[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCREnMKuqqk]
In this 20 minute Satellite TV interview by Randall Mark of The Standard, Richard Gage, AIA (founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth) lays out all the evidence for the controlled demolition of the 3 WTC high-rises on 9/11. The next day Vancouver 9/11 Truth had to turn away 50 people in this standing room only venue of 300 at the famous Public Library.
From: Coast to Coast AM Schedule
Architect Richard Gage, member of the American Institute of Architects, and founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, will discuss the destruction of the three World Trade Center high rises on 9-11, and why 700 architects and engineers have found evidence for explosive controlled demolition, and are calling for a new investigation.
| Date: 06-02-09 | |
| Hour: a – 1 hr. | |
| 3:00: Dr. Michael Coffman – Global Warming or Global Governance? | |
 |
|
| Hour: b – 1 hr. | |
| 4:00: Richard Gage, AI – Collapse of Buildings on 9/11 | |
|
|
| Hour: c – 2 hrs. | |
| 8:00: Charles Crismier – Seduction of the Saints 9:00: Ron Greiner – Health Savings Accounts Credit Card |
|
Related:
Adapted from: Transcript of Richard Gage explaining controlled demolition on KMPH in Fresno
Richard Gage:
“We’re told that…the buildings collapsed due to structural weakening, due to the fires.
The problem is that we don’t have large gradual deformations associated with collapses. And fires in high rises have never brought down a steel frame high rise building at all, ever.
And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence in the twin towers and the third skyscraper to collapse that day, which most people don’t know anything about it. We have the evidence of the ten key features of controlled demolition.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM]
We have 700 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation as a result of this evidence and the evidence in the World Trade Center that is very explosive.
Almost every architect and engineer we show this information to agrees with us that these are controlled demolitions. If we can get them to look at the information, because obviously the implications of a controlled demolition are dark for our country. Because that means somebody besides Al Qaeda was involved.
What we find down there [at ground level] is pools of molten iron. Several tons. …
Jet fuel and office fires don’t produce molten iron or molten steel. It doesn’t begin to melt until three thousand degrees. But what we have is the fires only produce maybe fourteen, sixteen hundred degrees.
So what produced all that molten iron? Well, it has in it the chemical evidence of a special incendiary, which is thermite, a high tech incendiary used to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. … This is very high-tech thermite, nano-thermite, it’s not found in a cave in Afghanistan, it’s produced in very sophisticated defense department contracting laboratories. …the particles are one thousand times smaller than a human hair. … We’re talking about several tons of nano-thermite and ordinary thermite.
One would have to have access through security. So the security company involved for the World Trade Center should be thoroughly investigated. And it turns out to be Securi-com, Stratesec, somebody should look to see who’s on the board of those companies. Some very interesting individuals turn out to be.
In addition, one would have to have the cover, of say, an elevator modernization, which was in fact going on nine months prior to 9/11 [Compare with the Rockefeller article, below. Nick Rockeller’s statement was eleven months prior to 9/11! – ed.], so that there were workers throughout the World Trade Center, that had access to the hoistway which is immediately adjacent to the core columns and beams in the building.”
Related:
(video) POWERFUL 9/11 Documentary Airs on PBS Across Colorado!!!!!!!
Joel Skousen: Best Evidence – 9/11 attacks a government black operation from beginning to end
A PNAC Primer: How We Got Into This Mess
(video) Nick Rockefeller Predicted “Event” To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
(video) Psychologists Explain 911 Denial — Fear, Pride…. “We need the truth in order to heal.”
(video) Molten Steel Found at Ground Zero Weeks After 9/11
(video) 9/11 Masterminds – Explosive Connections
Swedish Structural Engineer: WTC Towers Did Not Collapse from Fire
All of my 9/11 truth posts in reverse chronological order (latest posts appear first, 10 posts per page)
From: Uncensored Magazine, April 13, 2009
On the morning of April the 6th, Professor Niels Harrit of Copenhagen University in Denmark, who is an expert in nano-chemistry, was interviewed for an entire 10 minutes during a news program on the topic of the nano-thermite found in the dust from the World Trade Centre, (WTC). This explosive interview is posted at YouTube, with English subtitles here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6DQjBfbn24
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o]
During this news report, Harrit, who is one of the nine scientists primarily responsible for the pivotal paper entitled: ‘Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe’, talks about how their research, which was conducted over 18 months, led to the conclusion that planes did not cause the collapse of the three buildings at the WTC on 9/11.
He says that they found such large quantities of nano-thermite in the dust from the WTC, that he believes that this compound, which has the ability to melt metal, must have been brought into the WTC site in tonnes, on pallets. Consequently, he suggests that we need to address this matter with those who were in charge of the security at the World Trade Centre on 9/11.
Harrit, like Dr Steven Jones who also played a major role in this ground-breaking research, refers to their findings as “the loaded gun” and suggests that military personnel might be able to enlighten us more on the little-known topic of nano-thermite, which differs from regular thermite in a number of significant ways, including that its ignition temperature is far lower than that of the conventional kind, [1].
Related: [1]. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophy by Niels Harrit et al., 2009
The Seventh Tower by Niels Harrit, 2006
Nanothermites and WTC dust by Kevin Ryan, 27/12/08
Truth & Deception: An Interview with Kevin Ryan on 9/11, 14/2/09
From: Infowars
Disinfo operative Glenn Beck’s shabby and comical attempt to “debunk” FEMA camps was theater of the absurd at its most revealing. Recall Beck a few weeks ago trying to bait us with a promise to investigate the camps. He came off as alarmed over the prospect of internment camps and this set the hook. Stay tuned, folks, he teased, we’ll get to the bottom of this.
Glenn Beck, the seasoned operative, never intended a serious exposé. He planned to make those of us who know FEMA camps exist look like fools and churls. In order to do this he enlisted the retread James Meigs, editor-in-chief of the washed-up Hearst publication, Popular Mechanics. Back in 2005, Meigs spearheaded an effort to debunk the 9/11 truth movement with a Popular Mechanic cover story. Meigs and his crew of supposed debunkers approached the science of 9/11 very selectively and were more interested in ad hominem attacks leveled against researchers. Meigs concluded his diatribe by stating that “those who peddle fantasies that this country encouraged, permitted or actually carried out the attacks are libeling the truth — and disgracing the memories of the thousands who died that day.”
Meigs turned his “fact checking” (through omission) into a book — Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can’t Stand Up to the Facts. It was published by Hearst, the media corporation famous for its association with the expression “yellow journalism.” Hearst told the illustrationist Frederic Remington during the Spanish-American War: “You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war.” Nothing much as changed since 1895.
Related:
Alex Jones: The Reality of FEMA Camps in the U.S. [4/6/09 video]
[googlevideo=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1222445722544874066]Alex Jones Predicts 9/11-like Terrorist attack in U.S.
on his July 25, 2001 Show
“The point is, if any terrorism comes, it’s from this government, and if there was an outside threat like a “bin Laden” – who was a known CIA asset in the 80’s running the Mujahideen war, and whose family builds all the military bases over in Saudi Arabia right now, and sits on the board of Iridium Satellite. He’s the boogeyman they need in this Orwellian phony system.”
“I want the White House numbers up there now. A big part of this solution after you research government sponsored terrorism and check out what I’m saying is true, call the White House and tell them ‘we know that the government is planning terrorism, we know Oklahoma City and World Trade Center was [government sponsored domestic] terrorism. We know the Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted to blow up airliners, Baltimore Sun; if you do it, were gonna blame you, because we know who’s up to it. Or if you let some terrorist group do it, like the World Trade Center, we know who to blame.”
– Alex Jones
7/25/2001
From: Raw Story
A team of scientists claim to have unearthed startling data from dust and debris gathered in the days and weeks after the World Trade Center towers collapsed on Sept. 11, 2001.
In a study published by the Open Chemical Physics Journal — a peer-reviewed, scientific publication — Steven E. Jones and Niels Harrit level a stark allegation: that within the dust and rubble of the World Trade Center towers lays evidence of “a highly engineered explosive,” contrary to all federal studies of the collapses.
“We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center,” reads the paper’s abstract. “One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).”
They claim their analysis has uncovered “active thermitic material”: a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide in form of thermite known as “nanostructured super-thermite.”
Thermite, used in steel welding, fireworks shows, hand grenades and demolition, can produce a chemical reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time.
According to the Navy’s Small Business Innovation Research, super-thermite “is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services.”
“This finding really goes beyond anything that has previously been shown,” said Jones in a media advisory. “We had to use sophisticated tools to analyze the dust because this isn’t just a typical explosive, RDX or CD4 or something — this is a highly engineered material not readily available to just anyone.”
“The cost and production rate of super-thermite composites has limited the use of these materials in DoD applications,” claims the Navy’s SBIR.
Related:
Molten Steel Found at Ground Zero Weeks After 9/11
Rockefeller Predicted “Event” To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
Watch in full screen at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2144933190875239407
[googlevideo=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2144933190875239407]
Fabled Enemies: Spy Thriller Exposes Vast Intelligence Plot Behind 9/11
Depth of evidence presented in brand new 9/11 truth film buries official story for good
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, August 29, 2008
Fabled Enemies is a departure from every other 9/11 truth film released so far. It comes off as more of a spy thriller than a mere conspiracy romp. With tight editing, slick presentation, and sublimely complimentary backing music, the documentary draws the viewer in for an eminently watchable experience.
The film begins by revealing how in the very hours after 9/11, Osama bin Laden’s conviction of guilt in the court of public opinion was assured simply by constant repetition in the news media, and how the fairytale of 19 hijackers with box cutters began to unravel.
The film does not try to invent an alternative scenario behind what really happened on 9/11, it expertly demolishes the official version by concentrating on how Bin Laden’s network was protected every step of the way by higher-ups and the hijackers issued visas while good FBI agents like Robert Wright attempted to penetrate the wider plot but were blocked from doing so.
The treatment of Anthony Shaffer, who attempted to inform the 9/11 Commission about Able Danger, an intelligence program that identified the hijackers before 9/11, highlights precisely why the Commission was a set-up from the very beginning. Shaffer and his team were gagged and slandered and the vital information they had passed on was ignored and buried.
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske from: The Infowarrior with Jason Bermas, 4/2/09
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DY2taf_JyLg]Patrice O’Neal on THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas:
The Problem is YOU!
“In terms of the New World Order, who’s worse? Is it the people at the top that are having these meetings, these G-20 meetings that people are protesting, or is it the average citizen who has got to help these dudes and these women perform this action?“
“Who do you blame for like the holocaust? Do you blame Hitler, who essentially was a little crazy man with a mustache? Or do you blame the thousands and thousands of soldiers, who at the whim of his command would kill their fellow citizens?
“‘Oh, it’s my job, and I have to feed my family. I’m going to destroy your family.'” “…why the pawn is so willing to be the pawn?” “There can’t be a New World Order, there can’t be these little old men in a room at the top of a pyramid making these decisions unless there are us(es) who are willing to destroy other people.”
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKW_CUoPLdg]
Related:
“The Obama Deception”: A Film by Alex Jones (High Quality)
Rockefeller Predicted “Event” To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
All of my 9/11 truth articles at ToBeFree (in reverse-chrono order)
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrrzHjPC9p8]
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske from the video, below.
The Problem
“The truth is not comfortable,
and never will be.
We choose our own comfortable doctrine,
and build our doctrines and belief around that foundation. …
When an opposing view is presented,
we resist it without giving it much thought.”
“We’ve become illiterate financially, historically, morally, spiritually, etc.,
and will chastise or harm the person who challenges us to think.”
“We argue and sometimes fight
when our belief system is challenged.”
The Solution
“True attainment of knowledge, wisdom and truth is to:
weigh the evidence,
then form an opinion,
leaving opportunities for additional learning in the future.”
* * *
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_acSdhHiX_M]Are Americans willfully ignorant or stupid
Related:
From Willful Ignorance through Cognitive Dissonance to “Could I Be Wrong?”
WordPower: BEWARE, in the LAST DAYS People Will Be WILLINGLY IGNORANT
Rosie: “There was definitely an explosion before the first plane [hit]?”
Jesse Ventura, the former governor of Minnesota, ex Navy Seal Vietnam Veteran, Demolition Expert and an avid spokesperson for 911 Truth.The governor takes on a swarm of media in the footage below for about 30 minutes. This is a pretty intense interview!
(The first 2 minutes isn’t worth watching, it’s just someone walking around with a camera. Fast forward about 2 minutes to get to the interview.)
From: Antiwar
In the early-1990s, there was a group of ideologues and power-politicians on the fringe of the Republican Party’s far-right. The members of this group in 1997 would found The Project for the New American Century (PNAC); their aim was to prepare for the day when the Republicans regained control of the White House – and, it was hoped, the other two branches of government as well – so that their vision of how the U.S. should move in the world would be in place and ready to go, straight off-the-shelf into official policy.
This PNAC group was led by such heavy hitters as Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, James Woolsey, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, James Bolton, Zalmay M. Khalilzad, William Bennett, Dan Quayle, Jeb Bush.
…with the Supreme Court’s selection of George W. Bush in 2000. The “outsiders” from PNAC were now powerful “insiders,” placed in important positions from which they could exert maximum pressure on U.S. policy: Cheney is Vice President, Rumsfeld is Defense Secretary, Wolfowitz is Deputy Defense Secretary, I. Lewis Libby is Cheney’s Chief of Staff, Elliot Abrams is in charge of Middle East policy at the National Security Council, Dov Zakheim is comptroller for the Defense Department, John Bolton is Undersecretary of State, Richard Perle is chair of the Defense Policy advisory board at the Pentagon, former CIA director James Woolsey is on that panel as well, etc. etc. (PNAC’s chairman, Bill Kristol, is the editor of Rupert Murdoch‘s The Weekly Standard.) In short, PNAC had a lock on military policy-creation in the Bush Administration.
But, in order to unleash their foreign/military campaigns without taking all sorts of flak from the traditional wing of the conservative GOP – which was more isolationist, more opposed to expanding the role of the federal government, more opposed to military adventurism abroad – they needed a context that would permit them free rein. The events of 9/11 rode to their rescue. (In one of their major reports, written in 2000, they noted that “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing even – like a new Pearl Harbor.”)
After those terrorist attacks, the Bush Administration used the fear generated in the general populace as their cover for enacting all sorts of draconian measures domestically (the Patriot Act, drafted earlier, was rushed through Congress in the days following 9/11; few members even read it), and as their rationalization for launching military campaigns abroad.
Related:
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century — A Report of The Project for the New American Century September 2000 (Threat countries are listed, many of which we’ve regime-changed)
Rockefeller Predicted “Event” To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
PNAC member, Ambassador John Bolton admits U.S. wars were to protect U.S. oil interests
All of my Real Reason for U.S. Wars = NWO! posts (latest appear first)
From: Global Research
In THE NEW PEARL HARBOR REVISITED, David Ray Griffin provides a brilliant and much-needed companion to his path-breaking and movement-building book on 9/11, The New Pearl Harbor (NPH; 2004). Now, on the occasion of the seventh anniversary of those horrific events, Griffin surveys in detail all the main lines of evidence against the official account of 9/11 to have emerged during the last four years. THE NEW PEARL HARBOR REVISITED (NPHR) has been designed as volume 2 of a two-volume set with NPH as volume 1; together they provide a thorough and up-to-date case against the official conspiracy theory (they can be bought separately, of course).
Griffin has already published four other books that provide in-depth analysis of most of the evidence to have emerged since 2004. NPHR’s main purpose is to provide an easily accessible survey of all of the new evidence, so that it is now possible for a beginner to the subject (including journalists and members of Congress) to master its enormous complexity simply by reading two books. NPHR is structured identically to NPH; each chapter in NPHR comments and builds on the corresponding chapter in NPH. Much of the content is entirely new; there are many facts and analyses in NPHR which Griffin presents for the first time, and which literally make the book an up-to-the-minute statement of the case.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79eCo6ocBEc]
“Voting is voting your heart and voting your conscience. And when you do that, don’t ever, ever let a Democrat or Republican tell you you’ve wasted your voted. The fact is that if you don’t vote your heart and conscience then you have wasted your vote.”
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eytv1j0ZwII]
“Jerry always said if you’re made to pick the lesser of two evils, it means you’re still picking evil.”
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WvIJCM-LXo]
From: InfoWars
“I’m going to move on to another subject that a lot of people don’t want to discuss today,” he said, “I know when I discuss it, it’s amazing, I get attacked! And that’s something called 9/11!”
The crowd cheered and applauded as Ventura made numerous salient points about the FBI’s failure to list 9/11 on Bin Laden’s rap sheet and the DOJ’s failure to charge him.
“They charged him when he blew up our embassy in ‘98, why the biggest terrorist attack in history have they failed to officially charge him for? Why have they not convened a grand jury, presented their evidence and got an indictment?” asked Ventura. “When the FBI was pressed as to why 9/11 wasn’t included, their response was – we don’t have enough evidence.”
“Why did we have a President who stonewalled any investigation into 9/11 for two years?,” added the former Governor, as portions of the crowd chanted, “9/11 was an inside job.”
Ventura slammed the media for slavishly devoting a whole month of coverage to the death of Anna Nicole Smith, labeling it a sign of “the dumbing down of America.”
[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=5s75CPceiCw]
“My goal has not ever been to change minds.
My goal is to open minds.
So when people see my film or come to a show,
I want them to say: “Well, that’s a different way of looking at things,
and I’m maybe going to find out more.
I also want people to feel inspired,
so I try to make art that is uplifting.”
___________________
“After 9/11,
when we were in our moment of greatest sadness as a nation,
when we were mourning those deaths,
and all of us were in pain,
this small group of neoconservatives used our pain
in order to set their agenda on its course.”
I would love to see something like the Power to the Peaceful Festival happen even in Alaska. We need to stand up for what is right before it’s too late.
Headliner, Michael Franti said this about the event in the Power to the Peaceful Festival 2005 DVD, which is held annually on the 9/11 weekend in San Francisco:
“We want this day and the remembrance of those lives lost on September 11 not to be a call for vengeance, but to be a call for peace, and to be a call for social justice.”
See the trailer.
This is last year’s poster of the event. This year it will be held on the 6th:
Blessed are the Peacemakers, y’all!
From: InfoWars
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pow5_UYKaJ8]
Asked what he thought of the 9/11 truth movement and how Bill Maher’s show was interrupted by truthers at the time, Carlin responded, “I always question the received reality.”
“The consensus reality is often intentionally misleading,” he added.
Asked if he would support a new investigation into 9/11, Carlin was skeptical, stating,
“They don’t investigate themselves in this country – it would be a whitewash, it would be like the Kennedy thing, it would be like everything.”
“The people who are in charge do what they want and they will always do what they want, power does what it wants to and I wouldn’t trust an investigation….”
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxqRBc6qB08]
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIw4ELwc3Vg]
From: Prison Planet
Former Governor Jesse Ventura slammed the media witch hunt that he was subjected to in the wake of questioning the official 9/11 story and admitted that he was shocked by the reaction to his comments about the demolition of WTC 7 and the twin towers, but the ex-wrestling and movie star reiterated and expanded upon his views on 9/11 during an appearance on The Alex Jones Show.
“How come we’re not allowed to ask any questions today?” asked Ventura, referring to the hostile corporate media reaction that was elicited in response to his last appearance on The Alex Jones Show when he questioned the official 9/11 story. …
Ventura slammed the corporate media for obsessing about issues of little or no significance, drawing from personal experience when he was told what stories to cover during his tenure as an MSNBC host, but warned, “Rest assured the Internet will be the next thing the government will try to control.” …
“Why if the Al-Qaeda truly attacked us, why would we not be fighting them in Afghanistan, instead we’re focusing in the opposite direction and going into Iraq who had nothing to do with it,” said Ventura, adding, “In fact Saddam Hussein feared Al-Qaeda as a problem for him.”
Ventura stated that one of the biggest alarm bells that made him suspicious about 9/11 was George W. Bush’s reluctance to form a commission to investigate the attacks.
“I put myself in that position as a Governor or as a President – if I had a disaster happen like the one we had here in Minnesota where the bridge fell into the water, you would immediately commission a full blown public study,” he said.
“Yet George Bush stonewalled an investigation for over two years and the only reason he did one was because of pressure from the 9/11 victims,” added Ventura.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIrBN4PQ_4o]
“We in America, today, like to say we want to hear the truth.
We like to feel we want the truth.
Then why is it that we attack all the truth tellers?”
“Anyone know the definition of fascism?
It’s when corporations team with organized religion
to control your government.
Sound familiar?”
“Keep up the good work, guys.
Keep asking the questions.”
Transcriptions by Jeff Fenske
Related: Ventura’s 9/11 Questions Break Through Mainstream Media Dam
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4biSy4-mxs]
Retired public defender William Veale presents a concise summary of some of the evidence behind the controlled demolition hypothesis of the complete collapse of WTC buildings 1,2, and 7.
This is a clip from “Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic” –
http://www.improbablecollapse.com
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782
From: InfoWars
VENTURA: “…how can two planes knock down three buildings?”
HANNITY: Pretty easy. It’s 757s– 747s.
VENTURA: But there were three buildings that went down.
HANNITY: There was a lot of fire and there was a lot of damage–
VENTURA: Well, first of all, jet fuel blew up at the start. Jet fuel is four-fifths– and I don’t want to stay on this, I’d rather talk other things– but jet fuel is four-fifths kerosene. It doesn’t burn hot. So, using the analogy that it could melt the metal, then propane burns hotter. So if you turn on your camp stove for three hours, shouldn’t it melt the grates? But it doesn’t, does it?– it doesn’t.
Related:
Ludicrous Hit Piece Attacks Ventura On WTC Collapse Comments
Former Governor Jesse Ventura: WTC Collapse A Controlled Demolition
From: George Washington’s Blog
Note: I am not arguing that the hijackers’ names should be cleared or that they are good people who were victimized. Anyone who took a single life on 9/11 is a murderer and a scoundrel. I am, instead, simply asking who the true masterminds of 9/11 were, and who provided the resources to carry out the plan.
__________________________
We’ve all seen it on television. The defense attorney argues his client was “entrapped”. That is, that it wasn’t the defendant’s idea to commit the crime, but that the police planted the idea and urged him to do it.
Many of us have heard allegations that post-9/11 arrests of suspected Al Qaeda members were based on very thin information. Did you realize that all or virtually all of these arrests occurred due to entrapment? For example:
• PBS’ Frontline ran a special report focusing on the the alleged Al Qaeda plot in Lodi, California, which showed — based upon interviews with top law enforcement officials involved in the case — that the bust amounted to little more than entrapment and coerced and fabricated confessions from two men who, in fact, had nothing to do with the terrorist group
• The Washington Post ran a story about one alleged threat entitled “Was it a terror sting or entrapment?“, showing that the U.S. government lent material support to the wanna-be terrorists, and put violent ideas in their heads
• Raw Story reports that the alleged terrorist group that is alleged to have planned to blow up Chicago’s Sears Tower was non-violent before a government informant infiltrated the group and planted violent ideas in their heads
• There are numerous other instances of entrapment of peaceful or mentally incompetent people who are then arrested as “terrorists” (see this, this and this)
But surely 9/11 was different, right?Also Here
Related: Rockefeller Predicted “Event” To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11
From: The Raw Story
Newly-released records obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request contradict the 9/11 Commission’s report on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and raise fresh questions about the role of Saudi government officials in connection to the hijackers.
The nearly 300 pages of a Federal Bureau of Investigation timeline used by the 9/11 Commission as the basis for many of its findings were acquired through a FOIA request filed by Kevin Fenton, a 26 year old translator from the Czech Republic. The FBI released the 298-page “hijacker timeline” Feb. 4.
The FBI timeline reveals that alleged hijacker Hamza Al-Ghamdi, who was aboard the United Airlines flight which crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center, had booked a future flight to San Francisco. He also had a ticket for a trip from Casablanca to Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia.
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén