Category: 9-11 TRUTH Page 3 of 20
What caused Building 7 to collapse on 9/11? Dr. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska Fairbanks may have the answer, following an exhausting four year engineering study. Directed by Dylan Avery.
Sep 9, 2021
“Here I am in the middle of a massive government psyop on the 20th anniversary of another massive government psyop.”
Patrick J. Buchanan: 20 Years after 9/11—Are We Better Off?
09/09/2021
The triumphant Taliban of today are far stronger than were the Taliban of 2001 who fled at the approach of the Northern Alliance. Al-Qaida is now present in many more countries than it was when we first launched the Global War on Terror.
Nor is the America of 2021 the hubristic self-confident country of George W. Bush and the neocons who were going to convert the Middle East into something like our Middle West and advance from there “with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.”
Our country is a changed place from 2001. Gone are the unity, confidence and resolution. And how have all our interventions gone?
Call the roll.
The Pentagon Attack:
What the Physical Evidence Shows
by
Jim Hoffman
Version 0.9, March 28, 2006
[…]
Pentagon Facade Damage Fits a 757
| The Pentagon attack resulted in extensive damage to the facade corresponding roughly to the frontal profile of a 757. The damaged area included extensive punctures on the first floor and much smaller punctures on the second floor. |
Many of the over 100 eyewitness accounts in Eric Bart’s compilation recall characteristics of the explosion that accompanied the September 11th attack on the Pentagon that are suggestive if not conclusive of the detonation of a powerful explosive device. Two such characteristics are:
These reported characteristics might not be explainable by the rapid combustion of jet fuel alone. Neither do they necessarily indicate the presence of explosives, given the effects of a high-speed crash.
Most FEMA photos in the public domain were taken on 9/14/01, after much of the debris was cleared out of the building…
Photos Of Flt 77 Wreckage
Inside The Pentagon
Exclusive Photos & Story
From Sarah Roberts
12-4-2
| The recent Pentagon crash discussion on Rense.com has almost entirely focused on photos of plane debris on the lawn. Since most of the plane reportedly entered the building, we should also look for images of debris inside the building. Unfortunately, such images are very hard to come by since: (1) Much of the debris was burned and torn beyond recognition, (2) Most FEMA photos in the public domain were taken on 9/14/01, after much of the debris was cleared out of the building, (3) Most other photos remain in the private hands of investigators, rescue workers, and others who were inside the building. Many images are officially classified. The following article attempts to bring together all known images sent to me or in the public domain that show aircraft debris inside the Pentagon. The images were either found online or sent to me by recovery workers to be used with permission.First, we shall examine witness accounts of plane debris inside the Pentagon. These were given by recovery workers, firefighters, engineers, and Pentagon officials. Their statements help in interpreting the various photos taken inside the building. |
FBI Releases Never-Before-Seen Photos Showing Devastation At The Pentagon From 9/11 Attack – 3/23/17
Photos compiled here: FBI Releases Never-Before-Seen Photos Showing Devastation At The Pentagon From 9/11 Attack
You can see the entire archive HERE.
2,996 Americans died from the 9/11 attacks, including from illnesses following.
4,096 Americans killed during the war in Afghanistan as of 2018.
As many as 534,000 Afghan people total killed from the war in Afghanistan.
Plus the millions maimed, injured and displaced, including many children!
• • •
World Affairs Brief, August 20, 2021 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
AFGHANISTAN INVASION BEGAN AND ENDS IN A LIE
Almost everything about American involvement in Afghanistan has been a lie, from the original excuse to invade after 9/11 to the notion that no one could have predicted how quickly Afghanistan security would collapse as the US withdrew. As Thomas DiLorenzo writes, after a close study of true history, “...one realizes the breath-taking enormity of the lies and falsehoods about American history that have been concocted by generations of court historians in service of the state and statism – of the ruination of America.” The Biden administration and its servile generals were warned by military intelligence not to evacuate the Bagram military base until after all US and NATO personnel and their camp followers had been evacuated, but they did so anyway. As U.S. Army veteran and Pennsylvania Senate candidate Sean Parnell said, “our generals are more concerned about fighting Tucker Carlson than they were the Taliban.” During the 20 years of occupation and conflict, military officials continually lied to Congress about both the claimed military successes and the continued need for a military presence in the country supposedly to keep “terrorism from descending upon America.” The phony war on terror has been the defining fib that has driven everything about US occupation of Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden was never anything but a CIA controlled mercenary who had nothing to do with planning the attacks on 9/11. The US claimed that Afghanistan was harboring bin Laden and al Qaeda to cover for other globalist agendas. It was a lie, and so was the raid in Pakistan that claimed to have killed him. But after 20+ years of useless intervention warfare, and failed nation building, even the globalists saw it was time to pull the plug on this hell hole of money and bloodshed—but only because they hope to achieve other evil agendas in the process. …
Joel Skousen, World Affairs Brief, July 9, 2021 (worldaffairsbrief.com):
George W. Bush Admits to Explosives Being in WTC during 9/11. In this video of his speech on the 5th anniversary of 9/11, Bush admitted to explosives in the WTC attack as if the terrorists themselves planted the explosives, “set high enough so that the people above wouldn’t be able to escape.” Of course, everyone knows the terrorists couldn’t have had access to the buildings to load remote controlled charges high up in the WTC, so his admission hints that he may have been trying to explain away the fact that the buildings came down by controlled demolition, without saying drawing attention to how terrorists could have done that.
On Friday September 15 [2006], President George Walker Bush gave a press conference, and near the beginning of the conference he says;
“…For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high — a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping…”
From: World Affairs Brief, March 26, 2021 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Put Pressure on NIST
The bought-off engineers at NIST went to excruciating and dishonest lengths to “prove” that WTC bldg 7 did not come down by controlled demolition despite all the visual and forensic evidence to the contrary. They also claimed there were no witnesses to explosions in the building. Newly discovered eyewitness accounts put NIST in a corner on WTC 7 explosions. This article covers all the credible witnesses and A&E for 9/11 Truth efforts to get NIST to issue a retraction, which will never happen.
58:15 Three part collapse explained by Leroy Hulsey: The penthouse collapsed first, columns failing at a high level, they found. That was followed by *all* of the interior columns failing over a nine floor area. 1.3 seconds later, the exterior columns failed.
3:05:30 Niels Harrit explains why nano-thermite was explosive: “You put it into a polymer which can produce gas.”
3:29:30 Gage and Griffin demonstrate that Noam Chomsky sold out. AE9/11 Truth personally gave him 75 peer reviewed papers, after Chomsky said they needed some. Chomsky even accepts the official Lee Harvey Oswald JFK assassination theory!
3:36:30 Harrit: We are the ‘heretics’ of our day, like Galileo who questioned.
Gage: We’re challenging “‘America right or wrong’ is always right.” American exceptionalism can’t be questioned.
Griffin:“We are exceptional, but not necessarily in a good way.”
34230 Neils Harrit: With covid — “Now, we have become the terrorists. It’s we who are ‘contagious.’ … The ‘war in terror’ has morphed into the war on us. We are the terrorists now. … 9/11 has morphed into Covid-19.”
3:44:45 Richard Gage: “From the bottom of our hearts in the entire 9/11 truth movement, Neils Harrit, David Ray Griffin, Steven Jones, we love you. … Our hearts go with you. … Thank you so much! … We love you.”
3:46:50 Benny Wills, poet
– –
Part 1: Lights, Camera, Building 7 | Dylan Avery and Kelly David, with Leroy Hulsey, PhD [discuss the film]
Part 2 (1:00:00): Global Failure: Evidence Engineers Can No Longer Ignore |
Richard Gage and Roland Angle
Part 3: Three Pioneers of the 9/11 Truth Movement Reflect | David Ray Griffin, Niels Harrit, and Steven Jones
17:35 The one piece of steel saved from Building 7: the ends of the beam were partly evaporated, requiring temps of 4,000°F. “Office fires don’t even get a quarter of that, typically.”
Steel doesn’t begin to melt until 2800°F, Gage later says about the molten steel seen flowing from the tower and later, seen in the debris.
Explosives normally used in demolitions like C4 would give off a telltale bang, thus nanothermite was used instead.
4 and 8-ton structural steel sections were hurled laterally in all directions at 80 mph, landing 600-800 feet away! “98% of the steel is distributed laterally, outside the footprint, destroying buildings all around it. … If you look at the base of these towers, there’s only a two-story pile of [debris]. Everything else is destroyed and pulverized and sent outside of the footprint.”
48:10 How aluminum planes pierced through steel walls:
Objects traveling very fast produce surprising results:
• Tornadoes can drive straw through trees and 2x4s through concrete curbs
• Ping pong ball can be shot through a paddle
The walls were sectioned. The pattern left was rectilinear. “Most of what the plane did was punch through those sections and dislodge the four 5/8′ round bolts that’s holding them together. … It does appear mid-wingspan some columns that appear to have been sliced.” 14″ square steel columns having 3/4″ thick steel sides.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2vBfWpCH6U
Recommends Christopher Bollyn’s research and book on the Israeli involvement at 1:12:00.
Gage is on at 47:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lee-065SWgU
“If we are to prevent mass manipulation based on deception, in the future, we must recognize the patterns of intentional fear-mongering lies that every time lead to voluntary subjugation with relinquishing of freedoms, enlarging surveillance systems to track us all…The Patriot Act ISN’T [patriotic]!” – Annie Bukacek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJl2LcmEf_A
While Everyone Was Distracted By Covid-19, Final Report By UAF Concluded WTC 7 ‘NOT Destroyed by Fires’
The final report of a rigorous four-year computer modeling simulation that was followed by a robust peer review process has concluded that World Trade Center Building 7 could NOT have collapsed as a result of office fires, as the “official” explanation dubiously claims.
According to the highly anticipated final report issued last week by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, the official narrative surrounding the collapse of WTC 7 is simply implausible.
The UAF team’s findings, which were the result of a four-year computer modeling study of the building’s collapse, directly contradict those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which concluded in a 2008 report that WTC 7 was the first tall building in the history of the world to collapse primarily due to fire.
“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator.
“The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”
The four-year study was funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization representing more than 3,000 architects and engineers who have signed the organization’s petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11.
AE911Truth report:
“We are proud to have supported the University of Alaska Fairbanks and Professor Leroy Hulsey in conducting a genuinely scientific study into the reasons for this building’s collapse,” said Richard Gage, president and founder of AE911Truth.
“It is now incumbent upon the building community, the media, and government officials to reckon with the implications of these findings and launch a new full-scale investigation.” …
The final report, entitled A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 – Final Report, includes clarifications and supplemental text based on public comments submitted in response to a draft report released by UAF and AE911Truth on September 3, 2019. …
“I am grateful to everyone who supported or participated in this study in any way,” said Professor Hulsey. “We hope that our findings will be carefully looked at by the building community and spur further investigation into how this building came down on that tragic day.”
The Hulsey report and supporting materials can be found on UAF’s Institute of Northern Engineering website at http://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7 and on the AE911Truth website at https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7.