“On March 25, 2020, researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks issued the final report of a four-year computer modeling study on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
The 47-story WTC 7 was the third skyscraper to be completely destroyed on September 11, 2001, collapsing rapidly and symmetrically into its footprint at 5:20 PM. Seven years later, investigators at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely as a result of normal office fires.
Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team finds that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was not caused by fires but instead was caused by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
This presentation provides an in-depth look at the UAF findings.
“We are proud to announce the release of the final report of the four-year computer modeling study of World Trade Center Building 7 by researchers the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
AE911Truth is a nonprofit organization representing more than 3,000 architects and engineers who have signed the organization’s petition calling for new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11.
Richard Gage, AIA , a 30-year architect, member of the American Institute of Architects, and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will introduces the presenter, civil engineer Roland Angle, PE. Roland serves as the director of AE911Truth’s Project Due Diligence outreach to the engineering profession.
Roland graduated from UC Berkeley and began his career by designing hardened missile silos to withstand nuclear bomb blasts. He went on to a broad career in the civil engineering and construction field spanning the last 50 years.
Roland provides the highlights of the study that was led by Professor Leroy Hulsey and his team of PhD researchers at UAF. Professor Hulsey, a top forensic structural engineer of 50 years, until recently served as the chair of the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering at UAF.
The UAF team has conducted a finite element analysis study of the collapse this 47-story skyscraper, the third to collapse on 9/11, which so many know nothing about. This high-rise fell suddenly at 5:20 PM – seven hours after the Twin Towers destruction.
Most notably, it fell symmetrical at free-fall acceleration into its footprint in under 7 seconds, in the exact manner of a classic controlled demolition. Yet the National institute of Standards and Technology claimed, in their 1,000 page report issued seven years after the collapse, that the building fell due to normal office fires, which has never happened to any steel-frame, fire-protected building before or since 9/11.
A hearty thank you goes out to the thousands of concerned citizens who helped fund the university’shistorically important research. We encourage you to download the report at https://www.AE911Truth.org/wtc7 and take the time to understand the differences between the Hulsey report and the NIST report – and draw your own conclusions as to which better explains the collapse as we’ve now seen in the videos.
We invite you to also sign our petition at https://AE911Truth.org/petition, which calls upon Congress to open a a new investigation, and help us bring the report to the engineering community and to Congress. The more engineers who are raising their voices, the more Congress will listen and eventually be forced to open a new investigation. …
“The threats are really growing and expanding every single day…. We’re really at a point now where there’s a whole host of ways that our space systems can be threatened…. Hostile action toward our space-based assets is not a question of ‘if,’ but instead, ‘when.'” — General David Thompson, Washington Post, November 30, 2021. “Fifteen years after China’s ASAT strike, we still lack the ability to defeat an attack on our space systems or launch an offensive strike if circumstances warrant.” — US Air Force Gen. Kevin Chilton (Ret.), former commander of U.S. Strategic Command and Air Force Space Command, The Hill, April 12, 2022.
…these same globalists downplayed the Russian and Chinese threat all through the cold war years, and facilitated technology transfers to build up both Russia and China as future enemies. These defenders of Putin haven’t even begun to consider the complexities of globalist thinking or the sophisticated manner in which they play both sides of an issue. Armstrong begins by casting Putin as the victim of our evil globalists, without recognizing that Russia and China are competing predators seeking control of a future NWO. Neither are out to save us from the Anglo-American globalists.
Interesting, but the sword probably will be used. It’s possible that the globalists won’t need to use military might to control Europe once the US is taken out militarily. Russia and China may have to duke it out, and/or Joel Skousen thinks the globalists will use their secret high tech weapons, including aircraft to completely take over.
China has a serious foot shortage problem which will be exaggerated when global cooling starts. They’re afraid of their own people uprising. “A starving person has nothing to lose.”
America probably has anti-gravity aircraft. China may attack sooner, before our highest tech weapons are operational, Nyquist suggests. Skousen thinks they’re fully developed, and the globalists will use them after the US is attacked to take charge
46:00 Covid-19: China compromised Americans, including Fauci so they would be involved in developing Covid, so China couldn’t be blamed, and Fauci is controlled.
Weaponized smallpox could kill 60% of Americans. “Could you imagine the panic if there was a virus like smallpox that is 60% fatal. If people are panicking at something that’s only killing .03% of the population.”
1:14:00 Russia/China may only use localized EMP weapons, so the nuclear power plants won’t melt down, which would destroy the water table, so they couldn’t live or grow food there.
World Affairs Brief, February 25, 2022 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World. Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE
This past Wednesday Ukraine was invaded from three directions by Russian forces in a combined attack that finally settled all of the arguments around the world about whether Russia would invade Ukraine proper or be satisfied with occupying the two separatist regions of Donbas–Donetsk and Luhansk, which they had already sent troops into earlier in the week. As I predicted, the attack came from troops north of Kiev in Belarus, and to the south in Crimea in a pincers attack, in addition to the main force from the East. It appears Putin’s intent is to completely destroy Ukraine’s military capacity so that he can control Ukraine as a vassal state without having to destroy cities or occupy the country directly. He will have to control Ukraine’s borders and airports so that the West cannot rearm Ukraine if Putin claims she is still a sovereign nation—which will be a sham. Putin went to great lengths to construct a rationale of “self-defense” for the invasion based upon a series of lies about how Ukraine was attacking Donbas and Luhansk, when in fact, it has always been Russia fomenting and instigating any unrest in these areas, and it was Russian artillery forces that recently fired upon the Ukrainian forces to start an artillery duel that Putin could use to justify the larger attack. That false (and thinly veiled) rationale is still being used to justify the destruction of Ukraine’s military so that “it can no longer threaten the two breakaway regions.” Although the media will not say it, Russia’s claimed support for separatist movements is highly hypocritical and does not extend to any group trying to flee his control, as proven by his sending troops into Kazakhstan to silence the independence movement there—billed as mere social unrest over fuel prices. …
Putin may not want to fully occupy Ukraine, due to the costs and bad press that such a heavy-handed move would engender, but he certainly intends to impose his will on Ukraine, once it is “demilitarized.”…
Why Ukraine is of Strategic Importance to Russia: This site lists all of the huge agricultural, and strategic energy and mineral resources of Ukraine that Russia must control before going to war with the West in it’s quest for global hegemony.
The first 30 minutes are interesting — all I watched. Jake doesn’t understand that both Russia and China are preparing to take us out with EMPs and nukes though, once they’re ready — not yet.
“The entire medical industrial complex needs us all to be chronically ill to be profitable. Thinking that the medical industry wants us to be healthy is as silly as thinking that the defense contractors want world peace. They don’t. It’s bad for business.”
World Affairs Brief, December 31, 2021 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World. Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
THE PROSPECTS FOR WAR
As for timing of WWIII, I still don’t believe Russia and China will be ready to fully take on the West militarily until the latter half of this decade. Despite rapid advances in hypersonic and maneuvering glide weapons, China and Russia have only begun to manufacture and deploy these weapons recently. Full deployment and training will take a few more years. Continue reading “Skousen: Prospects for War with Russia and China”→
World Affairs Brief, December 3, 2021 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
World Affairs Brief, November 12, 2021 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
Bombshell Investigation Reveals Joe Biden Could Face WAR CRIMES Charges After Killing Innocent Children in Kabul Drone Strike
The Times investigation reveals that the U.S. killed “the wrong person” in a report accompanied by security camera footage that shows the target, Zemari Ahmadi, innocently filling water canisters for his family.
Patrick J. Buchanan: 20 Years after 9/11—Are We Better Off?
09/09/2021
The triumphant Taliban of today are far stronger than were the Taliban of 2001 who fled at the approach of the Northern Alliance. Al-Qaida is now present in many more countries than it was when we first launched the Global War on Terror.
Nor is the America of 2021 the hubristic self-confident country of George W. Bush and the neocons who were going to convert the Middle East into something like our Middle West and advance from there “with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.”
Our country is a changed place from 2001. Gone are the unity, confidence and resolution. And how have all our interventions gone?
BBC Admits Syria Chemical Attack Documentary Had “Serious Flaws”
FRIDAY, SEP 10, 2021
The BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) has admitted there were “serious flaws” in a Radio 4 documentary by journalist Chloe Hadjimatheou on the alleged 2018 chemical attack in the Syrian city of Douma.
On 2 September, the UK national broadcaster issued a statement which read:
“The ECU found that, although they were limited to one aspect of an investigation into a complex and hotly contested subject, these points represented a failure to meet the standard of accuracy appropriate to a program of this kind.”
… The documentary in question dealt with an alleged chemical attack in the city of Douma in 2018, and included an account by a former inspector with the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), identified as ‘Alex’ during the program, who expressed concerns about the conclusions of the OPCW on the matter.
In 2019, ‘Alex’ teamed up with Wikileaks to expose the OPCW for allegedly doctoring a report over the Douma chlorine attack, as OPCW officials notably avoided revelations from the fact-finding mission which may point to terror groups having been behind the purported gas attack.
We never should have regime changed them in the first place. The University of Alaska, Fairbanks proved in a 4-year, peer reviewed study that Building 7 did not collapse from fires on 9/11. All of the 80 vertical columns had to “near-simultaneously” collapse (at the same time), which Afghanis could not have done.
Also, jet fuel didn’t take down the twin towers, proven beyond the shadow of doubt by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
The USA followed FOX News instead of the HOLY Spirit in our post-9/11, reverse-Christian, regime-change wars.
Taliban has access to $85 billion US weapons, Republican congressman warns | Afghanistan Crisis
