Jesse Ventura, the former governor of Minnesota, ex Navy Seal Vietnam Veteran, Demolition Expert and an avid spokesperson for 911 Truth.The governor takes on a swarm of media in the footage below for about 30 minutes. This is a pretty intense interview!
(The first 2 minutes isn’t worth watching, it’s just someone walking around with a camera. Fast forward about 2 minutes to get to the interview.)
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crRbgES1zPI]
If Jah is by my side
I won’t tired
No, I won’t tired …
Your best you try to harm I and I*
Aiming to kill
But I love you still
Cause you are here to make
Prophecy fulfill** (Its Jah will)
No weapon that form against me
Desire shall not be
Divine protection
Shall set my soul free (Talk to me)
If Jah is standing by my side
Then why should I be afraid
Of the pestilence that crawleth by night
* I: replaces “me”, “you”, “my”; replaces the first syllable of seleted words I and I, I&I: I, me, you and me, we Rastafari speech eliminates you, me we, they, etc., as divisive and replaces same with communal I and I. I and I embraces the congregation in unity with the Most I (high) in an endless circle of inity (unity). source
** John 15:20, perhaps? — “Remember the word that I said to you: ‘A servant is not greater than his lord.’ If they persecuted me [Jesus], they will also persecute you.”
From: WorldNetDaily
The author of a unique best-selling book on the year 2012 and the return of biblical Nephilim claims mankind may be on the precipice of an earth-shaking event far beyond the imagination of most people. In “Nephilim Stargates: The Year 2012 and the Return of the Watchers,” Thomas Horn quotes the prophet Enoch concerning the history of powerful angels who descended from heaven onto Mt. Hermon “in the days of Jared” and used women to produce giant offspring.
But the history surrounding these demonic beings may not remain in the past. In fact, things may be about to get very scary, Horn claims.
Joel is back from Europe. It’s great to again hear his analytical analysis juxtaposed with Dr. Stan’s virtually error free wisdom.
This time (9/18), Sarah Palin is in the mix—how she’s being used—sadly.
“One of my greatest disappointments is to see that the conservatives are being completely snookered by Sarah Palin.”
– Joel Skousen
“She’ll be lucky to have any staff at all [as Vice President – editor]. They’ll probably give her a little office some place where she won’t be able to do any harm [to the new world order’s agenda – editor].”
– Dr. Stanley Monteith
Go to Radio Liberty Archives, and scroll down to the 9/18 program — the most recently posted at time of writing.
From: Mercola.com
The U.S. FDA has ordered stronger warnings on four medications widely used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, saying they can raise the risk of possibly fatal fungal infections.
Enbrel, Remicade, Humira and Cimzia work by suppressing the immune system to keep it from attacking your body. For people with rheumatoid arthritis, the treatment provides relief from swollen and painful joints. But the drugs also lower your body’s defenses against various kinds of infections.
Christians must be peacemakers. Jesus said: “Blessed are the PEACEMAKERS, for they shall be called the CHILDREN OF GOD.” – Mt. 5:9
Compare these points to Sarah’s ready-to-bomb / won’t-talk-with-Iran / Israel-is-always-right, simplistic conclusion:
• The Supreme Leader, not the President of Iran (who said the incendiary remarks), is the true leader of Iran, having the final say in all matters.
• Israel has a never-forget, remember-the-holocaust (never forgive) national slogan that drives them to commit crimes against humanity, multiple atrocities through the Mossad and their U.S. equipped military.
Palin: No Second Guessing Israel’s “Security Efforts”
Second night of Sarah Palin’s interview with Katie Couric on CBS Evening News, September 25, 2008
• • •
“We don’t have to second-guess what their efforts would be if they [equipped with U.S. jets, missiles and bombs] believe that it is in their country and their allies, including us, all of our best interests to fight against a regime, especially Iran, who would seek to wipe them off the face of the earth.
It is obvious to me who the GOOD GUYS are in this one and who the BAD GUYS are. The bad guys are the ones who say Israel is a stinking corpse and should be wiped off the face of the earth. That’s not a good guy who is saying that. Now, one who would seek to protect the good guys in this, the leaders of Israel and her friends, her allies, including the United States, in my world, those are the good guys.”
Related:
Scott Ritter on Obama/McCain’s bomb-Iran rhetoric: “Don’t stand tall; stand safe”
Scott Ritter: Fools would BOMB Iran—It could look like this
Chuck Baldwin: Sarah Palin’s Answers—Very Troubling
Skousen: The Real Sarah Palin Emerges — A Bit Too Ambitious To Be Principled
Palin: “This war against extreme Islamic terrorists is the RIGHT THING”
Palin: “In order to stop Islamic extremists…we must do whatever it takes and we must not blink”
CBS’ transcript of this interview; though, parts are missing without notation
World Affairs Brief, September 26, 2008. Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief.
THE REAL REASON FOR THE BAILOUT
The real agenda is to use this and other future financial crises to demolish what constitutional restrictions remain against government intervention and control of financial markets. A tremendous power shift is inherent in this bailout, so the $700 billion is not nearly as dangerous as the precedent that is being set for future intervention in the markets and the transfer of public funds to financial insiders. This is a devious means to raid the public purse as the nation sinks into financial ruin.
One of the most interesting exchanges to emerge in this debate between Congress and Treasury Secretary Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was the questioning of Congressman Ron Paul (R-tx), the sole member of the House banking committee willing to challenge the legality of this bailout and demand to know who is going to pay for it.
After complaining to Bernanke about setting a high fixed price for the toxic debt the Fed will buy back from banks and other insider financial institutions (way too generous, in his opinion) Paul demanded of Bernanke where he thinks he has the authority to bailout these institutions with taxpayer money. Bernanke responded that he gets all the authority he needs from the Federal Reserve Act of 1916. “When you authorized the Federal Reserve, you gave us the power.” Paul was not given the opportunity to rebut. If he had, he no doubt would have said something like, “I have read the act, Mr. Bernanke, and it gives you no such authority. And, even if it did, as you claim, then why are you and Mr. Paulson coming to Congress to authorize this bailout–if you already have the authority?”
I would also have demanded to know, “and why have you and others inserted the demand that “Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” If you are so sure of your authority, why are you afraid of a court review?
It’s because there is no constitutional authority for these bailouts and Paulson and Bernanke know it. The PTB used the same language restricting court review to make sure the courts did not have any say in the Telecom immunity and wiretapping bill, or the Military Commissions act. Of course, the courts don’t have to abide by this language. Any bill passed by Congress is invalid if it is in violation of the Constitution. What I fear, however, is that this language gives the courts an out to evade declaring it unconstitutional.
As for the cost, only Ron Paul demanded to know how this was going to be paid for. “We certainly aren’t going to tax the American people for this–no one is proposing that.” That only leaves deficit spending–and Paul had plenty to say about that and the whole issue of fiat money that got us into this debacle in the first place.
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske from Alaska: Big America on the History Channel
Narrator: In 1964, one of the most devastating earthquakes ever recorded struck Anchorage….
Narrator: Here at All Saints Episcopal Church [showing footage of the church in downtown Anchorage], the Reverend Norman Elliott was preparing his service.
Norman Elliott: On every Friday at Lent, it was the custom, here, to have the service of the stations of the cross, and we would begin at 5:15.
Narrator: Back in Anchorage, the Reverend Elliott was reciting a prophetic Biblical verse.
Norman Elliott: “And behold the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom, and the earth shook and the rocks were split“ [Mt. 27:51]. And the earth quaked [he said, looking into the interviewer’s eye]
Narrator: At that moment, 5:36 pm, the largest earthquake in North America was unleashed on Anchorage, Alaska.
“Difficulties are meant to rouse, not discourage.
The human spirit is to grow strong by conflict.”
– William Ellery Channing
From: Democracy Now!
“The American administration,
a government that seeks a solution to all problems through war?”
– Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
interviewed by Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez
Forgiveness lets life flow again.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8kslMev5mA]
From: National Geographic News
Even the sun appears headed for a recession.
The Ulysses space probe has detected fewer sunspots, decreased solar winds, and a weakening magnetic field—the lowest solar activity observed in 50 years, NASA scientists said yesterday.
That translates into a shrinking of the heliosphere, the invisible “bubble” of solar wind that extends beyond Pluto and guards the planets—ours included—from bombardment by cosmic rays. …
“Over the entire record of sun observations, this is the longest prolonged low pressure that we’ve observed.”
Some variance in solar activity is normal for the sun, which has a 22-year magnetic cycle and an 11-year sunspot cycle.
But McComas said in a statement that researchers have been “surprised to find that the solar wind is much less powerful than it had been in the previous solar minimum.”
Despite its name, solar wind is actually a stream of charged particles that expands out from the sun.
Ed Smith, a NASA Ulysses project scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, also added that the drop in solar winds has lasted longer than predicted. …
The so-called Maunder Minimum, a time of low solar activity, lasted from about 1645 to 1715. During this time, access to Greenland was largely cut off by ice, and canals in Holland routinely froze solid, according to NASA.
Glaciers advanced in the Alps….
Related:
Global Cooling: Alaskan Glaciers Grow For First Time In 250 Years
Anchorage’s ‘Summer’ of 2008 Record: Only 2 Days Above 69 Degrees
From: News with Views
At the time of this writing, the U.S. House and Senate are poised to pass a $700 billion bailout to Wall Street. At the behest of President George W. Bush, the U.S. taxpayers are going to be on the hook for what can only be referred to as the biggest fraud in U.S. history.
Virtually our entire financial system is based on an illusion. We spend more than we earn, we consume more than we produce, we borrow more than we save, and we cling to the fantasy that this can go on forever. The glue that holds this crumbling scheme together is a fiat currency known as the Federal Reserve Note, which was created out of thin air by an international banking cartel called the Federal Reserve.
According to Congressman Ron Paul, in the last three years, the Federal Reserve has created over $4 trillion in new money. The result of all this “money-out-of-thin-air” fraud is never-ending inflation. And the more prices rise, the more the dollar collapses. Folks, this is not sustainable.
Already, Bear Stearns was awarded a $29 billion bailout, followed quickly by the bailout of Freddie and Fannie that will cost the taxpayers up to $200 billion. Then the Fed announced the bailout of AIG to the tune of $85 billion. Mind you, AIG is an enormous global entity with assets totaling more than $1.1 trillion. Moreover, the Feds agreed to pump $180 billion into global money markets. And the Treasury Department promised $50 billion to insure the holdings of money market mutual funds for a year. Now, taxpayers are being asked to provide $700 billion to Wall Street. (I hope readers are aware that, not only will American banks be bailed out, but foreign banks will also be bailed out. Then again, at least half of the Federal Reserve is comprised of foreign banks, anyway.) In other words, the Federal Reserve is preparing to spend upwards of $1 trillion or more. Remember again, this is fiat money, meaning it is money printed out of thin air.
All of this began when the U.S. Congress abrogated its responsibility to maintain sound money principles on behalf of the American people (as required by the Constitution) and created the Federal Reserve. This took place in 1913. The President was Woodrow Wilson. (I strongly encourage readers to buy G. Edward Griffin’s book, The Creature from Jekyll Island.) Since then, the U.S. economy has suffered through one Great Depression and several recessions–all of which have been orchestrated by this international banking cartel. Now, we are facing total economic collapse.
But don’t worry: the international bankers will lose nothing–not even their bonuses. They will maintain their mansions, yachts, private jets, and Swiss bank accounts. No matter how bad it gets on Main Street, the banksters on Wall Street will still have the best of it–President Bush and the Congress will make sure of that. This is one thing Republicans and Democrats can agree on.
America’s founders were rightfully skeptical of granting too much power to bankers. Thomas Jefferson said, “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”
Jefferson also believed that “banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”
From: News with Views
“No one knows what to do. We are in new territory here. This is a different game. We’re not here playing soccer, basketball or football, this is a new game and we’re going to have to figure out how to do it.” Sen. Harry Reid [D-NV], September 17, 2008
It is exactly that level of ignorance in the U.S. Congress for decades that has brought America to the brink of financial ruin. William Greider, author of Secrets of the Temple, said the same thing during his testimony, House Banking Committee, October 7, 1993:
“Otherwise confident and intelligent people including members of Congress – defer to the Fed’s wisdom mainly because they do not understand it….The only players who are left out of this conversation are the American people and, to a large extent their elected representatives. Instead, they are provided a frustrating stream of evasive euphemisms and opaque jargon and platitudinous generalities and, sometimes, even downright deception. As more than one Federal Reserve governor confided to me, it would be very difficult – perhaps impossible – for the Fed to have an honest discussion of monetary policy with Congress or the public because the level of ignorance is so profound.”
Clearly, we have made huge strides in educating our fellow Americans about fiat currency and sound monetary policy, but without real newspapers in this country, most Americans don’t know the truth. It’s also crystal clear that members of Congress, with few exceptions, are clue less. I think it’s safe to say that many of those who do know, don’t have the courage to go up against the most powerful money cartels in the world; the rest are simply crooks who profit from a corrupted monetary system. Over the decades, Congress has been perfectly willing to forfeit their authority….
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qB-OhTfplYE]
Destroying the dollar is “ten times greater
than some companies going bankrupt.”
“The real fraud, today,
is the Federal Reserve that debases the currency.”
– Ron Paul
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dv6rQ0U01Yc]
Dr. Paul doesn’t get a chance to respond. Here’s Webster Tarpley’s take on Bernanke’s final statement. The Fed is still unconstitutional.
“You can’t change the Constitution with a statute.”
– Webster Tarpley on The Alex Jones Show, a few minutes ago.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOv1K8ikz5E]
Republican Congressman and former Presidential candidate Ron Paul calls for an end to the U.S. Federal Reserve System. This program was recorded as a part of Ron Paul’s Campaign For Liberty: Rally for the Republic event, in Minneapolis, MN, on September 2, 2008.
From: Info Wars
_____________________
From: Coast to Coast AM
Schedule for 09.24.08 – 09.26.08
Hosted by George Noory
Guest(s): Alex Jones, Andrew Gause
Wednesday, September 24
Alternative media activist Alex Jones will discuss his latest work on our volatile geopolitical environment and how it relates to fake UFO landings.
First Hour: Historian Andy Gause offers commentary on the bailout plan.
Coast to Coast AM is live nightly from 10pm to 2am Pacific.
[In Anchorage, Alaska, the main guest usually starts at 10pm (AK time) on 650 AM – editor]
From: Freedom Force
[googlevideo=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6015291679758430958]
There is no point in worrying about the erosion of personal freedom that is the reality of our present era if we can do nothing about it. They say that knowledge is power, but that is one of the greatest myths of all history. Knowledge without action is useless and leads only to apathy and despair.
So the question is: what type of action can reverse this trend? Writing letters and signing petitions to the same people who have created the problem is not going to do it. Voting for candidates selected by power brokers with hidden agendas will not do it either. There have been many proposals to reverse the tide of totalitarianism but, after decades of effort, none of them have worked.
In this address, G. Edward Griffin, Founder of Freedom Force, tells us why; and the reason is so simple, it will astound you. Once we clear away that single barrier, the plan for a pro-active counter-force falls quickly into place. This is the missing piece of the puzzle, the ultimate solution we have been seeking.
Visit www.freedom-force.org.
From: Campaign for Liberty
Letter from Ron: Time is running out
Dear Friends,
Whenever a Great Bipartisan Consensus is announced, and a compliant media assures everyone that the wondrous actions of our wise leaders are being taken for our own good, you can know with absolute certainty that disaster is about to strike.
The events of the past week are no exception.
The bailout package that is about to be rammed down Congress’ throat is not just economically foolish. It is downright sinister. It makes a mockery of our Constitution, which our leaders should never again bother pretending is still in effect. It promises the American people a never-ending nightmare of ever-greater debt liabilities they will have to shoulder. Two weeks ago, financial analyst Jim Rogers said the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made America more communist than China! “This is welfare for the rich,” he said. “This is socialism for the rich. It’s bailing out the financiers, the banks, the Wall Streeters.”
That describes the current bailout package to a T. And we’re being told it’s unavoidable.
The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences – predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics – are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!
From: Antiwar
In the early-1990s, there was a group of ideologues and power-politicians on the fringe of the Republican Party’s far-right. The members of this group in 1997 would found The Project for the New American Century (PNAC); their aim was to prepare for the day when the Republicans regained control of the White House – and, it was hoped, the other two branches of government as well – so that their vision of how the U.S. should move in the world would be in place and ready to go, straight off-the-shelf into official policy.
This PNAC group was led by such heavy hitters as Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, James Woolsey, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, James Bolton, Zalmay M. Khalilzad, William Bennett, Dan Quayle, Jeb Bush.
…with the Supreme Court’s selection of George W. Bush in 2000. The “outsiders” from PNAC were now powerful “insiders,” placed in important positions from which they could exert maximum pressure on U.S. policy: Cheney is Vice President, Rumsfeld is Defense Secretary, Wolfowitz is Deputy Defense Secretary, I. Lewis Libby is Cheney’s Chief of Staff, Elliot Abrams is in charge of Middle East policy at the National Security Council, Dov Zakheim is comptroller for the Defense Department, John Bolton is Undersecretary of State, Richard Perle is chair of the Defense Policy advisory board at the Pentagon, former CIA director James Woolsey is on that panel as well, etc. etc. (PNAC’s chairman, Bill Kristol, is the editor of Rupert Murdoch‘s The Weekly Standard.) In short, PNAC had a lock on military policy-creation in the Bush Administration.
But, in order to unleash their foreign/military campaigns without taking all sorts of flak from the traditional wing of the conservative GOP – which was more isolationist, more opposed to expanding the role of the federal government, more opposed to military adventurism abroad – they needed a context that would permit them free rein. The events of 9/11 rode to their rescue. (In one of their major reports, written in 2000, they noted that “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing even – like a new Pearl Harbor.”)
After those terrorist attacks, the Bush Administration used the fear generated in the general populace as their cover for enacting all sorts of draconian measures domestically (the Patriot Act, drafted earlier, was rushed through Congress in the days following 9/11; few members even read it), and as their rationalization for launching military campaigns abroad.
Related:
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century — A Report of The Project for the New American Century September 2000 (Threat countries are listed, many of which we’ve regime-changed)
Rockefeller Predicted “Event” To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
PNAC member, Ambassador John Bolton admits U.S. wars were to protect U.S. oil interests
All of my Real Reason for U.S. Wars = NWO! posts (latest appear first)
Over one million Iraqis have met violent deaths as a result of the 2003 invasion, according to a study conducted by the prestigious British polling group, Opinion Research Business (ORB). These numbers suggest that the invasion and occupation of Iraq rivals the mass killings of the last century—the human toll exceeds the 800,000 to 900,000 believed killed in the Rwandan genocide in 1994, and is approaching the number (1.7 million) who died in Cambodia’s infamous “Killing Fields” during the Khmer Rouge era of the 1970s.
ORB’s research covered fifteen of Iraq’s eighteen provinces. Those not covered include two of Iraq’s more volatile regions—Kerbala and Anbar—and the northern province of Arbil, where local authorities refused them a permit to work. In face-to-face interviews with 2,414 adults, the poll found that more than one in five respondents had had at least one death in their household as a result of the conflict, as opposed to natural cause.
Authors Joshua Holland and Michael Schwartz point out that the dominant narrative on Iraq—that most of the violence against Iraqis is being perpetrated by Iraqis themselves and is not our responsibility—is ill conceived. Interviewers from the Lancet report of October 2006 (Censored 2006, #2) asked Iraqi respondents how their loved ones died. Of deaths for which families were certain of the perpetrator, 56 percent were attributable to US forces or their allies. Schwartz suggests that if a low pro rata share of half the unattributed deaths were caused by US forces, a total of approximately 80 percent of Iraqi deaths are directly US perpetrated.
Even with the lower confirmed figures, by the end of 2006, an average of 5,000 Iraqis had been killed every month by US forces since the beginning of the occupation. However, the rate of fatalities in 2006 was twice as high as the overall average, meaning that the American average in 2006 was well over 10,000 per month, or over 300 Iraqis every day. With the surge that began in 2007, the current figure is likely even higher.
“Anger is never without a reason,
but seldom a good one.”
– Benjamin Franklin
From: Campaign for Liberty
The Bush Doctrine of Pre-Emptive War
Glenn Greenwald has a new article out in Salon questioning the lack of a serious debate over the right claimed by Bush to invade any sovereign country, any time, for any reason. In it, he references Norman Podhoretz.
For those of you who don’t know who Norman Podhoretz is, he is a militant socialist theorist who has called for a merging of the races as the only solution to what he calls “the Negro problem,” a co-signer of The Project for a New American Century’s statement of principles, a campaign adviser to Rudy Guiliani, and an advocate for unending war in the Middle East on behalf of Israel.
For this, George Bush gave him the Presidential Metal of Freedom in 2004. He is considered one of the modern fathers of neoconservativism. It is from the embrace of the ideas of Podhoretz, Irving Kristol and the Weekly Standard that I began referring to neoconservativism as American National Socialism and began drawing the obvious comparisons to Nazism. That this new national socialism is based on the work of Jewish scholars is almost as ironic as calling it a form of “conservativism.”
The piece also includes a nice quote from Dr. Paul.
Where is the debate over the Bush Doctrine?
Before it became clear that Sarah Palin had never heard of it, nobody — including the presidential candidates themselves — ever had difficulty answering questions about what they believed about the Bush Doctrine, nor ever suggested that this Doctrine was some amorphous, impossible-to-understand, abstract irrelevancy. Quite the contrary, despite some differences over exactly what it means, it was widely understood to constitute a radical departure — at least in theory — from our governing foreign policy doctrine, and it is that Doctrine which has unquestionably fueled much of the foreign policy disasters of the last eight years.
Celebrate What’s Right With the World
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rV3UqdAOhY]Willow Creek Arts Conference 2007 Dewitt Jones
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xV-ZzEm2IA]Session 1 Highlights
“Ironically the most difficult group to recruit has been the evangelicals who supported McCain and his pro-war positions. They have been convinced that they are obligated to initiate preventive war in the Middle East for theological reasons. Fortunately, this is a minority of the Christian community, but our doors remain open to all despite this type of challenge. The point is, new devotees to the freedom philosophy are more likely to come from the left than from those conservatives who have been convinced that God has instructed us to militarize the Middle East.”
“I’ve thought about the unsolicited advice from the Libertarian Party candidate, and he has convinced me to reject my neutral stance in the November election. I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.”
__________________________
From: Campaign for Liberty
A New Alliance – By Dr. Ron Paul
Friends – please read this new and important piece by Dr. Paul.
The press conference at the National Press Club had a precise purpose. It was to expose, to as many people as possible, the gross deception of our presidential election process. It is controlled by the powerful elite to make sure that neither candidate of the two major parties will challenge the status quo. There is no real choice between the two major parties and their nominees, only the rhetoric varies. The amazingly long campaign is designed to make sure the real issues are ignored. The quotes I used at the press conference from insider Carroll Quigley and the League of Women voters strongly support this contention.
Calling together candidates from the liberal, conservative, libertarian and progressive constituencies, who are all opposed to this rigged process, was designed to alert the American people to the uselessness of continuing to support a process that claims that one’s only choice is to choose the lesser of two evils and reject a principle vote that might challenge the status quo as a wasted vote. …
Ron Paul Endorsed — The rEVOLution Continues!
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WJynIeWkf4]
I took this photo last Saturday of my Prez, Chuck Maas, President of the Alaska Society of Outdoor and Nature Photographers (ASONP). We were shooting moose in the rut during Carl Battreall’s actually very exciting wildlife photography workshop, 9/20/08, near Flattop Mountain, Anchorage, Alaska.
© 2008 Life in the Son Photography
.
And Chuck took this of me.
© 2008 Chuck Maas
.
While I snapped this of him and his monster lens.
© 2008 Life in the Son Photography
“Sniper verses sniper,” I said.
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén