His name is Jordan [somebody].
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Abjtjck45fc
Category: Lying Page 9 of 31
Dr. Fauci Backtracks on Wearing Multiple Face Masks After Pushing It Just One Week Ago
January 31, 2021
On March, 8 2020 — Dr. Anthony Fauci advised healthy Americans against wearing face masks.
In April 2020 — The CDC said Americans should be wearing face masks for the COVID.
In May 2020 — Dr. Anthony Fauci and the New England Journal of Medicine have admitted that masks are little more than symbols. Virtue signaling.
On January 25, 2021 — Dr. Fauci told healthy Americans to wear two masks instead of one.
And now, one week later…
On January 31, 2021 —This weekend Dr. Fauci backtracked on that insane idea of wearing multiple masks.
https://twitter.com/TheEliKlein/status/1355991619225448450?s=20
Right On Cue For Biden, WHO Admits High-Cycle PCR Tests Produce COVID False Positives
Were the ‘conspiracy theorists’ just proven right about the “fake rescue plan” for COVID?
Did the ‘science-deniers’ just get confirmation that it was political after all?
World Affairs Brief, January 22, 2021 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com).
It’s Over: Disinformation Claims About Trump Being Restored Discredited
It has been a long battle trying to convince subscribers and Trump supporters that all the stories of false hope spread by “insiders” like Q about Trump staying in office after the theft of the election were bogus. In reality, Q was only a small part of the plot to lead Trump supporters astray with false hope. There were also former and current people in various branches of intelligence who would call up people like Generals Flynn and McInerny to feed them false information. They were so effective the good generals bought it—in part because they were naive about the depth of control held by the Deep State over the NSA and the rest of our government and military. Attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood were also targets of disinformation, with Wood spreading some of the most bizarre rumors. Simon Parkes, an old intelligence man in the UK, developed quite a following to his daily “Online Updates” with a mixture of true facts and outrageous claims. The disinformation he gets must be coming from British Intelligence which is in league with our own Deep State, because it echoes what many have been saying in the US. It became downright absurd last Wednesday when he claimed that the Inauguration would be faked —that it would be a computer generated event using Deep Fake computer animation and that all the soldiers in DC were there to arrest all the traitors and reinstall Donald Trump as president. Of course, that never happened. Even as he was saying it, president Trump was packing up and moving out of the White House. What is most disturbing is that NONE of the sincere recipients of this massive disinformation campaign have come out and apologized for passing on the bogus information. None have come out to expose and decry the people who whispered these lies in their ears. How are we to learn from these campaigns to deceive if the victims of this disinformation campaign don’t have the courage to reject and expose it?
As I said, it’s over. The facts are in. Trump has been illegally removed from office by election fraud. Nothing the disinformation crowd has claimed has come true about restoring Trump—not even close. And it never will. Ryan Hardy tweeted after the Inauguration,
6:15 Why did they falsely increase the numbers?
“If you want to paralyze people’s own ability to think and stand up for themselves, frighten them, scare them so bad they can’t think straight. They’re paralyzed.”
“The other thing that happens, you have to follow the money. At the time I first spoke up in April, I did not know that the amount of Cares Act dollars that would be distributed to hospitals and clinics would ultimately depend upon how many Covid-19 admissions a hospital might have. So what I’ve learned over the last few months is that if between January 1st and June 10th, a hospital was able to reach the threshold of 161 Covid-19 admissions, they would receive $77,000 per admission on top of what they’ve already been paid.”
– –
Family doctor and former Minnesota State Senator Scott Jensen made waves last year when he was one of the first in his field to speak out about the number of #Covid19 deaths thought to be inflated by the CDC’s irregular, and loose, guidelines on diagnosing death from Covid. Now, as the number of deaths has surpassed 400,000 in the US, Dr. Jensen and lawmakers are calling for an audit of these deaths.
57% of Democrats trust the media and only 18% of Republicans.
– –
Media trust hits new low
1/21/21
Trust in traditional media has declined to an all-time low, and many news professionals are determined to do something about it.
Why it matters: Faith in society’s central institutions, especially in government and the media, is the glue that holds society together. That glue was visibly dissolving a decade ago, and has now, for many millions of Americans, disappeared entirely.
By the numbers: For the first time ever, fewer than half of all Americans have trust in traditional media, according to data from Edelman’s annual trust barometer shared exclusively with Axios. Trust in social media has hit an all-time low of 27%.
- 56% of Americans agree with the statement that “Journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations.”
- 58% think that “most news organizations are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public.”
- When Edelman re-polled Americans after the election, the figures had deteriorated even further, with 57% of Democrats trusting the media and only 18% of Republicans.
Praying Medic, X22 Report, Simon Parkes and others spreading false info that everything will work out, pushing Qanon, saying Trump is playing 4D chess — even convincing conservatives that martial law is a good thing.
42:40 AnOmaly’s coming to Christ story — why he became a Christian in the last few years.
1:36:50 Why and how he got his hair cut. “It’s now way less annoying. Feels great.”
1:38:50 “Especially women get turned into this. I don’t know why. It’s the same reason why women vote liberal, and they get brainwashed by mainstream media because they’re more emotional or something, or they get drawn into the big fantasy narrative or whatever.”
1/8/21
Nearly 50% of U.S. voters believe that public health officials have been misleading when providing data on the coronavirus pandemic, a recent Just the News Daily poll shows. According to the poll, forty-eight percent of voters believe public health leaders have “misrepresented the data” to build support for certain policies while 34% of respondents say officials “reported the true facts” on the pandemic.
The remaining 18% were unsure one way or the other.
Exceptionally wise and pertinent words to overcome during these deceptive last days!
NOTES I TRANSCRIBED:
“The deception in these last days is overwhelming.”
“The enemy’s … primary weapon is subtle deception. He comes at us with carefully crafted arguments that stir up our emotions, and he often mixes in a little truth into the lies he promotes, causing us to question our God-given instinct. He comes back again and again until we are offended and angry. He knows that an offended person has compromised judgment.”
“The media has become the most powerful vehicle of lies, evil and confusion of our time. … And if you disagree with them you become ridiculed, hated, slandered.”
“We must stop and question the information being planted in our hearts and minds. We must each investigate the other side of the story.”
Romans 16:18 “By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive.” BSB
The Bible says numerous times “take heed that no one deceives you.”
“If we are moved by feelings and feed on lies how are we to discern the truth” as the delusion increases with more serious birth pain events?
We should ask ourselves in humility:
• Have I been siding with evil?
• Do I really want to know the truth?
• Am I offended?
• Has my heart been hardened?
• Has my love gone cold?
“Anything else should be questioned. This [lays his hand on the Bible] is God’s truth.”
Lie #1 ‘Asymptomatic infections’
Lie #2 PCR tests don’t indicate infections
17:05 “What surprised me is how careless we have been over the last ten or maybe twenty years, because the encroachment of our individual rights has been going on for a lot longer. This is just maybe the final stage of this plan.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMBNCpAW7cw
Contains excellent 17-minute video!
– –
Minnesota lawmakers say coronavirus deaths could be inflated by 40% after reviewing death certificates
December 22, 2020
Two Minnesota state lawmakers are calling for an audit of death certificates that were attributed to the coronavirus, saying COVID-19 deaths could have been inflated by 40%.
State Rep. Mary Franson and state Sen. Scott Jensen released a video last week revealing that after reviewing thousands of death certificates in the state, 40% did not have COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death.
“I have other examples where COVID isn’t the underlying cause of death, where we have a fall. Another example is we have a freshwater drowning. We have dementia. We have a stroke and multiorgan failure,” Franson said in the video.
She added that in one case, a person who was ejected from a car was “counted as a COVID death” because the virus was in his system.
Franson said she and a team reviewed 2,800 “death certificate data points” and found that about 800 of them did not have the virus as the underlying cause of death.
Lies from the pit of hell! [Probably from actual demons in WHO psychopaths, feeding them diabolical ideas!] So social media may in the future censor the standard usage of “herd immunity.”
___________
WHO changes its definition of ‘herd immunity,’ making widespread vaccination essential
The World Health Organization (WHO) has updated its definition of “herd immunity,” redefining the term as something only achievable when the “vast majority of a population are vaccinated.”
It was recently discovered that the WHO changed this definition, suppressing the fact that immunity happens as a natural process in populations as individuals are infected and develop immunity to a particular virus. Such “herd immunity” can, potentially, be assisted by a vaccine but is not dependent upon it.
The WHO definition prior to the change stated:
Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. This means that even people who haven’t been infected, or in whom an infection hasn’t triggered an immune response, they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person [emphasis added].
The WHO’s new definition is largely drawn from a speech delivered in October by the organization’s Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. It suppresses the fact that herd immunity is achieved by natural means and narrows the concept as to apply only to the process of vaccination, suggesting that protection from COVID-19 can’t happen without mass vaccination. It states:
‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.
Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it…
With herd immunity, the vast majority of a population are vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.
Fauci LIES to children!
I TOTALLY agree with Brian! Don’t lie to children or adults, period!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apEW7a8NkQA
December 18, 2020
AMA Lied – How Many Died?
The American Medical Association has been adamantly against hydroxychloroquine as a therapeutic for COVID for the past year. Just a few days before the presidential election they reversed course, reversing their opposition. Did they suddenly realize HCQ might have benefit in certain patient groups or were they lying for the past year? How many individuals died as a result of being denied potential lifesaving treatment?
The AMA is synonymous with organized medicine, despite myriad specialty societies that may better represent the needs of its member physicians. In fact, only 12 percent of practicing physicians belong to the AMA due to concerns that the AMA is more interested in its own finances and politics than the concerns of doctors.
When the AMA talks, media and the public listen, due to their perceived clout. Last spring, the AMA issued a statement critical of hydroxychloroquine as it was being used off-label in the treatment of COVID, not FDA-approved for this purpose with supposed “dangerous side effects.”
Quietly at the end of October, the AMA issued a new statement, conveniently overlooked by the media, giving the green light to doctors prescribing HCQ to their COVID patients.
RESOLVED, that our American Medical Association rescind its statement calling for physicians to stop prescribing hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine until sufficient evidence becomes available to conclusively illustrate that the harm associated with use outweighs benefit early in the disease course.
An updated statement clarifying our support for a physician’s ability to prescribe an FDA-approved medication for off label use, if it is in her/his best clinical judgement, with specific reference to the use of hydroxychloroquine and combination therapies for the treatment of the earliest stage of COVID-19.
What changed since last spring? How many COVID deaths could have been prevented if doctors, using their professional and clinical judgement, could have prescribed HCQ without fear of ostracization or loss of their jobs?
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal
- PCR tests cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. They also cannot confirm that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens
- The tests have exceptionally high false result rates. The higher the cycle threshold (CT) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero
- Florida recently became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests
- The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was developed based on a genetic sequence published by Chinese scientists, not the viral isolate. Missing genetic code was simply made up
Excellent presentation on ethics, using great image examples.
Basically, they’re lying with the tests by using way too many cycles, and they’re using their bogus “case” numbers for lockdowns and mask mandates. God says all liars will end up in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur (Rev. 21:5-8).
Good video in the article! “The W.H.O.’s test standard with a CT of 45 is beyond garbage.”
Dr. Chris Martinson:
Positive Covid Test? Ask This Question!!
Dec 1, 2020
The lockdowns are based on surging “cases” which are based on positive PCR test results.
However, what exactly is a positive PCR test result? What does it mean?
I’ll answer that and give you the answer to the most important question you should ask if you or a loved one gets a positive PCR test result. “What’s the Cycle Threshold (CT) value for that test?”
Sounds wonky but it’s actually really important to understand. A low CT value means someone is loaded with virus. A high value, oppositely, means less of a viral load. Beyond a certain level the load is insufficient to either infect someone else or be of any clinical or epidemiological relevance whatsoever.
The problem? Governments all over the country and world are basing their decisions on CT values that are very high. Too high.
5:35 “We have an infection mortality rate of .14%, and that’s about roughly the same as the common flu. … Why are we having a lockdown? We never had a lockdown or mask requirements for the common flu.”
7:25 “PCR tests can’t tell you anything about infections. … They can’t tell the difference between live and dead matter. … The only thing that they’re good for … is to cause panic, so people in panic mode will do whatever they’re told without asking any questions.”
26 A strategy that’s been 10 years in the making
34:20 Summary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQYzb5_kax8
Political leaders use mostly-false-positive PCR tests to artificially drive covid fear!
“As cases of coronavirus rise across America, shouldn’t death rates be going up too? Del breaks down how #COVID tests may be seriously flawed by providing less than accurate results and why the majority of positive cases could be false.
Transcribed by me:
“..President Trump, again out of the public eye, rejects *the reality* of the election outcome online, repeating *baseless claims* about the vote count despite *no evidence* of widespread fraud.” – Hallie Jackson (chief NBC White House correspondent) aired nationwide on NBC Nightly News, 11/9/20 (six days after the election)
Krankenhaushygiene up2date 2020; 15(03): 279-295
DOI: 10.1055/a-1174-6591
DOI: 10.1055/a-1174-6591
Infektiologie
Mund-Nasen-Schutz in der Öffentlichkeit: Keine Hinweise für eine Wirksamkeit
Ines Kappstein
Publication Date:
18 August 2020 (online)
Translated with Google Translate:
Mouth and nose protection in public: No evidence of effectiveness
At about the same time as the first loosening of the lockdown as part of the corona pandemic, all federal states in Germany introduced a mask requirement for public transport and shops at the end of April 2020, not least because of the “reassessment” by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI ) [1]. In this article, the recommendation of the RKI is to be evaluated.
CONCLUSION
Compulsory masks for many millions of citizens in Germany can result in tens of millions of contaminations every day, which would be largely avoidable because the already frequent hand-face contacts of people become even more frequent due to the mask requirement, but hand washing on the go is only exceptional is possible. There is a risk that the – inevitably – improper use of the mask and the increased tendency to touch oneself in the face while wearing the mask actually increases the risk of pathogen spread and thus pathogen transmission – a risk that one does but wants to reduce precisely through the mask.
A mask requirement gives a false sense of security, and a false sense of security is always a security risk.
CENTRAL MESSAGE
With numerous viral infections, the pathogen excretion begins at the end of the incubation period, i.e. before symptoms of the disease are noticed. This is e.g. B. also known from influenza, which is why one could have assumed this to be the case with COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic.
The evaluation of the publications cited by the RKI for its “re-evaluation” of masks in public space shows that there is no scientific basis with which the use of masks (of any kind) in public by almost the entire population of Germany (minus of children up to 6 years of age approx. 80 million people) can be justified, and current studies show the same.
On the contrary, a mask requirement for many millions of people in public spaces can even become a risk of infection because the required hand hygiene cannot be observed.
Indirect pathogen contacts via contaminated surfaces are not reduced by masks, on the contrary, they potentially occur more frequently than without masks.
In the transmission of respiratory viruses, close (<1 m) face-to-face contact plays the decisive role, which must also exist for at least a certain time (≥ 15 min) so that a risk of transmission can even materialize.
On the one hand, most contacts in public spaces are not face-to-face contacts. On the other hand, even if they take place, they usually last less than 15 minutes, so that an effective transmission of infectious droplets appears very unlikely in these situations.
Keeping your distance during conversations protects against direct pathogen contact and makes wearing masks superfluous.
“Doctors are being paid to list deaths as “coronavirus” without any indication the patient’s death was actually covid related.” – Pearson Sharp
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7x-biB_JrcU
“These people are so awful! All of us are learning this on the fly. It was a new disease. There are a lot of things we didn’t know. But to pretend that you are speaking God’s word [absolute fact], and rearrange our society on the basis of that, and never acknowledge you were completely wrong, that your assumptions were false, that’s the definition of dishonesty. That’s also the hallmark of the people who lead us. They know nothing.” – Tucker Carlson
Tucker Carlson: The cult of mask-wearing grows, with no evidence they work
Oct 14, 2020
… So what is the science on masks? It comes, interestingly, from the CDC, whose director has told you that masks were magic, more effective than vaccines. But the numbers suggest otherwise.
A new study conducted by 11 medical institutions analyzed a group of people who tested positive for COVID during the month of July. Here’s the interesting part: Among those who were infected, more than 70% reported they had “always” worn a mask for the preceding 14 days. Another 14.4% said they had “often” worn a mask.
In other words, almost everyone who got the coronavirus in July was wearing a mask and they were infected anyway. So clearly, this doesn’t work the way they tell us it works. Clearly, someone’s been lying to us — many people, actually.
How did this happen? Well, the short answer is we’re not sure how so many people got the coronavirus while wearing masks, but there are clues, clues that our leaders appear to be ignoring.
Here’s one: According to a study published in April by researchers at several medical institutions, including the Cleveland Clinic, surgical masks are actually ineffective at stopping the installation of small airborne particles. Instead, the researchers found that surgical masks, which almost everyone is using to protect themselves from the coronavirus and not murder other people, are actually only useful for protecting users from, “large droplets and sprays.” That’s not how the coronavirus spreads.
According to a letter signed by several researchers earlier this month in Science magazine, the biggest threat from the coronavirus “by far” is what is contained in small particles that can easily bypass facemasks in aerosol form. Droplets quickly fall to the ground, but aerosol lingers.
The researchers wrote that the tiny particles can remain in the air “for many seconds to hours, like smoke and be inhaled.” The particles are “highly concentrated near an infected person … But aerosols containing infectious viruses can also travel more than six feet and accumulate in poorly ventilated indoor air, leading to super spreading events.” (source)
October 13
CDC Masks Study: Most Corona Patients Still Got The Virus
CDC DATA: A new study conducted by eleven medical institutions analyzed a group of people who tested positive for Covid in July. Here’s the interesting part: among those infected, more than 70 percent reported that they had “always” worn a mask for the preceding 14 days. Another 14.4 percent said they had “often” worn a mask. In other words, almost everyone who got coronavirus in July was wearing a mask. They got it anyway.
SOURCE: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6936a5-H.pdf
https://www.facebook.com/TuckerCarlsonTonight/videos/663800497903990/