https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtJ00iODjpc
Trump In Danger- Secret Service Refusing to do Their Job
Category: Donald Trump Page 14 of 20
Good news about Trump’s personality! When he knows someone is evil, he has his limits as to how much he’ll act like everything is okay. Amazing!
She betrayed the German people, and is trying to get re-elected!
The main problem probably is that he’s getting bad advice from the neocons and traitors on his staff, and the warmongering, reverse-Christian, “Christian” Zionists whom he thinks he should please.
– –
Trump appears to ignore requests for a handshake with Angela Merkel
Published on Mar 17, 2017
During his first meeting with Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel, President Trump appeared to ignore requests from the media for the two leaders to shake hands. At one point, Merkel turns to Trump and says, “they want to have a handshake,” but gets no response from Trump.
Many leaders, political and spiritual, have failed by trying to save face — unwilling to admit error — fearing what people think more than what God thinks.
“Christian” Zionists have also given Donald bad advice.
– Editor
– –
Skousen Psychoanalyzes Trump:
I’ve always maintained that Trump is NOT A PLANT within the movement. Like most populists, I think Trump wants too much to be liked and is TRYING TO PLEASE the very establishment he claims to oppose. Sadly, it is also almost IMPOSSIBLE for Donald Trump to ADMIT ERROR once he has signed on to a policy mistake and made it his own. He lacks the verbal control skills to watch his own tongue, let alone follow the script of others.
• How Trump fell into this NEOCON TRAP: Trump is told by numerous neocon advisors that Iran is the real problem, the “number one terrorist supporting nation,” even though it’s a lie. US and British intelligence, colluding with Israel, are the number one terror sponsors in the world. They created al Qaeda, ISIS and all the Syrian rebels.
• Because Trump has BOUGHT INTO the idea that Iran is the “bogey man,” anything can be sold to Trump in the Middle East if it can be viewed as hurting Iran, and it can be perceived as fighting the phony war on terror.
• • •
From:
World Affairs Brief, March 17, 2017 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
This Week’s Analysis:
Analysis of Trump’s Latest Compromises
Trump-Russian Banking Connection is Fake Intelligence
Trump Wants to Cut UN Funds?
Mobocracy and Higher Education
Complain Loudly About New TSA Pat Down Procedures
Dutch Vote Defeats Anti-Immigration Party
[…]
ANALYSIS OF TRUMP’S LATEST COMPROMISES
Trump supporters are reeling from the recent string of compromises and mistakes as more and more essential campaign promises fall prey to compromises. The biggest ones this week were his support for a bill that falls short of repealing Obamacare and expanding support for the globalist interventions in Yemen and Syria. He seems tired of vetting nominees and has rubber stamped a dangerous percentage of neocons and globalists for positions in the highest levels of his administration. Naturally, many conservatives are anxiously wondering if Trump has been compromised or if he is simply the victim of his own lack of principles and failure to understand the globalist threat. I’ve always maintained that Trump is not a plant within the movement. He lacks the verbal control skills to watch his own tongue, let alone follow the script of others. Like most populists, I think Trump wants too much to be liked and is trying to please the very establishment he claims to oppose. Sadly, it is also almost impossible for Donald Trump to admit error once he has signed on to a policy mistake and made it his own.
The best example of the latter is his replacement Executive Order on a temporary immigration ban from six countries instead of the original seven. It was unnecessary to name any specific countries at all, but Trump insisted in order to save face on the original order. Even though any offending language about religious preference was removed from the new order, two activist judges in two different states blocked the temporary ban yet again—not based upon anything in the ban’s wording, but on comments made by members of the Trump administration that they perceived as discriminatory. Legal scholars are rolling their eyes in disbelief that a judge would base a ruling on comments rather than on the wording of the law—judicial activism at its worst.
Opposition is clearly building against Trumpcare, from all sides. In trying to please everyone, he ends up pleasing no one. For the first time since the American Healthcare Act (AHC) started working through the committee approval process this week, three conservative Republicans voted against approval of the bill in the important House Budget Committee—GOP Reps. Dave Brat of Virginia, Gary Palmer of Alabama, and Mark Sanford of South Carolina.
At least two dozen additional conservatives intend to vote against it when it comes for a vote unless amended, and that’s enough to kill it. Opposition by all Democrats is a given in both House and Senate, but in the Senate Mitch McConnell can only afford to lose 2 Republican votes if he is to pass the AHC—and 3 (Senators Paul, Cruz and Lee) have already said they won’t back it without significant changes.
The most important provision that has to be removed is the proposed 30% penalty for not maintaining continuous health insurance. That was a provision lobbied for by the insurance companies to replace the Obamacare mandate, which forces healthy people into the system to pay for those with expensive prior existing conditions. Even with those, it doesn’t keep premiums from rising by 2 or 3 times the former norm. Trump’s exaggerated promise that “you’re going to love” his replacement for Obamacare was doomed to fail, but the disappointing current legislation will be a cruel pill to swallow for supporters who hoped he would come through.
And then there are the liberal Republican Senators that won’t back the measure without a big expansion in Medicaid as a permanent fixture. This growing government health program, combined with the trappings of promising cheap insurance for everyone, will eventually end up causing a popular demand for a “single payer” government subsidized health system—especially after Trumpcare fails to lower premiums. By pushing for his own version of government healthcare, Donald Trump will be just as responsible as Obama for the coming government system that is evolving.
In trying to satisfy both liberals and conservatives, the Republicans will compromise and make changes to accommodate the largest factions. That guarantees that the Senate and House will pass differing bills which will then go through the “reconciliation process.” These reconciliation committees are often staffed by members of both houses that are compromisers, and I fear that the measures demanded by conservatives will be gutted in reconciliation. The result then goes before both houses as a simple yes/no vote, with no amendments.
In foreign policy, we are seeing the damage wrought by military hardliners surrounding the President as close advisors—particularly Defense Secretary Mattis and National Security Advisor McMasters. Despite campaign promises to stop globalist interventions around the world, the Trump administration is ramping up US military involvement in both Yemen and Syria. Evidence has recently surfaced in PJ Media that McMaster shares Obama’s views on Islam and terror.
Donald Trump’s new national security advisor, Lt. General H.R. McMaster, has made troubling remarks — such as “the Islamic State is not Islamic” — that one expects from the D.C. establishment. However a hearty endorsement that he gave to a 2010 book points to the totality of McMaster’s views on security issues as being worse than simply his parroting politically correct memes on Islam.
The book in question is Militant Islamist Ideology: Understanding the Global Threat. Written by CDR Youssef Aboul-Enein, it was published by the Naval Institute Press in 2010. I read and reviewed it back in 2012 and found its claims — many of which the Obama administration followed to disastrous results — to be incorrect and problematic.
For starters, Aboul-Enein asserts that only “militant Islamists” — ISIS types who behead, crucify, massacre, and burn people alive — are the enemy. “Non-militant Islamists,” however, are not: “It is the Militant Islamists who are our adversary. They represent an immediate threat to the national security of the United States. They must not be confused with Islamists.”
What he misses here is something that nobody in the media sees—that ISIS is so totally virulent and scripted in its violence against everyone, including Muslims that they can’t even be classified as “radical Islamic terrorists,” —not because their isn’t radical Islam, but because these terrorist are not trying to create a Califate, but rather to help breed extreme fear of the phony war on terror. Real terror organizations are fighting for a cause and they specifically make sure that people in that cause are not harmed. ISIS harms everyone, even Muslims. That can only mean that ISIS is the blackest of false flag operations meant only to stir up universal fear of terrorism, and NOT to create anything beneficial.
This theme, which the author expresses in convoluted language — at one point he urges the reader to appreciate the “the divisions between Militant Islamists and between Militant Islamists and Islamists” (p.176) — permeates the book. In reality, all Islamists share the same ultimate goal of global Islamic hegemony. They differ in methodology — but not in their view of us as the enemy to be crushed.
We’ve already seen the outcome of cooperating with “Non-militant Islamists” during the Arab Spring. The Obama administration cast aside decades of U.S. policy and support for secular Arab autocrats and made cozy with the Muslim Brotherhood. What followed is well-known: the Arab Spring quickly turned into the “Islamic Winter.” This culminated with the rise of the Islamic State, in large part due to Obama’s policies, both active (aiding Islamic terrorists by portraying them as “freedom fighters,” in Libya and Syria) and inactive (pulling all U.S. forces out of Iraq despite the warnings, and disposing of a 30-year ally of the U.S., the secularist Mubarak, for the Brotherhood in Egypt).
Of course, he misses the biggest point—that US and British intelligence created ISIS out of nowhere by simply rebranding about half of the Syrian rebels which had been brought in, funded and armed by Saudi Arabia and Turkey.
Worse, Trump is building bridges to Saudi Arabia, the prime source of funding and weapons for US backed terrorists. Bloomberg relished the scene, noticing that “Trump Wins Saudi Praise for ‘Turning Point’ After Meeting Prince.”
Saudi Arabia, seeking to breathe life into its decades-old alliance with the U.S., claimed “a historic turning point” in bilateral relations after President Donald Trump welcomed Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to the White House.
“Relations had undergone a period of difference of opinion,” a senior adviser to the crown prince said in a statement after Tuesday’s meeting. “However, today’s meeting has put things on the right track, and marked a significant shift in relations, across all political, military, security and economic fields.”
Sunni Arab leaders are embracing Trump with praise the president isn’t finding from other U.S. allies in the world, reflecting an eagerness to reset ties after feeling shunned by President Barack Obama, who crafted the 2015 nuclear deal with their Shiite rival Iran. The Saudi statement said Trump had a “great understanding” of the bilateral relationship. The president and the prince “share the same views on the gravity of the Iranian expansionist moves in the region,” the adviser said.
The foregoing describes succinctly how Trump fell into this neocon trap. Trump is told by numerous neocon advisors, before and after the election, that Iran is the real problem, the “number one terrorist supporting nation,” even though it’s a lie. US and British intelligence, colluding with Israel, are the number one terror sponsors in the world. They created al Qaeda, ISIS and all the Syrian rebels, none of which are moderate. In fact, new evidence appeared this week from Iranian and Iraqi sources that documented how US special operations helicopters rescued two ISIS commanders from the battle for Mosul and transferred them deeper into Syria.
Commander of Asa’eb al-Haq Movement affiliated to the Iraqi popular forces of Hashd al-Shaabi said that… US forces have carried out a rapid heliborn operation and evacuated two commanders of ISIL terrorists from Western Mosul in Northern Iraq.
Javad al-Talaybawi said that the US forces carried out the heliborne operation in one of the Western neighborhoods of Western Mosul, evacuating two senior ISIS commanders to an unknown location after the commanders came under siege by Iraqi government forces in intensified clashes in Western Mosul.
“Americans’ support and assistance to the ISIS is done openly to save their regional plan in a desperately attempt,” al-Talaybawi underlined.
Al-Talaybawi had warned late in February that the US forces tried hard to evacuate ISIS commanders from the besieged city of Tal Afar West of Mosul.
After photos surfaced in the media displaying US forces assisting ISIS terrorists, al-Talaybawi said that the Americans were planning to take ISIS commanders away from Tal Afar that is under the Iraqi forces’ siege.
In the meantime, member of Iraqi Parliament’s Security and Defense Commission Iskandar Watut called for a probe into photos and footages displaying US planes airdropping aid packages over ISIS-held regions.
Watut further added that we witnessed several times that US planes dropped packages of food stuff, arms and other necessary items over ISIS-held regions, and called on Iraq’s air defense to watch out [for] the US-led coalition planes. Eyewitnesses disclosed at the time that the US military planes helped the ISIS terrorists in Tal Afar region West of Mosul.
“We saw several packages dropped out of a US army aircraft in the surrounding areas of the city of Tal Afar in Western Nineveh province and six people also came out of a US plane in the ISIL-controlled areas,” the Arabic-language media quoted a number of eyewitnesses as saying.
The Iraqi army says that the US army is trying to transfer the ISIL commanders trapped in areas besieged by the Iraqi army to safe regions.
It is no wonder that Iran and Iraq are being targeted by globalists. They, along with the Russians, know that the US is secretly supporting terror, for conflict creation purposes. Iran is being targeted for blowing the whistle on US duplicity and because it has its own weapons industry and thus is the only Middle East nation capable of countering the globalist intervention in Syria.
What this suppressed report above also indicates is that the dark side of government has control of certain US Special Forces troops and helicopters and are still operating even though the President of the United States has not authorized these operations in support of ISIS, and is ignorant about them. Of course, he only knows what his briefers tell him and what he reads on the internet in the early morning hours. Apparently he missed this story or he would be hopping mad. Naturally, if he did read it and brought it up to his advisors, they dismiss the story as Iranian and Iraqi propaganda. Still the stories persist because they are true.
In short, because Trump has bought into the idea that Iran is the “bogey man,” anything can be sold to Trump in the Middle East if it can be viewed as hurting Iran, and it can be perceived as fighting the phony war on terror. That’s why Trump is getting deeper into the battle for Yemen, where Iranian-backed Houthi rebels overthrew the globalist regime in Yemen that was supplying weapons to US-backed terrorists.
I’m not saying the Iranian Ayatollahs are friends of liberty. They are not. But like the Russians, they are directly thwarting the globalist agenda in the Middle East, which is partially helpful to the anti-globalist cause. Eventually, Russia intends to strike the West more broadly and establish their own version of a globalist government, which won’t be good either.
As the Washington Post points out, Trump is going to resume military weapon sales to the Saudis after Obama claims to have halted those sales due to multiple massacres of civilians in Yemen:
The State Department has approved a resumption of weapons sales that critics have linked to Saudi Arabia’s bombing of civilians in Yemen, a potential sign of reinvigorated U.S. support for the kingdom’s involvement in its neighbor’s ongoing civil war.
The proposal from the State Department would reverse a decision made late in the Obama administration to suspend the sale of precision guided munitions to Riyadh, which leads a mostly Arab coalition conducting airstrikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen.
While the U.S. military has provided support to the Saudi-led air campaign since 2015, including aerial refueling for Saudi jets and a U.S. advisory mission in the Saudi operations headquarters, the Obama administration sought to scale back that support last year amid alleged Saudi strikes on civilian targets.
Of course, this was only done by the Obama Administration to assuage public opinion over the US backing a merciless Saudi regime. In fact, the Saudis already had enough inventory of these weapons so the “cut back” didn’t really stop their war in Yemen. Military sales would have resumed in due course anyway before the Saudis ran out of bombs.
In like manner, the media and Trump foolishly paint Obama as “soft on Iran” because of the Iran nuclear deal. But this was not a deal meant to help Iran, or establishment peace with the West. It was just the opposite—a future trap (with conditions Iran is bound to violate) set to justify an attack on Iran, once Syria was subdued. Even though none of the parties signed the agreement, it was put into a binding Security Council resolution that automatically authorizes a war against Iran should a violation be detected.
One of the psychological twists in the deal was that by Obama appearing to be “soft on Iran” Republicans and Trump would take up the opposite position, not realizing such action is exactly what the globalists really want. In the end, Republicans will be blamed for the war, not the globalists.
In furtherance of these militaristic goals, Trump has authorized more Special Forces in both Yemen and Syria, which the Syrian government rightly opposes. No nation has the right to invade the territory of another unless threatened directly by that nation. If the US claims to be helping to fight ISIS in Syria, they should have no trouble getting permission. Sadly, that isn’t the real goal.
Trump has also fallen into the trap of furthering the globalist agenda by backing a tougher military stance against terror—which he can’t really fight unless he traces terror back to its origin in the dark side of the CIA and MI6 in Britain. Will Grigg of Liberty News Daily comments on how Trump has also loosened the rules against civilian casualties in Counter-Terror Operations:
Donald Trump’s most insistent and frequently repeated campaign promises was to unshackle the military and intelligence agencies in pursuing counter-terrorism operations worldwide. As President, Trump is making good on that promise, which was regarded as problematic by some of his libertarian and traditionally conservative supporters.
According to the New York Times, The Trump administration is exploring how to dismantle or bypass Obama-era constraints intended to prevent civilian deaths from drone attacks, commando raids, and other counterterrorism missions outside conventional war zones like Afghanistan and Iraq…. Already, President Trump has granted a Pentagon request to declare parts of three provinces of Yemen to be an `area of active hostilities’ where looser battlefield rules apply,” continues the Times account. “That opened the door to a Special Operations raid in late January in which several civilians were killed, as well as to the largest-ever series of American airstrikes targeting Yemen-based Qaeda militants, starting nearly two weeks ago,” administration officials disclosed to the paper.
Mr. Trump is also expected to approve a similar Pentagon request to designate some parts of Somalia as a battle zone subject to similarly emancipated rules of engagement.
All of this comes at a time when the Trump administration is preparing a budget that will reallocate funds from diplomatic initiatives to the military.
The beginning of some anti-Trump actions lining up.
James mentions:
– –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpV1xV2mKhw
MARCH 15TH: ROTHSCHILD, DEBT CEILING & DEMISE OF THE DOLLAR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHTa-pGGkQQ
ILLUMINATI CLOWN SNOOP DOGG MOCKS PRESIDENT TRUMP A$SA$SINATION! BADBADNOTGOOD MIND CONTROL EXPOSED!
Chuck Baldwin writes on Facebook:
Neocon House Speaker Paul Ryan and the GOP congressional leadership are promoting “Obamacare Lite,” which keeps and even strengthens most of Obamacare. It even features guaranteed bailouts for insurance companies and permanently ensconces socialized medicine in America.
Senator Rand Paul and other conservative senators and House members are strongly opposing the bill. Kudos to them!!! Right now, at least 70 Republicans are vowing to vote against it.
But get this: President Donald Trump is pressuring congressional conservatives to surrender their principles and support this grotesque legislation. I hate to say it, but by doing this Trump is acting just like previous Neocon Republican presidents.
Really, Mr. Trump? You are going to support phony conservatives such as Paul Ryan and turn your back on conservative members of Congress? Have you forgotten that repealing Obamacare was one of the main reasons conservatives elected you President to begin with? Beyond that, the members of Congress that you are now backing are the same ones who did everything they could to keep you OUT of the White House.
Is this a precursor of things to come? If so, Democrats won’t have to put up with Mr. Trump for very long, because he will be a one-term President for sure.
Republicans control the entire federal government right now: the White House and both houses of Congress. They could pass a complete repeal of Obamacare; and then replace it with…NOTHING. If they wanted to, that is. But the truth is, the Republican Party is nothing but Democrat Lite, which is why nothing much changes no matter which party is in control in Washington, D.C.
Let’s see how many “conservative” and “patriot” radio talk show hosts, web hosts, magazine publishers and editors, etc., will try to justify this stupid thing because it’s Trump and the Republicans that are proposing it. This has been going on FOREVER.
It is stuff like this that makes the GOP so stinking dangerous. “It can’t get any worse than the Democrats.” Just keep telling yourself that–and looking the other way, of course.
Better yet, call a piece of crap a piece of crap (regardless of who is shoveling it) and let your congressman and senators know how disappointed and opposed you are to Ryan’s sellout.
I’ve posted Binney saying this many times on my blog, but this time it’s broadcast on the public airwaves on a nationally syndicated radio show, as well as Fox News, today:
Sean also let William Binney state on his Fox News’ show today (3/8/17) that the NSA collects and stores all the conversations (not just metadata) of everyone in the USA.
– –
All phone conversations are recorded, not just the metadata; all emails, tweets….
“Probably they can go back at least 5-10 years.” @6:30
“And now any one of the 16 agencies have access.”
“Unfortunately, they [people] don’t seem to care.”
– William Binney
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske
• • •
NSA Whistleblower William Binney on The Sean Hannity Radio Show (3/6/2017)
Remember, the CIA killed Kennedy.
NSA is recording EVERYTHING from EVERYONE!
– –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUbE3-fKggM
Ron Paul Drops Wiretap Truth Bombs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5esE4ThidE
#OBAMAGATE – TRUMP ACCUSES OBAMA OF TAPPING HIS PHONES DHS INSIDER NAILED THIS, SAYS STILL GOING ON
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0HMVvFQ7sE
#PIZZAGATE – #PEDOGATE – FBI ANON RESURFACES AS PROMISED BY OUR DHS INSIDER – SHADOW STATE VAMPIRES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ECfVnMzwA
Trump – Obama Wire Tapped Trump in Last Month of Campaign, 1531
Obama Wiretapped Trump Phone Before Election?
From: New American
Saturday, 25 February 2017
Some of Trump’s Picks Have Troubling Links to Globalism, CFR
Written by Alex Newman
After crushing the establishment and delivering a series of blows to globalism, President Donald Trump’s winning spree against the powerful forces that opposed him appears to be slowing down. In fact, with his recent selection of Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster as National Security Adviser and Judge Neil Gorsuch for the Supreme Court — both of whom have been listed as members of the establishment globalist swamp known as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) — concerns are growing even among Trump supporters and grassroots conservative activists. There were already several CFR-linked officials before the latest additions — the very same forces that viciously libeled and attacked him in their failed bid to stop the swamp draining.
World Affairs Brief, March 3, 2017 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
This Week’s Analysis:
Playing the Russian Card Against Sessions
Trump’s First Speech
Globalists in Trump Administration
Fourth Circuit Rules Against 2nd Amendment
Leak Crackdown in White House Justified
Preparedness Tip: Deluxe Camping Sink
PLAYING THE RUSSIAN CARD AGAINST SESSIONS
The Trump administration made a major mistake in sacrificing National Security advisor Michael Flynn over the issue of Russian contacts. They should have defended his five telephones calls with the Russian ambassador as a necessary post-election courtesy to the Russians who were concerned about overturning the Obama edict ousting Russian diplomat-spies. The US has them too in Moscow. By not defending the contacts, and firing Flynn, they have unknowingly set the stage for the media to take down anyone else in the Trump administration who had post election contacts with the Russians. This week, they picked on Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Trump ought to realize by now that the NSA is spying on him and everyone else in his administration, leaking rumors of Russian contacts and setting the same traps—unsubstantiated rumors first, in order to elicit a denial, and then producing transcripts to embarrass the target and demand a resignation.
In the Flynn case, David Ignatius of the The Washington Post set the trap by publishing a generalized version of a leak he got from within the deep state about the contacts—without letting on that the leak contained wiretap transcripts. Flynn thought he could get away with denying the rumors, but after he did so the trap was sprung by announcing the media had the transcripts proving Flynn was a liar.
In Attorney General Sessions’ case, which emerged this week, the establishment had set the trap earlier when Democratic Senator Al Franken questioned Sessions during his confirmation hearings about whether or not he had any contacts with the Russians. Sessions responded that he “did not have communications with the Russians” in his capacity as an adviser to then-candidate Trump. (Keep in mind this last phrase, as it is the key to his defense).
Then the Washington Post springs the trap, as they did with Flynn, by revealing that Sessions had private conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the Republican National Convention in July and also at his Senate office in September of 2016. The Post implied that this was part of the same Russian campaign to influence the election, quoting Professor Michael McFaul.
Michael McFaul, a Stanford University professor who until 2014 served as U.S. ambassador to Russia, said he was not surprised that Kislyak would seek a meeting with Sessions. “The weird part is to conceal it,” he said. “That was at the height of all the discussions of what Russia was doing during the election.”
Of course, the reason why Flynn and Sessions would deny the contacts is that the media was making a big deal out of Russian interference, and setting them up to hide any contacts—which would trap them later on, as we are now witnessing. Senator Franken predictably begins a public attack on Sessions for “misleading” the Senate confirmation committee about his Russian contacts.
Fortunately, the White House is defending Sessions rather than capitulating and allowing him to resign. Administration spokespersons rightly point out that Sessions was not representing the Trump campaign, but his position as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
“lt’s no surprise Senator Al Franken is pushing this story immediately following President Trump’s successful address to the nation.”
In an interview with NBC News he reiterated that “I have not met with any Russians at any time to discuss any political campaign, and those remarks are unbelievable to me and false, and I don’t have anything else to say about that.” He’d better be right because they may have spy transcripts and will use them to create a further crisis if needed.
They have already succeeded in getting Sessions to agree to recuse himself from any investigation involving Russian hacking of the election. That too is a mistake because the hacking claim of the DNC is a major intelligence and media lie that needs to be debunked officially once and for all. It’s amazing that I heard one commentator yesterday say that “no one is questioning the Russian hack of the DNC.” I have, and many others have. This is turning out to be a “big lie” that is being taken as gospel truth.
Sadly, by recusing himself, Sessions will deny himself any power to make sure the intelligence services produce honest evidence of Russian hacking, which they can’t do—because the FBI and others were using innuendo rather than actual spy transcripts. More data will be falsified for the investigation and the NSA will be trying to trap Sessions to see if he will involve himself against his promise. Mark Levin had these choice words relative to forcing Sessions to recuse himself:
Did Sessions give 20’% of uranium to Russians like Hillary Clinton did? No, he didn’t do anything like that. He met with the ambassador as matter of his duty as a senator not as a surrogate for the Trump 2016 campaign. However, Republicans in the house and Senate insisted that he recuse himself. You can bet Republicans will throw these guys overboard just like they did with Gen Mike Flynn. The left’s desire to destroy this administration is insatiable, and they are not going to stop. Did Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch ever recuse himself on anything? This is so pathetic that Republicans are all over T.V. saying Sessions should recuse himself.
Republicans like Kevin McCarthy are running for the hills whenever liberals attack. The bigger scandal here is that we’ve had Obama administration holdovers within intelligence agencies surveilling the Trump campaign and leaking information to the public, in hopes of getting Hillary Clinton elected. Those are police state tactics! Nothing Gen. Michael Flynn or Sessions have done are even in the same category as that. This is a massive scandal, the likes of which we have never seen. The real question should be, was Barack Obama as President using our intelligence services through the FISA court to gather information on their opponent? In addition, where did the information on Sessions come from? The Obama administration knew exactly what they were doing. They loosened NSA information gathering rules weeks before they left office. The information was then grabbed and spread to plants in the government.
I disagree with Levin that this was done by Obama holdovers or even his administration during the latter part of his tenure. This was the permanent deep state ensconced within government that never gives up control of its surveillance machinery. Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller wrote extensively about this Russian interference theme and how it was created by the deep state:
According to The NY Times, Obama White House officials waged a campaign to procure, save and disperse classified intelligence regarding Trump associates’ contacts with Russians. The campaign also involved curtailing the Trump team’s access to highly classified information and of lowering classification ratings on other information about the ongoing Russia investigation so that it could be more widely shared across the government.
According to The Times’ sources, the Obama officials waged the campaign out of fear that the Trump administration would cover up or destroy some of the information.
That’s a bogus claim because there was no Trump conspiracy to do anything illegal with the Russians. The only reason for embarrassment and the hiding of contacts is that the mainstream media poisoned the waters of improved relations with Russia, and the Trump team fell into the trap of denial rather than defense of working for better relations. Besides, these contacts were all informal and verbal. There was no written information to destroy, as the Times claims, except that recorded by NSA spying, with the Trump team didn’t know about.
The campaign was multifaceted but was not directed by Obama himself, the Times sources claimed.
Correct. Puppet presidents don’t direct these kinds of dark operations.
The wide-ranging report also includes some information that is not positive for Trump, including that federal investigators were given intelligence from foreign services that some Trump associates met with Russians in the Netherlands and Britain.
That’s an admission of dark side intelligence collusion with dark side forces they control in other allied countries. Even so, if they were Russian agents they would work under diplomatic or business cover.
That detail adds new information to a report from The Times last month that U.S. investigators had evidence that some Trump campaign advisers communicated with Russian government officials before the election.
Which is not illegal in and of itself.
That report noted that U.S. officials do not yet have evidence of any coordination between Trump advisers and the Russian government to influence the election. The White House strongly denied the claims made in that report, and asserted the FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe told Trump’s chief of staff, Reince Priebus, that the story was “bullshit.”
The Obama administration’s intelligence-sharing effort involved the White House, intelligence agencies and State Department, The Times reports. According to the newspaper, some Obama White House officials asked specific questions in intelligence briefings because they knew the questions and answers would be documented and saved for future review.
Actually, this tactic is to help coverup for intelligence agency spying by making it appear that they did not offer this information, but that it was extracted in response to a question.
Intelligence agencies ramped up efforts to convert raw intelligence gathered on Trump advisers into information that could be used by analysts. The intelligence was also classified at relatively low levels “to ensure as wide a readership as possible across the government,” according to The Times.
The State Department, then led by John Kerry, also took part in the intelligence-sharing campaign. The agency sent a batch of documents classified as “Secret” to Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, just before the election.
The Obama officials also moved to cap the number of incoming Trump officials who could view extremely sensitive information, “including the names of sources and the identities of foreigners who were regularly monitored.” The scheme would seem to lend support to Trump’s claims that the Obama White House sought to undermine his presidency by leaking classified information.
Keep in mind that there is a dual agenda in all of these Russian attacks: 1) to make Russia the boogeyman so that the Trump administration will not be able to join forces with Russia in getting rid of ISIS (a US/British/Israeli intelligence creation), and 2) to use the issue of contacts to get rid of non-insiders who are/were occupying sensitive positions in the administration.
That latter agenda is ongoing. The National Security Advisor post, for example, is normally the globalist point man and “handler” of puppet presidents, to ensure a continuation of globalist foreign policy and neocon-style military intervention. The National Security Council is also where many black operations are initiated and approved. Flynn was an outsider and critic of US intelligence agencies occupying that position and had to go.
In other bad news, the Trump White House has just asked globalist Fiona Hill, a Brookings Institution scholar who has written a skeptical book about Russian President Vladimir Putin, to join the White House national security staff
In like manner as the NSC, the Department of Justice (DOJ) must also be controlled by an insider since that is where illegal acts by globalist insiders in government receive protection and immunity against prosecution. Sessions as an outsider also needs to be removed.
However, the Powers That Be (PTB) might be able to live with Sessions since he is helping with the establishment campaign to protect law enforcement from citizen legal action over surveillance and abuse. Will Grigg comments that,
When he was nominated to serve as Attorney General, Jeff Sessions was hailed by law enforcement unions for bringing a “police-first mentality” to the position. On the basis of his performance thus far it is apparent that Sessions will not make it a priority to investigate claims of systemic corruption and abuse by local police departments.
In a recent press briefing, Sessions said that he had seen summaries of reports compiled by the Civil Rights Division regarding police departments in Chicago and Ferguson, Missouri.
“Some of it was pretty anecdotal and not so scientifically based,” Sessions commented, which isn’t surprising, given that he was reading executive summaries, which do not provide research details. Asked about the depth of the review he had conducted, Sessions admitted: “I have not read those reports, frankly.”
In describing the role of his department, Sessions said that it would serve as “the leading advocate for law enforcement in America, and I hope to be able to fulfill my responsibility in that regard.” Law enforcement is only one element of “justice,” of course. Due process is at least equally important, as is public accountability when abuse of power occurs.
Attorney General Sessions and President Trump are not seeking to minimize the federal role in local law enforcement. Both have pledged to put federal power at the disposal of the police. What they have promised is a less active role in holding law enforcement agencies accountable when officers injure citizens through incompetence or criminal misconduct.
Sessions is also wrongly reasserting federal authority over the legalization of marijuana at the state level. Both Trump and Sessions praise the role of the 10th Amendment in allowing states to set their own standards and not be dictated to by federal policies, relative to health care. However, in the matter of marijuana legalization, even for medical purposes, Sessions is no fan of state’s rights. This continuation of federal prosecution for marijuana sales puts citizens at risk in states where marijuana is legal for medical purposes.
In August of 2016 the liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Justice Department cannot prosecute medical marijuana cases if no state laws were broken, citing the 10th Amendment allowing States to have final cognizance over matters of law not granted to the federal government. As Fox News reported,
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ordered the federal agency to show that 10 pending cases in California and Washington state violated medical marijuana laws in those states before continuing with prosecutions.
Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, but Congress has barred the Justice Department from spending money to prevent states from regulating the use or sale of medical pot.
Federal prosecutors argued unsuccessfully that Congress meant only to bar the department from taking legal action against states and that it could still prosecute individuals who violate federal marijuana laws. The court rejected that, saying that medical marijuana-based prosecutions prevent the states from giving full effect to their own measures.
This week the Supreme Court refused to hear a case on appeal challenging Colorado’s medical marijuana law, putting off once again a definitive ruling on whether or not federal law, with no constitutional backing, has precedence over state law. As the Washington Post reported,
The Supreme Court’s decision today to toss out a lawsuit that could have brought Colorado’s legal marijuana boom to a screeching halt.. Oklahoma and Nebraska asked the Supreme Court to hear a challenge to Colorado’s marijuana legalization framework, saying that the state’s legalization regime was causing marijuana to flow across the borders into their own states, creating law enforcement headaches.
But by a 6-2 majority, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, without comment… In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that since marijuana is illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), it can’t be regulated at the state level. But numerous legal experts have pointed out that assumption is incorrect.
“Congress has no power to compel states to prohibit the cultivation, possession and transfer of marijuana,” according to Randy Barnett, an attorney who litigated a Supreme Court case exploring the limits of the CSA. “In the absence of such state prohibition, all such activities are completely legal under state law, notwithstanding that they are illegal under federal law,” he wrote last year.
In short, Congress can say that marijuana is illegal at the federal level. But if a state doesn’t want to enforce that prohibition itself, it doesn’t have to do so. And if it wants to go one step further and set up a market to regulate the trade in the drug, it’s free to do that as well.
Indeed, regardless of what you think of medical marijuana, this is a matter of state’s rights, and it looks increasingly like the courts are going to back that position, even as the DOJ tries to clamp down. I, personally, don’t totally agree with medical marijuana claims, but I strongly believe this is a matter to be left to the individual to decide and not government.
As a matter of principle, once Congress or the courts allow the government to dictate what they think is harmful or beneficial to individuals, when the fundamental rights of others are not affected, there is no limit to the individual choices that government can intrude upon.
First 7 minutes amazing on Trump’s speech before Congress!
21:35 Who is behind the vandalism of Jewish sights, and what does this mean? Mike is Jewish. 54:00 Trump sees this may be a false flag.
45:25 Judicial watch is investigating if the Rothschilds illegally financed one of John McCain’s fundraising events.
59:10 Michael seems proud of being able to play the part of Satan in a play 🙁
– –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yoFnbUvlF8
What Really Happened: Michael Rivero (Mike Rivero) Wednesday 3/1/17: (Commercial Free VIDEO)
Posted by Chuck Baldwin on Facebook, 2/20/17:
Here’s a plain, cold fact that most Christians and conservatives will NOT want to hear–and will probably ignore once they do hear it:
The notorious anti-freedom billionaire, George Soros, has financed fellow Zionists Jared and Joshua Kushner’s new business venture, “Cadre,” to the tune of $259 million. According to a Jewish business report, “Soros has had a long and productive relationship with the Kushner family.” Of course, Jared Kushner is President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, and worse, Trump’s personal adviser.
Yes, the supposed “enemy” of Donald Trump, George Soros, is a major financial partner and backer of his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Of course, Jared is a radical Zionist who comes from one of Israel and America’s most influential and most corrupt Zionist families. Jared’s father even served time in prison for corruption.
I have tried to warn people about the kind of influence that Kushner will exert over his daddy-in-law–and now President of The United States, Donald Trump. Now we know that Kushner and Soros are financially joined at the hip.
Supposedly, there is an internal battle going on within the U.S. intelligence communities between those loyal to the CIA and the Israeli Mossad (a LARGE portion of the SWAMP) and those loyal to President Trump. But if Trump is going to truly stand foursquare against these dark and evil forces, he will FIRST have to stand against Jared Kushner. And if that was going to be the case, why did Trump give Kushner such a powerful position in his government in the first place?
Along with many CFR globalists (22 so far) that Trump has placed in his administration, Jared Kushner might prove to be Trump’s undoing. The enemy is ALWAYS most effective within the camp.
Zachary King is a former Illuminati high wizard, turned Catholic. He’s an expert on witchcraft; though, some of his Catholic solutions are not Biblical.
– –
From: Zachary King on Facebook, 2/24/17
For those of you who wonder if Donald Trump is on the side of [G]od…Think back to when Barack Obama was elected president. Witches and Satanists kept silent because he was their president. Are you aware that the Satanic Temple backed Hillary Clinton when she ran for president? Not just financially, but through ads, commercials, and rallies.
And most recently the Satanists and the Witches showed up at the Women’s Rally in Washington DC. Were you aware of that minor rally? It was the rally one week before the massive +600k members of the March for Life. You remember the one the Vice President spoke at?
For those of you unfamiliar with the spell, It is designed to prevent or block Donald Trump from completing anything he tries to do for this country. In a poster for the spell event, Witches are being recruited to not just block Donald Trump, but all who support him. I have reviewed the spell and it is authentic. …
World Affairs Brief, February 24, 2017 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
This Week’s Analysis:
Trump’s Poor Replacement Choices
Why the Acosta Nomination is Bad
A Few Things Trump Has Done Right
Trump Wrong on Sweden Comment but Right About Refugee Crime
Drug War Revelation Points to CIA
Radiation Scare in Europe Mostly Hype
[…]
TRUMP’S POOR REPLACEMENT CHOICES
In the aftermath of Mike Flynn’s resignation and the withdrawal of Andrew Puzder as Labor Secretary, Trump has succumbed to nominating mainstream replacements that will not follow through with Trump’s change agenda. This sends a signal to the opposition that if they can block the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, they might just get a more liberal alternative. This week, I’ll detail why H. R. McMasters shows signs of being a globalist insider, and why Alex Acosta has a long history of accommodating the Left in questions of labor policy.
As a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Herbert McMasters is being portrayed as somewhat of an outsider due to his early criticism of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Vietnam War. That was perhaps true as he was starting out and trying to set himself up to be an alternative view, but in his later career his outlooks followed the military mainstream, with a decided blindness toward the influence of globalism on the military and foreign policy.
His book Derelection of Duty criticizes high ranking officers of the Joint Chiefs for not standing up enough to Robert McNamara and his globalist cronies sabotaging the war effort. McMasters sees a lot of bad decision making going on, but he didn’t understand how McNamara and the others were following an agenda to tarnish US involvement in Vietnam and give future wars of liberation a bad name. He starts out focusing on Kennedy’s mistrust of the military, saying that JFK blamed the Joint Chiefs for the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion. That simply wasn’t true. JFK knew very well that the air support was authorized by him before he went to bed. He also found out that it was McGeorge Bundy who cancelled the air support during the night while JFK slept and blamed it on the CIA. That turned Kennedy against CIA black operations, which eventually got him killed by the dark side of the US government.
But Bundy and his globalist cohorts in Kennedy’s “Brain Trust” were the real problems and Kennedy failed to see it. Bundy was the National Security Advisor of both Kennedy and Johnson and kept pushing the escalation of the Vietnam war, while engineering the military restrictions that made it impossible to win the war. McMasters fails in his book to adequately address why the military was continually restricted by these rules and who was behind them.
While McMasters gained a reputation as a critic of military higher-ups, he continued to climb the ladder of advancement due to excellent combat leadership during the Gulf war and in Afghanistan. He broke with traditional military doctrine in Afghanistan by billeting his troops in the cities rather than in bases outside, which helped gain the confidence of locals who began to turn on insurgents.
McMasters got his introduction to globalist doctrine in 2003 at the neocon-oriented Hoover Institution at Stanford, and later at the pro-globalist British International Institute for Strategic Studies in London in 2006.
Despite the globalist indoctrination, he was passed over for Brigadier General in 2006 and 2007, which is typical of how the military selection board penalizes mavericks who embarrass them. Being passed over for advancement usually spells the end of one’s career, but someone in the globalist ranks recognized McMaster’s positive reaction to globalist indoctrination in London, and reversed that move.
Why else would a dedicated globalist like John McCain praise McMasters and condemn Flynn, who was influenced by neocon and anti-Russian doctrine, but was a known outsider. As CNN reported,
“McMaster might be the 21st century Army’s pre-eminent warrior-thinker,” Ret. Lt. Gen. David Barno wrote of McMaster in an accompanying profile. He went on to call him “the rarest of soldiers — one who repeatedly bucked the system and survived to join its senior ranks… I watched senior Army generals argue over ways to end his career,” Barno added. “But he dodged those bullets.”
Actually, they did try to end his career but he was resurrected by other leaders who saw him as a globalist ally. Specifically, Secretary of the Army Pete Geren requested General David Petraeus, a known globalist, to return from Iraq to take charge of the promotion board and that’s when McMasters was promoted. You also don’t get named to Time Magazine’s list of the 100 most influential people in 2014 unless you are accepted by the insiders.
Sen. John McCain, the Republican chairman of the Armed Services Committee, a known neocon and virulent critic of Trump and Flynn, enthusiastically endorsed McMasters, calling him “an outstanding choice for national security adviser.” That’s telling, and not a good sign.
Sadly, Trump thinks this is someone who will shake things up, but the insiders know he will do so without damaging the globalist hold on institutional power. Let me give you an example of how McMasters thinks. He is revered for revising military doctrine to deal with long-term counterinsurgency warfare. But his ideas are nothing new. They were growing as a result of the Vietnam war, while I was in the Marine Corps.
You have to “win the hearts and minds” of the people in an insurgency and not simply go in and kill people. Granted, that’s what McMaster did in the city of Tal Afar in Afghanistan with success, but he mistakenly thinks you can transfer this kind of strategy to defeat ISIS. As Peter Bergen, CNN National Security Analyst wrote about the pacification of Tal Afar,
In 2005 then-Col. McMaster led the first successful full-scale battle against al Qaeda in the western Iraqi city of Tal Afar, a city of a half-million people. In his National Geographic interview, McMaster recalled that al Qaeda had turned Tal Afar into a living hell: “All the schools were closed because of violence, all the marketplaces were closed. There was no power. There was no water. The city was lifeless. People lived in abject fear.”
McMaster established 29 small outposts in the city. His regiment lived among the Tal Afar population and partnered with tribal elders to offer protection against al Qaeda. The citizens began to trust the Americans and provided them with intelligence on al Qaeda’s movements. Within a few months al Qaeda had retreated from Tal Afar.
McMaster’s approach was the exact opposite of the US strategy of the time, which was to hand over ever more control to the Iraqi army and withdraw the bulk of American soldiers to massive bases.
However, he errs when he thinks that the rise of ISIS is a symptom of Sunni unrest in Syria and Iraq. As Bergan reflects on McMaster’s ideas,
The Sunni militants that make up ISIS are not the underlying problem in Syria and Iraq, but rather they are a symptom of other deeper problems. McMaster knows that there surely will be a “son of ISIS” and a “grandson of ISIS” if there is not some kind of political solution to the wars in Syria and Iraq that produced ISIS in the first place.
These ideas are standard counter-insurgency thinking and completely untrue when it comes to ISIS. ISIS never was an indigenous rebellion but a manufactured foreign terrorist faction created by US and British intelligence with the help of the Israelis. These are mercenary’s from Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, and Libya, combined with local radical jihadists. Nobody who is defending local and ideological values goes around antagonizing the entire world, blowing up, beheading and raping Muslims and Christians alike. You don’t solve this kind of battle by “winning the hearts and minds” of terrorists, because they aren’t fighting for religion, country or family.
The bottom line is that McMaster is a closet globalist who will steer Trump into following the neocon agenda in Syria and Iran. I don’t think Trump has what it takes to resist the advice McMaster will give him. It’s likely that he’ll sabotage Trump’s plan to join forces with the Russians to eliminate ISIS. That’s part of the reason for all this anti-Russian propaganda about Russia influencing the election—to make sure Trump can’t join with them to oust ISIS.
I’m anti-Putin as far as their long term objectives to go to war with the West, but that’s not why the establishment has suddenly turned on Russia. They want this war in order to drive the West into a militarized global government, but they have to paint Russia early as the bad guy to stop the Russians from blocking the globalist agenda in Syria. McMaster recently gave a speech where he articulated his anti-Russian stance, as retold by Will Grigg of Liberty News Daily:
In a May 2016 speech to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, McMaster depicted an insurgent Moscow that was exploiting what he characterized as American complacency. [It’s actually not complacency, but decades-long permissiveness during and after the Cold War, allowing the Russians to build military might using Western trade.]
“Even though it may have been apparent, at least since 2008, that Russia was changing its geostrategic behavior [actually a resurgence of their old Soviet design that had been put on hold during the deception of the “fall.”] and engaging in … probing at the far reaches of American power, our strategic response was to accelerate our withdrawal” of combat forces from Europe, complained McMaster. “And what we’re seeing now is we’ve awakened to … this threat from Russia, who is waging limited war for limited objectives – annexing Crimea, invading Ukraine, at zero cost, and consolidating gains over that territory.” According to McMaster, “What is required is forward deterrence [and the ability] to be able to ratchet up the cost at the frontier.”
General McMaster’s perspective on Russia has earned the approval of Arizona Republican Senator John McCain, a frequent critic of President Trump who is also a passionate advocate of a more confrontational posture toward Moscow [reflecting that of another neocon, Sen. Cotton].
Republican Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas is among the most hawkish members of Congress, particularly with respect to Iran. According to the Daily Caller, Cotton “spearheaded the effort for President Donald Trump to select Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster for the post of national security advisor” following the forced resignation of Michael Flynn. Cotton, an Army veteran who served in Iraq, reportedly considered resigning in 2007 when McMaster was passed over for a promotion.
McMaster’s hawkish posture toward Russia helps explain Sen. Cotton’s enthusiasm for his appointment. Cotton’s views toward Moscow are closer to those of his colleague from Arizona, John McCain, than those of President Trump. In January, Cotton complained to Fox News that the Obama administration had “consistently looked the other way from Russia’s provocations and aggressions” and insisted that Washington needs to impose “a sense of new boundaries” on Russian President Putin. “He needs to have a sense of boundaries and to know that costs are going to be imposed if he crosses those boundaries,” insisted Cotton.
Of course that will never happen because the globalists can’t actively confront Putin lest they be viewed as the ones starting the war. This is all talk aimed at Russian aggression in Ukraine, but it’s real aim, as I said, is to poison Trump’s ability to link up with Russia in Syria.
It is a shame that no one in the Trump administration is trying to debunk the fake intelligence about Russian interference in the election. At least they could point out the hypocrisy of the media complaining about Russian interference, when the US directly interfered in the Russian election of 1995-6.
Former Congressman Curt Weldon exposed the hypocrisy of the US claims against Russian interference by detailing this week on the Alex Jones show how the US directly went to work inside Russia to elect Boris Yeltsin. We hear all this talk about Trump talking to Alex Jones by phone but apparently no one in the administration is watching these broadcasts. If they are, why aren’t they using the information to counter the media?
Weldon related how Bill Clinton’s political advisors were sent over to Russia in 1995-6 to literally run Boris Yeltsin’s reelection campaign, and they stayed in the Presidential Hotel in Moscow. Putin has to be aware that US political advisors ran the reelections campaign of a candidate whose popularity had fallen to below 10% and had a known drinking problem. Putin was there when this was going on.
The Russians know how we reelected the guy we wanted to be president, but haven’t made an issue of that fact, in rebuttal. Why? To do so would expose to Putin’s own people that the US was complicit in helping to cover up for the phony fall of the Soviet Union.
Weldon was also on the Cox committee that investigated the theft of our technology by China. The People’s Republic of China funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into the Clinton campaigns of 1996. This article on Wikipedia will give you an idea of the massive scope of the charges and the subsequent coverups by the Clinton Justice Department. Why doesn’t the mainstream media bring up this massive interference in the US election by China, that is so well documented? They only make an issue of conspiracies that serve globalist purposes, and right now the only purpose is to keep Trump from joining with Russia to kill ISIS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDMZSjugW9g
ILLUMINATI WITCH LANA DEL REY TO ATTEND MASS TRUMP SPELL BINDING RITUAL TONIGHT! WITCH LOVE EXPOSED!
Encouraging, but this was two years ago.
– –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPnpjw34o94
BOOM ! -Trump States Bill Clinton Has A LOT Of Problems Coming Up With Epstein Island CPAC 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhOwDsUOCqc
BREAKING NEWS! TRUMP BANS THE REAL FAKE NEWS CNN & BUZZFEED FROM WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING!
Rand Paul defends President Trump ‘John Mccain has been wrong on just about everything’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqyKJ0R_ytM
#BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE – EX CIA ROBERT STEELE INTERVIEW #PIZZGATE & TRUMP”S PATH TO GREATNESS & MORE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECz_O77q8X8
ROBERT STEELE LAST 2 MINUTES Of INTERVIEW. Chuck Schumer Being Blackmailed By NSA/CIA
Very good speech! But IS THIS SAFE? It just takes one….
And those goons behind him goofing around, selfying….
– –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIo3lBkoceU
FULL SPEECH: President Donald Trump Rally in Melbourne, Florida 2/18/2017 Trump Live Speech
I highlight key points in blue.
– –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWT9tUvzLDc
BREAKING – HUGE Exclusive Interview With DHS Insider! Talks About #PizzaGate #PedoGate & Much More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksg8cMFxT4Y
Trump Calls Liberal Media “Enemy of the American People”
REALLY INTERESTING. NEW info here:
Pence’s friend; what Flynn was doing; Dick Cheney’s role; what Trump should do…. But Alex SHAMEFULLY starts the show with a 4.5 minute $ad$, after which the show really starts.
Alex is disgusting these days, covering up for the main government destroying US and his love-of money spiels. But this is worth watching, starting at minute-4.5 or 5:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN1PShWvO5U
Former CIA Operative: Trump Is Battling Pedophile Network
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4GrlOMlOBY
Trump Toys with Reporters at Press Conference Today