Not a fan of phony ‘Christian’ Ted Cruz at all, but the officers taking off their hats during this prayer — awesome to see!!!
…the officer on the left anyway.
Continue reading “(vid) Officers show respect and reverence at church shooting scene”
Kurt Richard Haskell writes:
Ted Cruz’s father was part of the JFK assassination, which means Ted Cruz’s father = CIA. This also likely means that Ted Cruz himself is CIA. This also explains how Ted Cruz, a non- US citizen by birth could get this far in the election without anybody challenging his citizenship and eligibility to be president.
WAS CRUZ’S FATHER LINKED TO THE JFK ASSASSINATION?
Cuban hired by Lee Harvey Oswald bears a striking resemblance to Cruz
Wayne Madsen – APRIL 15, 2016
Based on the presence of the elder Cruz, an anti-Castro activist, in Dallas and New Orleans before the November 22, 1963, assassination of President John F. Kennedy, there is a strong reason to believe that Cruz was associated with Central Intelligence Agency’s anti-Castro operations.
Furthermore, a Cuban hired by alleged JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald and who bears a striking resemblance to Cruz is seen in an iconic photograph of Oswald and a group of Cubans Oswald hired who were distributing “Hands off Cuba!” pamphlets in New Orleans in the summer of 1963. The photo of Oswald and other Cubans he hired for the Fair Play for Cuba Committee was taken outside the International Trade Mart in New Orleans on August 16, 1963. WMR has been informed by a source that the individual to Oswald’s left is none other than Rafael Cruz.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-pwGx4vv2g]TED CRUZ BRIBING DELEGATE, CAUGHT ON CAMERA!
Minute-2:55[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg_SnL0OrNo]Fox News Declares Ted Cruz Ineligible To Be POTUS Due To Birth In Canada
Published on Mar 9, 2013
Starts @ 6:00[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__P59UW0_vk]Ted Cruz’s Number Was In DC Madam’s Black Book!
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40fYlwHFCRg]Ted Cruz’s Daughter Dressed Him in a Pink Boa and Underwear And Videotaped It
Published on Apr 13, 2016
During Wednesday night’s live broadcast of the Cruz family Town Hall on CNN, one of the daughters of Texas Senator Ted Cruz seems to have let it slip that there is video of her father in a bizarre wardrobe choice that his PR team is almost certainly tracking down as we speak.
The Republican candidate for President and his wife Heidi were joined by their two daughters on stage with Anderson Cooper during a late portion of the broadcast. In keeping with the Town Halls this week, which were often focused on more personal elements of the candidates and their families, Cruz discussed a recent Daddy-Daughter picnic at school. To demonstrate some of the everyday goofiness in his role as Father in Chief, Cruz relayed a harmless story of fatherly dress-up.
“She got to dress up Daddy in a pink boa and these like, big goofy-looking underwear…” explained the Texas Senator.
World Affairs Brief, April 1, 2016 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
This Week’s Analysis:
Trump Backs out of GOP Pledge—As Do the Others
North Carolina Nullifies Transgender Bathrooms
US Kills ISIS Leader Multiple Times
Anti-Vaccine Film Dropped from Film Festival
Belgium “Handler” of Suicide Bombers Released
China Still Very Much a Communist Dictatorship
Nothing has Changed to Secure Southern Border
Hillary’s Moral Skeletons
Preparedness Tip: Solar Water Pumps
Some pundits are calling it the Cuban Mistress Crisis since the Rubio campaign started the rumors about Cruz’s improprieties, but the rumors are creeping up from many sources. The tabloid National Inquirer took it upon themselves to tally up the accusations and suspect that Sen. Ted Cruz has had between 5 and 8 extra-marital affairs during his political career. Certainly Donald Trump, the alternative presidential candidate, is no paragon of moral virtue either, but Trump is also not running around the country trying to court the evangelical Christian vote by touting his “born again” status either. It is the charge of hypocrisy that is bearing down heavily on Cruz at the moment, especially after having been endorsed by Glenn Beck as the “Anointed Candidate” whose “time has been ordained.” This week I will discuss the charges and present some evidence you may not have seen before. It is far from conclusive at this point, but it wouldn’t be the first time a politician took advantage of adoring fans and co-workers.
Cruz immediately went on the offensive and blamed it all on Donald Trump. It is no secret that Trump is friends with the owner of the National Inquirer, David Pecker, who has flown with Trump on his 757 personal luxury jetliner. As Infowars.com reported,
Ted Cruz told reporters in Wisconsin the story was “all lies.” Cruz then went on to blame the article on Donald Trump and his “henchmen.” Cruz argued Roger Stone has been forwarding the article today on the internet. He thinks [the] Trump campaign is behind this story. Cruz also said the publisher of the National Enquirer is a friend of Donald Trump’s.
But these rumors did not start with Donald Trump. The rumors were started by the Rubio Campaign and GOP elites. Conservative Treehouse reported: It was discovered that weeks ago a large number of Marco Rubio operatives and supporters were trying to bring the sex scandal story to the MSM attention. Under the open guise of #TheThing they were communicating via various twitter feeds and following along to see if the story had been picked up. Most of the activity was centered around March 10th – March 15th.
Yesterday the hashtag CruzSexScandal went viral. Today, many of those DC operatives, participants, supporters, consultants, Super-PAC’s and campaign advisors have spent a great deal of time deleting their (The Thing) participation. The peak of their scrubbing coincided with Senator Ted Cruz accusing Donald Trump of planting the story.
Trump issued a statement saying he was not responsible for the article.
“I have nothing to do with the National Enquirer and unlike Lyin’ Ted Cruz I do not surround myself with political hacks and henchman and then pretend total innocence,” Trump said in the statement. “Ted Cruz’s problem with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while they were right about O.J. Simpson, John Edwards, and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Lyin’ Ted Cruz.”
In other words, just as Cruz had “nothing” to do with the first naked photo of Melania [Trump] that started off this latest scandal, so Trump had “nothing” to do with the Enquirer article.
It probably is not a coincidence that the establishment media isn’t making a big deal out of these charges—only the alternative and tabloid media. The establishment doesn’t want to oust Cruz just yet—they need him to stop Trump from gaining a majority of delegates so they can hand the nomination to one of their own during a brokered convention. You can bet they will dump Cruz and jump on the bandwagon against him once Trump is denied a first ballot win.
Conservative Christian supporters of Cruz aren’t abandoning him in large number either, for several reasons: 1) there’s no open confession yet by any of the women, 2) there isn’t anyone else in the race for President that espouses the Christian faith as openly as Cruz, and 3) many Christians are overly tolerant of sin once a person is “born again” (where some Christians feel that puts them under “grace” and covers for even future sins).
Other Christians disagree and feel that being “born again” requires a “daily walk” with Christ through his Spirit—that truly being “born again” is a spiritual awakening combined with a resolute commitment to follow the will of the Lord in all things, and that you can fall from that spiritual commitment by willfully going against God’s commandments and His spiritual promptings. Naturally, they also believe you can repent again and get back into His grace, but you can’t say you are “saved” while in rebellion to what you know is right.
If these charges are true, it does make Cruz a target of establishment blackmail from now on, if he isn’t already. All this reminds me of my days in Washington DC during the mid-1980s when I saw way too many “stalwart” conservative leaders in Washington fall into moral transgression, compromising their ability to lead and avoid government pressure.
While the tabloid press is known for their extravagant and sensationalist claims, the National Inquirer has outed some notable politicians with their rumors-come-true campaigns, including Bill Clinton, Gary Hart, John Edwards, Elliot Spitzer, and Jesse Jackson. Roger Stone, a Washington political operative and former adviser to the Trump Campaign, thinks the information surfaced about Cruz’ mistresses from within the Cruz campaign where the candidate’s behavior is visible behind the scenes. He says “the allegations are largely true,” but I’m not sure how he would know this. But, it’s also telling that Cruz isn’t threatening a defamation lawsuit against the Inquirer, as that would force the publication to bring forth its evidence.
Breitbart reported that they received a video from an operative allied with Marco Rubio that shows Cruz coming out of the Capitol Grille Restaurant and Hotel on Tuesdays and Thursdays with a woman other than his wife—one of the five women which the Inquirer outed (with no names and blurred photos). While going out to lunch regularly with a woman who is not your wife is frowned upon in evangelical religious circles that Cruz espouses, it certainly isn’t proof of an affair, but there is more evidence linking the women in the article to Cruz.
People on the internet have likely guessed the identity of three of the five un-named women’s pictures in the Inquirer story, according to The Conservative Tree House, which does credible political research, they propose Katrina Pierson, Sarah Flores, and Amanda Carpenter.
Katrina Pierson was a consultant with the Cruz Senate campaign in 2012, so she certainly would have insider knowledge of the candidate. Ironically, she is now Trump’s spokeswoman and has done several interviews attacking Heidi Cruz as an establishment shill. WND.com covered her accusations which were not entirely correct. For example, Heidi Cruz is no longer a member of the CFR and wrote dissenting opinions on the CFR “Building a North American Community,” task force in favor of free market solutions. She has also denied having an affair with Cruz.
Amanda Carpenter is the former Communications Director for Cruz. Amanda Carpenter is also a conservative activist, CNN contributor, and writer for Mark Levin and the Conservative Review who recently published a “BLACKLIST” targeting anyone who supports Ted Cruz’s primary opponent, Donald Trump.
Interestingly Sarah Isgur Flores, in addition to being a well known political operative, was also the campaign manager for Carly Fiorina. And that little factoid brings an earlier discovery into question; where the Super-PAC for Ted Cruz (Keep the Promise) actually sent the Super-PAC for Carly Fiorina (Carly for America “CfA”) $500,000 (link).
It is also telling that Fiorina has now endorsed Cruz and stepped in quickly to save Cruz from an embarrassing request from a reporter, asking for Cruz to make an unequivocal declaration that “he has never been unfaithful to his wife.” As the Daily Mail reported,
But instead of making a blanket declaration that he has been faithful during the entirety of his 14-year marriage – a move that would effectively end the vicious news cycle – Cruz stood silently as campaign surrogate Carly Fiorina leapt in to intercept the question and change the subject.
The most damning evidence comes from sources who have talked to Bill Still, a long time establishment journalist who now has crossed over to the alternative news side. His news broadcasts are done via video only. Here are the two with damaging evidence on both the Cruz campaign dirty tricks and the mistress scandal:
From The Still Report #750 video, he gives a summary of an interview with a 24 year veteran political operative who was employed by the Cruz campaign. In this video he confirms that the Cruz campaign tactic to tell caucus goers in Iowa that Ben Carson was dropping out was done on purpose and was not a simple mistake. In fact, he says it was originally the idea of Amanda Carpenter who works for CNN. The Cruz campaign quoted CNN as their excuse for the rumor they spread, but it was Carpenter who fed it to them, not the network. Still’s source said he quit rather than go through with the Ben Carson lie campaign, but was surprised at how others in the campaign were not concerned. He said they viewed Cruz as on an errand from God and that his tactics were justified to save the country. The operative demanded anonymity because he is still working for another campaign, but he did make this telling comment about the mistress scandal:
“It’s 100% true that he has affairs. All top-level staffers got an email directly from Heidi Cruz saying that she knew about it, and it was OK, and for us not to concern ourselves with it.”
The Washington Post did a background piece on Ted and Heidi that shows how their aggressive career patterns led to marriage separation and stress that often leads to temptations of infidelity:
They’d met on the 2000 George W. Bush campaign, when they worked three cubicles apart, and in the years since, they’d gone from an apartment in Northern Virginia to a 19th-floor condo in Houston to a series of three-star hotels in early-primary states. Heidi had taken an unpaid leave from her lucrative job at Goldman Sachs to join Ted on the trail.
But in the earliest days of their marriage, they weren’t always together. At a time when Ted Cruz felt unsatisfied with his track in Washington, he made a decision to take a high-profile job in Austin — as Texas’s solicitor general — that provided a testing ground for his conservative arguments but also forced him to move 1,500 miles from Heidi, who continued working at the Treasury Department in Washington.
The job ultimately helped to launch Ted Cruz’s political career. It also nearly backfired: He and Heidi weathered several years of strained, long-distance commuting. And when Heidi finally moved to Texas, the strain only grew. She fell into a depression, what Cruz calls the couple’s “difficult chapter.”
In other bad news for Cruz, it turns out he is in the pocket of the agro-GMO giant Monsanto, according to the Natural Society:
During a recent agricultural summit in Iowa, Ted Cruz used the words “anti-science zealotry” to describe the viewpoint of the over 90% of Americans who want GMOs labeled. Like Hillary Clinton, Cruz seems to have picked sides in the GMO debate, and his name calling isn’t very pretty.
Cruz recently told his audience – whoever that is – through the Washington Post, not to let “anti-science zealotry” shut down GMOs. This remark came at a time when major food corporations are doing an about-face on GMO labeling due to Vermont’s mandatory bill going into effect this July. He also said that the anti-GMO movement is driven by “hysteria.” Considering that so many people are against agrichemical companies like Monsanto, Dow, and Syngenta and the food companies who have been (illegally) blocking food transparency, Cruz must be expecting a hefty paycheck. Declaring such a thing is otherwise a bit of political suicide.
Cruz also stated: “People who decide that is what they want, they can pay for it already, but we shouldn’t let anti-science zealotry shut down the ability to produce low-cost quality food for billions across the globe.”
The trouble is people can’t easily decide to turn down GMO foods unless they are more clearly labeled. Also GMO products aren’t quality food—there is increasing evidence they produce long-term adverse health effects, including gluten intolerance, immune deficiencies, and adverse reactions in the digestive tract. Many conservatives are on the wrong side when it comes to issues of natural health and eating better.
While Ted Cruz has currently switched to a position opposing the Trans Pacific Partnership agreement—a stepping stone to globalist control, I’m now of the opinion that his switch isn’t genuine. He was the co-sponsor of the TPA that gave the president fast track authority that will impact the eventual yes-or-no vote (no amendments allowed). With that damage done, it’s likely that the TPP will pass anyway, without Cruz’s support and he can go on record as having falsely opposed it. That’s an oft played trick of dishonest politicians—vote against something they know will pass anyway so they can gain favor among the opponents.
‘CHRISTIANS’ TRASHING AMERICA — “HA HA HA!” SICK!
Ted Cruz Jokes About Killing Donald Trump by Running Him Over with His Car. Another new low in this campaign! The mainstream media in conjunction with social media platforms has been hoping to incite psychos to attempt to assassinate Trump in order to stop him from winning the Republican nomination and becoming president.
John Kasich’s co-chair joked about killing trump, saying “you gotta take him out with a head shot,” and death threats made by anti-trump thugs on social media and YouTube are largely ignored by the selective enforcement of the terms of service as the liberal puppet masters continue to create a climate they hope will incite someone to murder Donald Trump.
If anything anywhere close to these kinds of statements or “jokes” were made about Hillary Clinton, people would be arrested, and the liberal media would be destroying people’s careers. Like and share this post if you agree this insanity has to stop!!!
• • •
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99y4ElEYjuA]Ted Cruz Jokes About Killing Donald Trump by Running Him Over with His Car
Published on Mar 31, 2016
Ted Cruz joked about his fantasy of running over Donald Trump in his car when he was on the Jimmy Kimmel Live show Wednesday night! The mainstream media in conjunction with social media platforms, has been hoping to incite psychos to attempt to assassinate Trump in order to stop him from winning the Republican nomination and becoming president. John Kasich’s co-chair joked about killing trump, saying “you gotta take him out with a head shot,” and death threats made by anti-trump thugs on social media and YouTube are largely ignored by the selective enforcement of the terms of service as the liberal puppet masters continue to create a climate they hope will incite someone to murder Donald Trump. If anything anywhere close to these kinds of statements or “jokes” were made about Hillary Clinton, people would be arrested, and the liberal media would be destroying people’s careers. The sickening double standard is clear. Report by media analyst Mark Dice.
Glenn Beck and Ted Cruz The Master of Lies – “He lies with a straight face then hides behind the Bible. I don’t believe I’ve seen a candidate be so absolutely blatant with lies as is Ted Cruz” – Kelleigh Nelson
Detailed article contains many examples!
Kelleigh Nelson — Glenn Beck and Ted Cruz The Master of Lies
By Kelleigh Nelson
February 27, 2016
Be not a witness against thy neighbour without cause; and deceive [not] with thy lips. —Proverbs 24:28
A false witness shall not be unpunished, and [he that] speaketh lies shall perish. —Proverbs 19:9
Yes, politicians are liars, and they get away with it time after time, but Ted Cruz really tops the cake. He lies with a straight face then hides behind the Bible. I don’t believe I’ve seen a candidate be so absolutely blatant with lies as is Ted Cruz. …
The Lack of Discernment by Christians
Matthew 13:15 well describes what has happened with so many in the church. “For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.” They can not discern evil from good.
How sad it is today that so much of the church has lost her salt and light. If they knew God’s Word, they’d know an imposter when they saw one. Instead of truth and substance, today’s church gives you entertainment like Rock & Roll music and do the Boogie-Woogie every Sunday while America is burning down. That’s why so many are still believing in the likes of Ted Cruz and his crazy buddies, David Barton and Glenn Beck. …
Flip-Flops, Embellishments, and Outright Lies
Apparently, the Cruz campaign believes it is fine to lie to reach your goal. He always plays the honest man, even when he’s telling you the opposite of what he told you before.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHWtCbvEptw]Ted Cruz: Illegal Alien? NO PAPERS (Canada Born – Entered Illegally in 1974)?
Published on Mar 6, 2016
Is Ted Cruz an ILLEGAL ALIEN? Cruz was born in CANADA — but according to US immigration rules, Cruz NEVER became a US Citizen!
To become a US Citizen, you must file paperwork. You cannot just walk across the border. But Ted Cruz cannot produce any papers showing WHEN he became a “US Citizen.”
Did Ted Cruz enter the USA ILLEGALLY in 1974? If so, Cruz is an ILLEGAL ALIEN from Canada!
SHOW FRIENDS THIS SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE FROM THE DHS (IMMIGRATION) WEBSITE!
Everyone knew Ted Cruz WASN’T a “Natural Born Citizen,” since he was born in a foreign country (CANADA). But now, we learn that Ted Cruz isn’t even a (regular/naturalized) U.S. CITIZEN!
1) NOT Natural-Born-Citizen
2) NOT U.S. Citizen
This destroys any chance for CANADIAN Ted Cruz to run for US President.
Ted Cruz = Illegal Alien! NO PAPERS!
TED CRUZ = GOLDMAN SACHS.
TED CRUZ = COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR).
Ted Cruz NOT Eligible. Cruz hides his records — just like (CIA) OBAMA:
Is Ted Cruz another “plant” to purposely LOSE the election (like McCain LOST in 2008)? McCain THREW the 2008 election so we’d get OBAMA. Maybe Cruz is supposed to THROW the 2016 election so we get stuck with HILLARY. At the last minute, Hillary will “discover” Cruz is an ILLEGAL ALIEN — and Cruz will get disqualified — and we’ll get stuck with HILLARY!
ALSO: Canada didn’t allow DUAL citizenship in 1970 (when Cruz was born). Therefore, Cruz was a CANADIAN citizen. Cruz didn’t give up his Canadian citizenship until 2014.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvhOzVqq4tw]Marco Rubio is a liar Ted Cruz should not even be running for president
The documents Mike refers to:
“Natural born” @ Minute-27:45[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBFSs5Koff4]What Really Happened Show: Michael Rivero Friday 2/26/2016: (Commercial Free Video)
Published on Feb 26, 2016
— Check Out http://whatreallyhappened.com
Donald Trump Is Right to Retweet that Marco Rubio Is Not a Natural Born Citizen
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
February 22, 2016
Donald Trump retweeted that both Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are not natural born citizens. See https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/701045567783219201 . …
A natural born citizen is a citizen by virtue of birth and birth alone. But birth does not exist in a vacuum. There are circumstances that exist at the time of birth. Those circumstances are, among many, the parents to whom one is born and the place where one is born. In order to have a valid definition of the natural born citizen, it is necessary that we take these birth circumstances and make them part of a definition.
There does, indeed, exist a definition that contains the necessary and sufficient birth circumstances that must exist in order for one to be a natural born citizen. The historical and legal record demonstrates that in order to be a citizen by virtue of birth alone, one must be born in the country to parents who were its citizen at the time of the child’s birth. Indeed, a natural born citizen is a child born or reputed born in the country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child’s birth. See Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Sections 212 to 217 (1758) (1797) (“The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens”); Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875) (“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class, there have been doubts, but never as to the first”); accord U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 665 (1898) (“The child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle”). All other birth circumstances, i.e., either not being born in the country or not being born to two citizen parents, do not produce citizenship by virtue of birth alone.
Article II, Section 1:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United
From Ben Franklin’s letter to Charles William Frederic Dumas:
Philadelphia, 9 December, 1775.
“…I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed,) has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author. Your manuscript “Idee sur le Gouvernement et la Royaute” is also well relished, and may, in time, have its effect. I thank you, likewise, for the other smaller pieces, which accompanied Vattel…”
The letter addresses other matters concerning employment of colleagues, and translations of the proceedings of the Congress.
Vattel’s definition of a natural born citizen:
Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at § 212:
§ 212: The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
There is more, concerning ordinary citizens, inhabitants, naturalization, duties and responsibilities of citizenship, renouncing citizenship once you become of age, children born of foreigners, or at sea, it is a complex subject and a big book. Read it all here if you wish: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2246#lfVattel_label_1642
John Jay wrote to George Washington:
July 25, 1787
“Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”
In Sep., 1787, the “Committee of Eleven,” chosen at the Constitutional Convention to work out details on numerous occasions, changed the presidential requirement from citizen to natural born citizen, after receiving Jay’s letter. The Convention accepted the changes, hence the wording we have today.
Meaty exposé on Cruz and how politics really works in America by David Duke.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOIeJiKZLJA]Donald Trump Ted Cruz Goldman Sachs and the Zionist Oligarchs
Published on Feb 4, 2016
http://www.DavidDuke.com ( This Documentary – 98 % Positive Rating! — Proof that people recognize truth when they finally hear it !)
Former Republican Member of the House of Representatives-LA Dr. David Duke discusses Donald Trump, The Zionist control over the candidates of both parties for President of the United States and the possibility that Donald Trump could be the first President in our lifetimes who puts America First!
GREAT to hear Ted say this, during tonight’s RNC debate, about one of our greatest threats, an EMP attack, which Russia and China can already easily do — and would take out *hundreds* of millions — America being without electricity for many months.
Our anti-missile missiles don’t work very well, because they have to actually hit the missiles, unlike Russian ABMs, which only need to be two miles away, as they fly by each other. Ours need to be redesigned. We’re sitting ducks from Russia and China’s standard and EMP nukes.
The cost to harden the grid is minuscule, only about $2 billion, the price of one stealth bomber. The globalists want US to be vulnerable. The USA needs to be taken out so the one-world government will take place.
Transcript of the New Hampshire GOP debate, annotated
CRUZ: With respect to North Korea and what we should do now, one of the first things we should do is expand our missile defense capacity. We ought to put missile defense interceptors in South Korea. South Korea wants them. One of the real risks of this launch, North Korea wants to launch a satellite, and one of the greatest risks of the satellite is they would place a nuclear device in the satellite. As it would orbit around the Earth, and as it got over the United States they would detonate that nuclear weapon and set of what’s called an EMP, and electromagnetic pulse which could take down the entire electrical grid on the Eastern seaboard, potentially killing millions.
We need to harden the grid to defend ourselves, and we need missile defense to protect ourselves against North Korea.
Minute-4:[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C66-b2QBrdg]Marco Rubio’s Ties To Gay Prostitutes Comes Out!
“If you want non-interventionism, a policy that defends this country and not talk about policing the world,
you’ll have to look elsewhere than for Ted Cruz.”
– Ron Paul
• • •
‘Carpet Bomber’ Cruz: Libertarian or Neocon?
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is being advertised in some circles as the heir to the Ron Paul libertarian movement, yet one look at his foreign policy and it is immediately evident that he is anything but. His advisors are Bill Kristol, John Bolton, James Woolsey, Elliot Abrams and other washed-up neocon has-beens. No wonder he screams about “carpet bombing” the Middle East and making the sand glow in the dark. The libertarian movement is essentially built around rejection of wars of aggression and against interventionism. Ted Cruz, neocon, in today’s Liberty Report: (source)
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE1Mq3IJmMo]TEXE MARRS -Ted Cruz—Deceiver of Zion, Father of North American Union – May 9, 2015
Ted Cruz claims to be an originalist, against the Constitution being a living, bendable document.
“Originalism is a principle of interpretation that views the Constitution’s meaning as fixed as of the time of enactment.”
Cruz also skipped the vote to audit the Fed. His wife: CFR, Goldmann Sachs.
Even worse: he’s loudly a reverse-Christian, neocon warmonger!
Marco Rubio is an anchor baby, and Ted Cruz is not a natural born citizen. Neither are Constitutionally qualified to be president.
[youtube=youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8ymuGhd08s]President Wanted: No Citizenship Required
Published on Jan 15, 2016
David Knight breaks down how Ted Cruz is ineligible to be president of the United States based on the Constitution.
Ted Cruz is not eligible to be President: “No person except a natural born Citizen…shall be eligible” — Cruz’s supporters, including the corporate media, are demonstrating either an ignorance of the US Constitution or an *utter disregard* for it. This tells us that were Cruz to become President, he would continue the long and tragic tradition of recent Presidents to ignore the Constitution to the detriment of the people
Ted Cruz is not eligible to be President of the United States; The meaning of “Natural Born.”
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” — Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, clause 5
Ted Cruz is ineligible to run for President of the United States. He was born in Canada, of parents who were Canadian citizens at the time of his birth. Cruz’s mother claims to have been born in Delaware. The State of Delaware claims not to have any records of her. (The authenticity of the Birth Certificate provided by the Cruz campaign is now in dispute.) But even if genuine, it makes Cruz a US citizen, but not “Natural Born.”
Ted Cruz’s supporters try to get around “Natural Born” by claiming it simply means any US citizen, an opinion even echoed at Wikipedia!
But if any US citizen could be President, then the qualifier “Natural Born” would not be needed (and is not present in the Constitutional citizenship requirements for Representatives and Senators). Clearly, to the Founding Fathers, “Natural Born” had a specific and obvious meaning, applied exclusively to the Presidency!
The Founding Fathers did not need to define what “Natural Born” meant inside the Constitution as it had been defined in existing legal theory in works such as “The Law of Nations” by Emerich de Vattel, published in 1758 and relied on heavily by the framers of the Constitution. “Natural Born” was already legally defined when the Constitution was written as “born inside the nation.” …
In addition, there are no less than four United States Supreme Court Decisions that reaffirm that “Natural Born” means “Born inside the nation.”
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
There has never been a United States Supreme Court Decision that ruled “Natural Born” as having any other meaning than “born inside the country.”
All of Cruz’s supporters, including the corporate media, are demonstrating either an ignorance of the US Constitution, or an utter disregard for it. This tells us that were Cruz to become President, he would continue the long and tragic tradition of recent Presidents to ignore the Constitution to the detriment of the people.
The Constitution is the original contract with America. It is the rules by which We The People allow the government to act as caretaker of our National Sovereignty. If a politician does not wish to work within the restrictions and rules of the Constitution, the honorable thing to do is resign and find useful employment. If Ted Cruz’s supporters wish to live in a nation not protected by the Constitution they are free to move elsewhere.
But under the rules this nation operates on, Ted Cruz is not eligible to be President of the United States.
Ted Cruz claims to be an originalist, against the Constitution being a living, bendable document.
“Originalism is a principle of interpretation that views the Constitution’s meaning as fixed as of the time of enactment.”
Cruz also skipped the vote to audit the Fed. His wife: CFR, Goldmann Sachs.
Even worse: he’s loudly a reverse-Christian, neocon warmonger!
Marco Rubio is an anchor baby.
If Cruz lies about this, what won’t he lie about?
Most of the media will ignore this fact to get this warmonger in.
From: Washington Post
Ted Cruz is not eligible to be president
By Mary Brigid McManamon January 12
Mary Brigid McManamon is a constitutional law professor at Widener University’s Delaware Law School.
Donald Trump is actually right about something: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) is not a natural-born citizen and therefore is not eligible to be president or vice president of the United States.
The Constitution provides that “No person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
..on this issue, the law is clear: The framers of the Constitution required the president of the United States to be born in the United States.
Senator Cruz may be a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
October 22, 2013
The establishment specializes in the old fashion bait-and-switch. It knows the people are sick and tired of government as usual and they want change. Obama was billed as Mr. Hope and Change. But once installed in the White House, he immediately continued and expanded the Bush agenda, that is to say the agenda of the political establishment. Barry, like his predecessor, is little more than a frontispiece, a teleprompter reader for the elite.
Now that we’re fed up with Obama, it is time for the next round of phony change. That change will likely be represented by reformulated Tea Party Republicans Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. [Rand Paul would probably be real change. If Cruz is a true insider like this article indicates, the globalists may be championing Cruz so Rand will be overshadowed – editor]
“The Republican establishment despises Ted Cruz. And that’s great news for the senator from Texas: It’s the most prominent sign that he’s the front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination,” the National Journal opined last week.
The faux government shutdown with its intense partisan squabbling and meticulously orchestrated theatrics provided Cruz and the reformulated Tea Party Republicans with a stage to present themselves as the answer to politics as usual. According to the script, a staid GOP dominated by the likes of old guard John McCain and John Boehner is afraid of Cruz and the supposedly renegade faction of Tea Party activists in the House. But it’s all show business.
For all his allure as an outsider, Canada-born Ted Cruz is in fact an insider playing a role similar to the one Barack Obama played back in 2008 when his handlers portrayed him as the hope and change candidate out of nowhere.
Cruz’s insider connection is a family affair. His wife, Heidi, is a Goldman Sachs vice president in Houston, Texas, according to her LinkedIn profile. She also served as an economic advisor for the Bush administration. In 2011, a Cruz campaign spokesman portrayed Heidi as “an expert on North American trade,” in other words she is savvy when it comes to globalist transnational trade deals like NAFTA, the single most destructive government move against the American worker in history.
She was also a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations (see her bio at Claremont McKenna College), a position that expired prior to her husband’s attack on the globalist organization. In October, 2011, Ted Cruz reportedly characterized the CFR as “a pernicious nest of snakes” that is “working to undermine our sovereignty.” He previously called the CFR “a pit of vipers” during a speech delivered on October 13, 2011, to a Republican women’s group in Sugarland, Texas. Ben Smith, writing for Politico, attempted to associate Cruz with Texas residents Ron Paul and Alex Jones in order to pass him off as a rightwing conspiracy theorist on the same page as fringe libertarians and starry-eyed constitutionalists. He is, of course, nothing of the sort.
Like the domestication of the Tea Party and the expulsion of its more purist liberty-minded activists, the Cruz the warrior pitted against the establishment motif is another slick subversion directed at the political elite’s most puissant opposition – the real Tea Party and a threatening number of patriot activists gnawing at the edges of the political establishment.