The ‘Holocaust’ has been completely exposed, everyone. There were no death camps. The roundup was wrong, but there were no exterminations in any of these camps. Auschwitz had all of these amenities and activities, really!
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGn9xvFSs84]Holocaust 101 with Jim Rizoli Show # 6
Cancer-causing Glyphosate Herbicide Found in Urine of 93% of Americans
The Detox Project, using laboratories at the University of California San Francisco, has found the presence of glyphosate, the most used herbicide in the world, in the urine of 93% of the American public during a unique testing project that started in 2015.
From the project’s public statement on their website:
Glyphosate, labeled a ‘Probable human carcinogen’ by the World Health Organization’s cancer agency IARC in 2015, has now been revealed to be ubiquitous in the first ever comprehensive and validated LC/MS/MS testing project to be carried out across America. Glyphosate-containing herbicides are sold under trademarks such as Monsanto’s ‘Roundup.’
In a unique public testing project carried out by a laboratory at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), glyphosate was discovered in 93% of urine samples during the early phase of the testing in 2015.
Glyphosate was found in 93% of the 131 urine samples tested at an average level of 3.096 parts per billion (PPB). Children had the highest levels with an average of 3.586 PPB.
The regions with the highest levels were the West and the Midwest with an average of 3.053 PPB and 3.050 PPB respectively.
Glyphosate has been linked to cancer by the World Health Organization, and lawsuits against companies using the herbicide, which is prevalent in most conventional foods, have begun.
The video starts in America, showing how the banksters intentionally created a false bank run in 1907 to bring in the unconstitutional, private, ‘Federal’ Reserve Bank in 1913 — after which they crashed the economy, resulting in The Great Depression.
The Talmudists also created chaos in Germany, starting with what they did during and after WWI (millions died), as well as the extreme decadence [one of the photos is risqué – WARNING].
This is part of the true story that is probably not taught in any of the public schools in America.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQu3ovIlPh4]Adolf Hitler & The German Economic Miracle
Germar Rudolf is interviewed about the new Holocaust Handbook CURATED LIES: The Auschwitz Museum’s Misrepresentations & Deceptions. http://www.amazon.com/Curated-Lies-Mi…
Support Revisionist research – Buy Curated Lies on Amazon –
Holocaust Revisionist Germar Rudolf gives a presentation on the new Holocaust Handbook Curated Lies.
The new book by Carlo Mattogno exposes the Auschwitz museum’s misrepresentations, distortions, and deceptions.
With subtitles in English, Deutsch, Español, Português.
Were 900,000 Jews “gassed” at Treblinka?
Were 3.9 million Jews “steamed to death” in “steam chambers” there, too, as the Allied victors asserted right after World War II during the Nuremberg trials?
The current official “Holocaust” story is that Treblinka 2 is the largest mass burial site in the entire world, where the Germans gassed 900,000 Jews in 13 “gas chambers disguised as shower rooms.”
“Holocaust Revisionists” or “Holocaust Deniers” assert that there is no evidence to support this claim, and tales of “gas chambers disguised as shower rooms” are wartime atrocity fiction similar to previously debunked claims about Jews being made into soap and lampshades.
Between 2012 and 2014, British Archaeologist Dr. Caroline Sturdy Colls conducted investigations on the grounds of the former Treblinka camp with the intention to refute the Deniers’ claims once and for all. The results of her studies were prominently featured by TV documentaries in both the UK and the US.
In “The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax,” US filmmaker Eric Hunt expertly analyzes Dr. Sturdy Colls’ investigations and exposes them as a massive fraud. For instance, her research actually included digging near clearly marked Christian graves claiming to find new “hidden mass graves”; she also falsely assigned homicidal intent to a normal life-saving bath and disinfection complex at the entrance to the Majdanek concentration camp, and misidentified a terracotta tile excavated at Treblinka as belonging to the floor of a homicidal “gas chamber.”
Free yourself from a lifetime of Holo-brainwashing about “Six Million” Jews “gassed” in “Gas Chambers Disguised as Shower Rooms” —
Henry Makow is a Jew warning us about TalmudVision’s (TV) intentional sex programming, and the Satanic cult behind it.
From: Henry Makow
Illuminati “Sex Goddess” Programming
May 27, 2016
Every decade, certain movie stars epitomize sex appeal. These “sex symbols” program men to think women represent transcendent spiritual ideals. By inflating female value in men’s minds, Hollywood sabotages the heterosexual dynamic which requires male dominance. As with feminism, the Illuminati empower women in order to emasculate men and neuter both sexes.
We are programmed to desire sex, but could be programmed to desire mystical experiences or to perform selfless acts instead. We desire what our Illuminati masters teach us to desire and are “happy” if we achieve it. Mental rather than spiritual beings, we are programmed to be sex addicts by the satanists who control the mass media. …
It seems the whole trajectory of the Twentieth Century was to make sex the primary focus and purpose of life. This is how satanic possession works. …
Even in the thirties and forties, Hollywood was a sexual cesspool. It’s a tragedy that these degenerates define reality for us. …
Why are Jews so obsessed with sex? Jews don’t know this but Judaism is not a religion. The Illuminati Jewish leadership supplants God, and degrades mankind to an animal state using sex. Whenever you deny God, you can create myriad false Gods including sex.
[Modern – ed.] Judaism is secret society like Freemasonry; only initiates know its true character. It is defined by Cabalism, a satanic sex cult, and the Talmud, which is characterized by incest and pedophilia as well as hatred of non-Jews. (Cabalism is satanic because it says God is formless and unknowable. The essence of religion is that God is knowable – how else can you obey Him?)
Due to Masonic Jewish control of banking, business, government, culture and communications, we have all become Jews. Western society is a satanic cult. Sex is the new God. “Sex goddesses” point the way. Porn may have blunted their power somewhat by demystifying the naked body.
The lesson? This is a battle for the mind. If we don’t control our thoughts, they will.
This is beautiful, and very possibly the comprehensive, point-by-point article that will sink Irving’s false claim that exterminations happened in or near these eastern camps — the theory that Mark Weber and David Cole Stein have sadly also adopted.
Thank you very much for this important report, Hadding! There really is no evidence for any extermination plan or actions.
It’s sad to see David Irving so concerned about his own reputation and ability to produce income from writing that he’d sell out like this. I hope he finds his moral compass and admits his error.
I wrote on my Facebook post:
I just read most of this excellent 12 page report that DISPROVES the theory that claimed there was a partial Holocaust in the eastern camps, since the gas chamber MYTH in Auschwitz and Dachau has been settled.
One historian was desperately trying to save his career, and fabricated a story which has now been completely taken apart here.
There was no Holocaust — only work camps within hundreds of thousands of Jews died (not 6 million) due to starvation and Typhus near the end of the war, after we bombed the camps’ supply lines.
The Holocaust story was made up to demonize the Germans and victimize the Jews.
Hitler was following Martin Luther’s written ideas about expelling the Jews because of how many were trying to overthrow Germany.
I personally believe that only those responsible should have been put into the camps, but the main thing is that the ‘Holocaust’ as we know it absolutely did not happen, while the US and England actually did intentionally Holocaust to death about 1 million German civilians by fire bombing city center populations.
So there was a Holocaust during WWII, but not against the Jews.
“Talking Frankly” about David Irving
A Critical Analysis of David Irving’s Statement on the Holocaust
By Hadding Scott
The following article is a critical analysis of some statements made by British historian David Irving in a “privately filmed interview” of April 2009 lasting over 2 hours, and entitled, “Talking Frankly.” Until early 2016, this interview was available only on DVD. It was posted on YouTube in March 2016. It can also be watched here:
I first became aware of David Irving about 1992 during the period (1988 – 1995) when he acquired the reputation of being a “notorious Holocaust Denier.” The David Irving of that time was an inspiring figure. He espoused the idealism of pursuing truth rather than profit. He was a fearless iconoclast. The fact that he was already a celebrity historian (for example having been discussed in Kurt Vonnegut’sSlaughterhouse Five as the author of the book about Dresden, and having appeared on Leonard Nimoy’sIn Search Of as an expert on Eva Braun) made his stand for the cause of Holocaust Revisionism all the more impressive. This was a man who had status and something to lose, who was nonetheless championing the most controversial of truths. The persona that David Irving projected in that period resonated with my own ideals and encouraged me to live up to them.
After his testimony for Ernst Zündel in 1988, David Irving seemed to be an intellectual hero in full self-actualization. He said in a 1988 speech that he knew that he had “joined the ranks of the damned” and that the next five to ten years would be difficult, but that he would persevere. David Irving’s stand for Holocaust Revisionism seemed to be an expression of his long-evident character as the historian who intended to correct the omissions and distortions of victors’ history. Holocaust Revisionism seemed to be consistent with the essence of David Irving, the logical next stage in the evolution of the heroic historian.
But in retrospect, with greater knowledge, one can see that David Irving’s truth-advocacy was never entirely free of hesitation. While David Irving seemed to be an uncompromising truthteller, one can just barely discern the influence of calculated self-interest and the moistened finger in the breeze, even in his most outspokenly controversial period. The seed of retreat was always there.
For example, in that 1988 speech, wherein David Irving proclaims that he is now an “unbeliever” in the Auschwitz gas-chamber story, and that the whole gas-chamber story is likely false, he balks at blaming Jews for the lie. Instead, he claims that British psychological warfare put out the gas-chamber story “quite cold-bloodedly” — although documents of the British government (visible on Irving’s own site) indicated that the British psychological warfare executive was repeating a story that came to them from Jews. I assume that David Irving unearthed all of his documents relating to this matter at about the same time, whence it follows that David Irving knew, when he said in 1988 that the British had invented the gas-chamber story, that it really came from Jews.
All of this points to a fear of the Jews that was never entirely overcome. Jewish power is, after all, a serious matter for a commercial author who depends on the Jewish-dominated publishing industry for his livelihood.
It seems that David Irving believed that he could minimize conflict with Jews by minimizing Jewish responsibility for the Holocaust-lie. During that 1988 speech, as Irving explains how Jews themselves are supposed victims of the lie, a man in the audience blurts out, “You’re very generous!” In 1988 David Irving was indeed generous in his assessment of the role of Jews in promoting the Holocaust, but that generosity did not save him from Jewish odium and organized Jewish harassment.
In 1996, when Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich appeared, it became clear that David Irving was in retreat, and trying to appease his enemies by writing a book that slammed a leading figure in Hitler’s Germany while showing sympathy toward Jews.
I heard a prominent Holocaust Revisionist at that time remark (privately) that David Irving had been accustomed to living the high life as a famous historian who drove a Rolls Royce, and, contrary to his professed idealism and professed willingness to sacrifice in pursuit of truth, David Irving had embraced Holocaust Revisionism with the expectation that it would be the next big thing in modern historiography, and that he would benefit from having gotten into it early – not realizing how adversely the Jewish backlash would affect his lifestyle and interfere with his career.
In other words, David Irving was never as idealistic as he professed to be. However impressive, however convincing and inspiring he seemed in the period from 1988 to 1995, David Irving was more heroic tenor than hero. This is clearer than ever today.
During the failed libel-suit against Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books in 2000, Irving complained extensively about the pecuniary loss that he had suffered as a result of Jewish propaganda against him as a “Holocaust Denier.” With that suit he was trying to escape the label “Holocaust Denier,” and in 2016 he seems to be still trying.
These days, David Irving actually promotes the proposition that there really was some kind of Holocaust, and, although he has not retracted his endorsement of the Leuchter Report (which he himself republished in 1989), on the whole he is not only trying to distance himself from Holocaust Revisionism but indeed working against it.
Most of “Talking Frankly” is autobiographic, but in the final segment David Irving presents a revised version of the Holocaust that salvages as much of the genocide-accusation that can be salvaged without contradicting the Leuchter Report. There are three main elements here. The order in which he presents them reflects their importance in retreating from the quasi-heroic stand that he took in 1988. First he makes a partial retreat from his position on Auschwitz; then he asserts that many Jews were killed in the Operation Reinhardt camps; finally, he plays up an alleged mass-shooting of Jews that is supposed to have happened in 1941.
There are eight or nine documents to which Irving refers in his discussion of the Operation Reinhardt camps:
an alleged letter from Heinrich Himmler ordering the demolition of Treblinka and the establishment of a farm on the site (putatively to disguise what had been happening there);
Himmler’s letter to Heinrich Müller about “Jews dying like flies”;
Himmler’s letter to Ernst-Robert Grawitz about the low rate of cancer-mortality in the camps;
two inventories of confiscated valuables from 1942 and 1943;
the Hoefle telegram;
the Korherr Report;
a letter from Himmler to Korherr instructing him on how to word the executive summary of the Korherr Report for Hitler;
alleged memoirs of Adolf Eichmann.
[Hadding then critiques & dismisses Irving’s claims about these documents point by point – ed.]
What to say about David Irving?
…the more I checked his claims, the more I realized that any claim made by David Irving must be checked, because with incredible frequency he distorts the meanings of documents and invents episodes as needed to serve his ultimate purpose of creating an interesting story full of paradox, intrigue, and suspense – and lately, of escaping the label “Holocaust Denier.”
I do not dislike David Irving. I have to say that David Irving is an entertaining storyteller, and he has produced some interesting nuggets of information (some of which might even be true). As an expert on documents, he is awesome. He speaks in a compelling manner. But at this point I do not trust the man’s interpretations of anything. To the extent that what he says about the Holocaust in “Talking Frankly” may be presumed to represent his normal level of historical veracity, I would not rely on David Irving as a source of “real history.” He may not really be worse than mainstream historians, but he is far from being the heroic truthteller that he likes to portray, which I used to think he was.