Month: July 2014

Dr. Stanley Monteith’s Radio Liberty Audio Archives

 World Affairs Brief, July 4, 2014 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.

Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)

This Week’s Analysis:

Why Illegals Rarely Get Deported

Hobby Lobby Decision and its Possible Effects

Iraq—Joint Task Force: Russia, Iran and US?

TSA’s New Security Scare Tactics

Climate Change Propaganda Discredited Again

What’s Really Behind Fusion Centers?

Happy 4^th-The NSA is Still Spying and Government Still Lying

Outrageous Speaking Fees of Hillary Clinton

Japan Changes Passivist Constitution

Preparedness Tip: Strategic Relocation Realty Website

WHY ILLEGALS RARELY GET DEPORTED

Flooding Europe with Muslims and America with Latinos is a key part of the globalist agenda to create ethnic conflict, overwhelm traditional conservative voting patterns and take advantage of immigrants’ far higher birth rate to permanently alter Western culture. This is NOT an exclusively Democratic Party agenda. Both the Obama administration and the Bush administration before it invoked a secret policy of using executive authority to deter the effectiveness of the Border Patrol. Putting more agents on the border is pointless if their arrests are negated by a system that only gives the illegals a future court date and then releases back into society. 95% don’t appear for their day in court, preferring to hide out until amnesty arrives. Predictably, Obama offered to sign pending “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” legislation as a solution, but this form of amnesty is the magnet, not the solution. Obama is also demanding that Congress increase deficit spending another $2B to handle the “humanitarian” crisis, when $2.5B would complete the fence and stop the problem—but that’s not what they want. On this 4^th of July, let us concentrate on the accelerating dangers to our liberty rather than mindless flag waving and fireworks, which only tend to keep people wedded to the establishment view of events.

A local CBS station in Arizona covered how Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says he wants to know why the immigrants he turns over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) keep coming back

 “I want an explanation and investigation as to why 3,800 of the people in my jails that are charged with state and local crimes are here illegally,” Arpaio told Newsmax TV. “We turn them over to ICE and they keep coming back over and over again.” Arpaio stated that he has sent a letter to Homeland Security demanding an answer. “How come they’re not deported, or if they are, why do they keep coming back across the border?” Arpaio questioned.

He’s got a point, and Arizona taxpayers should be hopping mad at the revolving door the feds and the courts have created. The administration will keep claiming they are doing their best and they can’t stop it, but it’s not true. They won’t stop it because of the conflict creation agenda that I mentioned above. Here’s an accurate description by Brandon Darby of Breitbart.com of the policies being employed by the Bush and Obama administrations that ensure the illegals keep coming:

The illegal immigrants who cross as incomplete family units simply enter the U.S. illegally, turn themselves in to U.S. Border Patrol agents, are processed, and then are released with a notice to appear at a future date for court proceedings. U.S. taxpayers then fund bus tickets for the illegal immigrants to go to the U.S. city of their choosing. Approximately 95 percent of the illegal immigrants never return as promised for court proceedings, according to Hector Garza, a Border Patrol agent and spokesperson for the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) Local 2455.

 “The majority of these people crossed the border illegally and were then dropped off here at the bus station, so they could continue to their final destination, and that destination is an American city near you,” said Garza. “This right here is border insecurity at its best. Our border is not patrolled, it’s not being secured… our federal government is releasing thousands and thousands of illegal aliens into our communities.”

A double layer border fence would halt illegal immigration by at least 95%, but even though every piece of current reform legislation contains provisions for “securing the border” we know from past experience that the fence will never be completed. It’s just a gimmick to pacify the opposition. In 2006, Republicans passed the “Secure Fence Act of 2006”, with a vote of 283–138, but the Bush administration quit building after a year and refused to fund it to completion

Critics keep harping on how ineffective and costly the fence is. Of course it is ineffective—it isn’t finished and illegals simply go around the existing double fenced portions. The current border fence is more gaps than fence, and much of the fence is there only to bar vehicle crossings. Illegals can simply step over the low barrier.

All administrations have sabotaged the cost aspect by permitting crony contractors to overcharge for products and services. The Bush administration wasted much of the fence allocation by diverting billions to a horribly conceived “high-tech electronic surveillance fence” that was supposed to eliminate a physical fence, but never worked.

And, when you spend $2B on emergency humanitarian aid for illegals who the administration refuses to deport, it doesn’t take long to see that the fence, even if it costs $4B, is a bargain because it’s not a recurring cost, but a permanent fix.

Worse, in the past year the current administration, in collusion with Latino TV and radio networks, created incentives for thousands of unaccompanied minors to cross into the US by advertizing the various strategies illegals can take advantage of to subvert the law. It’s no secret that the Obama administration refuses to deport them once they arrive. Here’s a report from one of my subscribers on the Latino propaganda beating the drums of illegal immigration:

 Most Hispanics get there news and information from Univision, which is very liberal in how they portray the news that deals with politics. They are also constantly bombarding the audience with amnesty propaganda. 

Most of their news is focused on the immigration issue. Yet, lately it seems as if they have been more aggressive about it. They had a segment about the bodies (belonging to immigrants that had attempted to cross the border illegally but had failed) that were buried in a Texan cemetery. Their point was that it was very inhuman the way that they were buried-with no respect according to them (because the remains are unidentified). They ended that segment by showing a woman crying and saying that it is not fair nor humane for these people to be buried as undocumented. She then says that we should fix our situation so that nobody has to come into this country undocumented.

The next segment was about two boys from Honduras who had come illegally and had been in one of these “detention centers” for some time. They were released and reunited with their families in the US. The story is about how much they suffered during their travels, how much they suffered in the detention center and how happy they now are. I wanted to point out some parts of the video. They quote one of the boys as saying “That it was like a nightmare”. They then show him saying why. The boy laughs as he’s saying “Because we had to suffer hunger, because I was really bored and because-I don’t know-I didn’t like the food”. Later on they must have asked him if he wanted to say something to his parents (and maybe even to the president) because the same boy said, “To my parents, that I love them; and to Obama, thank you”. Here is the link to the actual video.

Who told the boy from Honduras that it was thanks to Obama that he was able to “fulfill his dream” (as Univision called it)? It seems like maybe these kids are coming into this country, and they are giving them this idea of seeing Obama as this benevolent leader who can make/change laws and fulfill dreams. These children come, already thinking that they are entitled to receive care from the government. These children, without knowing, are being brought really into servitude and it is us who have to pick up the check. And while we do, they now have more leverage to further their goals. These children don’t come learning about the Constitution or freedom, but they do come in learning of how kind Obama is and that the government is there to take care of you.

The article that is included in the link that I sent you is about Obama telling Central American parents to not send their children to the United States or they would be sent back. Yet, as my source noted, the article ends by saying that, in contrast to undocumented children from Mexico, illegal children “from Central America cannot be sent back immediately. That authorities have to provide sanitary assistance and basic necessities before releasing them to their parents (in the States) or foster parents while they wait for their court date. It almost seems as if they’re telling the people that though President Obama said this, it’s still safe to come.”

What to do? First finish the fence. Customs and Border Protection spent $2.4 billion between 2006 and 2009 to complete 670 miles of border fence. Estimates are now up over $3-4B simply because the government wants to deter Congress from voting to finish it—and even if they would authorize that amount, the courts would keep ruling in favor of environmental challenges to stop it.

Second, penalize Mexico by deporting all people back to Mexico who entered from there. Mexico is presently issuing cross-through visas to these foreign nationals whose purpose (it must be clear by now) is to break US law.

Finally, Americans on the border are getting fed up with busing these illegals around and releasing them into their communities. This week we saw what I hope will become a common precedent for civil disobedience against this evil government agenda that is sweeping the country. Protestors in Murrieta California blocked buses bringing immigrants into their community from Texas for processing (and releasing). As the NY Daily News wrote,

Angry locals in Murrieta, Calif., packed a 750-seat high school gym for a town hall meeting Wednesday night, a day after protesters blocked the streets to prevent the arrival of 140 immigrants from overcrowded Texas facilities.

“Send them back! Send them back!” the crowd shouted at Murrieta officials and federal Border Patrol agents trying to address the meeting, as hundreds of residents stood outside unable to enter the crowded assembly. Concerned residents asked about public health, safety, and what happens once the immigrants are processed and released to the community.

Loud booing erupted as Chief Border Patrol Agent Paul Beeson revealed that four of the 140 immigrants destined for Murrieta — but rerouted to a nearby Border Patrol station in Chula Vista given the street protest — had been hospitalized for scabies and fevers. Another wave of immigrants is set to arrive in Murrieta for processing on Friday, the Fourth of July.

Scabies is an itchy, highly contagious skin disease caused by an infestation of the mite Sarcoptes scabiei. But the disease issue goes beyond lice and scabbies as these illegals are being often transported on airlines and buses used by other Americans. The risk of contamination from lice, scabbies and other infectious disease residues on seat backs is high. Fox News wrote an horrendous story about how medical workers at a Texas hospital are being threatened if they leak anything about the horrific condition these kids are in, and it’s all being levied on American taxpayers:

A government-contracted security force threatened to arrest doctors and nurses if they divulged any information about the contagion threat at a refugee camp housing illegal alien children at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, sources say.

In spite of the threat, several former camp workers broke their confidentiality agreements and shared exclusive details with me about the dangerous conditions at the camp. They said taxpayers deserve to know about the contagious diseases and the risks the children pose to Americans.

“There were several of us who wanted to talk about the camps, but the agents made it clear we would be arrested,” a psychiatric counselor told me. “We were under orders not to say anything.” The sources said workers were guarded by a security force from the BCFS, which the Department of Health and Human Services hired to run the Lackland Camp.

 The sources say security forces called themselves the “Brown Shirts.” [a knowing reference to NAZI civilian thugs in Germany] “It was a very submissive atmosphere,” the counselor said. “Once you stepped onto the grounds, you abided by their laws – the Brown Shirt laws.” She said the workers were stripped of their cellphones and other communication devices. Anyone caught with a phone was immediately fired. “Everyone was paranoid,” she said. “The [illegal] children had more rights than the workers.”

She said children in the camp had measles, scabies, chicken pox and strep throat as well as mental and emotional issues. “It was not a good atmosphere in terms of health,” she said. “I would be talking to children and lice would just be climbing down their hair.”

A former nurse at the camp told me she was horrified by what she saw. “We have so many kids coming in that there was no way to control all of the sickness – all this stuff coming into the country,” she said. “We were very concerned at one point about strep going around the base.”

 “When they found out the kids had scabies, the charge nurse was adamant – ‘Don’t mention that. Don’t say scabies,’” the nurse recounted. “But everybody knew they had scabies. Some of the workers were very concerned about touching things and picking things up. They asked if they should be concerned, but they were told don’t worry about it.”

The nurse said the lice issue was epidemic – but everything was kept “hush-hush.” The nurse told me she became especially alarmed because their files indicated the children had been transported to Lackland on domestic charter buses and airplanes.

Finally, the staff of The Daily Bell commented on Obama being the key to all that is going wrong with America: President Obama has changed the way US citizens receive health care and now he is convulsing the nation’s southern border by deliberately abrogating its security. Love him or hate him, if Obama succeeds in changing US immigration policies, he should go down in history as one of the more effective and powerful presidents in US history.

But they are only partly right. He is not actually “the worst president in six decades.” Most recent presidents are puppets to an insidious globalist conspiracy of power to subvert liberty, culture, morality and national sovereignty—and that isn’t going away simply by electing another controlled Republican to office in 2016—who won’t undo any of what Obama has done.

 Related:

(video) Jerome Corsi: Open border to bring America into the NWO — “They’re using these children as a ‘beard’ for a sinister purpose” – David Knight