Her hospital in Portland, Oregon only had 1 covid patient when she said this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LL2tNOH9jI
Her hospital in Portland, Oregon only had 1 covid patient when she said this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LL2tNOH9jI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzIULQ8BdHI
“CDC does not recommend that people who are healthy wear a facemask….”

The government and many businesses are making mask wearing mandatory; though, none of these masks totally keep 0ut viruses, and all leave the eyes exposed.
I was asked on Facebook to fact-check this picture chart showing how efficient face masks are. It turns out that cloth masks really don’t protect the wearer against viruses, like the chart shows. And most surgical masks and FFP1 masks aren’t effective in keeping viruses out, unlike what this chart shows.
A rule of thumb seems to be that masks that do the best job in keeping viruses out are hard to breath with, like the N95. One driver even passed out, crashing the car while wearing a N95 mask. And all leave eyes exposed.
I share what experts say below this picture chart.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-rlEQb2gPc
– The Washington Times – Friday, May 1, 2020
The face-masking of America, at first a federal no-no, then a federal recommendation, has now trickled to state and local governments, and into the private business sector, as a mandate.
As a mandated muzzle on individuals.
This seems a blatant violation of an individual’s right to choose — of an individual’s right to self-govern. America, after all, isn’t a nation founded on collectivism, but rather individualism — on the right of individuals to exercise their God-given authorities, absent government tinkering and intrusion. What gives government the authority to order citizens to cover their faces?
What gives businesses the authority to serve as government’s enforcer on this same face masking matter?
Particularly when even the federal authorities only recommend, rather than order?
If face masks can be made mandatory, then so, too, gloves — then so, too, hair coverings and facial hair and clothing and shoe standards, as well as a slew of other so-called protective measures. Masks should be individual choices, nothing more.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8qJMbNwheA
Governors and mayors across the nation have claimed that their emergency powers allow them to ban large groups during the coronavirus pandemic. They don’t want groups gathering in malls, movie theaters or even churches, despite the constitutional protection of religious rights.
Now one official is moving into extreme territory, demanding churches provide him with the names, addresses and telephone numbers of anyone who shows up to worship.
The move by Quinton Lucas, the mayor of Kansas City, Missouri, already is attracting the attention of Liberty Counsel, which has been defending churches amid the coronavirus lockdowns.
Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver noted Kansas City is requiring that churches “submit list of members and attendees along with their names, addresses and telephone numbers to city officials for tracking and surveillance purposes.“
“I am running out of adjectives to describe how completely insane the tyrannical abuses launched by state governors and local officials against pastors and churches are becoming,” he said in his newsletter. “It is as if these leaders never bothered to so much as glance at the Constitution they swore to uphold and defend. They seem to be governing from some make-believe, dystopian viewpoint.”
He said the order also applies to businesses, but that doesn’t make it any more constitutional.
“Are we avoiding looking too closely because we don’t want to know the answer?”
“You use more fossil fuels to do this than you’re getting benefit from it. You would have been better off just burning fossil fuels in the first place, instead of playing pretend.”
‘This absolutely cannot extend civilization’s life. This relies on the most toxic and industrial processes that we’ve ever created.”
Massive environmental destruction!
Population control.
51:50 “What I’m hearing is that if I haven’t come to grips with my own anxiety about death and life — and presented with a reminder of that — I’m highly likely to make some tragic decisions for the community.”
“Biomass plants” burn toxic substances and trees, polluting communities and clearcutting forests.
The Sierra Club
The profit motive: “What if they, themselves have become misguided? What if they made some kind of deal they shouldn’t have made, and are leading us all off the cliff? …hiding under a cover of ‘green.'”
“The takeover of the environmental movement by capitalism is now complete.”
Clearcutting, destroying the planet…
Mind-control:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5L-kfn1BGM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fdot9l3yi98
JANUARY 9, 2019
One of the core purposes of the First Amendment is to allow people, regardless of their views, to hold the government accountable through expression. So, if your elected representative has an official Facebook page where she invites comments, can she block you from commenting because you criticize her work?
According to a federal appeals court, the answer is a resounding no.
On Monday, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the interactive portion of a public official’s Facebook page is a “public forum,” so an official cannot block people from it because of the opinions they hold.
ERIC STRIKER • APRIL 30, 2020
Boston University’s director of the Elie Wiesel archive, Bar-Ilan University’s Institute of Holocaust Research historian Joel Rappel has discovered the origin of the infamous “6,000,000” number: a 1944 meeting of Zionist pioneering organizations in what is now known as the state of Israel.
For years, supporters of the Holocaust narrative have held that the number first appeared at the Nuremberg trials using highly discredited testimony by Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoss. The 6,000,000 figure was again repeated by Adolf Eichmann, who was kidnapped by the Mossad and forced to participate in an internationally televised 1962 show trial in Israel.
According to documents in the Central Zionist Archive, the first mention of the 6 million claim was at a meeting of high ranking Zionist political figures in Palestine on January 19th, 1944 — more than a year before the war in Europe ended and a census could be taken, and a year before the Red Army entered Auschwitz.
“At some point, we’re going to have a real pandemic.”
Tom Hanks…
“When people are afraid, they give away all of their freedoms. … They’re handing their minds over to these people.”
“A better name [for trauma based mind-control, MK Ultra] would be ‘fear based mind-control,’ because they would torture and traumatize these little children. I worked with the adults that have been child victims of this programming, and they would be just terrified. There would just be these titanic tsunami waves of fear going through them. I think fear itself is enough to control people.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjBqHV3tRAs
How this non-Doctor, non-scientist has monopolized Global Health following the Rockefeller model and surpassing it.
“His decisions are shaping the entire global response to the coronavirus pandemic.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQSYdAX_9JY
A real-life hero!
Quotes I transcribed from this interview:
“People have given up their freedoms for fear.”
“If we have a second wave, it’s because we’ve sheltered in place.”
“This is crushing Americans, and is stomping on our freedoms.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK0shLq9x6c
Ben Swann interviews whom I consider a real-life hero, Dr. Erickson!
This video also banned by Google on YouTube!
Just one day after YouTube removed video from his new conference, Dr. Dan Erickson speaks one on one with Ben Swann about the news conference in which he shared data about the actual mortality rate of the coronavirus. Since then, a number of baseless attacks have come against Erickson, including the claim that he incorrectly gathered data.
https://www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck/videos/232910414645609/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5pBYm3ZwTg
What’s going on here?
So far, I’ve liked Dr. Shiva, but his attacking of others seems excessive; though, some of it makes sense, like Bobby Kennedy Jr. not getting things done, as if he may be a part of the establishment, so people sit back and don’t do anything.
Full Article Here – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ne…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tioJEu62Lhs
“It’s not even the virus that’s severely impacting most people. It’s the politicians’ response to the virus that is significantly impacting people.”
“Even as numbers were corrected [downward], policies weren’t corrected.”
“Are the decisions that are being made based on science or based on politics?”
“And when a politician decides that skewed numbers, made up statistics, bad information, and projections that are flat out wrong can be used to guide your life in a way over which you have no power, in that case, government has gone too far.”
Globalist Bill Gates funds institutions making these erroneous projections.
– Ben Swann
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYZjW11EiHI
So now you’ve got some 20-something employee of youtube making $15 an hour claiming that he knows more about the coronavirus situation than a ER doctor who is on the “front lines” and is in effect the local health authority. Does this make sense? Who made Youtube an authority on medical matters?
I’m impressed with this gutsy ABC affiliate in Bakersfield, completely unlike our TV news channels and our newspaper here in Anchorage, Alaska, which only report what Big Pharma and Big Government tells them to.
This 23ABC NEWS Bakersfield report says Google won a 2017 lawsuit with PragerU that determined the 1st Amendment doesn’t apply to Google/YouTube.
Dr. Erickson’s press conference that 23ABC News posted on their YouTube channel had 5 million views.
April 26, 2020
David Brownstein, MD
Folks, I have been writing to you about COVID for over a month. It is been a painful time period for all of us. What is really sad is that too many political dictates are being fostered on us without any good scientific evidence to back them up. One of those requirements that has me irritated is the use of face coverings that I see so prevalent out there. When I go to Costco, 95% of the people in the store are wearing face masks. Why is that?
The Governor of Michigan recently released an edict requiring that citizens wear a face covering when in any enclosed public space. It specifically states, “Any individual able to medically tolerate a face covering must wear a covering over his or her nose and mouth—such as a homemade mask, scarf, bandana, or handkerchief—when in any enclosed public space.” Later in the edict, it states, “Supplies of N95 masks and surgical masks should generally be reserved, for now, for health care professionals, first responders and other critical workers who interact with the public.”
It should be well known that cloth masks, bandanas, or handkerchiefs will do very little to stop the spread of coronavirus. In fact, they may actually increase your risk of becoming ill from corona and other influenza-like illnesses. A 2015 study found cloth masks, when compared to surgical masks, increase the rate of influenza-like illnesses 13x! (1) Cloth masks are probably best avoided and should not be reused without properly sanitizing them.
Regular surgical masks are not much better in this situation. The COVID-19 virus is 0.125 µm in size. Surgical masks have been shown to not adequately filter against aerosols measuring from 0.9-3.1 µm. (2) Other researchers have shown that particles from 0.04-0.2 µm can penetrate surgical masks. (3)
A 2020 study in Seoul, South Korea looked at the effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking COVID-19 in a controlled comparison of four patients. (4) The COVID-infected patients were put in negative pressure isolated rooms. The scientists compared disposable surgical masks (3 layers) with reusable cotton masks. Patients were instructed to cough 5 times while wearing no mask, surgical mask, or cotton mask. Interestingly, all swabs from the outer masks—including surgical masks—were positive for COVID-19. Inner masks were also found to be contaminated. That means the mask did not effectively filter out the COVID virus since it is too small. The authors state, “Neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered {COVID-19} during coughs by infected patients.”
Big Pharma has wrongly demonized HCQ because it’s off-patent, not a money maker. Vitamins A, C & D with zinc still work better, but Big Pharma rejects natural remedies. They didn’t even use zinc in many of their HCQ tests, which is what the docs were using when they got excellent, often immediate results!
Related:
Early on, it looked like the FDA would promote HCQ. Mike Rivero tells why not:
“There are cures out there. The American 𝐩𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐮𝐩𝐬𝐞𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞. They use them in fish tank cleaner, by the way. … It’s an inexpensive chemical, and the pharmaceutical industries don’t like inexpensive cures. They want very expensive cures that they own. And that’s why we’ve had so many of our politicians, governors and mayors literally threatening doctors not to prescribe hydroxychloroquine and the others.”
“Apparently, the hydroxychloroquine prevents the cytokine storm that causes so much of the discomfort and the breathing problems, and the 𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐜 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐫𝐮𝐬.”
– Mike Rivero on ‘What Really Happened,’ 3/30/20
History of HCQ studies
Sequential CQ / HCQ Research Papers and Reports
January to April 20, 2020
Executive Summary Interpretation of the Data In This Report
The HCQ-AZ combination, when started immediately after diagnosis, appears to be a safe and efficient treatment for COVID-19, with a mortality rate of 0.5%, in elderly patients. It avoids worsening and clears virus persistence and contagious infectivity in most cases.
– –
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén