5:35 “All of these young guys who write to me, they’re all addicted to pornography. …and they’re looking to find some way out. The first way out is to explain what it is and what it is not. What it is not is ‘liberation,’ and what it is is control. … With the grace of God you can break that addiction.”
12:10 Greta explained
30:00 “…Mom feels guilty, and the daughter feels full of rage.”
32:30 “…basically a stand-off in the family where Mom’s consumed with guilt and Greta is consumed with hatred, and it can’t go on this way. And then suddenly, they discover climate change.”
34:20 How psychology is demoralizing society
37:10 Sigmund Freud
Cory Clark tweeted on 10/3/19:
Across multiple topics and conditions, women were consistently more supportive of censorship than men. The one exception was for text that argued that women evolved to be better leaders than men. For this passage, women were equally as (non)supportive of censorship as men.
The study that Cory Clark co-researched: The Ideology of Censorship, June 2019
Barnes & [not very] Noble banned David Icke’s new book, “The Trigger,” because it tells the truth about who really did 9/11.
A 2010, extensive, 3-year vaccine study by the Agency for Healthcare Research “found that the actual rate of vaccine injury per vaccine was 2.7%. So in other words, one out of every 40 people were getting injured.” – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. @ 27:10
Facts About California’s Mandatory Vaccine Law (SB 276 2019)
Ted Pike on Israeli News Live with Steven Ben-Nun!
Ironically, 155 books (mostly scholarly) that completely refute the claims made by Michael Brown about WWII history in his July 5 video (minute-3) were banned by Amazon in 2017. Brown was silent. Now it’s too late.
WILL AMAZON BAN THE BIBLE NEXT?
Michael Brown: Site crossed a very dangerous line removing psychologist’s books
July 6, 2019
In a very disturbing move, Amazon has removed the books of Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, the psychologist whom critics have dubbed “the father of conversion therapy.” In other words, for claiming that sexual orientation is not innate and immutable, and for claiming that change is possible, Dr. Nicolosi’s books must be banned.
This leads to the logical question: Will Amazon ban the Bible next? … Continue reading “Michael Brown: Will Amazon Ban the Bible Next? – Christian Psychologist’s Books Banned— “When political leanings influence censorship decisions we move a step closer to burning books in the streets””
Dr. Mercola’s passionate plea, transcribed by me!:
“Google worked for many years to earn your trust, but it was just setting a trap to twist that trust into powerful control. Google had the brilliant idea of utilizing crowdsourcing to provide you with the best answers to your questions, pushing the most frequently selected content to the top of search results. …
Crowdsourcing has become crowd control. Google began giving you everything you want so it can now take everything you have. … Google has become the ultimate puppet master, infecting people and manipulating them without them even knowing it. The true goal is to be in complete control of us, directing our behavior. …
On June 3 of this year, Google predictively removed my website and several other health sites from their search results. …
Above all else, please, please stop using Google! … Don’t use other Google products like the Chrome browser. … Use…the one I use, which is Brave, based on the software Chromium, so it’s easy to import all of your favorite bookmarks…. Stop using Gmail. Why would you want Google to read all of your emails and further abuse your privacy? There are many better options like Proton mail. …subscribe to my free, daily newsletter….”
Continue reading “(vid) Google Removes Dr. Mercola’s Health Articles from Search Results! — Google worked for many years to earn your trust, but it was just setting a trap • Crowdsourcing has become crowd control, manipulating people without them even knowing it • Please stop searching through Google • Stop using their Chrome browser and Gmail — Why would you want Google to read all of your emails?”
Justice to convene meeting on whether social media companies are ‘intentionally stifling’ free speech
Attorney General Jeff Sessions has scheduled a meeting with state attorneys general in September to discuss a “growing concern” that tech companies may be “intentionally stifling” the free flow of ideas on their platforms.
In a statement issued right after executives from Facebook and Twitter finished testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee, the Department of Justice (DOJ) also suggested that the platforms were running afoul of antitrust laws.
“The Attorney General has convened a meeting with a number of state attorneys general this month to discuss a growing concern that these companies may be hurting competition and intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas on their platforms,” DOJ spokesman Devin O’Malley said in a statement issued near the end of the congressional hearing.
President Trump and conservative House Republicans have repeatedly aired complaints about bias against conservatives on Facebook, Twitter, Google and other social media platforms.
World Affairs Brief, August 10, 2018 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE WAR AGAINST FREE SPEECH
Alex Jones is the most prominent conservative fighting a battle against censorship and financial revenue as the major internet media platforms ban his content and refuse to pay him for his popular content. The Powers That Be (PTB) are working every angle to bankrupt Alex. It started months ago when YouTube denied him his advertizing revenue from the millions of viewers who watched his video commentaries. Then an establishment legal firm conjured up a lawsuit against Jones on behalf of several Sandy Hook families complaining they have been threatened and harassed by Jones supporters. This week it mushroomed to an outright censorship ban on Facebook, Youtube, the Apple Store, Spotify and others after CNN orchestrated a pressure campaign against him and targeted all the major social media tech giants. Supposedly, Alex is guilty of “hate speech,” one of those nebulous and political correct epithets that can be skewed to cover almost any criticism of anyone else. The claim of hate speech itself, if left to stand, is a major attack on the principle of free speech. This week I’ll discuss the backlash in support of Jones, and the issue of whether these are strictly private companies are, in fact, really public/private partnerships akin to public utilities that should not be able to suppress free speech.
Is It Illegal to Censor Jones? This is bound to become more of an issue as this attack on free speech continues and expands against other conservative, conspiratorial voices. The first question is “Are these companies truly private?” If yes, then they can do whatever they want on their social media platform. Or can they?
According to the reigning legal argument in civil rights and anti-discrimination circles, once you (as a private person or private company) open your business to the public, you are no longer private as to your ability to discriminate. I oppose this expansive view against the privacy of property, but as long as it is accepted by the Left, it can and should be used against them.
These social media companies are clearly inviting all the public to participate and thus are not free to discriminate. That is perhaps why they are justifying this in the name of “hate speech,” as if that gives them a legitimate test of criminality that allows for discrimination. As I and others have pointed out, you can’t make hatred illegal any more than you can any form of negative opinion against another is illegal. In fact, if there was ever was an outpouring of hatred here, it is against Alex Jones and his points of view.
You can outlaw incitement to violence, and it appears they are trying to equate hate speech to violence, as if they are always synonymous, but they are not. Only when someone is yelling hateful speech and directly inciting violence is this true, but the Left is trying to expand the view of hate speech backward to any negative criticism of someone. Point of fact: there is no way to draw the line except at the most violent prone end of the incitement spectrum. Everything less than that has to be protected speech or Free Speech is gone. Continue reading “Skousen: Is It Illegal to Censor Alex Jones?”
Article includes video!
From: Daily Mail
China demolishes hundreds of churches and confiscates Bibles during a crackdown on Christianity
7 August 2018
- Locals in Henan stated concerns of a move by the atheist ruling Community Party to control Christianity
- Residents were asked to replace posters of the cross and Jesus Christ with portraits of President Xi Jinping
- Experts say the government is waging the most severe systematic suppression of the religion since 1982
- Chinese leaders have ‘always been suspicious of the political threat’ that Christianity poses to the regime
‘Chinese leaders have always been suspicious of the political challenge or threat that Christianity poses to the Communist regime,’ said Xi Lian, a scholar of Christianity in China at Duke University. ‘Under Xi, this fear of Western infiltration has intensified and gained a prominence that we haven’t seen for a long time.’
Officials once largely tolerated the unregistered Protestant house churches that sprang up independent of the official Christian Council, clamping down on some while allowing others to grow. But this year they have taken a tougher approach that relies partly on ‘thought reform’ – a phrase for political indoctrination.
Last November, Christian residents of a rural township in south-east Jiangxi province were persuaded to replace posters of the cross and Jesus Christ inside their homes with portraits of Xi, a local official said.
‘Through our thought reform, they’ve voluntarily done it,’ Qi Yan, a member of the township party committee, told the AP by phone. ‘The move is aimed at Christian families in poverty, and we educated them to believe in science and not in superstition, making them believe in the party.’ …
‘Xi is a closet Maoist – he is very anxious about thought control,’ said Willy Lam, a Chinese politics expert at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. ‘He definitely does not want people to be faithful members of the church, because then people would profess their allegiance to the church rather than to the party, or more exactly, to Xi himself.’
Various state and local officials declined repeated requests to comment. But in 2016, Xi explicitly warned against the perceived foreign threats tied to faith, telling a religion conference: ‘We must resolutely guard against overseas infiltrations via religious means.’
It’s good many are waking up to the Talmudic media’s bias; though, desiring the president to violate the 1st Amendment is foolhardy.
Amazingly, many ‘Christians’ still actually believe that also-Talmudic Fox News is ‘fair and balanced’.
‘Enemy of the people’: Almost half of Republicans say Trump should be allowed to close media outlets
President Trump’s attacks on the media, whom he dubbed “enemies of the people,” have struck a chord with supporters. A new poll found that 43 percent of Republicans want to give him the power to shut down certain news outlets.
Public trust in the press has diminished since the days of Woodward and Bernstein, falling by 30 percentage points since the late 1970s. While an overwhelming majority of Americans surveyed by Ipsos agreed that the concept of a free press is essential for democracy, many are unhappy with how the press behaves in reality.
Less than half of Americans surveyed believe that news outlets strive for honest reporting. Only 29 percent of Republicans believe in the honesty of the media, and 80 percent believe the press treats President Trump unfairly.
Their concerns are shared by Trump, who regularly bashes the “fake news” media for dishonest reporting. …
According to the Ipsos poll, one third of all Americans agree that the “news media is the enemy of the American people.” Among Republicans, this number rises to 48 percent.
While 68 percent of Democrats believe that the media is honest, and only 23 percent think that most outlets have a liberal bias, a Harvard study found that the media portrays Trump’s presidency in an overwhelmingly-negative light.
In covering Trump’s first 100 days in office, 80 percent of articles and reports from CNN, NBC, CBS, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and Fox News were negative. 93 percent of CNN’s reports were negative, while Fox went easiest on Trump, with a relatively even split of positive and negative coverage. Continue reading “Almost half of Republicans say Trump should be allowed to close media outlets – Willing to trash 1st Amendment”
Continue reading “(VID) Alex Jones Ban is a Smoke Screen”
Screenshot @1:44 from HighImpactVlogs video: Look What PEOPLE are REALLY Saying About CNN’s Stand Against Alex Jones!!
My notes, transcribing quotes from Rick Wiles:
28:55 “Every Christian should disavow Alex Jones. You should disavow him until he repents, and quite frankly until he is delivered.”
29:30 Alex Jones’ livid, demonic rant clip! “You will pay! … God is going to destroy you!”
33:00 “Last week, remember he was imaginary fanning a western revolver, talking about Robert Muller, the special counsel investigator of President Trump, and he was basically saying: ‘I’m coming for you, coming for you.’ This is behavior of a person exhibiting mental instability. … And he is known for his defense of the 2nd Amendment. Alex Jones is the poster child for why you should confiscate guns from mentally unstable people.
34:20 “For the record…, we disavow Alex Jones. … We don’t support Infowars.”
35:10 Alex’s court case that could be the excuse to limit freedom of speech.
38:00 “This is what I’ve wondered about this for nearly 20 years with Alex Jones: is he a plant, an agent-provocateur who has been placed in this position and given publicity, given fame for the purpose of shutting down sensible voices that oppose the deep state? … That if you question the deep state, you must be as crazy as Alex Jones.”
40:00 “I knew Alex Jones in the early days.”
41:30 “His lawyer said he’s an actor. Did they tell the truth, because they were in court under oath?”
42:30 “If Alex is not an actor, if he’s not a plant, he’s seriously mentally ill. And he needs help. He should shut down his program. He should get mental help. He should get spiritual help. If that is truly him, he needs to be someplace where he’s receiving spiritual and psychiatric assistance counseling, because that behavior is the sign of somebody losing their mind.”
• • •
Continue reading “(VID) Rick Wiles TruNews: Does the Fate of the 1st Amendment Rest on Alex Jones? — Court case • Alex's demonic rant: "I'm coming for you [Muller]!" • "Is he a plant, an agent-provocateur placed in this position for the purpose of shutting down sensible voices that oppose the deep state?" • "If Alex is not an actor, if he's not a plant, he's seriously mentally ill • That behavior is the sign of somebody losing their mind" • "Every Christian should disavow Alex Jones until he repents"”
Continue reading “(3 min vid) Deep State Eyes Alex Jones Courtroom Showdown to Justify Ending Free Speech Online — What may seem like a simple trial over libel, actually poses damaging consequences for the future of free speech in America. In an excerpt from the Tuesday, July 31st edition of TruNews, the team discusses the significance of InfoWars founder Alex Jones' looming courtroom showdown over statements made on his program, and how a ruling against him could be used to create a national precedence on where the 1st Amendment ends, and Fake News begins”
“We will stand with Israel because Israel’s [Talmudic] cause is our cause. Israel’s [Talmudic] values are our values. Israel’s [Talmudic] fight is our fight.”
– U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley in a speech at Christians United for Israel (CUFI) where John Hagee presents to her the “Defender of Israel” award at minute-7:30
• • •
Continue reading “(VID) Red Ice: Mark Zuckerberg Doesn't Want To Ban 'Holocaust Denial' on Facebook”
Trump warns Twitter it will be investigated for ‘SHADOW BANNING’ conservatives as he calls practice of depressing their exposure ‘discriminatory and illegal’
- Published report found conservatives’ exposure on Twitter is artificially limited
- President blew up about the practice on Thursday, claiming it’s ‘discriminatory and illegal’ and promising some sort of investigation
- Twitter’s automatic fill-in engine doesn’t suggest some right-wingers’ accounts when the first few letter of their names are typed
- That problem isn’t universal among conservatives but liberals have been unaffected
- House Majority Leader Mevin McCarthy tweeted: ‘It’s time to rise up and demand accountability from Big Tech’
9:40 “Once you start deciding what the level of acceptability is the whole thing collapses.”
GREAT point at 19:00!
20:05 “The beginning of the mark [of the Beast]”
25:50 Do NOT support DISINFOWARS. I must disagree with Nick here. Alex is doing more harm than good, sadly.
It also sounds like Nick thinks the one-world government is a good thing, but won’t happen for a couple of hundred years from now? I’ve never heard him say this before.
Russia and China are getting ready to take US out, and may actually do it in the next decade.
• • •
Continue reading “(VID) Nick Begich: Freedom Of Speech Under Attack – "Once you start deciding what the level of acceptability is the whole thing collapses"”