"You don't need 30 rounds to hunt" – Correct, but the 2nd Amendment wasn't written in case the deer turn against us

The 2nd Amendment is supposed to be a deterrent, so it never has to be used. That’s why it needs to be upheld.
Few mention the *real reason* for the 2nd Amendment, including the NRA and Ted Nugent.
– –

“You don’t need 30 rounds to hunt.”
Correct, but the 2nd Amendment was not written in case the deer turn against us.

(VID) Rick Wiles TruNews: Does the Fate of the 1st Amendment Rest on Alex Jones? — Court case • Alex's demonic rant: "I'm coming for you [Muller]!" • "Is he a plant, an agent-provocateur placed in this position for the purpose of shutting down sensible voices that oppose the deep state?" • "If Alex is not an actor, if he's not a plant, he's seriously mentally ill • That behavior is the sign of somebody losing their mind" • "Every Christian should disavow Alex Jones until he repents"

My notes, transcribing quotes from Rick Wiles:
28:55 “Every Christian should disavow Alex Jones. You should disavow him until he repents, and quite frankly until he is delivered.”
29:30 Alex Jones’ livid, demonic rant clip! “You will pay! … God is going to destroy you!”
33:00 “Last week, remember he was imaginary fanning a western revolver, talking about Robert Muller, the special counsel investigator of President Trump, and he was basically saying: ‘I’m coming for you, coming for you.’ This is behavior of a person exhibiting mental instability. … And he is known for his defense of the 2nd Amendment. Alex Jones is the poster child for why you should confiscate guns from mentally unstable people.
34:20 “For the record…, we disavow Alex Jones. … We don’t support Infowars.”
35:10 Alex’s court case that could be the excuse to limit freedom of speech.
38:00 “This is what I’ve wondered about this for nearly 20 years with Alex Jones: is he a plant, an agent-provocateur who has been placed in this position and given publicity, given fame for the purpose of shutting down sensible voices that oppose the deep state? … That if you question the deep state, you must be as crazy as Alex Jones.”
40:00 “I knew Alex Jones in the early days.”
41:30 “His lawyer said he’s an actor. Did they tell the truth, because they were in court under oath?”
42:30 “If Alex is not an actor, if he’s not a plant, he’s seriously mentally ill. And he needs help. He should shut down his program. He should get mental help. He should get spiritual help. If that is truly him, he needs to be someplace where he’s receiving spiritual and psychiatric assistance counseling, because that behavior is the sign of somebody losing their mind.”

• • •


Continue reading “(VID) Rick Wiles TruNews: Does the Fate of the 1st Amendment Rest on Alex Jones? — Court case • Alex's demonic rant: "I'm coming for you [Muller]!" • "Is he a plant, an agent-provocateur placed in this position for the purpose of shutting down sensible voices that oppose the deep state?" • "If Alex is not an actor, if he's not a plant, he's seriously mentally ill • That behavior is the sign of somebody losing their mind" • "Every Christian should disavow Alex Jones until he repents"”

Delta Airlines is secretly supporting David Hogg and Gun Control Activists

EXPOSED: THIS MAJOR AIRLINE IS SECRETLY SUPPORTING DAVID HOGG AND GUN CONTROL ACTIVISTS

David Hogg and the gun control lobby have found a new ally in their bid to undermine the Second Amendment. A major airline likely wasn’t expecting to have their secret support exposed, but thanks to David Hogg’s bragging, we all know the truth.
Hogg was traveling home from New York City yesterday, where he attended The Common Good Forum and Spirit Awards, where he was honored by the group for his work to ban guns, under the guise of stopping gun violence.
A constant tweeter, Hogg takes every opportunity to grandstand and lecture America on gun violence. He mentioned that he had to get back to Florida to stage “die ins” at local Publix grocery stores on Friday (because they support the National Rifle Association), and tweeted from his plane. When he tweeted from his Delta flight, he had to brag about the airline’s support for his cause, and exposing that the airline plays favorites with their charitable causes.
“Shout out to @Delta thank you for donating 4 planes to get kids from Parkland to DC for the March, renouncing your previous relationship with the NRA and lastly for having outlets on you planes. You are a perfect example of how corporate America can stand with us. THANK YOU,” Hogg tweeted from the plane.
Most people were aware that Delta had previously cut ties with the NRA, but few were aware that the airline donated the use of four planes to get kids to the “March for Our Lives.” It’s not the kind of gesture Delta makes often, but they seemed committed to supporting the March’s gun control agenda.
Entire Article

No Joke: Deerfield Illinois Bypasses Constitution, US Citizens Given 60 Days To Turn In Guns Or Become Criminals

Related Chicago Tribune article:

Deerfield bans assault weapons and high-capacity magazines

– –

Illinois Town Bypasses Constitution, US Citizens Given 60 Days To Turn In Guns Or Become Criminals

Fri, 04/06/2018
Authored by Jack Burns via The Free Thought Project,
Residents of a town in Illinois were just handed down an unconstitutional decree from their local government, they now have 60 days to give up their guns or be fined up to $1000 per day…
As the state promises gun rights activists they’re not coming for their guns, behind the scenes they’re pleading for it to happen. And now the feared gun grab is occurring. Residents in Deerfield, Illinois have 60 days to surrender their “assault weapons” or face fines of $1000 per day per gun.
The gun ban ordinance was passed on April 2nd with residents left with few choices of how to dispose of their valuable “assault weapons.” Upon careful reading of the ordinance, residents will be left with revolvers, .22 caliber “plinking” rifles, and double barrel shotguns to defend their homes and families from criminals who could care less about the law.
Fines for not disposing of the weapons range from $250 to $1000 per day per gun for those who choose not to comply with the city’s ordinance. While a fine may seem reasonable to some, as TFTP has reported on multiple occasions, failure to pay fines always results in police action. It is not far-fetched to predict major turmoil and arrests in the event of non-compliance. … Continue reading “No Joke: Deerfield Illinois Bypasses Constitution, US Citizens Given 60 Days To Turn In Guns Or Become Criminals”

Talmudism: Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign

Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign

Kevin MacDonald on February 17, 2018

… According to Abrams, because of this vision, Jews have taken the lead in secularizing America.  In fact, the key role of Jewish organizations in shaping the Constitutional law on Church/State relations is well known. And it’s not much of a mystery who’s behind the war on Christmas.
And by successfully changing immigration policy, Jews have reduced the political power of the rural White subculture of America to the point that even though roughly 7 in 10 White males voted Republican (and ~60% of White females), Obama and the Democrats won the recent election. Even if the current push for gun control fails, we can expect that Jewish organizations will continue the push to disarm White males.
Jewish organizations are not at all against guns when they are in the hands of the police and other authorities. The ADL (see the ADL’s Law Enforcement Agency  Resource Network) and the SPLC (Law Enforcement Training and Law Enforcement Resources) have made strong alliances with law enforcement in America.
Further, it has often been observed that Jewish organizations have historically favored a strong central government rather than states’ rights.
Entire Article

(vid) Jake: How to Talk to People About Preserving Gun Rights – The real meaning of the 2nd Amendment – Henry Lee: "A militia… are in fact the people themselves. …to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms." • Madison: "(The Constitution preserves) the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation… (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. … A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people…" • 'Well regulated' meant 'well functioning.'

Jake says at 10:25: “At that time, colonial America, the phrase ‘well regulated’ meant ‘well functioning.’ … ‘Well regulated militia’ is a militia that functions effectively. … The founders knew that for a body of people to remain free they needed to have an armed militia.”
Jake quotes founding father, Richard Henry Lee:

“A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves, and render regular troops in a great measure unnecessary. …to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” [Additional Letters From The Federal Farmer, 169 (1788)]

Jake quotes words from the chief architect of the Constitution, James Madison, which is actually put together from these two quotes:

“(The Constitution preserves) the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation… (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.” [The Federalist, No. 46]

“The right of the people to keep and bear… arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country….” [I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789]


From the video’s comments
I wrote:

The NRA, Fox News, Ted Nugent and others don’t tell the real reason for the 2nd Amendment, so most people don’t understand the purpose for high capacity magazines. It’s not about hunting, but is a deterrence for government to know they cannot become tyrannical.

I mentioned this to Ted Nugent when he was at the Alaska State Fair. He told me: “that’s the only reason, period” — but that’s still not how he talks in public. A few hours later, I watched Ted on stage, turn around and swing his butt at us, wagging an attached foxtail.

Jake is asked in a comment:

Jake, I’m a Christian and I believe in the 2nd amendment but can you please show me where in the bible it says we have the right to have a gun ?

Jake responds:

Considering the Bible was written thousands of years before the invention of guns, you and I both know that the Bible doesn’t have a passage that discusses gun rights.

The Second Amendment does not specify the right to have guns anyway. It references the right to “bear arms”.

The word “arms” originated from the Old French word “armes” and was adopted into Middle English. The definition of the word meant “weapons of a warrior.”

So, while there is no mention of “guns” in the Bible, there is ample reference to various arms. One example is Luke 22:36 where Jesus tells his disciples, “if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one”. And with reference to the general principle of having the right to defend one’s own property by force, Exodus 22:2 says: “If a thief is caught breaking in at night and is struck a fatal blow, the defender is not guilty of bloodshed”.

The principle of the innate right to self-defense is well established jurisprudence that has been consistent for thousands of years. The right of defense of one’s own life, property and the lives/property of others through the use of force includes the right to possess the means to carry out that self-defense. As property ownership is a God-given (or natural) right, the ownership of arms to defend one’s property is an attendant inalienable right.

• • •

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKikFznMyfI
Continue reading “(vid) Jake: How to Talk to People About Preserving Gun Rights – The real meaning of the 2nd Amendment – Henry Lee: "A militia… are in fact the people themselves. …to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms." • Madison: "(The Constitution preserves) the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation… (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. … A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people…" • 'Well regulated' meant 'well functioning.'”

(vid) More Jaw-Dropping Washington "March Against Our Rights" MADNESS! — "What would you say to 200,000 women last year used guns to protect themselves from being harmed or raped?

He asks: “what would you say that 200,000 women last year who used guns to protect themselves from being harmed or raped?

• • •

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skqzq7Tj1E4
Continue reading “(vid) More Jaw-Dropping Washington "March Against Our Rights" MADNESS! — "What would you say to 200,000 women last year used guns to protect themselves from being harmed or raped?”

William Pierce: Gun Control in Germany 1928-1945 — Hitler softened the gun laws • It was Hitler’s enemies who should be compared with the gun-control advocates in America today

Gun Control in Germany, 1928-1945

by William L. Pierce (1994)
A common belief among defenders of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is that the National Socialist government of Germany under Adolf Hitler did not permit the private ownership of firearms. Totalitarian governments, they have been taught in their high school civics classes, do not trust their citizens and do not dare permit them to keep firearms. Thus, one often hears the statement, “You know, the first thing the Nazis did when they came to power was outlaw firearms,” or, “The first thing Hitler did in Germany was round up all the guns.”
One can understand why many American gun owners want to believe this. They see in the current effort of their own government to take away their right to keep and bear arms a limitation of an essential element of their freedom and a move toward tyranny, and they want to characterize the gun-grabbers in the most negative way they can. Adolf Hitler has been vilified continuously for the past 60 years or so by the mass media in America, and certainly no politician or officeholder wants to be compared with him. If the gun-confiscation effort can be portrayed convincingly as something of which Hitler would have approved, it will have been effectively tarred.
Gun Control 1928-1945This identification of the inclination to deny citizens the right to keep and bear arms with National Socialism and Adolf Hitler has been strengthened recently by clever magazine advertisements which show Hitler with his arm outstretched in a Roman salute under a heading: “All in favor of gun control raise your right hand.” A Jewish group, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), quite noisy for its size, has been especially zealous in promoting the idea that the current gun-control effort in America has its roots in Germany during the Hitler period. This group has gone so far as to claim in several articles published in popular magazines read by firearms enthusiasts that the current restrictive legislation being proposed by the U.S. government is modeled on a gun-control statute enacted by Germany’s National Socialist government: the German Weapons Law (Waffengesetz) of March 18, 1938.
Again, one can understand the motivation of the JPFO. Many non-Jewish firearms owners are well aware that the movement to restrict their rights is led and promoted primarily by Jews, and anti-Jewish feeling has been growing among them. They know that the controlled news media, which are almost unanimously in favor of abridging or abolishing the Second Amendment, are very much under the influence of Jews, and they know that the most vocal anti-gun legislators in the Congress also are Jews. It is natural for a group such as the JPFO to mount a damage- control effort and attempt to prevent anti-Jewish feeling from becoming even stronger among gun owners. Their strategy is to deflect the blame from their kinsmen in the media and the government and direct it onto their most hated enemies, the National Socialists — or at least to create enough smoke to obscure the facts and keep the gun-owning public confused.
Unfortunately for those who would like to link Hitler and the National Socialists with gun control, the entire premise for such an effort is false. German firearms legislation under Hitler, far from banning private ownership, actually facilitated the keeping and bearing of arms by German citizens by eliminating or ameliorating restrictive laws which had been enacted by the government preceding his: a left-center government which had contained a number of Jews. Continue reading “William Pierce: Gun Control in Germany 1928-1945 — Hitler softened the gun laws • It was Hitler’s enemies who should be compared with the gun-control advocates in America today”

Mike Rivero: "Notice they're always targeting the 'assault' weapons, the ones that would give the American people the means to resist intrusive government…, that would allow us to hold off tyranny" — the real reason for the 2nd Amendment

Mike Rivero @ 39:00 — “Notice they’re always targeting the ‘assault’ weapons, the ones that would give the American people the means to resist intrusive government. … They’re specifically trying to target the assault weapons that would allow us to hold off tyranny” — the real reason for the 2nd Amendment.

• • •

What Really Happened: Mike Rivero Monday 3/26/18: Today’s News Talk Show

Published on Mar 26, 2018

Why don't the NRA, Ted Nugent, Fox News… tell the REAL REASON FOR THE 2ND AMENDMENT. It's not about hunting, but to protect citizens from a tyrannical government. I mentioned this to Ted when he was at the Alaska State Fair. He told me: "that's the only reason, period" — but that's still not how he talks in public

Neither the NRA or Ted Nugent remind us of the REAL REASON FOR THE 2ND AMENDMENT. It’s not about hunting, but to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government. It’s a strong deterrent for the government to not become tyrannical.
I mentioned this to Ted when he was at the Alaska State Fair. He said: “that’s the only reason, period” — but then he doesn’t mention it in public, from what I’m seeing — nor does hardly anyone else.
That’s why “assault” rifles should not be banned, or high capacity clips.
It’s not about hunting or even self-defense. Why don’t patriots openly talk about the real reason?
A few hours later, I watched Ted on stage, turn around and swing his butt at us, wagging an attached foxtail.
Jeff Fenske

Anti-gun protests as WW3 looms: The height of ignorance and hypocrisy — They’re begging the government to take away our second amendment right to defend ourselves against a tyranical government. Don’t people know that every dictatorship in the past has been preceded with disarming the citizens by taking away their guns?

Where is our antiwar movement?  We’re 5 seconds away from WWIII and what are people galvanized by?  They’re begging the government to take away our second amendment right to defend ourselves against a tyranical government.  Really?
Don’t people know that every dictatorship in the past has been preceded with disarming the citizens by taking away their guns?
Entire Article

YouTube Bans Firearms Demo Videos, Entering the Gun Control Debate

From: Bloomberg

YouTube Bans Firearms Demo Videos, Entering the Gun Control Debate

YouTube, a popular media site for firearms enthusiasts, this week quietly introduced tighter restrictions on videos involving weapons, becoming the latest battleground in the U.S. gun-control debate.

YouTube will ban videos that promote or link to websites selling firearms and accessories, including bump stocks, which allow a semi-automatic rifle to fire faster. Additionally, YouTube said it will prohibit videos with instructions on how to assemble firearms. The video site, owned by Alphabet Inc.’s Google, has faced intense criticism for hosting videos about guns, bombs and other deadly weapons. …

The National Shooting Sports Foundation, a gun industry lobbying group, called YouTube’s new policy “worrisome.”

“We suspect it will be interpreted to block much more content than the stated goal of firearms and certain accessory sales,” the foundation said in a statement. “We see the real potential for the blocking of educational content that serves instructional, skill-building and even safety purposes. Much like Facebook, YouTube now acts as a virtual public square. The exercise of what amounts to censorship, then, can legitimately be viewed as the stifling of commercial free speech.”

Entire Article