As if she’s demonically possessed and to be feared, instead of being attractive.
Power over men — occult feminism.
Illuminati eye symbolism.
– –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABz2m0olmPg
KENZO World – The new fragrance
Great to see truth tellers speaking up in France!
– –
Marion Maréchal-Le Pen, the elegant, articulate niece of Front National leader Marine Le Pen, dissected the dizzying mental gymnastics of modern day feminism during a scathing 3-minute speech in front of her fellow French parliamentarians.
Le Pen made her remarks during debate on a ban of pro-life websites and the spread of “false information” regarding abortions, but she went after more than just SJW censorship:
Feminism had been reduced to “sexism in grammar, a pink toy in a happy meal”, Maréchal-Le Pen said, adding that feminists had “lost the plot” on real threats. The real threats, she said, were issues like the migrant sex assault in Cologne on New Year’s Eve 2015/2016 and Islamic law which she said was “being enforced in some of France’s districts”.
She slammed feminists’ views of the “patriarchy” and their placing blame on “heterosexual white men”. She also accused leftists of cosying up to Islamists to further their cause adding the alliance was the reason “self-proclaimed protectors of women’s rights” defend the Islamic veil which she called an “Islamic submission tool”. (source)
Marion Le Pen attacks feminist hypocrisy in 3 minute speech (better English subtitles)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y1TIbt49K0
Feminists Openly Calling For Wife Beating / Killing
STEFAN’S VIDEO PRESENTATION EXPLAINS A LOT • MIND BLOWING INFORMATIVE • RIVETING!!!
Some of the most important things I’ve learned this year!
Why are so many women Democrats?
Why do women vote more than do men?
Why do so many Dems no longer care about their appearance?
What does being raised in day care have to do with it?
This written description just touches the surface of what Stefan actually shares:
– –
Stefan Molyneux makes an excellent point in this thoughtful and insightful monolog that before now, had not occurred to me. He notes that the emptiness, the ugliness, the shamelessness, the lack of social grace, the absence of basic, rudimentary civil behavior, the coarseness, the vulgarity, the unbelievable foul-mouth ranting, the unintelligence, the unreasonableness, the ignorance, the immaturity, and the crass egocentric posturing seen in the vast majority of these purple or red haired Social Justice Warriors of the Clintonista Feminist Left are unified in their barbaric demeanor by their having spent their babyhood and their formative pre-school years in a daycare center, instead of being raised at home by a loving mom in a nurturing, caring environment.
Females don’t become this damaged, radicalized, and twisted unless they had been treated with coarseness and non-loving, sterile “care” during their most vulnerable and formative years of childhood. These women’s lives are ruined. They will never find happiness, or peace, or fulfillment when they’ve thrown away the most precious and fleeting years given to them to find a mate and start a family. Decent, good, kind and gentle men don’t want to marry the sort of shrieking, infantile, vulgar females seen in these anti-Trump Youtube videos. They want a loving, respectable, gentle, graceful, and feminine woman to create a family with. If they’ve been degenerated into homosexuality, then there’s nothing worth talking about. They’re lost. For those deluded heterosexual females who think they’re having fun by behaving so outrageously and vulgarly in public, the day will come when they will rue their indiscretion and realize that this game called life doesn’t last forever; that the opportunities are fleeting; and that old age spent alone and childless is a reality that will not seem like so much fun when it arrives.
Molyneux called it ~ you live in anger, you die in solitude. Truer words were never spoken. … Ken Adachi (source)
• • •
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8oMY1sF-E0
MP3: http://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/3571/the…
Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/stefan-molyneu…
Buried in the sordid and socialized mess of the Women’s March is an essential truth that is worth evaluating and understanding. It is a cliché that feminists are physically unattractive, but there is solid science and research behind it.
One study of American women indicated that women generally pursue careers because they fear they are too unattractive to land a man. In another study, the more attractive a woman thought she was, the less feminist she was. Whenever there is a clear pattern that is almost never discussed, it is worth pursuing to the end.
Sources: http://www.fdrurl.com/womens-march
Some signs read: ‘abort Trump’ and ‘abort Pence.’
– –
From: lifesitenews.com
See slideshow above of 53 photos taken by LifeSite’s Claire Chretien and Lisa Bourne during the march
WASHINGTON, D.C., January 23, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) …
What we saw broke my heart and strengthened my resolve to end abortion, the greatest human rights injustice of our time.
First, there were the “pussy hats.” These pink knit hats with two small, pointy ears are part of a project launched over Thanksgiving weekend in support of “women’s rights.” Feminists are obsessed with cats, and then there’s the whole female anatomy/Donald Trump double entendre.
Then, there were the signs. It was hard to find any without profanity. They featured sparkly uteruses, the Virgin Mary as female genitals, and frequently made use of the word “p****.” A lot of the signs just said, “f*** Trump.”
And the children. Parents apparently saw nothing wrong with putting “pussy hats” on their elementary school-age daughters and bringing their kids to a march where images of sex acts and sexual assault were plastered on signs about the president.
The march seemed to be primarily pro-abortion rather than pro-transgender. It was a celebration of the sexual revolution, procreation-free sex, and abortion. …
There was an overwhelming lack of joy at the women’s march – just anger and sadness. But the women who marched aren’t our enemies. They deserve to be shown the love, compassion, and mercy that are the hallmarks of the pro-life movement. They are all potential converts to the pro-life worldview. Many of them have no doubt been harmed by abortion. …
If modern feminism means complaining about the objectification of women while dressing as female genitalia, believing women are “oppressed” without the right to kill a defenseless human being, and thinking that women aren’t empowered unless the government provides us with free cancer-causing contraceptives, count me out.
TalmudVision (TV) broke down Christian values in a disarming way.
Quote from the video: “The Mary Tyler Moore Show also begins knocking down taboos on television”
Inside the Success of ‘The Mary Tyler Moore Show’
From: latimes.com
In steadfast pursuit of gender equality and to promote nonconformity, it’s become popular in some social circles to start early, very early, by raising young children in a gender-neutral way: not revealing the baby’s sex at birth, dressing them and their bedroom in various shades of oatmeal, encouraging them to play with gender-neutral toys. There’s also pressure on corporations to help; parental complaints led Target to stop sex-segregating its toys, for instance.
Offering kids the opportunity to pursue what they’d like, freed from societal expectations, is an undeniably positive thing — whether it has to do with toys, clothing, or their future aspirations. But the scientific reality is that it’s futile to treat children as blank slates with no predetermined characteristics. Biology matters.
A large and long-standing body of research literature shows that toy preferences, for example, are innate, not socially constructed or shaped by parental feedback.
Most girls will gravitate toward socially interesting toys, like dolls, that help social and verbal abilities develop. Most boys will gravitate toward toys that are mechanically interesting, like cars and trucks, fostering visuo-spatial skills. …
I hear from many well-meaning parents who raised their children in gender-neutral homes and were surprised to find that they nevertheless gravitated toward stereotypical interests and toys. Little boys who were given pots and pans to play with turned them into makeshift toy cars, complete with self-generated engine sounds. Little girls turned to one another and started playing house.
‘Caring’ for the environment:
WoW!! How to explain this??
Satan’s horns symbol (right hand) at 12 seconds:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaF1PM6roGU
Liberal Protester screaming at inauguration
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znfsa1sfnIQ
Screaming woman at Trump’s inauguration interviewed: The dark & the light are so tight right now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ6Xh26kHiw
Luke & Father Version
Raw footage source of clip – from itv.com:
Source of clip 2 (interview) – from itv.com with text:
Jessica Starr made no attempt to disguise her emotions on Pennsylvania Avenue today.
She was sitting on the ground in silent protest when the announcement blared over loudspeakers: “Donald J Trump is the president of the United States”.
Suddenly, involuntarily, Jessica erupted into a visceral, primal scream.
Sobbing, she apologised to the world: “I’m so sorry, I love people, this is not America, this is not what we want”, she told me.
There was so much more I could have asked her, but I left her to have her moment in peace.
PORTLAND, OR—From her local Starbucks Monday morning, progressive Christian blogger Rachel Brooks reportedly refreshed her Bible app a number of times, hoping to find that God had updated his “antiquated” stance on homosexuality, according to several eye-witnesses.
“I’m sure God knows His viewpoint here is on the wrong side of history,” Brooks muttered into her venti blonde roast while reading 1 Corinthians 6. “Not just on this, but on a number of other issues, He comes off as unacceptably repressive.”
Brooks reportedly checks the app several times a day, hitting the refresh button in hopes that the word of God will receive the long-awaited update confirming the immutable Lord of creation has “gotten His act together” and caught up with the rest of the world’s sense of morality—a hope she documents on her popular blog, Upgrading Christianity.
I watched about half of ‘Adam’s Rib’ on YouTube here to get a fuller perspective in posting this article, in which I highlight key points. Katherine Hepburn, playing the feminist wife declared: “Equality: mutual everything or nothing.” Then she mocks him to wear the pants and become superior.
The Talmudists go all out, including presenting actors in drag, pictured below — in 1949!! They’ve been mocking men ever since, to re-engineer society, replacing our Creator’s guidelines, so they can one day rule everyone — carrying out Satan’s NWO plan.
The film was a huge success, grossing $4 million, a huge sum back then: According to MGM records the film earned $2,971,000 in the US and Canada and $976,000 elsewhere resulting in a profit of $826,000.[1]
A transcript
– –
From: henrymakow.com
ADAM’S RIB: A FEMINIST GENDER BENDER FROM 1949
by Anon
(Abridged by henrymakow.com)
Why am I writing about a movie from 68 years ago that most people have forgotten? Because it shows that the Golden Age of Hollywood was not really “sweet and innocent” at all. It helps to answer the questions “how was our society destroyed?” and “where did it begin?”

Adam’s Rib is a feminist gender bender movie from 1949. Notice that the title is Biblical but the movie is Anti-Biblical. This tricked conservatives into thinking that it was a safe movie to watch.
The plot involves a woman who shoots her unfaithful husband and puts him in critical condition but is found “not guilty” by a court of law. [Echoes of Chicago]
A lawyer (Spencer Tracy) is assigned to represent the man in court. His wife (Katherine Hepburn), instead of supporting her breadwinning husband who lavishes her with gifts, thinks it is fun to compete with her husband and to ridicule him in court. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon” -radical communist Saul Alinsky.
The lawyer’s reaction is to yell “I wanted a wife, not a competitor!”
MODELLING DYSFUNCTION AND SELFISHNESS
His liberal wife does not cook, clean, nor raise any children. She spends her time drinking, smoking, and going to fancy restaurants. And insulting and goading her conservative husband whenever he disagrees with her.
When her husband gives her a fancy hat, she gives it away to her client accused of attempted murder.
She effortlessly gets a job as a lawyer on a whim. …
The victim of the shooting is mocked by transforming into a woman.
All men in the film are mocked except for an effeminate songwriter. …
As the lawyer’s wife gives him a massage, she slaps him. But when he gives her a massage and slaps her, she is offended. There are two sets of rules: Although they are “equals”, she can do things that he is not permitted to do. “Some are more equal than others” – George Orwell. …
At the beginning of the movie, women had cried repeatedly to manipulate men. …
Throughout the movie, a neighbour plays the song “Farewell Amanda” on the piano…. The song was written by homosexual occultist Cole Porter (Scroll and Key). The effeminate piano-playing joker in the movie is a dead ringer for Cole Porter, too. He mocks the husband at every opportunity and hits on his wife right in front of him. The husband lets it go. He is too weak to defend his wife. …
When Katherine Hepburn states that men and women are “exactly the same”, Spencer Tracy says “Well, not quite exactly”. In other words, men and women are identical except for their physiology.
Both the lawyer and his wife call each other “Pinky”, hardly a manly moniker. Once again they are portrayed as almost identical equals.
The husband is continually made to look like a fool. He jumbles his lines, he bumps his head, and he gets lifted in the air by a woman in court who is clearly much stronger than he is. Everyone thinks it is hilarious. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy” – Saul Alinsky.
The smartest person in the movie is another woman in court who has endless degrees and credentials. …
This movie always gets a high rating from critics. It is well-acted, full of humour, and it makes you think. However, morality is never taken into account in their ratings. If it was, Adam’s Rib would rate a zero.
The main message of the movie is that “man is evil and weak, and woman is strong and virtuous, so women don’t need men”.
It is almost as if Spencer Tracy’s character in Adam’s Rib represents God of the Bible, and the secular crowd mocks him and are unthankful for his gifts.
Adam’s Rib mocks conservative values and glorifies liberalism, much as All in the Family would do 22 years later, starting in 1971.
[Editor’s note: Norman Lear, producer of “All in the Family,” was raised Jewish. He considered his Jewish father a “rascal,” and then created the Archie Bunker character as a white protestant rascal for Americans to laugh at (cued by the laugh track) every week for years:
Lear was born in New Haven, Connecticut,[2] the son of Enie/Jeanette (née Sokolovsky) and Hyman “Herman” Lear, a traveling salesman.[3][4] He has a younger sister, Claire Lear Brown (1925-2015).[5] Lear grew up in a Jewish home and had a Bar Mitzvah ceremony.[6] His mother was born in Elizabethgrad in Kherson Gubernia in Ukraine, while his father was born in Connecticut, to Russian-born parents.[7][8][9]
When Lear was 9 years old, his father went to prison for selling fake bonds.[10] Lear thought of his father as a “rascal” and said that the character of Archie Bunker (whom Lear depicted as white Protestant on the show) was in part inspired by his father, while the character of Edith Bunker was in part inspired by his mother.[10] (source)
“All in the Family” was immensely popular in the ’70s:
The show is often regarded in the United States as one of the greatest television series of all time.[3] The show ranked number one in the yearly Nielsen ratings from 1971 to 1976. … TV Guide’s 50 Greatest TV Shows of All Time ranked All in the Family as number four. Bravo also named the show’s protagonist, Archie Bunker, TV’s greatest character of all time.[5] (source)]
The Luciferians, the communists, and in more recent years Hollywood, have been fomenting this “Battle of the Sexes” for hundreds of years. It is a cornerstone in their “divide and conquer” tactic. What else would you expect from Hollywood, the land of immorality propaganda?
Adam Weishaupt, founder of the illuminati, wrote:
“There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These [women] should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense release to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowledge that they do so, for they will only be indulging their own desire for personal admiration.”
This undermining of Godly morals and traditional families is essential for the luciferian globalists to replace God with lucifer, demoralize society, and set up a New World Order dictatorship. “The family is enemy number one,” said satanist Aleister Crowley.
Yes, we were programmed to accept feminist gender bending and immorality a long time ago, as this movie from 1949 aptly illustrates.
• • •
More, directly from the article: ADAM’S RIB: A FEMINIST GENDER BENDER FROM 1949
When the lawyer’s wife asks the jury to picture a role reversal, two women morph into effeminate men and the man morphs into an ugly woman. All three are shown dressed in drag, promoting transvestism and transgenderism.
![]() |
| Women become men and men become women in this nightmarish fantasy world. Here the accused is transformed into a man. |
![]() |
| The mistress is also transformed into a man. |
![]() |
| The victim of the shooting is mocked by transforming into a woman. All men in the film are mocked except for the effeminate songwriter. |
[…]
“Feminism masquerades as a movement for women’s rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are “socially constructed” to oppress them.
Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity by making women masculine and men feminine” (Dr. Henry Makow).
• • •
Each time a “new normal” got past the censors on the pretext that “great art must not be suppressed,” there was no turning back. Older movies seem attractive to us now because they nostalgically convey the more virtuous climate of the past, but within each time period, Hollywood was always boiling the frog toward greater immorality. – James Perloff (source)
VIDEO DOES PLAY:
– –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1QUUQ3vHhA
Campbell’s Cleverly Used Star Wars in Gay-Themed Ad
According to LivingResistance, South Korean people are up in arms, after finding out the President is part of a satanic cult and is divulging top secret information to her lover, in exchange for favors and money.
According to sources, the female President of South Korea, Park Geun-hye, was having a relationship with another female named Choi Soon-sil. Choi Soon-sil is apparently from a billionaire satanic cultist family and has ties to the Clintons, as most other billionaire cultists do. As their relationship grew, Choi Soon-sil was given top clearance state secrets and million-dollar deals were made with her, at the expense of the South Korean people. Choi would receive the president’s plan for governance, and ran her own “shadow cabinet” that would give comment on the presidential policy plans. The net result was astonishing. It appears that Choi was involved in virtually every major policy initiative from the Park Geun-hye administration. Choi even received national security briefings and gave comments on Park’s Dresden speech- the most significant pronouncement of South Korea’s policy on North Korea.
Park Geun-hye allowed Choi Soon-sil to advise her in many areas, including allowing her to channel demonic spirits through her body. Park had a cable released by Wikileaks in which she says she believed there was “complete control over her body and soul.”
The people of South Korea became enraged when they found out all of this information. They began rioting, protesting, they filed for an impeachment and have demanded Park step down, to which she has agreed.
This sounds like a very familiar story to me. I see many similarities in Hillary Clinton sharing state secrets to her aide and female lover, Huma Abedin, who did not have appropriate clearance. Some also believe Clinton does take part in black magic.
Entire Article
From: Henry Makow
Gender differences which are natural and universal are portrayed as oppressive. … The passive, nurturing feminine role is denied. Thus females invariably usurp the male role and feminize their male partners.
In 2016, more movies than ever featured the sex role reversal.
[…]
As time has passed, Disney has gotten much more progressive with their portrayals of women. Long gone are the Cinderellas and Auroras, who lack any agency and must depend on men to get them out of trouble. [Now Disney women] are, however subconsciously, instilling in young girls the idea that you can be empowered and fight your own battles and create your own happy ending without the help of a man.”
At the same time, the cabalist Jews who run Hollywood are busy undermining the image of the strong effective male. The patriarchal male is replaced by a stunted adolescent. Even the actors look like boys, not men. …
When men are the heroes, there is usually a “progressive” i.e. Satanist intent. …
Another trend is to simply remove and replace male characters with females. …
Another aspect of role-reversal is the pairing of older women with younger men in numerous romantic films. …
As Henry Makow says, “Every left-wing message or movement is dedicated to inducting society into the Cabalist Jewish Satanic cult. Due to their complete control of the media, we can’t recognize what is happening to us. Any awakening to our real situation is suppressed by accusations of bigotry which must be ignored. We have moved from a Christian social concept to a satanic Jewish one which turns morality and reality on its head. i.e. “revolution. “
Not good. A nation divided!
Women led the way in voting for Hillary in all three ethnic groups. 12% more black and white women voted for Trump than did men of the same color.
– –
Doing an online search, I had a hard time finding an article challenging Nat Geo’s blatant reengineering of society in this edition, even when I included words like ‘God’ in my search. Mostly only articles supporting NatGeo would come up, even then! Google used to post everything, but they now seem to have a big filter, waiting until later to post articles they don’t like.
One one hand, National Geographic has done outstanding photographic work, on the other, they have been anti-God for as long as l can remember, going out of their way to promote the false science/religion of evolution, endlessly saying “millions” and “billions of years.” And it seemed the more breasts they could post the better — to normalize nudity in our culture.
But what they’re doing here is as blatant as it gets, which this author nails!
– –
From: whatdidyousay.org
AUTHORED BY GARY DEMAR DECEMBER 19, 2016
[…] “‘When I was born, doctors said I was a boy, but I knew in my heart I was a girl,’ Jackson explained in her first video. ‘So I may have some boy body parts, but that’s not wrong, that is OK.’”

This boy did not make the cover of the magazine. National Geographic chose to put him on the cover as sexual exploitation. … Today’s defenders of this type of sexual insanity, in the words of Daniel Patrick Moynihan, “defined deviancy down”1 so that what was morally shocking twenty years ago is acceptable and promoted as an enlightened form of morality. Robert Bork explains the phenomenon:
“Emile Durkheim, a founder of sociology, posited that there is a limit to the amount of deviant behavior any community can ‘afford to recognize.’ As behavior worsens, the community adjusts its standards so that conduct once thought reprehensible is no longer deemed so.”2
At the same time, these same moral misfits are defining their own brand of moral deviancy up. What was considered morally normal thirty years ago – two parents of the opposite sex married and living together, participation in the Boy Scouts and being protected from homosexual predators, rejecting a pro-death culture, and stay-at-home moms – is now
“portrayed as oppressive and shot through with pathologies, ‘As part of the vast social project of moral leveling,’ [Charles] Krauthammer wrote, ‘it is not enough for the deviant to be normalized. The normal must be found to be deviant.’ This situation is thoroughly perverse. …”3
This type of moral deviancy has infected the mind of a nine-year-old boy who fancies himself to be a “transgender rights activist.” Instead of debunking the falsity of the claim, the folks at National Geographic promote it as some kind of moral high ground.
National Geographic is now plumbing the depths of pseudoscience. None of this nonsense should surprise us given the fact that fake news and fake science have been the modus operandi of the Left for decades – everything from evolution and abortion to the claim that the climate is warming/changing because of humans and cow farts.
If this type of propaganda is promoted as the new morality, how many second and third graders might come to believe they are not what their obvious sex organs tell them they are? Could a child call the local government child protective agencies and claim that he or she is being abused because his or her parents won’t allow him or her be what he or she really is? What if a boy confides in a teacher that he’s really a girl, but his parents won’t allow him to be and dress as a girl?
Will the State intervene and take the child away to ensure that the “appropriate” steps are taken to accommodate the child’s “true gender”? Maybe the child is taken from his parents and placed in a safe “transgender family” environment. Will sex reassignment surgery be performed against the will of the parents to mollify the sexual confusion of the child?
Entire Article
Related:
I wrote a warning here, recently, about Nat Geo’s agenda even back then; though, their photography has been truly amazing!: (film) Chased by the Light A Photographic Journey with Jim Brandenburg — Moved early in life to swap a hunting rifle for a camera
From: The Hill
Democratic voters are almost three times as likely to have “blocked, unfriended, or stopped following someone on social media” after Donald Trump‘s victory, according to a study released Monday.
The nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI ) found 24 percent of Democrats distanced themselves from people on social media because of a political postings. Nine percent of both Republicans and independents reported doing the same to those in social media circles.
Additionally, 28 percent of liberals surveyed said they removed someone from their social media circle because of the content that person posted, compared with 8 percent of conservatives.
For moderates, 11 percent said they blocked, unfriended or unfollowed someone due to what that person posted online.
The survey shows considerable splits along gender lines as well.
Women were “twice as likely as men to report removing people from their online social circle because of the political views they expressed online,” 18 percent to 9 percent, according to the study conducted by Daniel Cox and Robert P. Jones.
Three in 10 Democratic women said they removed someone from a social media platform due to a political opinion shared. This compares to just 14 percent of Democratic men doing the same.
Republican men and women were about equal on this front….
From: Nathanael Kapner, a Jew himself exposing the Talmudic NWO agenda
Who Owns
The Trump-Attacking Media?
By Brother Nathanael Kapner October 18, 2016 ©
___________________________________
DEAR DIARY, I’d like to tell the world what I know about the media…that washer of brains now attacking Donald Trump.
For starters, I used to live near Murray Rothstein who changed his name to Sumner Redstone.
He’s no blue-blooded Bostonian that he’s passing himself off as. What WASP is named Rothstein?
Rothstein, aka Redstone, owns Viacom the umbrella group over CBS.
And CBS’s latest attack on Trump is digging up a 1992 clip in which Trump says he would date a young girl when she grows up. (Trump was divorced from his first wife at the time of the remark.)
Though some are lily-livered over Trump’s inelegancies of yesteryear…1992 is a long way off from 2016, and Trump’s now running for president, not flirt of the year.
And besides, dear diary, if the presidency is a matter of “dating,” then who has Hillary been “dating?” Other women?
How about the New York Times? Constantly trashing Trump.
Latest is the Times reporting that a “steady stream of women” have stepped forward accusing Trump of “some form of sexual assault.”
Have to laugh. Is looking at an attractive woman a “form of sexual assault?” Most women, especially when wearing suggestive apparel, like that kind of attention.
But the journalists of the New York Times work for a Jew named Arthur Sulzberger Jr, the current chairman of the paper that’s owned by the Sulzberger family.
I grew up with the Jew York Times.
And every Jew back east knows that the New York Times provides the prevailing litany of Jewish positions, which includes abortion, homosexuality, and race-mixing (for the goyim).
A prominent politician has called it, “New York values.”
Then you’ve got the Washington Post whose writers, Ruth Marcus, Ann Appelbaum, and Jennifer Rubin, vomit out on a steady stream of how horrible Trump is.
One thread runs through all that they write: a hatred for everything white, and an abiding hostility toward all things masculine. Mr Trump threatens their Marxist views.
They work for Jeff Bezos, who’s not a Jew. But does he really own the Washington Post?
Bezos’ investment company, Nash Holdings LLC, is the owner.
It’s a private company, and most likely in hock to Wall Street Jewish financiers who prefer that US jobs stay in Mexico.
On to ABC that sponsored the first Trump/Clinton debate.
All the lead questions were addressed to Hillary, and all the attacks were turned on Trump.
What do you expect? The principal shareholders of ABC are two Jews:
Robert Iger and Alan Braverman, whose shows promote homosexuality and all manner of perversion.
Trump’s “macho” image and his running mate Pence’s evangelical position don’t fit the snake hole.
Next is NBC/MSNBC, owned by the Jew, Brian Roberts.
Latest has Morning Joe (useful goy on Jewry’s payroll) with a gang of Jews telling the audience that Trump has already lost the election.

(NaturalNews) Remember how Twitter kicked out Milo Yiannopolis for being mean and censored the hashtag #HillaryforPrison?
Well, I guess that censorship is a one-way street because the repugnant hashtag #RapeMelania was trending this morning and no one at Twitter seemed to feel that was worth censoring. Other recent allowable Twitter trends have been #DieWhitesDie and #AssassinateTrump – but that’s cool too.
(Article republished from DaisyLuther.com)
And Twitter censors aside, where is the feminist outrage? They call President Elect Trump a misogynist but they don’t denounce this?
Perhaps I misunderstood “feminism” and thought that their good will towards women meant all of us, not just the ones who agree with them politically. Maybe “rape culture” is okay as long as it happens to a woman married to a man they don’t like. Maybe Melania is asking for it because they don’t like her husband.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/056023_rape_Melania_Twitter_hashtags.html#ixzz4QJTA4je8
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén