked their own genocide for self-serving ends, for example to extract money from Germany or to justify the “oppression of the Palestinians”. Their arguments rely upon and promote the idea that the world is controlled by an international Jewish conspiracy.

And there is also evidence that Holocaust denial can incite violence against Jews. It is for these reasons that Holocaust denial is a crime in 16 European countries as well as Israel.

The argument that criminalising Holocaust denial is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been rejected by the Institutions of the Council of Europe, the European Commission of Human Rights, and by the United Nations Human Rights Committee.

In other words, there is no free speech right to deny the Holocaust.

It is naïve to suggest that Holocaust denial should be allowed so that it can be openly debated. Holocaust denial has persisted despite the fact that the Holocaust is one of the best documented genocides in history, with huge volumes of evidence documenting virtually every aspect of it. Holocaust deniers are malicious propagandists who cannot be reasoned with or engaged; they have to be silenced.

Entire Article