3.9 billion people on lockdown from a virus that’s killed 47,000 people worldwide!
“What does our future look like, and how many rights are we allowing to be taken from us?”
Category: 1st Amendment Page 4 of 5
Related:
– –
GOP Governor Refuses To Cave, Keeps Church Doors Open As ‘Essential’
Despite national media pressure to close down houses of worship, Republican Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has refused to cave, overruling some counties within his state and designating churches, synagogues, and mosques as so-called “essential.”
The Republican governor imposed a statewide stay-at-home order on Wednesday as a precaution against the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, carving out exceptions for “essential” businesses and activities.
The house of worship carveout comes on the heels of the arrest of Revival International Ministries pastor Rodney Howard-Browne, who held two large, in-person services….
Other states, however, like Michigan, New Mexico, Delaware, Ohio, Texas, and West Virginia, have also allowed “some exemption” for religious services, The Hill noted.
KrisAnne Hall’s friend Debby, a grandma standing up for liberty during the unconstitutional coronavirus lockdown, mentioned at minute-10:30 here:
KrisAnne Hall Daily Journal *LIVE* What Are The Governors Doing Now?
“This whole stand was about the 1st Amendment. … This is the last stand for freedom on the planet. If America falls, the whole world will fall under global tyranny.”
“The Republic is in a crisis. The light of liberty is flickering. It’s like any little wind can blow it out. And when it blows out, it’s gone forever.”
– Rodney Howard-Browne
Gorka interview at minute-33:30
Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters: Assange being used as a warning to journalists
Anti-boycott laws do not only punish companies, they are the most dangerous assault on free speech in the United States since the McCarthy era.
by Juan Cole Reposted from Informed Comment
Israeli caretaker prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who has been indicted for corruption and is facing an election soon, just boasted that his ministry of strategic affairs has managed to undermine first amendment protections for free speech in the United States by lobbying state legislatures to pass laws forbidding the boycott of Israel.
From: TruthTellers.org
National Prayer Network
TAKE ACTION AGAINST TRUMP’S “END OF FREE SPEECH” DECREE!!!
17 December, 2019 By Rev. Ted Pike
President Trump’s recent Executive Order IS THE TEXT of the Jewish ADL’s “Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, S852, recently denied US Senate Committee consideration. See the Senate Bill here:, and See the Executive Order here: S852 can make a “hate criminal” of any student, teacher, administrator or even employee of U.S. Public Education who strongly criticizes Israel. It says they can be arrested for the crime of “anti-Semitism” and “intimidation” of Jewish students on campus. They then can be punished under the harsh “anti- discrimination” rules of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
“Donald Trump’s so-called “antisemitism” Executive Order Is abominable, reprehensible & downright tyrannical. It is a blatant attack against the First Amendment protection of free speech and for all intents and purposes elevates all things Jewish to royalty status in America–being granted official government protection against any kind of criticism.”
Jesus warned about the “leaven of the Pharisees,” their Talmudic, anti-Logos thought!
Wonderful, important discussion showing it’s the Talmudists who are banning speech and pushing sexual liberation, which is used as a weapon to destroy Christian culture! Alex needs to stop defending this group that deplatformed him.
Alex accuses Hitler of pushing porn on the Germans, when it was the Talmudists. Michael correctly points out that Hitler burned some of this in the book burning. And Hitler was also not a saint, as Michael points out. Hitler threw many Catholic priests into Dachau, where many died, because they stood up to Hitler’s tyrannical rule that got Germany destroyed. The Lutherans mostly supported everything Hitler did, including all of the reverse-Christian, offensive wars that ended up getting Germany destroyed.
Alex says he’s a Christian, but doesn’t follow Christ, and protects the Talmudists who were behind him being deplatformed.
Michael Brown cannot refute this quote by Paul, who clearly says in Rom. 11:28 that the Jews as a people (not just the leaders) are “enemies” of Christians because of Jesus’ gospel: “As concerning the gospel, *they are enemies* for your sakes….” Their Talmud is anti-Logos, against Christ — the “leaven of the Pharisees” Jesus warned us about.
MY NOTES
4:55 “An antisemite used to be someone who didn’t like Jews, and now it’s someone the Jews don’t like.”
7:45 “I don’t hate anyone. I’m taught to love anyone, including enemies, and pray for many people.” – Vince James
14:50 It’s about the rejection of Logos, not DNA.
28:40 The Michael Brown situation
35:15 A film about the Holodomor, which Hollywood completely ignores, because the Jews did this proven atrocity. A film called “The Chekist,” a Russian film.
42:05 The “Jew coup” that TruNews reported. “The tragedy of Donald Trump is that he gave them everything they wanted, and they still turned on him.” [Trump won’t regime-change Iran though.]
51:10 EMJ on the leaders or the leaders and the people?
5620 Pornography used as a weapon. Many are getting free!
‘Holocaust’ discussed at 4:15
More Than Half Of Americans Want The Government To Censor Speech
10/29/2019
The First Amendment, which guarantees Americans freedom of speech, should be overhauled to reflect current cultural norms, according to 51 percent of the respondents to a survey published on Wednesday by the Campaign for Free Speech. The campaign is hoping to call attention to the dire state of Americans’ preeminent civil rights with the poll, which breaks down opposition along gender, race, class, and educational lines.
History will continue to repeat until humans learn the lessons of the past. Censorship is always necessary for tyranny to thrive.
Sadly, the group that made this movie is also against free speech on campuses and beyond when it’s speech that tells the truth about the Talmudic NWO agenda, the “leaven of the Pharisees” Jesus warned about.
Cory Clark tweeted on 10/3/19:
Across multiple topics and conditions, women were consistently more supportive of censorship than men. The one exception was for text that argued that women evolved to be better leaders than men. For this passage, women were equally as (non)supportive of censorship as men.
The study that Cory Clark co-researched: The Ideology of Censorship, June 2019
Ted Pike on Israeli News Live with Steven Ben-Nun!
Ironically, 155 books (mostly scholarly) that completely refute the claims made by Michael Brown about WWII history in his July 5 video (minute-3) were banned by Amazon in 2017. Brown was silent. Now it’s too late.
– –
From: WND
WILL AMAZON BAN THE BIBLE NEXT?
Michael Brown: Site crossed a very dangerous line removing psychologist’s books
July 6, 2019
In a very disturbing move, Amazon has removed the books of Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, the psychologist whom critics have dubbed “the father of conversion therapy.” In other words, for claiming that sexual orientation is not innate and immutable, and for claiming that change is possible, Dr. Nicolosi’s books must be banned.
This leads to the logical question: Will Amazon ban the Bible next? …
Justice to convene meeting on whether social media companies are ‘intentionally stifling’ free speech
09/05/18
Attorney General Jeff Sessions has scheduled a meeting with state attorneys general in September to discuss a “growing concern” that tech companies may be “intentionally stifling” the free flow of ideas on their platforms.
In a statement issued right after executives from Facebook and Twitter finished testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee, the Department of Justice (DOJ) also suggested that the platforms were running afoul of antitrust laws.
“The Attorney General has convened a meeting with a number of state attorneys general this month to discuss a growing concern that these companies may be hurting competition and intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas on their platforms,” DOJ spokesman Devin O’Malley said in a statement issued near the end of the congressional hearing.
President Trump and conservative House Republicans have repeatedly aired complaints about bias against conservatives on Facebook, Twitter, Google and other social media platforms.
World Affairs Brief, August 10, 2018 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
[…]
THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE WAR AGAINST FREE SPEECH
Alex Jones is the most prominent conservative fighting a battle against censorship and financial revenue as the major internet media platforms ban his content and refuse to pay him for his popular content. The Powers That Be (PTB) are working every angle to bankrupt Alex. It started months ago when YouTube denied him his advertizing revenue from the millions of viewers who watched his video commentaries. Then an establishment legal firm conjured up a lawsuit against Jones on behalf of several Sandy Hook families complaining they have been threatened and harassed by Jones supporters. This week it mushroomed to an outright censorship ban on Facebook, Youtube, the Apple Store, Spotify and others after CNN orchestrated a pressure campaign against him and targeted all the major social media tech giants. Supposedly, Alex is guilty of “hate speech,” one of those nebulous and political correct epithets that can be skewed to cover almost any criticism of anyone else. The claim of hate speech itself, if left to stand, is a major attack on the principle of free speech. This week I’ll discuss the backlash in support of Jones, and the issue of whether these are strictly private companies are, in fact, really public/private partnerships akin to public utilities that should not be able to suppress free speech.
[…]
Is It Illegal to Censor Jones? This is bound to become more of an issue as this attack on free speech continues and expands against other conservative, conspiratorial voices. The first question is “Are these companies truly private?” If yes, then they can do whatever they want on their social media platform. Or can they?
According to the reigning legal argument in civil rights and anti-discrimination circles, once you (as a private person or private company) open your business to the public, you are no longer private as to your ability to discriminate. I oppose this expansive view against the privacy of property, but as long as it is accepted by the Left, it can and should be used against them.
These social media companies are clearly inviting all the public to participate and thus are not free to discriminate. That is perhaps why they are justifying this in the name of “hate speech,” as if that gives them a legitimate test of criminality that allows for discrimination. As I and others have pointed out, you can’t make hatred illegal any more than you can any form of negative opinion against another is illegal. In fact, if there was ever was an outpouring of hatred here, it is against Alex Jones and his points of view.
You can outlaw incitement to violence, and it appears they are trying to equate hate speech to violence, as if they are always synonymous, but they are not. Only when someone is yelling hateful speech and directly inciting violence is this true, but the Left is trying to expand the view of hate speech backward to any negative criticism of someone. Point of fact: there is no way to draw the line except at the most violent prone end of the incitement spectrum. Everything less than that has to be protected speech or Free Speech is gone.
It’s good many are waking up to the Talmudic media’s bias; though, desiring the president to violate the 1st Amendment is foolhardy.
Amazingly, many ‘Christians’ still actually believe that also-Talmudic Fox News is ‘fair and balanced’.
– –
‘Enemy of the people’: Almost half of Republicans say Trump should be allowed to close media outlets
President Trump’s attacks on the media, whom he dubbed “enemies of the people,” have struck a chord with supporters. A new poll found that 43 percent of Republicans want to give him the power to shut down certain news outlets.
Public trust in the press has diminished since the days of Woodward and Bernstein, falling by 30 percentage points since the late 1970s. While an overwhelming majority of Americans surveyed by Ipsos agreed that the concept of a free press is essential for democracy, many are unhappy with how the press behaves in reality.
Less than half of Americans surveyed believe that news outlets strive for honest reporting. Only 29 percent of Republicans believe in the honesty of the media, and 80 percent believe the press treats President Trump unfairly.
Their concerns are shared by Trump, who regularly bashes the “fake news” media for dishonest reporting. …
According to the Ipsos poll, one third of all Americans agree that the “news media is the enemy of the American people.” Among Republicans, this number rises to 48 percent.
While 68 percent of Democrats believe that the media is honest, and only 23 percent think that most outlets have a liberal bias, a Harvard study found that the media portrays Trump’s presidency in an overwhelmingly-negative light.
In covering Trump’s first 100 days in office, 80 percent of articles and reports from CNN, NBC, CBS, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and Fox News were negative. 93 percent of CNN’s reports were negative, while Fox went easiest on Trump, with a relatively even split of positive and negative coverage.