NOTE: Author, Henry Makow is Jewish
——–
From: HenryMakow.com
IMF Chief’s Sexual Behavior Typical of Illuminati
Dominique Strauss-Khan, the Jewish Head of the IMF, has torpedoed his career by sexually assaulting a chambermaid at his NYC Hotel Saturday. As the article , “Our Leaders are Sex Addicts” (Feb 2008) below explains, this behavior is typical of the satanic Sabbatean-Frankist cult that spawned the Illuminati. The article relates how the prominent Jewish leader Rabbi Stephen Wise was also a Sabbatean sexual profligate. The Illuminati-controlled mass media have spread this decadent behavior to society as a whole.
by Henry Makow Ph.D
The world is set to drop into the central bankers’ outstretched hand like a ripe peach from a tree. Illuminati bankers are harvesting the fruit of their centuries-old plot to destroy Christian Civilization and place humanity on a treadmill of greed, sex, violence, trivia and political correctness.
They have succeeded because we have no leaders. They select obedient blackmailed perverts to execute their design. I always marveled that Bill Clinton betrayed the dignity of his office and the trust of 300 million people for a blow job. But, in retrospect, a sex addict is the rule rather than the exception when it comes to our “leaders” (i.e. managers.)
“President Clinton has been very helpful to us,” a banker confided in 1998. “We knew of what character he was before we placed him as president. Exposing him was very helpful in adjusting the moral habits of the youth downward. This is to our advantage. Even more agreeable to us were the vain efforts of those who thought they could remove him against our will. He is useful to us and he will not be removed by anyone until we are ready to have him removed.”
[…]
JORGE W. BOOSHE
According to the late Alan Stang’s courageous groundbreaking book, “Not Holier Than Thou: How Queer is Bush?” (2007) organized homosexuality, with its belief in sex-for-its-own-sake, is an important Illuminati control mechanism.
Stang speculates that Bush is a homosexual and demonstrates that, despite his Christian family pretensions, he has advanced the homo-sexualization of society and “given organized sodomy considerable control over the federal government.” (66)
Stang documents that a well-known male prostitute, Jeff Gannon, made dozens of visits to the Bush White House in 2003 and 2004 often staying over night. Apparently the President could be easily blackmailed. And this doesn’t even include Margie Schrodinger, the black Texan housewife whose name has disappeared down the memory hole. She formally charged the President with rape (about 2002) and then conveniently “committed suicide.”
Stang’s book is a thorough laundry list of homosexual activism within the Republican Party. It came out before Mark Foley and the Congressional Pages, Larry Craig and the ‘wide stance.” It tears the veil off the media’s feel-good, sugar-coated image of homosexuality. It is hard to stomach but must be read. Why? Because some homosexuals, by their own admission, hate society and have no morality. Thus these particular homosexuals are perfect agents of Illuminati subversion.
Alan Stang was one of the most important journalists in America and I highly recommend his book. By now, you should know that Barrack Obama has a homosexual past. Listen to this interview with Larry Sinclair by Jeff Rense. Sinclair who claims he had sex with Obama is being ignored by the mass media, but you can bet that if BO started to steer an independent course, Larry Sinclair would suddenly be in great demand. I could go on about Hillary’s threesomes but enough…
CONCLUSION
The media ritual of choosing a new President is in full swing. The masses choose which Illuminati sex addict or stooge they want and feel they are living in a democracy. The Illuminati banker just smiles:
“Excuse me if I seem to be mocking your system of beliefs, but they are rather outdated. Have you no eyes to see your vain liberties and your righteous pontifications are nothing before us? …We place our proposed leader before you and you vote for what we want. In that way we give you the vain voting exercise in the belief you had something to do with placing your president in office.”
[…]
Entire Article Here
