https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qq2Ty9KAtMQ
đ Is Donald Trump a Puppet of Globalist George Soros?
Transcriptions:
“Everybody is being misled into this Zionist agenda.”
“Christians are the ones being most duped by this.”
“Israel has been hijacked, and is controlled by the Rothschilds.”
“Christians are deceived by their own ministers.”
“This is how they’re going to gain control of the middle east and expand Israel.”
“You’re seeing the greater Israel plan being pushed as fast as possible.”
“They’re playing on your emotions.”
“The NWO is going to be run out of Israel.”
“Israel has been hijacked, folks. The Rothschilds own Israel.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdw36x715hU
DONALD TRUMP DROPS MOAB! 100% PROOF HE IS WORKING FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDERS GREATER ISRAEL PLAN!
Michael Savage (fearless at age-75) has been AMAZING since Trump’s disgusting attack, and maybe saved America from ‘Sheriff Trump’ taking US to war with Russia, led by the Talmudists.
Michael says his show is now #1 in listenership, beating Rush, who pushes the war drums like the others, including Fox News.
What if Michael had not stood up to the Talmudists, and the media had been completely in lock step behind ‘Sheriff Trump,’ as Michael has been calling him, ~”shooting his 6-gun into the air and shooting his own foot off?”
â â
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 8, 2017
I always just assumed that the Jew Michael Savage was only supporting Trump in order to push him toward the kind of thing we saw Thursday night.
Instead, the Jew Savage is one of the only voices in mainstream âconservatismâ (along with Tucker Carlson and Ann Coulter) who is being extremely skeptical of this apparent new war.
LISTEN HERE:Â 6-MINUTE AUDIO CLIP
Gotta give credit where credit is due.
Hadding Scott writes:
On 6 April 2017 Michael Savage (nĂŠ Weiner), a radio personality heard across the United States, gave an anti-war broadcast that began by observing, on the one-hundredth anniversary of the United Statesâ entry into the First World War, that Woodrow Wilson had been reelected in 1916 on the premise that he had kept the United States out of the European war and would continue to do so â but then was coaxed into war in spite of his original intentions, with disastrous results.
Obviously, this is a parable for what is happening with Trump.
He points out correctly that we really do not know who in Syria used sarin. He invokes âcommon senseâ as an argument against assuming that Assad was responsible for the sarin-deaths. He states repeatedly that it makes no sense to blame Assad for the gassing.
Savage offers answers to two distinct but, in practice, intertwined questions. The two questions are, who wants war with Russia? and, who wants to destroy Syria?
Savage initially blames âthe generalsâ and âthe military-industrial complexâ for wanting war. Then he blames âthe progressivesâ and âthe liberals.â He gets closer to the truth when he mentions âthe Neocon ventriloquists in the media,â since Neoconservatism is a Jewish movement. He mentions Jeff Zucker and Wolf Blitzer. Blitzer at one time was an employee of AIPAC.
Who wants war with Russia? George Soros and the left, he says.
Savage points out that the ex-chief rabbi of Israel has compared the sarin-gassings to the Holocaust as a way of agitating for war. To answer the question of who wants Syria destroyed, Savage finally declares at the end of his first hour: âIsrael benefits the most if Assad is gone.â
The constituencies for war against Russia and war against Syria are both Jewish.
He links the change in Trumpâs policy to the reduction of conservative Catholic Steve Bannonâs status within the administration. âIt seems to me that the liberals and the Neocons are prevailing, and they both have Trumpâs ears.â
* * *
Michael Savage has not always criticized his fellow Jewsâ warmongering. In 2003 he was such a noteworthy warmonger that he was rewarded with a prime-time show on MSNBC, replacing Phil Donahue, after it was decided that MSNBC would line up with the rest of the news-media in supporting the war against Iraq. At some point, perhaps after witnessing the overthrow and brutal murder of Muammar Qadhafi, Michael Savage became a critic of Neoconservative warmongering, and has linked it to Israeli interests. He has been doing that at least since 2013.
The broadcast of 6 April 2017, however, marks a new level of frankness and clarity for Savage, in terms of declaring the responsibility of the Jewish State. He implies that he has held back in the past.
âBut there is another element, and you know I am reluctant to say it, because of the fear I have, in saying what I am going to say to you, but I guess Iâm past the point of holding back almost anything,â he says.
Let us hope that the so-called Alt Right will not be less clear and less bold than this Jewish talkshow-host in declaring that Jewish interests motivate these wars. Our people need to know this, so that they will recognize the pattern of lying and know what not to believe.
I donât see anyone in the Alt-Right not denouncing the strike.
Everyone is denouncing it.
But at the same time, everyone is trying to make sense of just what the hell is going on.
I donât think that âthe Jews talked him into itâ is any better of a line of reasoning than âhe saw dead babies and it made him feel sad.â
There has to be something more going on here. And I donât think that âitâs a part of a multi-dimensional chess gameâ is a very reasonable excuse.
That is of course possible, but itâs also possible that the aliens came to him and told him he had to do it.
As of right now, the answer that makes the most sense to me is that he is being blackmailed or having his hand forced through some other means. But if they have blackmail against him that can make him do this, then presumably that same blackmail can be used to make him do anything else.
The only other possibility is that this was a one-off strike simply meant to get the neocons off his back, or to get some good press for a week or whatever, as he prepares some big move against the forces moving against him. That is possible, and as an isolated incident, bombing a mostly abandoned airbase full of broken planes doesnât really mean much of anything.
The problem is, there is no indication this is an isolated event, and instead, the system appears to be ratcheting up pressure against Russia.
The only thing I can say is that we need to hope for the best and prepare for the worst and not jump to conclusions.
Senior editors at pro-Trump website Breitbart News have instructed staff members to stop writing critical stories of Jared Kushner, sources tell Business Insider.
Kushner, son-in-law and adviser to President Trump, has clashed recently with White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, the former CEO of Breitbart News. (RELATED: Jared Kushner Played Key Role In Causing Trumpâs Manafort Problem)Â
The New York Times previously reported that âKushner allies have also raised the issue with the president of the increasingly unflattering coverage that Mr. Kushner is receiving from Breitbart News.â
Trump reportedly told the populist Bannon and the more moderate Kushner to âwork this outâ after the pairâs feud was repeatedly dragged out into the press, according to the Times.
Breitbart ran stories critical of Kushner before Trump reportedly ordered the ceasefire.
“The damage that has been done to America’s reputation and trustworthiness around the world is epic in scale. Everybody now sees the U.S. as this rogue nation that concocts fairy tales about other countries , and then uses them to justify wars of aggression.”
~ Michael Rivero, 4/10/17 on his show, 4 days after Trump bombed Syria based on a false flag
⢠⢠â˘
âDonât you feel wonderful that we voted for a man of peace and got a man of war.â
â Michael Savage, 4/10/17 on his show
From: Breitbart
Michael Savage spoke out forcefully against intervention in Syria and aggression towards Russia during both Thursdayâs and Fridayâs monologue segments of the Michael Savage Show.
Savage asked Thursday, âwho got to you, Mr. President? Who is whispering in your ear and could have made you make this dramatic of a change towards Russia in just three days?â On Friday he condemned the strikes, saying âwe just helped ISIS.â
In Savageâs opinion, it is âthe generalsâ who are leading President Trump into military conflicts. At the same time, he believes key advisers are being pushed away from Trumpâs team. Savage pointed to both Jeff Sessions and Representative Devin Nunes (R-CA) removing themselves from inquiries into Russia, and also mentioned former Breitbart News Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon, saying âthe generals have gotten to him and turned him from peace with Russia. And the people standing in the way of war, like Steve Bannon, are being shown the door.â
Savage rebuked President Trump on Friday, sarcastically calling the strike a âmilitary tweet.â He later expanded that thought, saying it was âa limp-wristed attack in order to gain the attention of the fools in the media and the fools amongst the so-called republican voters who think this was a real great military action.â He criticized not only the President but also members of Congress on both sides of the aisle who applauded the strikes, exclaiming, âYou know youâre on the wrong side if that cesspool of filth supports your actions.â
Michael Savage believes Thursdayâs strike was a poor decision by President Trump that is out of line with the goals of his campaign and the desires of those who voted for him. Savage asked, âhow is is this an âAmerica firstâ decision?â He added that Syrian intervention wouldnât create a single job and is a no-win situation for America, likely to turn into another quagmire.
He also used his monologue to lay out a case that the poison gas attack may not be what it seems. According to Savage, âThis was a complete false flag event⌠Assad had nothing to gain by gassing his own people.â He believes the symptoms witnessed in Syria are consistent with a phosgene gas, not the sarin gas widely reported. He stated âthe West jumped to a conclusion,â and later added, âwe just helped ISIS.â
Michael Savage refers to himself as a âconservative peacenik.â
“Trump destroyed his support base with 59 tomahawk missiles…”
â Shane Bullis on Facebook, April 7, 2017
đ
Democrats have been poking the Russian bear since Trump won the election. The constant accusations of them fixing our election is not making them friendly towards us in the least. And why are they doing it? Because Trump said he could work with them?
But it doesnât stop there. People in Trumpâs own sphere are turning him towards the beating war drums. Dems and the establishment GOP both handcuffed loyal Trump advisers like Jeff Sessions, and now Devin Nunes, to take themselves out of any investigations on the Russia conspiracy. Steve Bannon, a close adviser is asked to step down from his NSC role.
Who got to you Mr. President?
“We’re always going to see evil in the world because evil people are willing to do things; good people are not.”
â Michael Rivero
â â
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzedtXM6I8M
What Really Happened: Michael Rivero (Mike Rivero) Friday 4/7/17: (Commercial Free VIDEO)
[âŚ]
Trump undertook this act of war against the legitimate government of a sovereign state who has the support of Russia and China:
Here are the prominent Americans who support Trumpâs missile attack:
He who supported a third-party candidate against presidential candidate Trump, who finds Trumpâs âAmerica Firstâ nationalism vulgar and embarrassing, who openly advocates a deep-state coup against President Trump â now approves of Trump risking WW3 by firing 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at Syria, without even an investigation as to whoâd actually deployed the sarin gas attack.
The pathological liar and disgraced former NBC anchorman calls Trumpâs missile strikes that killed 4 to 17 human beings, a âbeautifulâ sight:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (DâCA) said, âTonightâs strike in Syria appears to be a proportional response to the regimeâs use of chemical weapons.â Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (DâNY) said, âMaking sure Assad knows that when he commits such despicable atrocities he will pay a price is the right thing to do.â (Wikipedia)
Senators John McCain (RâAZ) and Lindsey Graham (RâSC) said, âUnlike the previous administration, President Trump confronted a pivotal moment in Syria and took action. For that, he deserves the support of the American people.â
House Speaker Paul Ryan (RâWI) said the strike was âappropriate and just.â
Also Sens. Bob Corker (R-TN), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Cory Gardner (R-CO), Orin Hatch (R-UT), David Perdue (R-GA), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Ben Sasse (R-NE), and Thom Tillis (R-NC). (Wikipedia)
Yesterday, April 7, speaking to a crowd of supporters in Houston, Texas, Clinton applauds Trumpâs missile strikes and urges him to undertake even more U.S. military action to take out Assad â and open Americaâs doors to Syrian refugees:
âThe action taken last night needs to be followed by a broader strategy to end Syriaâs civil war . . . . So I hope this administration will move forward [and] . . . recognize that they cannot in one breath speak of protecting Syrian babies and in the next close Americaâs doors to them.â
And so, Donald Trump finally achieves bipartisan support . . . . Sarc/
With Donald Trump being snookered so easily into attacking Syria,
Iâm very much worried he will now attack North Korea.
⢠⢠â˘
World Affairs Brief, April 7, 2017 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
This Weekâs Analysis:
Trump Fooled by False Flag Chemical Incident
Analysis of the Garland Texas False Flag Attack
Trump Threatens Military Action Against North Korea
Keeping the GOP Healthcare Bill Alive
Refugee Cap Returns to 110K
Judicial War on BLM Protestors
Trump Concern on Trade Deficits Misplaced
Senate Invokes Nuclear Option to Confirm Gorsuch
Preparedness Tip: Berkey Water Filters
[âŚ]
TRUMP THREATENS MILITARY ACTION AGAINST NORTH KOREA
For years Iâve thought that the US ought to pre-emptively strike North Koreaâs nuclear and missile sites before she gets too dangerous to handle without full scale war. No nation has been more aggressive in attacking its neighbors and threatening the world than North Korea, a virtual prison nation. But unlike its aggressive and constant threat toward Iran, which doesnât even have a nuclear weapon yet, NK has always been treated permissively, for reasons I will explain shortly.
The United States, under globalist advisors, has continued to play the role of the sucker in its weak attempts to induce NK to give up its nuclear weapons program. Signing one agreement after another, the US acted as if it was powerless to make NK dismantle its nuclear program. In each disarmament agreement, the North Koreans have cheated and yet the West fulfilled its part of the agreement, including food aid and oil shipments.
After three major failed agreements you would think the West would finally realize that North Korea’s nuclear program will never be relinquished through negotiations. But it isnât stupidity or blind optimism that has driven globalist policyâit is the knowledge that NK is Chinaâs trigger for WWIII, a war the globalists want, and thatâs why they have never been serious about stopping NK. They want that trigger preserved. And what better trigger than a perceived âcrazy manâ Kim Jong-un, so neither China or Russia get the blame.
North Korea tested another ICBM this week, landing in the Sea of Japan. That got president Trump’s attention, and Japanâs too. NK is in a state of constant development of solid fueled long-range rockets though they are reluctant to show the West anything but short and medium range launches. Launching a missile into the sea at medium range makes it difficult for the US to determine the missile’s accuracy since only North Korea knows the coordinates of the intended target area.
In advance of his meeting Thursday with Chinese President XI Jinping, Trump told the UK Financial Times, “If China is not going to solve North Korea, we will. That is all I am telling you.” The White House added that “the clock has now run out” on North Korea’s nuclear program and that “all options are on the table” âa not-so-subtle code phrase for âmilitary action.â
What kind of action? General Jack Keane said that bombing North Korea’s nuclear facilities “may be the only option left”. But that’s not true. The US could also shoot down future missile tests, especially ones that are heading toward the Sea of Japan and deny NK the test results.
So the tensions are clearly escalating in the Far East, and China loves to join in and assert its dominance. China responded to the Trump saber rattling with a statement that, “It will safeguard the security and stability of its Northeast area at all costs,” referring to both its territorial claims on all of the China Sea as well as client state North Korea. Tensions between the US and NK are at the highest point ever.
North Korea Serious about Threats to US:
Lester Holt reported to NBC News that
A senior North Korean defector has told NBC News that the country’s âdesperateâ dictator is prepared to use nuclear weapons to strike the United States and its allies. Thae Yong Ho is the most high profile North Korean defector in two decades, meaning he is able to give a rare insight into the secretive, authoritarian regime.
According to Thae, North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un is “desperate in maintaining his rule by relying on his [development of] nuclear weapons and ICBM.” He was using an acronym for intercontinental ballistic missiles – a long range rocket that in theory would be capable of hitting the U.S.
The thing which moderates this dire news is that North Korea has not yet successfully tested a full nuclear warhead in operational mode, and many of its missiles have failed in test launches. US military experts, which discounting North Korea as an imminent threat do believe this unstable country is a long-term threat.
How Dangerous Are Kim’s Nuclear Weapons?
Not very, to be frank. North Korea has never tested a nuclear warhead atop a missile, so even the North Koreans don’t know how accurate their technology is. Even if it does work, North Korea does not possess maneuvering warheads [so they can be shot down, unlike Russia’s â editor] and it has a very limited number of warheads and ballistic missiles to launch against medium range US targets in Guam or Hawaii.
While the US has a fairly limited anti-ballistic missile shield, North Korea has so few long range missiles and nuclear warheads that a couple of standard anti-ballistic missiles (THAAD interceptors or Aegis Missile systems) could stop the one or two long range missiles NK could put into the upper atmosphere against US targets. A handful of missiles is pretty easy for the US to detect and destroy. Only nations that have hundreds of missiles firing simultaneously can get through the US protective umbrellaâand that means Russia and China.
So itâs not the NK nuke threat that is the real worry, rather what China and Russia would do in support of North Korea.
A New Warning: I have long said that I didnât think China would unleash NK to start WWIII until the next decade because Russia and China are in the midst of a major rearmament, which wonât be complete until the 2020-2024 range. Obviously, they would prefer to be fully ready before launching a war.
The globalists, on the other hand, would prefer a war earlier rather than later, but they canât make it look like they started this war, so they have worked for 30 years to simply facilitate our enemyâs arsenals, transferring military and scientific technology to both China and Russia. Much of those transfers have been done courtesy of the US Commerce Department. Much has also been done through Israel. We sell our top technology to Israel and they sell it to the Russians and Chinese.
With the coming of Donald Trump, I suspect that the globalists may try and kill two birds with one stone: First, let Trump start this war by striking North Koreaâs nuclear program and 2) let Trump take the blame which will cost him the next election and forever taint him as the guy who started WWIII.
In summary, with Donald Trump being snookered so easily into attacking Syria, Iâm very much worried he will now attack North Korea, leading him down a path he vowed not to goâintervening militarily around the world. I suspect his globalist advisors may be setting him up for an attack on North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, that could provoke a Chinese nuclear response against the US, which our anti-missile systems could not control.
Here are the likely or possible scenarios:
1) North Korea sees Trump threatening and launches its first nuclear tipped missile at Guam or Hawaii, to make good on his bluster against the US. The US intercepts the missile and retaliates against NK nuclear and missile sites. The world sees this as fully justified and China cannot retaliate. WWIII doesnât start yet, and the NK threat is temporarily abated.
2) Trump does a pre-emptive cruise missile strike against North Korean nuclear sites and/or missile launch sites. [Iâm not against that, except that it should have been done years ago when China was not in a position to retaliate.] Even though China can retaliate, it doesnât do so because it isnât ready yet for WWIII. The NK nuke and missile threat is gone for now but NK, with the help of China rebuilds in a more secretive manner. WWIII is merely postponed.
3) Trump strikes North Korean missile sites, and North Korea invades South Korea in response with her ample conventional weapons and army. The US has to use tactic nukes to stop the massive invasion of over 2 million North Koreans, and China responds in kind by striking the US military forces with a pre-emptive nuclear missile strike, joined by Russia. WWIII starts.
The targets will be military bases and communications facilities [Joel has often said this would start with an EMP attack, targeting everyone â editor], not cities per se, although about 12-15 major metros will be affected by the strikes on military bases integral to those cities. It could happen during Trumpâs term, and it seems to me that the globalists would very much like to tag Trump with the blame for this war.
The bottom line is that you should accelerate your preparations for relocation, war and survival, rather than count on having more time. If Trump doesnât attack North Korea pre-emptively, it doesnât mean war is avoidedâjust postponed. Itâs coming eventually in any case. If he does attack pre-emptively, the North Koreans and Chinese are too proud to let that happen without some form of retaliation. I would give it a 60-40 chance it would blossom into WWIII. If they donât retaliate enough to escalate into WWIII, its only because they have decided to wait for a better time to take revenge when their military preparations are complete.
In any case, we can no longer depend on Trump to not fall into whatever traps the globalists set for him. I actually found globalist puppet presidents easier to predict. Trump is now showing he is far more dangerous than having a puppet president because he can be so easily fooled and he has this reactionary quality that allows him to be goaded into war far too easily.
Even though I have never thought Trump would really turn things around and save this country, Iâve always said he will âslow down the globalist agenda and buy us more time.â That only turned out to be true in terms of globalist trade agreements and maybe the flooding of this country with illegal alien and refugees (which he hasnât stopped yet). But in terms of foreign policy and the threat of war, Trump may well give us LESS time, and fall completely into the globalist war trap. I personally am very worriedâŚ.
-Wish it wasnât coming but it is.
â â
Related:
Globalists can then blame Trump and his supporters for starting WWIII, which the globalists have been scheming for decades. Ughhh!
Related:
â â
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5Wl_ZwNstg
Military Leaders’ Plan To Trick Trump Into War
This includes many of Donald’s past TWEETS on how he said we should stay out of Syria. Donald did not say he was starting WWIII, however, which the article’s title states.
I think it’s too early for WWIII, but who knows for sure, if we keep harassing them?
The USA has been lying 24/7 for months about Russia hacking the election, and now we completely insult them by invading the country they’re trying to actually help?
â â
“We voted him in specifically not to do what he just did.” â Scott Bennett
4-6-17
Hour 2 – Scott Bennett Subs For Prof James Fetzer – New Rense Radio show M-W-F
(subscription only)
Trump may very well be blackmailed, perhaps because of footage someone has on him from way back. He’s completely changed his stance on Syria.
And because Russia is involved, this is not only pure, reverse-Christian evil, it’s nuts!
Russia has vast nuclear superiority and EMP weapons that can take US out, while they’re hardened for an EMP, and have anti-missile missiles that actually work!
â jeff
This breaks my heart! Is so wrong! More innocent blood on our hands! We are the Devil!
Related:
â â
Thursday night the United States launched 59Â tomahawk cruise missiles from the U.S. Navy warships USS Porter and USS Ross at a Syrian airbase located at Shayrat. The Trump administration believes that the base was the origination of the chemical gas attack which killed over 70 civilians. This is President Trumpâs first major military action. (source)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyQQYkOPX1s
USS Ross Launches Tomahawk Strike on Syrian Air Base
From: ZeroHedge
The six year Syrian proxy war to dethrone president Bashar al Assad quietly ended with a whimper yesterday when at a news conference in the Turkish capital, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson suggested the end of Bashar Assadâs presidency is no longer a prerequisite for a way out of the Syrian crisis, in a dramatic U-turn from Washingtonâs long-held policy.
âI think the longer term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people,â said Tillerson at a joint conference with Turkish Foreign Minister Mevut Cavusoglu on Thursday, AFP reported. Later, UN Ambassador Nikki Haley echoed Tillerson, saying “Our priority is no longer to sit and focus on getting Assad out.” âŚ
Under President Barack Obama, the United States made Assadâs departure one of its key objectives. The Syrian armed opposition also insisted upon the longtime leaderâs resignation as one of the conditions during the Astana peace talks.
For those unaware, allowing the people of Syria to decide the fate of President Assad has been Russia’s stance since the conflict began. âŚ
In other words, the entire proxy conflict, with thousands of lives lost, and millions of Syrian immigrants flooding Europe, has been for nothing.
Better yet, we have confirmation that Tillerson’s pivot was indeed groundbreaking courtesy of John McCain’s reaction. The Senate Armed Services Committee and prominent neocon said in a statement that “I am deeply disturbed by statements today by our Secretary of State and Ambassador to the United Nations regarding the future of Bashar al-Assad in Syria.”
McCain then slammed Tillerson, saying “Once again, U.S. policy in Syria is being presented piecemeal in press statements without any definition of success, let alone a realistic plan to achieve it.”
The angry neocon continued: “ultimately, the administrationâs statements today could lead Americaâs true allies and partners in the fight against ISIS to fear the worst: a Faustian bargain with Assad and Putin sealed with an empty promise of counterterrorism cooperation. I hope President Trump will make clear that America will not follow this self-destructive and self-defeating path.”
He was not alone: Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham says if reports were accurate, âI fear it will be the biggest mistake since President Obama failed to act after drawing a red line against Assadâs use of chemical weapons.” He added that “This would be crushing news to the Syrian opposition and to our allies throughout the Middle East. I fear it is a grave mistake.”
With America’s two biggest neocons slamming Trump’s Syria reversal, it is safe to say that at least in this particular case, Trump made the right decision.
“They wouldn’t still be attacking him this strongly and going down this Russian-interference-in-the-election rabbit hole, which is just a total sham. If he was really one of them and controlled they’d back off on those things. But they haven’t, and I don’t think they’re through. They’re still spying on Trump, and any mistake he’ll make privately that’s impeachable, we’ll see that come out in the future too. There are just all kinds of wolves in sheep’s clothing circling him.”
â Joel Skousen, on The Jeff Rense Show, 3/29/17, transcribed by Jeff Fenske
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén