Talmudism: Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign

Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign

Kevin MacDonald on February 17, 2018

… According to Abrams, because of this vision, Jews have taken the lead in secularizing America.  In fact, the key role of Jewish organizations in shaping the Constitutional law on Church/State relations is well known. And it’s not much of a mystery who’s behind the war on Christmas.
And by successfully changing immigration policy, Jews have reduced the political power of the rural White subculture of America to the point that even though roughly 7 in 10 White males voted Republican (and ~60% of White females), Obama and the Democrats won the recent election. Even if the current push for gun control fails, we can expect that Jewish organizations will continue the push to disarm White males.
Jewish organizations are not at all against guns when they are in the hands of the police and other authorities. The ADL (see the ADL’s Law Enforcement Agency  Resource Network) and the SPLC (Law Enforcement Training and Law Enforcement Resources) have made strong alliances with law enforcement in America.
Further, it has often been observed that Jewish organizations have historically favored a strong central government rather than states’ rights.
Entire Article

(vid) The Bundy Trial and Why It Should Matter to You — Cliven Bundy and his sons have been incarcerated for nearly two years. Regardless of your position on the matter you must ask yourself how American citizens can be held so long without trial. John Lamb discusses Ryan Bundy's recent release to a halfway house and the latest developments in the case


Continue reading “(vid) The Bundy Trial and Why It Should Matter to You — Cliven Bundy and his sons have been incarcerated for nearly two years. Regardless of your position on the matter you must ask yourself how American citizens can be held so long without trial. John Lamb discusses Ryan Bundy's recent release to a halfway house and the latest developments in the case”

(vid) Obamacare Repeal Debate: Kimmel vs Graham vs Rand Paul! — Jimmy Kimmel wants to keep Obamacare. Lindsay Graham wants to move it to the state level with federal tax dollars. Rand Paul wants to repeal it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UtY-XljEHg

Continue reading “(vid) Obamacare Repeal Debate: Kimmel vs Graham vs Rand Paul! — Jimmy Kimmel wants to keep Obamacare. Lindsay Graham wants to move it to the state level with federal tax dollars. Rand Paul wants to repeal it”

(vid) States Rights? – Alaska Rep. Don Young apologizes to Washington state congresswoman – What really happened

According to the Constitution, there shouldn’t be any federal ownership of land in Alaska, so also no federal rulership of it. It’s up to Alaska to decide.

The congresswoman from Washington state thinks otherwise, as the Constitution isn’t followed much these days. 84-year-old, 23 term congressman Don Young gets upset, breaks protocol and even uses an expletive, which he knows full well is wrong. And then says he didn’t say ‘damn’ when he clearly did.

The house suspends discussion for five minutes, after which Don Young apologizes, which definitely does appear genuine, and is accepted. But will the media play the footage of the apology? No way. We an watch it here though.

Here is the entire interaction, how it really went down:

Continue reading “(vid) States Rights? – Alaska Rep. Don Young apologizes to Washington state congresswoman – What really happened”

Lincoln’s Army Raped, Pillaged, and Plundered SC: General Sherman’s Professed Hatred of Self Government — NOT because there were more slaves there than in other states, or because of anything else related to slavery.  It was because South Carolinians, even more than other Southerners, did not believe in uncompromising obedience to the central state

Why They Raped, Pillaged, and Plundered: General Sherman’s Professed Hatred of Self Government

By Thomas DiLorenzo
December 4, 2014

November and December of this year mark the 150th anniversary of General William Tecumseh Sherman’s famous “march to the sea” at the end of the War to Prevent Southern Independence.  The Lincoln cult – especially its hyper-warmongering neocon branch – has been holding conferences, celebrations, and commemorations while continuing to rewrite history to suit its statist biases.  Business as usual, in other words.  But they are not the only ones writing about the event.  Historian Karen Stokes has published South Carolina Civilians in Sherman’s Path: Stories of Courage Amid Civil War Destruction that contains a great deal of very telling information about Sherman’s motivation in waging total war on the civilian population of South Carolina.

Stokes begins by quoting a letter that Sherman wrote to General Henry Halleck shortly before invading all-but-defenseless South Carolina:  “[T]he whole army is burning with an insatiable desire to wreak vengeance upon South Carolina.”  In another message a few weeks later, Sherman reiterated to Halleck that “The whole army is crazy to be turned loose in [South] Carolina.”

South Carolina Civilia…Karen StokesBest Price: $14.56Buy New $13.38(as of 11:00 EDT – Details)

A New York newspaperman who was “embedded” with Sherman’s army (to use a contemporary term) wrote that “There can be no denial of the assertion that the feeling among the troops was one of extreme bitterness towards the people of the State of South Carolina.”  The Philadelphia Inquirer cheered on as Sherman’s army raped, pillaged, burned, and plundered through the state, calling South Carolina “that accursed hotbed of treason.”

In a January 31, 1864 letter to Major R.M. Sawyer, Sherman explained the reason why he hated the South in general, and South Carolina in particular, so much.  The war, he said “was the result of a false political doctrine that any and every people have a right to self-government.”  In the same letter Sherman referred to states’ rights, freedom of conscience, and freedom of the press as “trash” that had “deluded the Southern people into war.”

Sherman’s subordinates expressed similar opinions.  In 1865 Major George W. Nichols published a book about his exploits during Sherman’s “march” in which he describing South Carolinians as “the scum, the lower dregs of civilization” who are “not Americans; they are merely South Carolinians.”  General Carl Schurz is quoted by Stokes as remarking that “South Carolina – the state which was looked upon by the Northern soldier as the principal instigator” of the war was “deserving of special punishment.”

Lincoln Unmasked: What…Thomas J. DilorenzoBest Price: $6.00Buy New $9.96(as of 08:36 EDT – Details)

All of this is so telling because it reveals that neither Sherman, nor his subordinate officers, nor the average “soldier” in his army, were motivated by anything having to do with slavery.  South Carolina suffered more than any other state at the hands of Sherman’s raping, looting, plundering, murdering, and house-burning army because that is where the secession movement started.  It was NOT because there were more slaves there than in other states, or because of anything else related to slavery.  It was because South Carolinians, even more than other Southerners, did not believe in uncompromising obedience to the central state.

(vid) The Civil War was Not for Slavery – Prayer U Video Refuted

For me at least, the speaker is difficult to follow, since a lot of this information is new to me, and because of his speaking style, so I often stopped the video and read the quotes for myself.

Most of this makes sense. Though, I’ve often thought that tariffs were a good thing, helping domestic production and financing the government without the need for an income tax.

I hope James Perloff takes this subject on. He would take this to a new level of understanding for many.

– –

The Civil War was Not for Slavery

Published on Jan 15, 2017

The Civil War was NOT a war for slavery rebuttal to Prager University video that falsely claims the Civil War was about slavery. More stories about banning the Confederate flag and removing other history at http://ConservativeAmmo.com/RemoveHis…

The reason slavery is the popular justification for the Civil War, is that it’s the only way to excuse the gross amount of illegal actions taken by Lincoln for engaging in a war to prevent the Confederacy from having the right to govern themselves. The Civil War was an illegal war, carried out by the North to retain America’s biggest cash crops: cotton and tobacco, and to justify it, the North came up with one of the great lies of history.

Sources in video:
Prager University video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7q…

Lincoln’s Comments on Blacks in the 4th Lincoln-Douglas Debate (Page 50) http://thekeep.eiu.edu/cgi/viewconten…

http://www.amazon.com/When-Course-Hum…
http://www.amazon.com/The-South-under…
http://www.amazon.com/The-Real-Lincol…
http://www.amazon.com/North-against-S…
http://www.amazon.com/Tariffs-Blockad…
http://www.amazon.com/For-Good-Evil-I…
http://www.ashevilletribune.com/archi…
http://www.madisonjournaltoday.com/ar…
http://www.amazon.com/Rethinking-Amer…

Responses to most popular objections in the bottom of description:

Comment
1, Everyone knows the Civil War was for slavery, or so-and-so expert says the Civil War was about slavery or this random guy on YouTube is not an expert

Response: Fallacy of Faulty Appeal of Authority—arguing that a claim is true because someone else believes it

Comment: This guy is a neo-Confederate, or this is the Southern Lost Cause on YouTube

Response: This is a Circumstantial Ad hominem- claiming a person is motivated to make an argument, and therefore, it can’t be true.

Most all other comments that object to the video either present evidence that was debunked in the video (because they probably didn’t watch the whole video) or are not responding to something that was said in the video

States Decide Constitutionality, Not the Supremes! — From elementary school on, we learn that the Supreme Court gets to make the final decisions on all things constitutional…

Who Decides Constitutionality?

Who decides when the federal government has acted outside of those delegated powers?

Most Americans will quickly answer, “The Supreme Court, of course!”

Thomas Jefferson emphatically disagreed, arguing that the states make the determination in the last resort. Jefferson pointed out the absurdity of a branch of the federal government determining the extent of the federal government’s powers in the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798.

The government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.

From elementary school on, we learn that the Supreme Court gets to make the final decisions on all things constitutional. In fact, the idea is so deeply engrained in the American psyche, to assert otherwise generally elicits howls of indignant protest. But if you stop and think about it, you will recognize the notion makes absolutely no sense.

Essentially, Supreme Court apologists argue that after fighting a bloody war to free themselves from a tyrannical government, the founding generation ratified a Constitution specifically limiting the general government’s power, insisted on a Bill of Rights to further define the limits on that power and ratified an amendment explicitly stating what was already implicit – that all powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Then, after all this, those same people gave one branch of the federal government absolute authority to interpret the Constitution.

Ridiculous.

It would be a little like letting a Dallas Cowboy player referee a game between the Cowboys and the New York Giants.

Simply put, if the federal government gets to decide the extent of its own power, through its own judicial branch, and the people of the states possess no mechanism to hold the government it created in check, the whole notion of  limited, enumerated powers becomes a farce. The federal government, in practice, becomes one of limitless power.

That was not the intent of the founding generation. They never envisioned nine federal employees determining the extent of federal power. They knew that a self-limiting institution simply doesn’t exist, and they would have never allowed the creation of one to rule over them.

James Madison emphatically asserted that the states retain absolute authority.

The States then being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated; and consequently that as the parties to it, they must themselves decide in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interposition.

Further expounding on the subject, Madison pointed out that the president and Congress weren’t alone in the ability to overreach constitutional authority.

The [Virginia] resolution supposes that dangerous powers, not delegated, may not only be usurped and executed by the other departments, but that the judicial department also may exercise or sanction dangerous powers beyond the grant of the Constitution; and, consequently, that the ultimate right of the parties to the Constitution, to judge whether the compact has been dangerously violated, must extend to violations by one delegated authority, as well as by another; by the judiciary, as well as by the executive, or the legislature.

Madison went on to say it logically follows that the states must retain the final say.

However true, therefore, it may be, that the judicial department, is, in all questions submitted to it by the forms of the Constitution, to decide in the last resort, this resort must necessarily be deemed the last in relation to the authorities of the other departments of the government; not in relation to the rights of the parties to the constitutional compact, from which the judicial as well as the other departments hold their delegated trusts. On any other hypothesis, the delegation of judicial power would annul the authority delegating it; and the concurrence of this department with the others in usurped powers, might subvert for ever, and beyond the possible reach of any rightful remedy, the very Constitution which all were instituted to preserve.

Chuck Baldwin: No Hope In Trump; No Hope In DC – There is only one course of action for freedomists: SECESSION — Donald Trump is finishing what G.W. Bush began. Bush forever destroyed the influence of genuine Christian patriotism in this country with his phony brand of warmongering Christianity. Now, Trump is forever destroying the influence of the Tea Party/Patriot movements in this country with his phony brand of warmongering/Police-State-building “nationalism.” • And this time the fallout will be fatal!

From: chuckbaldwinlive.com

No Hope In Trump; No Hope In DC

Published: Thursday, April 27, 2017

At this point, people who are still holding out hope that Donald Trump is going to drain the swamp and save America are delusional. In less than 100 days, Trump has taken America to the precipice of World War III. He has filled his administration with Goldman Sachs banksters, CFR globalists, New World Order Zionists, and warmongers. Trump refuses to prosecute Hillary Clinton for egregious crimes against our country, but he is vowing to prosecute Julian Assange, a man whose “crime” is publishing the truth he receives from whistleblowers about the criminal conduct of the U.S. government. Plus, Assange isn’t even an American. He is an Australian. What jurisdictional authority does President Trump have to arrest and prosecute a citizen of another country who has committed no crime in the United States? None! And if all of that is not bad enough, Donald Trump killed more innocent men, women, and children last month than Syria, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China combined.

See this report:

More Than 1,000 Civilians Reportedly Killed By U.S.-Led Airstrikes As Trump Expands War On Terror

And this one:

Law Of War? Civilian Deaths In US Strikes In Syria, Iraq Soar Under Trump

No, Donald Trump is not going to drain the swamp; he has completely immersed himself and his administration in the swamp–just like every President of recent memory before him. And every 100 days of his administration from this day forward will only reconfirm this obvious reality.

At some point, the people who thought that Donald Trump was an outsider and “anti-establishment”–and the ones who continue to sacrifice their principles defending him in the forlorn hope that they are going to ride his coattails to glory–will be forced to awaken to the stark reality that either Donald Trump was totally disingenuous from the beginning or he has already capitulated to the swamp creatures ensconced in Washington, D.C. Either way, there is absolutely no hope in Donald Trump. And neither is there any hope in Washington, D.C.

Washington, D.C., is totally and thoroughly corrupt. It is run by bloodthirsty, conscienceless subhumans who will stop at nothing until they bring Armageddon upon the entire world. DC is nothing more than a coven of perverted, putrid, parasitic, pathetic, pompous, pretentious, prideful, pathological purveyors of global pestilence.

How long will freedom-loving Americans continue to believe the empty promises of phony politicians? How long will they continue living in the fantasy that somehow Washington, D.C., is going to see the error of its ways, repent, and return the nation to constitutional government? How long will they continue to look the other way while the swamp creatures in Washington, D.C., corrupt the minds and hearts of their children in these institutions of propaganda called public schools? How long will they continue to allow the swamp creatures in Washington, D.C., and their bottom-feeding serpent buddies at the Federal Reserve and on Wall Street demolish sound money principles and destroy a free market economic system? How long, folks? How long?

Donald Trump is finishing what G.W. Bush began. Bush forever destroyed the influence of genuine Christian patriotism in this country with his phony brand of warmongering Christianity. Now, Trump is forever destroying the influence of the Tea Party/Patriot movements in this country with his phony brand of warmongering/Police-State-building “nationalism.”

The truth is, Trump started drowning in the swamp even before he was inaugurated. Most of the people in his administration could have been picked by ANY of the other neocon Republican presidential candidates. Right now, Washington, D.C.’s neocon warmongers are gushing all over Donald Trump.

On the Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) recently said that on foreign policy “I am like the happiest dude in America right now. We’ve got a president and a national security team that I have been dreaming of. . . . I am all in. Keep it up, Donald.”

Ladies and gentlemen, please understand that the single issue that defines a neocon (i.e., Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Paul Ryan, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, G.W. Bush) and a neolib (i.e., Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Harry Reid) is foreign policy. To the swamp creatures in Washington, D.C., everything is defined by foreign policy. Everything! These are beasts of prey. They feed on the blood and carcasses of the dead. They are enriched by war; they crave war; they promote war; they create war.

Donald Trump ran on the coattails of Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul. Most of what Trump trumpeted (no pun intended) was proclaimed and popularized by Buchanan and Paul. They failed to win the White House. Trump succeeded. Do you really think Pat or Ron would have filled their administrations with globalists, billionaires, international bankers, and CFR members? Do you really think Pat or Ron would have turned control of the White House over to two ultra-liberal globalist Zionists such as Jared and Ivanka Kushner? Do you really think Pat or Ron would have launched 59 Tomahawk missiles on a sovereign nation without our country being attacked or consent from Congress? Do you really think Pat or Ron would take America to the precipice of World War III before finishing their first 100 days in office? Hell no!

Donald Trump ran on Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul’s platform of constitutional populism, but he didn’t really believe it. Like G.W. Bush betrayed the Christians who elected him, Donald Trump has betrayed the constitutionalists who elected him. And this time the fallout will be fatal–especially if, as it appears, Trump takes America into another war–or even nuclear war.

No one will ever believe the campaign rhetoric of constitutionalism and populism again. Trump has poisoned the pot. The Democrat Party is plunging further and further into radicalism, extremism, and socialism. But four years from now, people will embrace the radical leftist agenda of the Democrats over the phony constitutionalist agenda of Donald Trump. Then, watch out! Katy bar the door!

Face it: G.W. Bush gave us Barack Obama, and Donald Trump may give us…the antichrist.

From this point onward, freedomists need to “get religion.” I mean they need a revelation. They need to come to the disconcerting decision that there is NO HOPE in Washington, D.C.

There is only one course of action for freedomists: secession. The only other alternative is slavery.

And people need to understand that the spirit of secession is sweeping the globe. Currently, there are 42 separatist movements underway in Africa; 68 in Asia; 107 in Europe; 16 in North America; 18 in Oceania; and 9 in South America. That’s a total of 260 active separatist movements going on RIGHT NOW.

During the past few years, secession movements among states of the United States include Alaska (2006, 2017); California (2010, 2015 – 2017); Florida (2015); Georgia (2009); Hawaii (2011, 2017); Montana (2008); New Hampshire (2012, 2017); Oregon (2016); South Carolina (2010); Texas (late 1990s, 2009, 2017) and Vermont (2003, 2005 – 2007, 2017). This does not include the secession movement currently underway among the Lakota Indians in Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.

The answer has NEVER rested in Washington, D.C. It has always been a fatal mistake for people to expect an answer from Washington, D.C. The answer has always rested with “We the People.” Always! History proves that the bigger central governments become, the more tyrannical they become.

And the fact is, the United States is much too large and too populous to maintain liberty. Increasing population has taken government further and further away from the People. Politically speaking, the only thing that has thwarted Washington, D.C.’s total takeover of the states is the Electoral College system. But a rancid public education system, a cowardly pulpit, a corrupt news media, and runaway political correctness have brought liberty to the brink of destruction. Only the states can recapture the spirit of liberty–ONLY THE STATES! But which states is the sixty-four million dollar question. (My money’s on the Rocky Mountain states–which is one of many reasons why I was led to move here.) Continue reading “Chuck Baldwin: No Hope In Trump; No Hope In DC – There is only one course of action for freedomists: SECESSION — Donald Trump is finishing what G.W. Bush began. Bush forever destroyed the influence of genuine Christian patriotism in this country with his phony brand of warmongering Christianity. Now, Trump is forever destroying the influence of the Tea Party/Patriot movements in this country with his phony brand of warmongering/Police-State-building “nationalism.” • And this time the fallout will be fatal!”

(illustration) WITHOUT THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE – What the Popular Vote Looks Like

Voting for electors is strange, but the smaller population states having a more significant say than their population size alone would dictate is significant.
– –

Progressives are taking aim at the Electoral College and want to replace it with a national popular vote. This would both remove the indirect mediation of the electors’ votes, and more damagingly, eliminate the power of states in choosing a president.

You can read my pre-election explanation of how the Electoral College works and why the Founding Fathers created it here. The 2016 presidential election is a perfect illustration of why America needs to keep this institution in place, regardless of whether one supported the winner or the loser in 2016.

ILLUSTRATION & TEXT

(audio) Oregon Truth – “Not a Shootout!” | The KrisAnne Hall Show, Jan. 27th 2016

UPDATE 1/29/16: (video) FBI releases video of Finicum being shot at Burns Oregon

KrisAnne is an amazing, passionate speaker!

I disagree with one thing, though. I don’t see how taking over the building was/is peaceful.

I disagree with another thing too, but I’ll let it pass.

– –

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRYsIrtbtWE]Oregon Truth | The KrisAnne Hall Show, Jan. 27th 2016

KrisAnne Hall 

KrisAnne Hall

Published on Jan 27, 2016

Oregon Truth

January 27, 2016 By KrisAnne Hall
Please subscribe, like, comment and share.

Let us not be led by the govt controlled media who have proven themselves to be secret traitors. HERE is the Truth. It repulses me that you probably won’t hear it told by MSM. RIP LaVoy Finicum. You will be missed but not forgotten.

Subscribe to the KrisAnne Hall YouTube Channel
http://youtube.com/subscription_cente…

Visit the Liberty First Gift Shop: http://krisannehall.com/shop/

About Krisanne Hall

KrisAnne Hall is an attorney and former prosecutor, fired after teaching the Constitution to TEA Party groups – she would not sacrifice liberty for a paycheck. She is a disabled veteran of the US Army, a Russian linguist, a mother, a pastor’s wife and a patriot. She now travels the country and teaches the Constitution and the history that gave us our founding documents. KrisAnne Hall does not just teach the Constitution, she lays the foundations that show how reliable and relevant our founding documents are today. She presents the “genealogy” of the Constitution – the 700 year history and five foundational documents that are the very roots of American Liberty. –

See more at: http://krisannehall.com/

(audio) KrisAnne Hall w/ John B Wells: State Sovereignty, Land Rights and Federal Overreach 1/14/16 — Burns, Oregon – Bundys – Hammonds – Constitution

I’m glad John posted this on YouTube, but it’s only up as an audio. I watched it a few days ago on Caravan to Midnight. KrisAnne will be teaching the Constitution to the citizens in Burns, Oregon, today and tomorrow.

KrisAnne is an EXCELLENT communicator with an obvious PASSION for observing the U.S. Constitution! Her husband is a pastor and a missionary to Haiti.

Subscribers can watch the video at Caravan to Midnight, which has this description [I’ve only watched the KrisAnne segment]:

Ep. 450 – In today’s program we are joined by pop-culture and political commentator Lisa Durden to explore 3 predictions for race relations in 2016, the legacy of David Bowie, some awkward moments at the Golden Globe Awards and more. Then, Constitutional attorney KrisAnne Hall comes aboard for a discussion about State Sovereignty, land rights and Federal overreach.

• • •

KrisAnne starts at 1:15:40[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkTBzkocHbo]Caravan To Midnight – Episode 450 State Sovereignty, Land Rights and Federal Overreach

John B. Wells 

Related:

(video) KrisAnne Hall: What’s Really Going on in Oregon! Taking Back the Narrative!

(video) KrisAnne Hall: Libery First, Tools In Defense Of Liberty

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwJmRqtFooE]KrisAnne Hall, Libery First, Tools In Defense Of Liberty

KrisAnne Hall

(video) KrisAnne Hall: What’s Really Going on in Oregon! Taking Back the Narrative!

POWERFUL!

– –

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T424sWq1SkE]What’s Really Going on in Oregon! Taking Back the Narrative ! KrisAnne Hall

KrisAnne Hall

KrisAnne Hall

Published on Jan 5, 2016

Important update.
Let’s talk about what’s going on in Malheur Oregon and take back the narrative.

What does the Constitution say about this?
What are the precedents?
Listen watch, subscribe, like, comment and share now. Make this go viral.

Subscribe to the KrisAnne Hall YouTube Channel
http://youtube.com/subscription_cente…

Visit the Liberty First Gift Shop: http://krisannehall.com/shop/

About Krisanne Hall
KrisAnne Hall is an attorney and former prosecutor, fired after teaching the Constitution to TEA Party groups – she would not sacrifice liberty for a paycheck. She is a disabled veteran of the US Army, a Russian linguist, a mother, a pastor’s wife and a patriot. She now travels the country and teaches the Constitution and the history that gave us our founding documents. KrisAnne Hall does not just teach the Constitution, she lays the foundations that show how reliable and relevant our founding documents are today. She presents the “genealogy” of the Constitution – the 700 year history and five foundational documents that are the very roots of American Liberty. – See more at:

http://krisannehall.com

Related:

(audio) KrisAnne Hall w/ John B Wells: State Sovereignty, Land Rights and Federal Overreach 1/14/16 — Burns, Oregon – Bundys – Hammonds – Constitution

Chuck Baldwin: Burns, Oregon, Is Not Bundy Ranch — There is no justification for what Ammon Bundy and his followers have done in Burns • Ammon Bundy and the others are helping to reverse the pro-freedom, pro-Second Amendment momentum and to provide an excuse for gun-grabbers like Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi to justify more anti-gun legislation. In other words, Ammon and his followers are actually assisting the very people they claim to be resisting

Chuck Baldwin: Burns, Oregon, Is Not Bundy Ranch — There is no justification for what Ammon Bundy and his followers have done in Burns • Ammon Bundy and the others are helping to reverse the pro-freedom, pro-Second Amendment momentum and to provide an excuse for gun-grabbers like Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi to justify more anti-gun legislation. In other words, Ammon and his followers are actually assisting the very people they claim to be resisting

From: News With Views

Burns, Oregon, Is Not Bundy Ranch

By Chuck Baldwin
January 7, 2016
NewsWithViews.com

Let me be clear: the situation in Oregon does not remotely compare to the events that took place at the Bundy Ranch in Nevada. In Nevada, the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) was the aggressor, which included a very real threat of violence against the Bundy family. The Bundy family appealed to their neighbors and friends for help. And help rightly arrived. The legal nuances of the Bundy situation notwithstanding, BLM gave the appearance of preparing another Waco incident that just could not be tolerated. Over 80 innocent Americans, including elderly men and women and small children, were murdered by our federal government during that unconscionable raid. There must NEVER be another Waco in this country.

The decision of Ammon Bundy (Cliven Bundy’s son)–and the men who are with him–to mount an armed takeover of the remote, empty Malheur National Wildlife Refuge building in Harney County outside Burns, Oregon, is unwise, careless, and downright foolish. There is no just cause for such action.

Previous to the move to take over the federal building, a peaceful protest in support of the Hammond family had taken place in Burns. This protest was commendable and well-conducted. Hundreds of local residents took part in that peaceful protest. The local community of Burns was very sympathetic to the plight of the Hammonds and rightly angered by the federal government’s treatment of them.

[…]

I personally believe that government agent provocateurs infiltrated and agitated these men into taking this action, thereby giving the federal government the excuse it needs to justify Obama’s Executive Order enacting stricter rules on gun purchases. In my opinion, both of these events happening during the exact same week is NOT a coincidence.

[…]

Whether my supposition is true or not, it doesn’t justify the individual decisions of Ammon Bundy and his followers to act in this manner. If I could talk to them, I would encourage them in the strongest terms possible to peacefully walk away from this situation. All this does is fuel the anti-gun hysteria of already hysterical anti-gun zealots in and out of Washington, D.C., and also serves to allow the anti-gun media to further demonize proponents of the Second Amendment and constitutionally-ordained militia.

By taking the action they did, Ammon Bundy and the others are helping to reverse the pro-freedom, pro-Second Amendment momentum and to provide an excuse for gun-grabbers like Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi to justify more anti-gun legislation. In other words, Ammon and his followers are actually assisting the very people they claim to be resisting.

Speaking of Obama’s gun grab, we can all thank House Speaker Paul Ryan and his fellow Republicans such as Montana congressman Ryan Zinke for Obama’s Executive Order further restricting the purchase of firearms. It was Ryan’s $1.1 trillion Omnibus bill that fully funded Obama’s executive decision.

See this report here.

Furthermore, while bemoaning the President’s decision, Republican House members have said absolutely NOTHING about defunding Obama’s Executive Order, which is in their power to do, and which would completely take away the means for the executive branch to enforce the order.

See this report here.

Entire Article Here

Related:

(video) KrisAnne Hall: What’s Really Going on in Oregon! Taking Back the Narrative!

 

Joseph Story 1833: STATES should govern INTERNALLY, FED should "principally employed upon EXTERNAL objects, such as war, peace, negotiations with foreign powers, and foreign commerce"

The federal government’s role is supposed to be small within the country, according to the rule of law, and not involved in most of what it does.

– –

The Tenth Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

~

“Another not unimportant consideration is, that the powers of the general government will be, and indeed must be, principally employed upon external objects, such as war, peace, negotiations with foreign powers, and foreign commerce. In its internal operations it can touch but few objects, except to introduce regulations beneficial to the commerce, intercourse, and other relations, between the states, and to lay taxes for the common good. The powers of the states, on the other hand, extend to all objects, which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, and liberties, and property of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the state.”

– Joseph Story 1833 (source)

House passes bill blocking states from requiring GMO labels on food — The Fed rules the states, unconstitutionally!

Completely unconstitutional and horrible! And the Republicans pushed it!
People have a right to know when Monsanto’s ‘safe,’ GM toxins are in food, but now the Fed (former Monsanto employees run the FDA) decides what is right & rules the states, unconstitutionally:

“Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.), who authored the bill, called mandatory labeling laws — which have already passed in Vermont, Connecticut and Maine — unnecessarily costly given that GMOs have been deemed safe by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

In many ways, the Republicans are getting worse than the Democrats!
Article Here
Related:
65 Health Risks of GM Foods

Who Decides Constitutionality? States, according to Jefferson and Madison

From: tenthamendmentcenter.com/

Who Decides Constitutionality?

Who decides when the federal government has acted outside of those delegated powers?

Most Americans will quickly answer, “The Supreme Court, of course!”

Thomas Jefferson emphatically disagreed, arguing that the states make the determination in the last resort. Jefferson pointed out the absurdity of a branch of the federal government determining the extent of the federal government’s powers in the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798.

The government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress.

From elementary school on, we learn that the Supreme Court gets to make the final decisions on all things constitutional. In fact, the idea is so deeply engrained in the American psyche, to assert otherwise generally elicits howls of indignant protest. But if you stop and think about it, you will recognize the notion makes absolutely no sense.

Essentially, Supreme Court apologists argue that after fighting a bloody war to free themselves from a tyrannical government, the founding generation ratified a Constitution specifically limiting the general government’s power, insisted on a Bill of Rights to further define the limits on that power and ratified an amendment explicitly stating what was already implicit – that all powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Then, after all this, those same people gave one branch of the federal government absolute authority to interpret the Constitution.

Ridiculous.

It would be a little like letting a Dallas Cowboy player referee a game between the Cowboys and the New York Giants.

Simply put, if the federal government gets to decide the extent of its own power, through its own judicial branch, and the people of the states possess no mechanism to hold the government it created in check, the whole notion of  limited, enumerated powers becomes a farce. The federal government, in practice, becomes one of limitless power.

That was not the intent of the founding generation. They never envisioned nine federal employees determining the extent of federal power. They knew that a self-limiting institution simply doesn’t exist, and they would have never allowed the creation of one to rule over them.

James Madison emphatically asserted that the states retain absolute authority.

The States then being the parties to the constitutional compact, and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity, that there can be no tribunal above their authority, to decide in the last resort, whether the compact made by them be violated; and consequently that as the parties to it, they must themselves decide in the last resort, such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interposition.

Entire Article Here

35,000 People Sign Petition To Give Alaska To Russia – WhiteHouse.gov

“We the People,” the White House’s online petition website that claims it is “giving all Americans a way to engage their government on the issues that matter to them,”  is currently hosting a petition for Alaska to leave the United States and join Russia.

The petition, written by S. V. of Anchorage, simply reads:

Groups Siberian Russians crossed the Isthmus (now the Bering Strait) 16-10 thousand years ago.

Russian began to settle on the Arctic coast, Aleuts inhabited the Aleutian Archipelago.

First visited Alaska August 21, 1732, members of the team boat “St. Gabriel »under the surveyor Gvozdev and assistant navigator I. Fedorov during the expedition Shestakov and DI Pavlutski 1729-1735 years.

Vote for secession of Alaska from the United States and joining Russia.

Entire Article Here

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLIs_Zy5uo4]6400 People Sign Petition To Give Alaska To Russia – WhiteHouse.gov

GMN elemedia

Published on Mar 22, 2014

2 important geo-political factors:

1) Russia’s interests and successes in securing the Arctic region’s natural resources
2) Reports that Russia wants to take back Alaska

This evening we were digging into the validity of reports about Russia wanting Alaska, and what we discovered was startling.

First, we found a petition posted on WhiteHouse.gov signed by 6400 people (as of writing this post). The petition is titled: WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO: Alaska back to Russia.

Next, we found a huge ream of facts that the USA has been working towards giving Russia the Alaskan sea bed, as well as 8 islands — all without the permission or say-so by the Alaskans. This is not a conspiracy theory, it is a fact that the reader must research themselves by reading the materials in the links below. Look at the information yourself, and you will not only be shocked about Alaska, you will notice that the USA has been working to help Russia since the days of the old USSR. Even George W. Bush sounds like an Agenda 21 New World Order communist in his executive orders supporting the Alaskan give-away, using terms such as “climate change” & “environmental sustainability”. Truly shocking when we started paying attention.

Additionally, one must take a look at Obama’s actions in dealing with Putin and the Russians. The fact remains that Putin is a former KGB agent from the USSR, and his entire career has been built on assuming his current postition so that he can build Russia back to it’s old world status as the USSR. Putin is a KGB Communist, and when one observes how Obama is vertually subservient to Putin’s geo-political moves, we must wonder where Obama comes from.

Do a little homework and we realize that Obama is said to be a KGB agent designed to destory America from within. From Obama’s mysterious background to his present day dessimation of the U.S. Constitution, all signs points towards one thing: Obama may be working for the Communist Soviets all along. The facts leading up to that conclusion are undeniable, and it is also undeniable that Putin has fooled the world as a New World Order PR master as he nudges the world towards Soviet principles and power.

Research Links:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/213941783/O…

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/peti…

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2…

http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/03…

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/03/alas…

http://wonkette.com/401850/john-mccai…

http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/fs/128…

http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archive…

http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATI…

http://statedepartmentwatch.org/Givea…

http://www.wnd.com/2008/07/70902/

http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/fs/128…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNxED…

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/obamas-giv…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vq2S0…

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/should-…

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/what-60…

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/0…

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/0…

Podcast Download: http://petersantilli.com/feed/
GuerillaMediaNetwork.com http://ow.ly/o7pRT
Please be sure to comment, share, like and subscribe!
Live Call-In Line: Tel 218-862-9829
Live 24/7 Listener Line 712-432-7848

The Pete Santilli Show broadcasts live exclusively on the Rense Network and the Guerilla Media Networkhttp://guerillamedianetwork.com/pete
Monday thru Saturday 10am PST

For Breaking News Visit 21stCenturyWire.com http://ow.ly/o1zU3
GMN is now Spreaker.com’s #1 radio show worldwide!http://ow.ly/l7Ma1

[video] Tom Woods: Ron Paul Right, Thought Controllers Wrong, on Secession — A secession clause isn't needed in the Constitution

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPn-vYH2eYc]Ron Paul Right, Thought Controllers Wrong, on Secession

Published on Dec 1, 2012

Bestselling author Tom Woods cuts through the establishment’s hysteria at the very suggestion of secession, and considers the arguments on their merits.

http://www.LibertyClassroom.com
http://www.TomWoods.com
http://www.WoodsLetter.com

Related:
Can Alaska Secede If America Ceases to Be the ‘Land of the Free’?
Chuck Baldwin: Breakup Of U.S. Is Inevitable — State secession is the last best option
Ben Swann: Do States Actually Have The Right To Secede?
Why Texas would flourish as an independent Republic based on liberty, not debt (has interesting comments)

[video] Ben Swann: Do States Actually Have The Right To Secede?

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fegDJuLqo0]Do States Actually Have The Right To Secede?

Published on Nov 13, 2012 by 

Ben Swann takes a look at the more than 30 petitions on the White House blog We The People asking that their state be allowed to peacefully secede from the United States.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petitions

Related:
Can Alaska Secede If America Ceases to Be the ‘Land of the Free’?

[video] Tom Woods: 'Nullification' as a Constitutional Remedy – The Cornerstone of the Constitution — "The more we use this word the better."

I see a lot of hope in this!
– –

‘Nullification’ —
“The more we use this word the better.”

– Tom Woods

* * *

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO0rrHOCYbc]They Have Rigged The System to Ensure Fraud: Tom Woods Speaks with Infowars

Published on Sep 27, 2012 by TheAlexJonesChannel

Thomas E. Woods, Jr., is the New York Times bestselling author of 11 books. A senior fellow of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Woods holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Harvard and his master’s, M.Phil., and Ph.D. from Columbia University
http://www.tomwoods.com/

[video] Tom Woods: How to Resist Federal Tyranny Through Nullification — States' Rights

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n0HMnozCJM]How to Resist Federal Tyranny with Author Tom Woods

Published on Sep 11, 2012 by TheAlexJonesChannel

Alex talks with New York Times bestselling author Tom Woods, a senior fellow of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He is the author of eleven books, most recently Rollback: Repealing Big Government Before the Coming Fiscal Collapse and Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century.
http://www.tomwoods.com/

[video] Nullification: The Rightful Remedy — What do we do when the Federal Government steps outside of it's constitutional boundaries? Do we ask federal bureaucrats in black robes to enforce the limits of it's own power? Thomas Jefferson and James Madison didn't think so…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jYNNp42KZs]The Government is Not Your Boss!

Published on Aug 11, 2012 by TheAlexJonesChannel

Jason Rink is the Director and Producer of “Nullification: The Rightful Remedy.” What the film is about: What do we do when the Federal Government steps outside of it’s constitutional boundaries? Do we ask federal bureaucrats in black robes to enforce the limits of it’s own power? Thomas Jefferson and James Madison didn’t think so, […]
http://www.jasonrink.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.planetinfowars.com/
[Support infowars and spread the news]
http://www.infowarsstore.com/

[video] Nullification: The Rightful Remedy "The 9th Amendment and the 10th Amendment"

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecW9yrx7Q7Y]Nullification: The Rightful Remedy “The 9th Amendment and the 10th Amendment”

Published on Mar 30, 2012 by TheF4FS

http://www.nullificationmovie.com In this short clip from the documentary Nullification: The Rightful Remedy, we hear from experts Thomas E. Woods, Jr., Sheriff Richard Mack, Stewart Rhodes, Art Thompson, Charles Goyette, and others. They discuss the importance of the 9th and 10th Amendments, and their role in limiting the power of the federal government.

When Americans Understood the Declaration of Independence — a roadmap for opposing a highly centralized, militaristic empire of the sort the U.S. government has become

From: Infowars

When Americans Understood the Declaration of Independence

Thomas J. DiLorenzo
lewrockwell.com
July 4, 2012

The Fourth of July was not always a national celebration of the militarization of American society and of the federal government’s never-ending quest for world domination (disguised as “defending our interests abroad”). Americans did not always attend church services on the Sunday before the Fourth of July to “honor” their “military heroes” and pray that they may kill many more human beings in other countries that have done them no harm. Americans once actually read and understood the Declaration of Independence for what it was: a declaration of secession from the British empire and a roadmap for opposing a highly centralized, militaristic empire of the sort the U.S. government has become.

The Declaration of Independence was the ultimate secessionist or states’ rights document. “Governments are instituted among men,” Thomas Jefferson wrote, for the sole purpose of securing God-given, “unalienable” rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Moreover, governments derive “their just powers from the consent of the governed” and nowhere else. And “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government . . .”

The way in which “the People” were to express their consent (or lack thereof) was through state and local political organizations. Hence, in the final paragraph of the Declaration of Independence Jefferson wrote that: “We . . . the Representatives of the united States of America . . . are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.”

It is important to note that the word “united” is not capitalized but “States” is, and that the individual states are described as “Free and Independent.” Thus, the free, independent, and sovereign states were united in the cause of secession from the British empire. The phrase “united States” did not mean, and does not mean in any of the founding documents, the “United States government,” as is commonly believed today. It is always in the plural to signify that the free and independent states are united in their common cause of protecting life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. To Jefferson and the other signers of the Declaration of Independence, each American state was sovereign in the same sense that Great Britain, France, and Spain were sovereign states.

Entire Article Here

[video] Jerome Corsi: Obama, The Illegitimate President & More On How Deep the Doo Doo Is!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NoTZJYqew4]Obama: The Illegitimate President with Dr. Jerome Corsi 1/3

Uploaded by  on Jan 31, 2012

Alex talks with best selling author Jerome Corsi about a summon issued by a Georgia judge ordering Obama to appear before the court in a lawsuit challenging his eligibility and presence on the March presidential ballot. Obama did not appear and his lawyers said he would ignore the subpoena and not participate in the legal proceedings. Corsi and Alex also talk about the rapidly escalating situation in Iran and the Persian Gulf. Jerome Corsi is the author of The Obama Nation and Unfit for Command.
http://www.jeromecorsi.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChTXiJVzti4]
Related:
Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator – Absolute Proof
[A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY] From A to Z: What’s wrong with Obama’s birth certificate? Examine for yourself…
How To Prove Obama Is Not From America: WATCH THIS VIDEO

[video] Jerome Corsi on Bombing Iran: Through chaos the globalists are creating the world government and Fox News is part of the coverup. Along with war over there will be fighting in the streets here. Some states will secede.

PROBLEM > REACTION > SOLUTION

or

“Order from chaos”

The globalists create the chaos >

people react in fear: “we’ll give up our rights” >

One world government – game over

* * *

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRRkgbURWZo]Dr. Jerome Corsi: World War 3 is About to Begin! 1/2

Uploaded by on Nov 29, 2011

Author and columnist Jerome Corsi talks about Obama and the orchestrated attacks inside Iran….
http://www.jeromecorsi.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://www.infowars.com

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvtZaDSKNNY]

ARE PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONSTITUTIONAL?

I was reading a thread on Facebook, and realized I haven’t yet addressed this important topic.

The discussion is often about whether prayer should be allowed in schools, but to me the bigger issue is whether we should even have federally controlled schools, which is unconstitutional.

And I have long thought that whether public prayer is allowed or not is minor compared to teaching the religious belief in evolution as fact, which can actually be disproved with facts; though, these facts aren’t taught. Teaching evolution as fact teaches children that the book of Genesis is erroneous, and we’re just like animals — so ~“why not just do it like they do it on the Discovery Channel” — which sex education helps happen.

Charlotte Iserbyt goes into detail how our children are being systematically brainwashed on purpose:

[IMPORTANT! 74-minute, real history video] Charlotte Iserbyt: The Secret History of Western Education — The Scientific Destruction of Minds

Charlotte Iserbyt: Exposing the Miseducation of America — She found documents that show the federal government and tax exempt foundations have been changing the education system from fundamental academic study to what amounts to operant conditioning dog training.

Charlotte Iserbyt: Federalizing and Corporatizing All of The Schools

Charlotte Iserbyt: Skull & Bones, The Order at Yale Revealed | More on the Secret History of Western Education & Psychology!

This following article addresses whether we should even have federally controlled schools?

jeff

– –

From: News With Views

ARE PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONSTITUTIONAL?

Lynn M. Stuter
January 20, 2003
NewsWithViews.com

As the war over education reform — Goals 2000, school-to-work, and “outcome-based education” — rages on, the time is more than ripe to ask ourselves, “Are public schools constitutional?”

Looking at the United States Constitution, no provision is made for education, but the Constitution does instruct that … “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (Tenth Amendment) In other words, education is reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Why, then, do we have a cabinet level United States Department of Education (US DOE)? Does this not violate the U.S. Constitution? In a word, “yes.” The US DOE was established under the Carter Administration as a political payoff to the teacher unions for their support of Jimmy Carter for president.

[…]

For example, humanists (Darwinists) believe in evolution while Christians believe in creationism. Is evolution being taught in the public schools? Yes, it is and has been for many years. Is the religion of humanism being taught in the public schools? Humanism is the religious basis of education in the public schools of today.

Entire Article Here