Doctors kill 2,450% more Americans than all gun-related deaths combined! — Your doctor is FAR more likely to kill you than an armed criminal | While Sandy Hook was mass murder, the U.S. health care system is practically a holocaust, killing far more people than Adolf Hitler!

From: Pakalert Press

Doctors kill 2,450% more Americans than all gun-related deaths combined

Mike Adams

Everyone agrees the Sandy Hook shooting was a tragedy. Lots of people subsequently exploited the deaths of those children to push a political agenda of disarming Americans by claiming “guns kill people.”

But compared to what? Swimming pools kill people. Horseback riding kills people. …

Your doctor is FAR more likely to kill you than an armed criminal

It’s true: You are 64 times more likely to be killed by your doctor than by someone else wielding a gun. That’s because 19,766 of the total 31,940 gun deaths in the USA (in the year 2011) were suicides. So the actual number of deaths from other people shooting you is only 12,174.

Doctors, comparatively, kill 783,936 people each year, which is 64 times higher than 12,174. Doctors shoot you not with bullets, but with vaccines, chemotherapy and pharmaceuticals… all of which turn out to be FAR more deadly than guns.

This is especially amazing, given that there are just under 700,000 doctors in America, while there are roughly about 80 million gun owners in America.

How do 700,000 doctors manage to kill 783,936 people each year (that’s over one death per doctor), while 80 million gun owners kill only 31,940? Because owning a gun is orders of magnitude safer than “practicing” medicine!

Check out the following infographic, which can also be viewed in a higher resolution at:
www.naturalnews.com/Infographic-Firearms-vs-Doctors-Drugs.html

As the infographic explains, you are over three times more likely to be killed by a drug side effect than a firearm.

On the firearms side of things, you are almost twice as likely to be killed by YOURSELF than by someone else using a gun. But even this number can’t be blamed on guns themselves, because if people really want to commit suicide, they will find other ways to accomplish it (such as jumping off buildings or bridges).

Where is the call for “doctor control?”

Despite the statistical fact that you are overall 24.5 times more likely to be killed by your doctor than by a gun — and it’s actually far worse if you spend more time around doctors than you do gang members — there is absolutely no call in the media for “doctor control.”

There’s zero talk about making medications safer, or reducing the number of people who are medicated every day in America.

There’s no mention of the astonishing fact that surgical procedures do not need to be proven safe and effective before being tried on patients. Surgery in America is, in effect, a grand experiment often conducted with little or no scientific support.

There’s no discussion of the fact that psychiatric drugs promote violent shootings as we’ve seen over and over again across America.

Nope, the entire focus is on how BAD guns are, while the government simultaneously promotes how GOOD vaccines are! …and chemotherapy, surgery, pharmaceuticals and everything else that’s killing usen masse.

Every U.S. hospital is another Sandy Hook

Hundreds of people are killed every single day across U.S. hospitals from pharmaceutical side effectsalone. On top of that, hospitals are killing people with superbug infections, fouled up surgeries, and failedheart stents, among other deadly problems.

Sandy Hook was the tragedy the government wanted you to see. But they didn’t want you to pay attention to all the deaths happening elsewhere — in far greater numbers — such as at hospitals and via pharmacies.

Because all those deaths overseen by doctors and pharmacists are making billions of dollars for the corrupt, criminally-run pharmaceutical industry and the for-profit, corporate-driven health care complex.

While Sandy Hook was mass murder, the U.S. health care system is practically a holocaust. In fact, the U.S. health care system has killed more people than Adolf Hitler — by far!

Spread the word: If we want to save lives, the most important place to start is at the doctors and drug companies. They are dealers of death who have been granted obscene monopolies by the FDA and state medical boards. Until their stranglehold on U.S. health care is finally broken, millions more innocent Americans will die at the hands of doctors, surgeons and pharmacists.

Entire Article Here

Related:

Shocker: Comparing deaths from medical drugs, vitamins, all US wars — “In any given 10 years of modern medical treatment? 2,250,000 deaths!”

Statistics prove prescription drugs are 16,400% more deadly than terrorists — 783,936 people in the United States die every year from conventional medicine mistakes. That’s the equivalent of six jumbo jet crashes a day for an entire year!

[ video ] Why doctors are more dangerous than guns — Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, reveals why you are 6200% more likely to be killed by your doctor than by a homicidal shooter!

[ video ] Boston Bombers During Shootout: “We Didn’t Do It!”

Boston Bombers During Shootout: “We Didn’t Do It!”

Audio feeds suspicions brothers may have been set up

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
April 30, 2013

Video footage from the scene of the shootout with the alleged Boston bombers appears to contain audio of the suspects screaming out, “We didn’t do it!” as police fire on the two brothers.

Although by no means clear, the words below appear to be shouted by the suspects as they come under police gunfire.

– 24 seconds: “chill out”
– 26 seconds: “chill out”, “chill out”
– 31 seconds: “chill out”
– 37 seconds: “we didnt do it”
– 41 seconds: “we didnt do it”
– 45 seconds: “we didnt do it”
– 1 minute 9 seconds: “hey officer”

Despite being described as a “shootout,” the audio suggests that shots are only being fired in one direction by police and that the brothers are not returning fire at this point in the exchange.

The tape offers little proof as to the Tasrnaev brother’s guilt, but it follows a number of other intriguing caveats which some have offered as evidence that the suspects were framed and had no actual involvement in the bombings.

– A Facebook post attributed to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev although not authenticated reads, “This will be the last message before the police get me. I never done it. They set me up. Father please forgive me. I am sorry it has come to this.”

– The suspects’ mother Zubeidat Tsarnaeva continues to insist that her sons are innocent, telling the Associated Press, “It’s all lies and hypocrisy.”

– Tsarnaeva also claims that the FBI “were controlling his every step,” referring to Tamerlan Tasrnaev, and that both the FBI and the CIA were following the brothers since 2011.

– The aunt of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, claims that the footage which emerged of police arresting a naked uninjured man was her nephew, contradicting the official narrative that Tsarnaev was critically injured in a shootout and suggesting he may have been killed while in custody.

– Eyewitnesses to the shootout contradict claims by authorities that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev ran over his own brother in a car, stating instead that he was run over by police.

– Despite numerous images of other suspects with large black backpacks at the scene of the bombings, the FBI insisted that these photos not be deemed credible and that the Tasrnaev brothers were the only possible culprits.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

[ video ] Sibel Edmonds: Terror by Design – CIA’s “Gladio B” and The Boston Bombings

Whistleblower, translator and expert in Chechnya, Turkey and the Caucuses, Sibel Edmonds, connects the CIA to the Boston Bombing. Is this blowback or terror by design?

Edmonds examines connections between an Imam brought to the US by the CIA who subsequently became a multi-billionaire and founded over 350 radical mosques, Uncle Ruslan Tsarni and the CIA man in the Chechnya region for decades, Graham Fuller, father-in-law to Ruslan.

* * *

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDRZiGVLaJc]Terror by Design: “Gladio B” and The Boston Bombings

TheAlexJonesChannel

Published on Apr 30, 2013

Whistleblower, translator and expert in Chechnya, Turkey and the Caucuses, Sibel Edmonds, connects the CIA to the Boston Bombing. Is this blowback or terror by design? Edmonds examines connections between an Imam brought to the US by the CIA who subsequently became a multi-billionaire and founded over 350 radical mosques, Uncle Ruslan Tsarni and the CIA man in the Chechnya region for decades, Graham Fuller, father-in-law to Ruslan.

Related:

[ video ] Sibel Edmonds: CIA Controlled Tsarnaev Brothers — THE BIG PICTURE – Boston bombing is not blowback, but a deal with Russia!

Sibel’s Site: Boiling Frogs

[ audio | text ] Joel Skousen: Marathon Bombing Update 4/26/13 — Answers Lead to More Questions

[ audio | text ] Joel Skousen: Boston Marathon Bombing Cries Out for Answers — The backpacks don’t match

[ video ] Joel Skousen 4/22/13: Tsarnaev Brothers Were Set Up

[ video ] Joel Skousen 4/15/13: Boston Bombing – Hallmarks of A False Flag

[ audio ] Underwear Bomber Eyewitness Kurt Haskell talks about the 2013 Boston Bombings — Dzhokhar almost certainly INNOCENT. The brown bag lady – the post-detonation pic of where her bag was…

POWERFUL 9/11 Documentary Airs on PBS Across Colorado!!!!!!!

Top architect explains why 9/11 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and Al Qaeda didn’t have the technology or access to do it. Who did? Two months before the ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION PROJECT, Nick ROCKEFELLER predicted a 9/11-like event to trigger war!

Airline Captain Philip Marshall with John B. Wells on ‘Coast to Coast AM’ 9/8/12: “The Big Bamboozle: 9/11 and the War on Terror” — Fasten your seatbelt — the sad truth is that all of the solid evidence points to a dark collaboration between members of the Bush Administration and a covert group of Saudi government officials. The hijackers weretrained at a CIA-operated airport in Arizona.

[13-minute video] The Official 9/11 Story Defies Science — Experts PROVE that sooty black burning JET FUEL (kerosene) DOES NOT MELT STEEL!!!

Psychologists Explain 911 Denial — Fear, Pride…. “We need the truth in order to heal.”

God is a 9-11 Truther — “It is past time for Christian leaders and pastors and churches get on the side of TRUTH regarding the 9/11 attacks because God is there. God is on the side of the TRUTH, and deception was the intent of the US 9/11 Commission Report.”

Nick Rockefeller Predicted “Event” To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11

David Rockefeller: “I’m PROUD of” being “part of a SECRET CABAL working AGAINST the best interests of the United States”

Molten Steel Found at Ground Zero Weeks After 9/11

Architect Richard Gage on 9/11 truth: “98% of those who watch this presentation end up agreeing with us…. We really only get called conspiracy theorists and kooks by those who are UNWILLING TO LOOK at the evidence.”

9/11 Masterminds – Explosive Connections

9/11 Molten-Steel Smoking Gun! Brian Williams (NBC) presents the WTC Metorite — “Exposed to TEMPERATURES AS HOT AS THE INNER EARTH

Swedish Structural Engineer: WTC Towers Did Not Collapse from Fire

[10-minute video] 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Don’t be the last to know

[Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Video] 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, Full-length

All of my 9/11 truth posts in reverse chronological order (latest posts appear first, 10 posts per page)

[ 2-minute video ] Alex Jones: The Globalists See Us as Merely Bugs — The Power Paradox, We Are All Human

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohaYkHI7RA]The Power Paradox, We Are All Human.

TheAlexJonesChannel

Published on Apr 30, 2013

The technocrats like to play God. If they were even a trillion miles near to Gods spirit they would see what a joke their big plans are…. Parasites are total zeros.

Related:

Globalist kingpin, David Rockefeller’s beetle (bug) collection — names species after himself

David Rockefeller: “I’m PROUD of” being “part of a SECRET CABAL working AGAINST the best interests of the United States”

[ video ] Ron Paul on Regime-Changing Syria: “Going in is the worst thing to do / We don’t have the MORAL IMPERATIVE / These wars overseas are costing us a trillion dollars a year and we have nothing to show for it except MORE ENEMIES / It’s going to bring us down.”

The USA is getting ready to REVERSE-CHRISTIAN REGIME CHANGE yet one more country.

So why does the world hate US? Why are we going down?

God says: “What you sow you will reap.”

Jeff

– –

“Going in is the worst thing to do.”

“We don’t have the MORAL IMPERATIVE.”

“These wars overseas are costing us a trillion dollars a year,
and we have nothing to show for it except MORE ENEMIES.”

“It’s a sacred cow that you can’t cut a nickel out of the military.”

“It’s going to bring us down.”

– Ron Paul

Transcribed by Jeff Fenske

* * *

Ron Paul: We’re Already Very Much Involved in Syria – Cavuto 4/29/2013

(video) Ron Paul on Regime-Changing Syria: “Going in is the worst thing to do / We don’t have the MORAL IMPERATIVE / These wars overseas are costing us a trillion dollars a year and we have nothing to show for it except MORE ENEMIES / It’s going to bring us down.”

The USA is getting ready to REVERSE-CHRISTIAN REGIME CHANGE yet one more country.

So why does the world hate US? Why are we going down?

God says: “What you sow you will reap.”

Jeff

– –

“Going in is the worst thing to do.”

“We don’t have the MORAL IMPERATIVE.”

“These wars overseas are costing us a trillion dollars a year,
and we have nothing to show for it except MORE ENEMIES.”

“It’s a sacred cow that you can’t cut a nickel out of the military.”

“It’s going to bring us down.”

– Ron Paul

Transcribed by Jeff Fenske

* * *

Ron Paul: We’re Already Very Much Involved in Syria – Cavuto 4/29/2013

National Review Critiques Alex Jones as Fire-and-brimstone Preacher — Jones is a vexing problem for the neocon and liberal factions of the establishment. Liberals have tried in vain to undermine Alex’s political influence by either lampooning him or dismissing him as an addlepated conspiracy loon. | It is fair to say that the order to characterize Jones and Infowars as a fringe religious movement came right from the CIA. It is common knowledge that Buckley and his National Review were connected to the CIA.

National Review Critiques Alex Jones as Fire-and-brimstone Preacher

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 30, 2013

Photo: Dan Winters

Alex Jones is a vexing problem for the neocon and liberal factions of the establishment. They can no longer deny his influence enjoys an exponential growth curve. Liberals have tried in vain to undermine Alex’s political influence by either lampooning him or dismissing him as an addlepated conspiracy loon. This approach usually draws more people to his websites and radio and television shows instead of sending them away.

The neocons over at the National Review Online have devised a different approach. Instead of portraying Jones as a dangerous right-wing fanatic (a tactic favored by the Southern Poverty Law Center), the neocons have decided to depict Jones as analogous to a fire-breathing and bible-thumping Southern preacher.

“There are two forces in Jones’s world,” writes Betsy Woodruff, a William F. Buckley Fellow at the National Review Institute. “The battle for souls is between the corrosive forces of the New World Order (who have infiltrated everything from the Obama and Bush White Houses to MTV) and the indefatigable human will. Jones is a latter-day gnostic. He wants his audience to wake up from their sleep, emerge from their Platonic cave, and see the world as it truly is. That’s the conversion moment. The next step is walking with Alex Jones in the new life of the spirit.”

“We should credit Jones’s success to his status as the ultimate street preacher,” Woodruff continues. “In the town square of cyberspace, he’s the sign-waving, Bible-beating, sackcloth-and-ashes-sporting prophet of end times that you just can’t ignore.”

For the establishment intelligentsia on both side of the false left-right paradigm virtually nothing is more derisive than characterizing opponents as religious fanatics. For the neocons, this is a common practice. They have consistently portrayed Muslims as wild-eyed fanatics and Islam as a violent religion. Ms. Woodruff has adapted this field tested technique in an effort to minimize the impact of Jones and his followers and reduce his message to mere theological proselytization.

Ms. Woodruff, however, is preaching to the neocon choir. Beyond the constrained realm of Bill Buckley acolytes and neocon grandstanders for the Israeli-centric vision of the known universe, Jones’ message makes certain and undeniable sense. It really does not take a rocket scientist – or an American Enterprise Institute fellow – to see that a cabal of international bankers, transnational corporations and one-world globalists are taking America down the garden path to destruction. Despite the National Review allusion that Alex Jones is selling snake oil to the gullible masses, millions of people find credence in his critique and reassurance in his scorching criticism of the global elite.

According to a poll conducted by Public Policy Polling earlier this month, nearly one-third of Americans believe a secretive power elite is conspiring to rule the world and install an authoritarian global government. The establishment media desperately labors to obfuscate this fact. But as the economy worsens, public confidence in corrupt officialdom and government plummets, and the wars continue to roll on with tragic consequence, more and more Americans arrive at the conclusion that things are not as they seem – or as the elite and the establishment intelligentsia insist they are.

It is fair to say that the order to characterize Jones and Infowars as a fringe religious movement came right from the CIA. It is common knowledge that Buckley and his National Review were connected to the CIA, a fact confirmed by the late publisher’s son, Christopher. The younger Buckley’s book, Losing Mum and Pup: A Memoir, is “quite interesting in that it ties a string between Buckley and the CIA, after Buckley was already involved with National Review,” notes Economic Policy Journal.

For an in-depth look at Buckley, the National Review, the CIA and the attack on libertarianism, see Richard Cummings’ Swine Before Perle — ‘The National Review’ Attack on LRC.

How to instantly tell who’s evil vs. good: the philosophy of ‘control’ vs. ‘empowerment’

How to instantly tell who’s evil vs. good: the philosophy of ‘control’ vs. ‘empowerment’

Mike Adams
Natural News
April 30, 2013

(NaturalNews) I get this question all the time from readers: How can we know whom to believe? Who’s really telling the truth? Which person should I support for political office at the next election?

What if I told you there is an incredibly simple way to tell not only who’s good and who’s bad, but also how to tell who is pushing absolute evil onto our world?

This method is remarkably accurate, and you can use it right now to assess almost anyone.

It all starts with understanding the spectrum of control vs. empowerment.

Imagine a 10-foot string stretched out on the ground. On the far left side of the string, there is a point we’ll call “Control.” On the far right side of the string, another point is called “Empowerment.”

Let’s start with the “Empowerment” side first. This point represents people who primarily seek to empower you with knowledge, skills, wisdom and tools. “Empowerment” represents GOOD because it allows wisdom, skills and abundance to multiply from one person to the next. It recognizes the value of the individual and honors consciousness and free will.

On the far left side of the string — which also represents the political left in America today — we have “Control.” This point represents people who primarily seek to control you: to extract money from you (rob you), to limit your freedoms, to demand your obedience and to use the threat of force to command your compliance. This philosophy dishonors the individual and downplays free will and individual liberty. “Control” is inherently evil because it seeks to diminish the power of a large number of people in order to accumulate power into the hands of a few people.

(The context of this discussion is, of course, entirely in the realm of dealing with adults. Obviously children should be subjected to certain controls for their own development and safety. That’s called good parenting. But to treat adults like children and attempt to control them like a parent controlling a child is unjustified and inherently destructive.)

Examples of “control” vs “empowerment”

A person who seeks to teach others how to garden and thereby grow their own food is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a person who seeks to place other people on government food stamps and thereby make them dependent on government for their food is practicing control and is inherently EVIL.

A school that teaches students to think for themselves and engage in critical, skeptical thinking about the world around them is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a school that teaches students blind obedience to institutional authority while denying them the liberty to think for themselves is practicing control and is therefore EVIL.

A person who seeks to help others create their own successful businesses and generate abundant profits for themselves and their employees is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a person who seeks to destroy entrepreneurship, suppress innovation, punish small businesses and burden private sector job creation with onerous taxes and regulation is practicing control and is therefore EVIL.

A person who seeks to teach others how to protect themselves against violent crime through the intelligent, ethical use of weapons for self defense is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a person who seeks to strip away from everyone else their right to self defense, placing them in the position of defenseless victimization, is practicing control and is therefore EVIL.

A city mayor who seeks to teach his constituents the principles of nutrition and food choice so that they might make better decisions about their diet and health is practicing empowerment and is therefore GOOD. But a city mayor who demands blind obedience to his selective agenda of banning large sodas or other junk food items is practicing control and is therefore EVIL. (Bloomberg, anyone?)

So, getting back to the title of this article, the way to instantly tell whether a person is “good” or “evil” is to examine their actions on the control vs. empowerment spectrum. If they predominantly seek to control others, they are mostly evil. If they predominantly seek to empower others, they are mostly good.

Be careful to examine peoples’ actions, not merely their words. Anyone can talk a good game of “empowerment,” but very few actually seek to educate and uplift others around them.

The politics of control vs. empowerment

The political left is deeply invested in a philosophy of control. The left believes in centralized control over the economy, societal control of parenting and children, government control over education, centralized bankster control over money, and government control over health care.

The political right is invested in a philosophy of non-interventionism. They classically believe the government should keeps its hands off education, the economy, businesses operations and private lives. (Of course, today’s political right is actually just as much pro-big government as the political left.)

Libertarianism, by the way, is a philosophy of allowing — allowing people to make their own fortunes, or mistakes, or personal decisions as long as their behaviors do not harm others. Classic libertarianism means people are free to do what they wish, including marrying someone of the same sex if that’s their choice, as long as their actions do not cause direct harm to others around them. Many people mistakenly think they are libertarians but they are actually closet control freaks because they want everyone else to conform to their own ideas of marriage, religion, recreational drug use, prostitution and so on. A true libertarian must tolerate the free will actions of others even if those actions are obviously self-destructive to the individual.

In terms of ethics, “controlism” is inherently destructive because it denies an individual his or her humanity. “Empowerment” is inherently good (or even blessed) because it invests in the individual the power of determining her or her own life outcomes.

The universe is written in the code of conscious empowerment

From a spiritual perspective, the Creator granted humans free will precisely because free will puts control into the hands of the individual, not a centralized power figure. If we were not meant to be free, we would never have been created with free will.

In this way, “controlism” stands in contradiction to the laws of the universe and the existence of free will and consciousness. Thus, the underlying philosophy of the political left is anti-consciousness, anti-free will and a contradiction of the fundamental laws of the universe.

This is why collectivist mandates feel so alien to a free-thinking human being… because control freakism is a violation of self-evident, universal truth. This is also why the leftist / collectivist political philosophy is doomed to fail: It exists in gross violation of the laws of the universe. No human being inherently wants to live without freedom, functioning merely as an obedient peon under a system of centralized control. It feels wrong because it is universally and spiritually wrong.

That is why it will fail. And that is why all those who defend individual liberty, free will and individual empowerment quite literally have God and the universe on their side.

In summary, then, if you want to determine whether a person is “good” or “evil” — in effect, whether they are living in congruency with the laws of the universe — simply place them on the spectrum of “control” versus “empowerment” and your question all but answers itself.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040122_control_empowerment_philosophy.html#ixzz2RwE7CudT

[ video ] Feds Targeting Patriots & Christians?: People who are going to sporting events seem to be the most complacent about the rise of the police state. It’s easy to catch them up into an ‘Us vs. Them’ paradigm — ‘USA! USA!’ mentality — like you saw in Boston.

“People who are going to sporting events
typically seem to be people who are the most complacent about this sort of thing
[TSA police state, “give up your rights,” privacy intrusions]. …

It’s easy to catch them up into an ‘Us vs. Them’ paradigm —
‘USA! USA!’ mentality — like you saw in Boston.”

– David Knight (minute-4)

Transcribed by Jeff Fenske

* * *

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0BGtBI-gSA]Is the Government Targeting Patriots & Christians?

TheAlexJonesChannel

Published on Apr 30, 2013

The mainstream media scoffs at the idea that Christians, Constitutionalists, and people who advocate limited government have anything to fear from the US government. Jakari Jackson & David Knight examine recent actions by the government that militarize the police and use the military as police.

Related:

Mark Dice: “Karl Marx said that religion is THE OPIATE OF THE MASSES — when really it’s FOOTBALL”

[5-minute satire video] Mark Dice: NFL Replacement Refs are Destroying America! — “If people got as mad about our government being hijacked by secret societies as they are about the Green Bay Packers losing a game over a bad call by some replacement refs, then maybe we wouldn’t be in the Great Recession and on the verge of disaster!”

Chuck Baldwin: America’s Bread And Circus Society — America’s Pastime Has Turned Into America’s Obsession. “If the people of the United States do not quickly repent of this madness, the consequences will be just as destructive for our once-great republic as it was for Rome”

Alex Jones: As United States Collapses, Media Worships LeBron James

[ video ] How TELEVISION & SPORTS Are Being Used To MANIPULATE & DESTROY The REPUBLIC

[1949] George Orwell: How the elite pacify the ‘proles’ with films, football, beer and gambling. “The larger evils invariably escaped their notice.”

Alex Jones: “It’s so frustrating because the average adult male knows all about football, but they don’t know how to be free men: ‘I don’t care bout dat, there gonna be football game on tonight.’ … And when you lose everything you got, just remember that you were told! … You will be judged by your own cowardice!”

All people want to do is party or watch football while our country is getting jacked! — Alex Jones

Alex Jones: The Big Football Game That Actually Matters

Super Bowl XLV in Perspective — ENDGAME