“You are witnessing a controlled demolition of this country.”
– John B. Wells
Caravan to Midnight, 7/9/14
Transcribed by me
Category: The End of America? Page 7 of 14
World Affairs Brief, June 27, 2014 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)
This Week’s Analysis:
Iraq: Hyping a New War on Terror
Hong Kong Liberty is Illusory
Meanwhile US still permissive with China
More Hype about Imminent UN Gun Confiscation
North Korea Slowly Re-connecting with Russia
India Next H-Bomb Power?
New Trend in SWAT?
Ukraine: Putin’s Choreographed Plan
US Support of Egypt’s President Sisi is Premature
US has no more Minuteman Mirv’d Warheads
Preparedness Tip: Developing Mental Toughness
[…]
US HAS NO MORE MINUTEMAN MIRVED WARHEADS
Despite Russia backing out of this treaty and forging ahead with new missiles with multiple warheads (a technology Nixon and Kissinger sold to Russia), the US just finished removing all of the triple MIRVED warheads on all US Minuteman ICBMs:
The Minuteman ICBMs were previously configured to carry up to THREE multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicles, (MIRV), that were each armed with a nuclear warhead and able to hit THREE separate targets from a single missile launch.
On June 16, maintainers at Malmstrom removed the LAST of the extra MIRVs on a Minuteman Missile in the 341st Missile Wing’s inventory. The 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, a U.S. national security strategy document, dictated [unilaterally, I might add] that all Minuteman III missiles be reconfigured to carry only one MIRV with ONE warhead.
Anyone who still thinks that the US intends to defend America with its arsenal of nuclear weapons is just kidding themselves.
Related:
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
Skousen: Analysis of Strategic Threats in the Current Decade
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
“War is coming. I think the average American finds it difficult to believe that the same sort of devastating war that we’re seeing that is destroying Syria, which is 3-4,000 years old. Look at the pictures of those cities over in Syria, which are being destroyed today. Remember, of course that your government is financing the Islamic terrorists that are killing the Christians, certainly, raping the Christian women, killing the little Christian children.
They’ve killed over 162,000 Syrian civilians. And does anybody in America really care? Well, I do. And I hope many of our listeners do.
And I hope that you understand that God is just, and certainly His justice will not sleep forever. I think He’s going to bring judgment on America — not because what our good people are doing. It’s just because they’re so busy having the good life. They’re not involved in what’s going on.
And of course, they’ve changed the music. They’ve changed the message of our Christian churches.
And the Christian churches, rather than taking a stand against these terrible things that are happening, and the terrible atrocities that we are funding throughout the world, where they’re killing civilians. We’re funding it with our tax money. Why, of course, the church is silent, absolutely silent.
– Dr. Stanley Monteith on Radio Liberty, 6/5/14 hour 2
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske
Audio Here:
Dr. Stanley Monteith’s Radio Liberty Audio Archives
| Date: 06-05-14 | |
| Hour: 1 | |
| 3:00: Bradlee Dean – | |
 |
|
| Hour: 2 | |
| 4:00: Joel Skousen – World Affairs Brief | |
|
|
| Hour: 3 | |
| 8:00: Barry Chamish – Israel | |
|
|
|
| Hour: 4 | |
| 9:00: Cheryl Hancock – Update From Israel | |
|
|
|
Related:
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
Skousen: Analysis of Strategic Threats in the Current Decade
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ0GLr3aOSs]China building second Aircraft carrier
Published on Jan 19, 2014
China building second Aircraft carrier
For more Latest and Breaking News Headlines
SUBSCRIBE to https://www.youtube.com/user/ZakWorld…
China is building its second aircraft carrier, which is expected to take six years, and the country aims to have at least four such ships, Chinese and Hong Kong media reports said on Sunday.
After two decades of double-digit increases in the military budget, China’s admirals plan to develop a full blue-water navy B capable of defending growing economic interests as well as disputed territory in the South and East China Seas.
The country’s first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning – a Soviet-era ship bought from Ukraine in 1998 and re-fitted in a Chinese shipyard – has long been a symbol of China’s naval build-up.
Successfully operating the 60,000-tonne Liaoning is the first step in what state media and some military experts believe will be the deployment of locally built carriers by 2020.
In comments carried on Chinese news websites, Wang Min, the Communist Party boss of the northeastern province of Liaoning, where the first carrier is based, said the second carrier was being built in the port city of Dalian.
Its construction would take about six years, and in future China would have a fleet of at least four carriers, Wang told members of the province’s legislature on Saturday, the reports added.
Dalian is the port where the existing carrier was re-fitted for use by the Chinese navy.
Some of the reports about the new carrier were apparently latter removed from the Internet, as links to the stories did not work.
Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post, citing unnamed military sources, said the reports may have been removed either because the government wanted the construction to be low profile or because Wang did not have the authority for such an announcement.
The Defence Ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
The Liaoning successfully executed more than 100 tests, including those of its combat systems, during drills in the disputed South China Sea last month.
The exercises off the coast of Hainan Island marked not only the first time China had sent a carrier into the South China Sea but the first time it had manoeuvred with the kind of strike group of escort ships U.S. carriers deploy, according to regional military officers and analysts.
Related:
(audio) Joel Skousen: Timing of the Russia/China invasion of U.S.A. — Full readiness in 6-8 years!
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
I’ve been listening to Stan Deyo since the ’90s, and I like him a lot! Here Stan brings out a very important point that few are. The globalists are mostly foreign. Perhaps we focus too much on the globalists within our borders.
– –
“I think at the moment, that the United States is a pain in the backside of the New World Order. A lot of the elitists are not in the United States and are elsewhere, as you know. And they need to take us out as a military power, whether we would do what they want or not. They need to weaken us to the point that the United States won’t interfere with middle-east operations, and operations in Australia and other countries that the elitists want to do.
They want to take us down to remove us as a threat. Russia and China know that our military guys could probably break with the Pentagon, or with the White House, anyway, and make counterattacks in the event of a nuclear war starting. So they have to neutralize our military and our will to fight. …
They’ve pushed every button from the White House. They’ve pushed every button they could to bring America into civil disorder and to collapse the economy here. I don’t think they’ve left anything undone or unplanned to tear this country apart.”
– Stan Deyo
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske from:
Related:
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
Skousen: Analysis of Strategic Threats in the Current Decade
“You bring a passion to these subjects that nobody else does. I can’t do it…. You deliver a wake-up call better than anybody else.”
“…there may be no return.”
“If we don’t come before God, pure….”
“This is judgment. What we’re experiencing now is judgement for our sins, for us, for our own sins.”
“Join me in repenting….”
“The church, today, out there is so corrupt. The theology that is spread is ridiculous. Repentance is not a one-time thing. You don’t say, ‘I accept Jesus Christ in to my heart,’ and that changes you forever. Repentance is a constant thing you need to do….
– Joseph Farah
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K16oPa4BelY]Establishment Fighting Liberty To Control The Narrative
Published on Apr 28, 2014
Joseph Farah, journalist and editor-in-chief of World Net Daily, joins Alex in studio to discuss these topics and more. Alex also takes your calls to hear your take as well.
http://www.wnd.com
Related:
World Affairs Brief, April 11, 2014 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)
THIS WEEK’S ANALYSIS:
Will Putin Invade Eastern Ukraine?
US Keeps Disarming in the Face of Russian Aggression
NSA Exploitation of Internet Security
Nevada Cattle Rancher’s Standoff with the Feds
Bad Cops Keep Getting Judicial Support
Bad Analysis on the Yuan as New Reserve Currency
Preparedness Tip: First Aid
[…]
US CONTINUES DISARMING IN THE FACE OF RUSSIAN AGGRESSION
The Defense Department just announced its intent to remove 50 additional Minuteman missiles from their silos at 3 bases. They claim the empty silos will remain in warm status, meaning that they can be reloaded if needed. However, the US isn’t building any more missiles and they will be using up these missiles in tests over time. Their storage locations will be known to the Russians and thus can easily be destroyed if they still exist when war comes.
The Wall Street Journal reported on the fact that our government has finally acknowledged that the Russians violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which bans the testing, production and possession of nuclear missiles with a range between 310 and 3,400 miles:
Russia has tested at least three missiles—the R-500 cruise missile, the RS-26 ballistic missile and the Iskander-M semi-ballistic missile—that run afoul of the proscribed range limits.
But, rather than use this as an excuse to stop further US compliance with treaties, the US continues to disarm unilaterally. As I reported earlier in the WAB, “Russia has increased its counted deployed strategic nuclear forces over the past six months, while at the same time America’s stockpile of warheads and launchers has declined.”
As the WSJ further reports, Obama has dismissed Russia as a regional power, and he is maneuvering the US closer to a position of absolute nuclear inferiority to Russia.
Russia has seized Crimea and has 50,000 troops as a potential invasion force on the border with eastern Ukraine. The Kremlin is also abrogating the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, in which Kiev agreed to give up its nuclear arsenal—at the time the third largest in the world—in exchange for guarantees of its territorial integrity from Russia, the U.S. and U.K. That memorandum has now proved to be as much of a scrap of paper to the Kremlin as Belgium’s neutrality was to Berlin in the summer of 1914.
The Kremlin is also violating the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which bans the testing, production and possession of nuclear missiles with a range between 310 and 3,400 miles. Russia has tested at least three missiles—the R-500 cruise missile, the RS-26 ballistic missile and the Iskander-M semi-ballistic missile—that run afoul of the proscribed range limits.
The Obama Administration has suspected for years that Vladimir Putin was violating the INF Treaty, which supporters hail as the triumph of arms control. The Russians were boasting of their new missile capabilities in open-source literature as far back as 2007. Yet as defense analysts Keith Payne and Mark Schneider noted in these pages in February, “since 2009, the current administration’s unclassified arms-control compliance reports to Congress have been mum on the Russian INF Treaty noncompliance.”
At a minimum, Congress should call on Rose Gottemoeller, confirmed last month as under secretary of state for arms control over strenuous objections from Florida Senator Marco Rubio, to explain what the Administration knew, and what it disclosed, about Moscow’s INF violations when she negotiated New Start. [The US has always refused to publicize or acknowledge Russian treaty violations].
Ms. Gottemoeller has been publicly noncommittal on this point, perhaps because she knew New Start would never have won a two-thirds Senate majority if Russia’s INF cheating had been widely known. The episode reminds us of why people like former Arizona Senator Jon Kyl were right to oppose the ratification of New Start.
Mr. Obama has dismissed Russia as a regional power, but he is maneuvering the U.S. closer to a position of absolute nuclear inferiority to Russia. The imbalance becomes even worse when one counts tactical nuclear weapons, where Russia has a four-to-one numerical advantage over the U.S.
To the surprise of defense analysts, the Pentagon will make the sharpest cuts in the submarine and bomber legs of the nuclear triad, while mostly preserving the silo-based Minuteman ICBMs. This means that the U.S. will maintain a stationary, and vulnerable, nuclear force on the ground while largely dismantling what remains of our second-strike capability at sea and in the air. A crucial part of deterrence is convincing an adversary that you can survive a first strike. It does not help U.S. security to dismantle the most survivable part of the U.S. arsenal.
This is even more pernicious when you factor in PDD-60, the 1997 Presidential Decision Directive directing our missile forces to “not rely on launch on warning” but to prepare to retaliate after absorbing a nuclear first strike. That dumb nuclear doctrine is still in force, and has never been repealed, even by that nominal Republican president, George W. Bush.
That first strike would wipe out all of our silos if they were not allowed to launch on warning—and though our Missileers still believe they are going to get the order to launch on warning, I’m betting that order will never come. Without the command codes from the White House, they can’t launch. By cutting the rest of our strategic nuclear triad, we make sure the impact of that first strike cannot be recovered from. And don’t forget that in 1998 Clinton agreed to keep 50% of our missile subs in port to make sure they were more vulnerable—to assure Russia that we posed no threat to it. The WSJ concludes:
It’s fashionable in the West to dismiss this as “Cold War thinking,” but it appears that Vladimir Putin hasn’t given up on such thinking or he wouldn’t be investing in new nuclear delivery systems.
Cold War or no, recent events are providing daily reminders that the great-power rivalries of previous centuries are far from over. They have also offered the grim lesson that nations that forsake their nuclear deterrent, as Ukraine did, do so at considerable peril. After the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979 the Senate refused to ratify Jimmy Carter’s SALT II Treaty. Any serious response to Russia’s aggression in Ukraine should include a formal and public U.S. demarche about Russian cheating on the INF treaty, while promising to withdraw from New Start if the cheating continues.
Nuclear arsenals aside, the timing of Mr. Obama’s nuclear dismantling couldn’t be worse as Mr. Putin contemplates his next moves in Ukraine and sizes up a possible Western response.
Related:
(audio) Joel Skousen: Timing of the Russia/China invasion of U.S.A. — Full readiness in 6-8 years!
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
“I really believe that there are people working behind the scenes who are setting us up for this terrible, terrible conflict that’s coming. And I think behind that there are powerful, spiritual forces.
And I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and His justice is not going to sleep forever.”
—Dr. Stanley Monteith
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske
Related:
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
The WW3 Prophecies (includes prophecies by others)
RED DAWN: ASIAN MILITARY INVASION OF USA? (prophecies by many others)
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
Skousen: Analysis of Strategic Threats in the Current Decade
12 Reasons NOT To Expect a PRE-Trib Rapture
‘Let Us Be ONE’ Prophecy Continues 10/8/08: “It’s TOO LATE to REVERSE what’s been done for MY MEN have been REJECTED … Now is the Time to OVERCOME and GET RIGHT With ALL … FREEeeeeeeeeeeeee———DOM at last … Your HEART will SWELL with LOVE and it will be EASY to REMAIN In Me when others are On The BOAT With You”
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
“Welcome to the Satanic Cult Awards, ladies and gentlemen! All hail the Dark Lord!”
—Conan O’Brien
* * *
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWgxkUGUJoc]Conan O’Brien “Welcome to the Satanic Cult Awards” at MTV Movie Awards Illuminati Analysis
Published on Apr 13, 2014
“I sense that we are reaching end-game.”
– John B. Wells
Caravan to Midnight, 3/26/14
“Look at the world today.
There are no political solutions to spiritual problems… ”
– Steve Quayle
(source)
Or quoted elsewhere:
“There is no political solution to a spiritual problem.”
* * *
Related:
Has anyone noticed that RUSSIA WON the 2014 Olympics, with USA coming in FOURTH?
Expert: China Preparing to Target U.S. Aircraft Carriers
“Mutually Assured Destruction” guiding hypersonic missile policy in Washington & Beijing
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
January 20, 2014
China’s new hypersonic missile vehicle is primarily designed to target U.S. aircraft carriers, military expert Chen Hu told the state-run China Central Television (CCTV) in yet another admission of Beijing’s increasingly hostile geopolitical posturing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWQehbdUTLM
The WU-14, a hypersonic glide vehicle which can penetrate missile defense systems by traveling at up to ten times the speed of sound, underwent its first test flight earlier this month.
Despite assurances by China’s defense ministry that the new vehicle was not aimed at any particular country, Chinese military expert Chen Hu told state media that the system, “can surely be used against US carriers in any region around the globe” and that it was “designed to strike large military targets including US aircraft carriers.”
Noting that the development of the vehicle was necessary in order to maintain the balance of power in East Asia, Chen said that its purpose is to prevent the United States from using its hypersonic weapons against China, adding that the Cold War-era doctrine of “mutually assured destruction” is guiding policy both in Washington and Beijing.
Last year, China reportedly sunk a mock U.S. aircraft carrier utilizing the DF-21D anti-ship missile, dubbed the “carrier killer,” during a wargame which took place in the Gobi Desert.
Bellicose rhetoric directed at the United States by China has intensified in recent months in light of heightened tensions over the disputed Senkaku Islands.
Last month, Beijing bragged that its first aircraft carrier combat task force, led by the inaugural Liaoning warship, matched anything the United States had to offer.
A lengthy editorial which appeared in Chinese state media last month explained how the Chinese military’s current reformation process was part of a move by President Xi Jinping to prepare the People’s Liberation Army for war in response to US aggression in the Asia Pacific, developments which have prompted “major changes” in China’s national security situation.
Beijing has also pontificated about China’s ability to attack US military bases in the Western Pacific, as well as releasing a map showing the locations of major U.S. cities and how they would be impacted by a nuclear strike launched from the PLA’s strategic submarine force.
Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
Related Articles
Related World Affairs Brief text:
Audio From:
Dr. Stanley Monteith’s Radio Liberty Audio Archives
Joel talks timing at minute-26
| Date: 01-02-14 | |
| Hour: 1 | |
| 3:00: Richard Gage AIA – Architects & Engineers For Truth 9/11 | |
|
|
| Hour: 2 | |
| 4:00: Joel Skousen – World Affairs Brief | |
|
|
| Hour: 3 | |
| 8:00: Open Lines | |
|
|
|
| Hour: 4 | |
| 9:00: Patrick Wood – Current Events | |
|
|
|
Related:
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
Joel Skousen estimates China still has 8-10 years before their above water fleet will be big enough to attack US, as many Christians have envisioned (links follow article) — God warning US.
Looks like China is making big progress — while our globalist owned and controlled media is intentionally silent — setting US up — while they’ll be in their bunkers or in foreign countries, intending to rule after the fallout….
The globalists at the top are Satanists, carrying out their master’s bidding over generations — the one-world government prophesied in the Bible.
jeff
– –
From: Infowars
Our Warships Rival U.S. Navy, Brags Chinese PLA
Beijing’s jingoistic rhetoric shows no signs of abating
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
December 5, 2013
Amidst tensions with the United States over the disputed Senkaku Islands, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is bragging that its aircraft carrier combat task force, led by the inaugural Liaoning warship, is now close to rivaling the U.S. Navy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Blz99aZ5tas
The article features on the China Military Online website, which is described [correct link – editor] as “the only authoritative media of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army,” acting with the “official authorization of the related departments of the state and the PLA.”
The report heralds the prowess of the Liaoning, along with its accompanying battleships, the “Shenyang” and “Shijiazhuang” missile destroyers as well as the “Yantai” and “Weifang” guided missile frigates.
The “combat effectiveness” of the fleet, once additional warships are added, will transform its firepower to a level, “very close to a U.S. aircraft carrier battle group in its heyday,” states the report. Beijing plans to rival “the usual practice adopted by the U.S. Navy” by supplementing the combat force with a further two destroyers, an assault nuclear submarine and one supply ship.
“Given the consideration of the smaller tonnage and bomb load of the warships of the PLAN than those of the U.S. warships, the combat effectiveness of this taskforce is probably close to the current carrier strike group (CSG) of the U.S. (1-2 cruisers, 2-3 destroyers and other supporting warships),” states the report.
Some will see no coincidence in the timing of the report given the current stand-off between China and the U.S. over the disputed Senkaku Islands. It dovetails with a separate announcement that Beijing, “has begun mass producing and delivering its J-15 carrier-based multirole fighter jet.”
Following China’s announcement that it would impose an “air defense zone” over the region, backed by not so subtle hints that offending aircraft which refused to identify could be intercepted and even shot down, Washington called Beijing’s bluff by flying two unannounced B-52 bombers through the area just days later.
However, the Obama administration has since indicated it may accept the legitimacy of the air defense zone for now so long as China back pedals on its demand that all aircraft check in first.
The PLA’s public heralding of its warships arrives in the aftermath of a separate report to emerge out of Chinese state media which asserted that military experts were discussing how to turn the moon into a Star Wars-style “death star” from which the PLA could launch missiles against any target on Earth.
Last month, Chinese state-run media also released a map showing the locations of major U.S. cities and how they would be impacted by a nuclear attack launched from the PLA’s strategic submarine force.
China increasingly jingoistic rhetoric has been backed by aggressive military moves in recent months, first by sending warships to the coast of Syria to in September to “observe” the actions of U.S. and Russian vessels in the region and then by sailing a surveillance ship through Hawaiian waters for the very first time in an unprecedented move which was described as a provocative retaliation to the America’s naval presence in the East China Sea.
Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
Related:
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Alaskan Dreams of China Nuking US — “Even Alaska went under!”
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
The man who is fixing my computer, Anchorage computer tech, Joe Lenox told me about his recent dream of the U.S., including Alaska getting nuked by China. He wrote it down, and is allowing me to post it. Thanks, Joe!
The China/Russia invasion of the U.S. has been prophesied by Dumitru Duduman, Henry Gruver, others, and now Joe. And Joel Skousen has analyzed it from a geopolitical perspective, giving us about 8-10 years before China will have its above water fleet ready. Articles linked below.
Joe writes:
Date: November 28th 2013 @ around 0400 hrs
I went to sleep normally, without even thinking about wars, WWIII, or anything else for that matter.
At around the time mentioned above, I woke up from a disturbing dream. The dream was so vivid, it became “Lucid” meaning, I became aware that I was in a dream state.
I’ve witnessed at least 40% of United States blown up by a Nuclear Bomb from China. I couldn’t determine the time and date, but what I saw was so vivid; it was inconceivable for me to comprehend; even Alaska went under.
Related:
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
The globalists are intentionally setting US up to get nuked, which Dumitru Duduman and others have prophesied will happen — links below. Joel Skousen thinks we still have 8-10 years, because China’s above water navy needs further development. It will be a joint Russia/China attack. The globalist-owned mainstream media is intentionally as silent as these submarines.
– –
From: The Truth Wins
New Russian Submarines Are So Silent That The U.S. Navy Calls Them “Black Holes”
By Michael Snyder, on December 1st, 2013
Did you know that Russia is building submarines that are so quiet that the U.S. military cannot detect them? These “black hole” submarines can freely approach the coastlines of the United States without fear of being detected whenever they want. In fact, a “nuclear-powered attack submarine armed with long-range cruise missiles” sailed around in the Gulf of Mexico for several weeks without being detected back in 2012. And now Russia is launching a new class of subs that have “advanced stealth technology”. The U.S. Navy openly acknowledges that they cannot track these subs when they are submerged. That means that the Russians are able to sail right up to our coastlines and launch nukes whenever they want. But instead of trying to find a way to counteract this potential threat, the Obama administration has been working very hard to dismantle the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal. In the end, we could potentially pay a great price for this utter foolishness.
A recent RT article discussed these new super silent “black hole” submarines. To say that they are impressive would be a massive understatement…
Russia has launched its new state-of-the-art Novorossiysk submarine, which set sail from a St Petersburg shipyard to become the first of six diesel-electric stealth subs delivered to the Russian Black Sea fleet in the next two years.
The Novorossiysk belongs to the Varshavyanka-class (Project 636), which is characterized by advanced stealth technology, making it virtually undetectable when submerged.
“Our potential opponents call it the ‘Black Hole’ due to the very low noise emission and visibility of the submarine,”Konstantin Tabachny, captain of the Novorossiysk, told Channel One TV. “To be undetectable is the main quality for a submarine. And this whole project really fits its purpose.”
Of course Russia has been building “near silent” submarines for quite some time. In fact, their nuclear submarines are already far quieter than anything the U.S. currently has…
Russia recently launched its near silent nuclear submarine following several years of development.
The Borey Class submarine, dubbed Vladimir Monomakh, has a next generation nuclear reactor, can dive deeper than 1,200 feet, and carries up to 20 nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM).Each of these “Bulava” ICBM’s can carry ten detachableMIRV warheads, what they call “re-entry vehicles,” capable of delivering 150 kiloton yields per warhead
And as I mentioned above, these submarines have the ability to approach the coastlines of the United States without the U.S. military ever even knowing that they were there.
In addition, Russia has been working feverishly to upgrade other elements of their strategic arsenal as well. For example, it was recently announced that Russia will soon begin work on a new strategic bomber…
Russia will begin the full-scale R&D work on its future strategic bomber in 2014, a senior aircraft-manufacturing industry official said Thursday.
The project, known as PAK-DA (an acronym meaning “future long-range aircraft”), has been in the works for several years but was given the formal go-ahead by the Russian leadership last year.
The Russians are also working very hard to modernize their nuclear forces…
[…]
Sadly, most Americans have no idea that any of this is going on.
Most Americans just assume that “the Cold War is over” and that Russia will never be a threat to us ever again.
If only that was actually true.
Today, Russia is stronger both economically and militarily than it has ever been before.
And as you just read about, Russia is rapidly preparing for a potential future conflict with the United States.
If the Cold War truly is over, then why does Russia have more spies inside the U.S. today than it did at any point during the Cold War?
The American people need to wake up.
As all of this has been going on, Barack Obama has been working relentlessly to dismantle the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal. The following is an excerpt from one of my previous articles…
—–
Back in 1967, the U.S. military had more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads.
Since that time, the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal has been reduced by about 95 percent.
Related:
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7O8RukKEsU]Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America
Published on Nov 10, 2013
Alex is joined by Joel Skousen to discuss the plans of China to have boots on American soil within days and the dangers of China’s large investment in the United States.
http://www.joelskousen.com/
Strategic Relocation Documentary Film
http://www.infowarsshop.com/Strategic… Your Price $19.95
Related:
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
(video) Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
World Affairs Brief, October 4, 2013 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World. Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)
This Week’s Analysis:
Selective Government Shutdown: The Political Agenda
Obamacare Exchanges Open Doors
Armed Services Turn Hostile to Those Opposed to Gays
Assessing China’s Long-Term Threat
Kenyan Mall Massacre—A Blackout of Information
[…]
ASSESSING CHINA’S LONG-TERM THREAT
Every week new information surfaces about China’s massive military building program. This week wired.com wrote about China’s new fleet of small, triple-hull, low-radar-profile attack vessels that are designed to act in swarms against larger naval foes. The US has been working on a small, fast warship much longer but with little to show for it:
In just seven years, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy has built 83 of the 400-ton Type 022s at an estimated cost of $40 million per ship. And production continues at a high rate in several shipyards. The U.S. Navy, by comparison, has finished just two LCS [Littoral Combat Ship] in the same span of time, each at a cost of more than $600 million.
While bigger US ships might outgun even half of the Chinese vessels, an 80 to 2 advantage in quantity can take its toll on American technical superiority. As wired said in another article, the Chinese weapons strategy focuses on numbers:
But Beijing has a brutally simple — if risky — plan to compensate for this relative weakness: buy missiles. And then, buy more of them. All kinds of missiles: short-range and long-range; land-based, air-launched and sea-launched; ballistic and cruise; both guided and “dumb.” [and put them on small fast ships like they are building]
Fortunately, quite a few analysts in the private sector are taking a good hard look at the future Chinese nuclear threat and even starting to watch for World War III. Breakingdefense.com published an article this week that jumped right into the whole topic. Here are excerpts with my comments and corrections:
Because China believes it is much weaker than the United States, they are more likely to launch a massive preemptive strike in a crisis. [It has nothing to do with weakness, which China clearly is intent on overcoming. It has everything to do with the strategy of deception and surprise attack.] Here’s the other bad news: The current US concept for high-tech warfare, known as Air-Sea Battle, might escalate the conflict even further towards a “limited” nuclear war, says one of the top American experts on the Chinese military. [The escalation will happen very fast once it starts. If I’m right about North Korea being preserved by the West from regime change to serve as the trigger for WWIII, in any initial attack on South Korea by the North, the US will be “forced” to use tactical nuclear weapons to stop NK’s overwhelming forces in the peninsula. This will provide China with the excuse to initiate their pre-emptive nuclear strike on America—blaming the USA for “first use.”]
China analyst Larry Wortzel said at the Institute of World Politics: “The People’s Liberation Army still sees themselves as an inferior force to the American military, and that’s who they think their most likely enemy is.” That’s fine as long as it deters China from attacking its neighbors. But if deterrence fails, the Chinese are likely to go big or go home. [Go Home isn’t an option for the Chinese]. “What they do is very heavily built on preemption,” Wortzel said.
Wortzel argued that… “China’s dependent on these ballistic missiles and anti-ship missiles and satellite links,” he said. Since those are almost all land-based, any attack on them “involves striking the Chinese mainland, which is pretty escalatory.” [Wortzel is too hung up on the concept of escalation—thinking that the war will rise gradually in intensity, as have past wars. But, he’s wrong. He fails to understand that both the Russians and Chinese intend to execute a huge nuclear first strike so as to eliminate our retaliatory potential.]
“You don’t know how they’re going to react,” he said. “They do have nuclear missiles. They actually think we’re more allergic to nuclear missiles landing on our soil than they are on their soil. They think they can withstand a limited nuclear attack, or even a big nuclear attack, and retaliate.” [And, they can–because they are preparing huge underground shelters. In the US, only our leaders are preparing huge shelters. They want the public vulnerable so they can come out of our bunkers and talk us into joining a militarized NWO to prosecute the war.]
So how would China’s preemptive attack unfold? First would come weeks of escalating rhetoric and cyberattacks. There’s no evidence the Chinese favor a “bolt out of the blue” without giving the adversary what they believe is a chance to back down. [This is frankly very naive, and based on wishful thinking. The Chinese are ruthless in their strategic thinking and won’t give much warning]
When the blow does fall, the experts believe it would be sudden [but notice what Wortzel says the “sudden” attack applies to:]. Stuxnet-style viruses, electronic jamming, and Israeli-designed Harpy radar-seeking cruise missiles (similar to the American HARM but slower and longer-ranged) would try to blind every land-based and shipborne radar. Long-range anti-aircraft missiles like the Russian-built S-300 would go for every plane currently in the air within 125 miles of China’s coast, a radius that covers all of Taiwan and some of Japan. Salvos of ballistic missiles would strike every airfield within 1,250 miles. That’s enough range to hit the four US airbases in Japan and South Korea – which are, after all, static targets you can look up on Google Maps – to destroy aircraft on the ground, crater the runways, and scatter the airfield with unexploded cluster bomblets to defeat repair attempts. Long-range cruise missiles launched from shore, ships, and submarines then go after naval vessels. And if the Chinese get really good and really lucky, they just might get a solid enough fix on a US Navy aircraft carrier to lob a precision-guided ballistic missile at it.
Wortzel is conjuring up a scenario in which the Chinese attack like we would attack—a multi-faceted strike using all forms of military power—cruise missiles, anti-ship missiles, bombers, fighters, naval power and a mix of electronic jamming warfare and cyber attacks. What he is missing is the advantage the Chinese and Russians intend to gain by using hundreds of ballistic missiles flying that are capable of taking out most of our military in a dramatic first strike!
Why they can’t see this, given the huge investment both Russia and China are making into underground protected and mobile ballistic missile systems, is worrisome. The Russians just announced another new ballistic missile system this week. US military planners have been propagandized for so long in their War College lectures, about the deterrence factor of “Mutually Assured Destruction” that they no longer seem to believe anyone is going to pull the nuclear trigger.
Think like the enemy: Even if you had similar conventional weapons at your disposal, but always slightly behind American military technology, wouldn’t you rather use the nuclear option to reduce the odds and wipe out most of those US and NATO weapons in one nuclear first strike? The reason why the Chinese and Russians are building convention weapons is for mopping up and occupation after a nuclear first strike. For the enemy, nuclear weapons are not a last resort, but the primary offensive choice.
The article spends a lot of time talking about the degree of training and sophistication it takes to run a coordinated war between Army, Naval, Air and Missile forces. They are right and the Russians and Chinese aren’t close to being able to imitate the sophistication of US and NATO coordinated attacks using a wide range of conventional weapons.
The bigger issue is ensuring the Second Artillery [what the Chinese call their ballistic missile forces] can operate relatively seamlessly with the Chinese air force and navy. So far, the three forces rarely train together in peacetime and they have no real-world combat experience fighting together. “Their military was always separated really into a ground force, a navy, and an air force, and since about ’63 a missile force, that never operated together, never,” said Wortzel. “They planned independent campaigns.”
But the Chinese are getting better, in the use of joint command structures in disaster relief operations and, most notably, with their “Vanguard 2009” exercises in the Jinan Military District, Dean Cheng notes. It’s well worth noting that the officer who commanded both those exercises and much of the response to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, Gen. Fan Changlong, has since been promoted two ranks to become senior vice-chairman of the Central Military Commission, sort of China’s equivalent of the Joint Staff and the National Security Council rolled into one. While not conclusive, Fan’s rapid rise to such an influential position “suggests that joint operations is really important,”
Cheng declined to guess how good the Chinese had gotten at coordinating all their armed services in joint operations. “Is it a shortfall? Probably, but it’s a lot less of a shortfall than in 1999,” he said.
Others ask why the Chinese are building aircraft carriers even while planners in the West are wondering if carriers are sitting ducks in the next world war. I think it’s another sign that the Chinese plan on using the pre-emptive nuclear strike to take down most of the US military. Only then could their inferior carriers be useful for the inevitable occupation of the Far East from Japan down to Australia that they are planning.
Sure, the Chinese are planning on using EMP and cyber attacks to shatter the computer dependency of US military coordination—but only after the West has been softened up and perhaps beaten into submission by a massive pre-emptive nuclear strike. It’s archaic and wishing thinking that the Chinese and Russians will hold back the use of nuclear missiles as a last resort. Every major Russian war game starts with a simulated pre-emptive nuclear strike on America, followed up by conventional weapons, not the other way around.
Related:
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
Skousen: Analysis of Strategic Threats in the Current Decade
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
“It’s a magical conflict creation scenario, could have been written only by the Devil himself,
so diabolical, so long term in its vision.”
“It’s going to certify our reputation as the bully of the world.”
– Joel Skousen
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske
* * *
From Coast to Coast AM:
Joining John B. Wells, Stewart Rhodes, founder and President of Oath Keepers, argued that there’s a relentless campaign going on to centralize power, militarize the police, and strip power out of the hands of average citizens. …
His organization, the Oath Keepers, works with military veterans, law enforcement, and first responders to remind them of their oaths to defend the Constitution, and not “just follow orders” that go against the people. Their mission also includes training these veterans and officers to become community leaders, to be able to step in during a crisis….
The real war going on is the elites versus the free people of the world, whom they seek to usher into a police state, Rhodes stated. The American people have to get back to their independence, starting with self-sufficiency and food reserves, yet the survivalist approach of working in isolation isn’t going to work, he commented. We have to think in terms of community, he said, such as a local VFW forming its own battalion.
Syria & Geopolitics
First hour guest, political scientist Joel Skousen provided insights on world affairs such as the situation in Syria. He doubted that Assad was behind the chemical attacks on Syrian civilians. The US and Israel have been looking for a way to justify an attack on Iran, and they hope by attacking Syria, Iran may support Assad with a retaliation, which would open the door for a war with them, Skousen posited. The US wants to target Iran not only to curtail their nuclear weapons development but to cut them off as an oil supplier to China, he continued, adding that he foresees an eventual war between the US and Russia & China.
* * *
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B04L7dadmtk]Coast To Coast AM – Sept 08 2013 – Defending the Constitution – C2CAM, Radio, Disclosure Radio,
Published on Sep 9, 2013
Coast to Coast AM:Date:Sept 08 2013
Coast to Coast AM:Host:John B. Wells
Coast to Coast AM:This Week Guests:Stewart Rhodes, Joel Skousen
Coast to Coast AM:Topic:Defending the Constitution
Coast To Coast AM / C2CAM Radio Broadcast on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…
Related:
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
Skousen: Analysis of Strategic Threats in the Current Decade
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
I just wrote this on my Facebook page:
I’ve probably listened to this 3 or 4 times, and watched some of it too — partly to put together some of G. Edward’s thoughts for my post at ToBeFree, but also because I find Edward profound, and he’s such a great speaker and good guy! I have a lot of respect for him. He has been researching this for 50 years!
Edward doesn’t mention DIETRICH BONHOEFFER specifically, but he talks about the plot to kill Hitler at the very end of this broadcast [which seems to abruptly cut off, but more wasn’t actually said. I checked with the original].
I have always been impressed with Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s focus on the Sermon of the Mount, and his refusal to go along with Hitler when most of the pastors succumbed, but I’ve wondered if God really did lead him to try to kill Hitler. I think G. Edward is right. I don’t think it would have done any good had his group succeeded, and my guess is that the Holy Spirit didn’t actually lead Dietrich to attempt to assassinate Hitler, which ended with Bonhoeffer getting caught and executed.
– –
“We have to rediscover our humanity before it’s lost.”
Guns won’t work:
If Bonhoeffer had successfully killed Hitler, would someone just as bad replaced him? Himmler, for example?
“If you want to know what they will do, see what they have done when they have come to power. … See what Stalin did.”
~”Some of these people don’t think of themselves as scum. They think of themselves as intellectuals, the wise ones — because everyone else is too dumb, and they need their input.”
– Alex / Edward
* * *
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6-sM3O8x8Y]Taking America Back with G. Edward Griffin
Published on Aug 7, 2013
Alex welcomes back author and film producer G. Edward Griffin, who talks about the condition of the collectivist state. Griffin is the author of the landmark book, The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve, and producer of the documentary What in the World Are They Spraying? The Chemtrail/Geo-Engineering Coverup. http://www.freedomforceinternational….
Stay in the know – Follow Alex on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
‘Like’ Alex on FACEBOOK – https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme…
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.net/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv
Related:
[movie] Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined — Featuring G. Edward Griffin
For an alternative view, I posted: Skeptics Dismiss Theory that Francis is the Last Pope
– –
Both videos also at SidRoth.org:
Guests: Tom Horn & Cris Putnam – Part 1 of 2
Guests: Tom Horn & Cris Putnam – Part 2 of 2
* * *
PART 1[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuzCawVlGLo]The LAST POPE? – Tom Horn and Cris Putnam on It’s Supernatural
Published on Apr 1, 2013
Tom Horn and Cris Putnam unveil a 900 year-old prophecy buried in the library of the Vatican. It describes a series of 112 Popes. Now the 112th Pope has been elected. Will the prophecy concerning him come true? Is he the final Pope?
* * *
PART 2[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NtpaCIXtrk]Is Pope Francis the LAST POPE? Tom Horn & Cris Putnam give some answers
Published on Apr 14, 2013
Tom Horn and Cris Putnam investigate endtime deceptions in the form of fallen angels, human hybrids and shifting doctrines of salvation. Be aware and be prepared! – See more at:http://www.sidroth.org/site/News2?abb…
Related:
Petrus Romanus: The Final Pope Is Here [Paperback] Thomas Horn (Author), Cris D. Putnam (Author)
My Dream: The Name of the Antichrist Revealed — Joe Biden??
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
I’m doing some housekeeping today, posting some articles I’ve had on hold.
I’m actually tired of reporting on this. It’s amazing how few care about something this potentially likely and catastrophic — and so incredibly easy to fix. But we’re not… : (
– –
From: Canada Free Press
Do You Feel Lucky? The Danger of EMP
By Frank Gaffney Jr. (Bio and Archives) Monday, May 20, 2013
GMIC engenders intense bursts of electromagnetic energy. No fewer than five studies mandated by the executive or legislative branches have confirmed that such electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is lethal for the electronic devices, computers and transformers that power everything in our 21st Century society. Since these things are generally unprotected against EMP – whether naturally occurring or man-induced, they would almost certainly be damaged or destroyed. The U.S. electrical grid could, as a result, be down for many months, and probably years.
We know that this EMP-precipitated effect could also be achieved by the detonation of a nuclear weapon high over the United States. And actual or potential enemies of thiscountry – notably Russia, China, North Korea and Iran – understand our acute vulnerability in this area, and have taken steps to exploit it.
“Catastrophic” is a term often used to describe the repercussions for our country of the cascading shut-down, first of the key elements of the grid, then inexorably, all of the electricity-dependent infrastructures that make possible life as we know it in thiscountry. That would include those that enable: access to and distribution of food, water, fuel and heat; telecommunications; finance; transportation; sewage treatmentand cooling of nuclear power plants.
President Reagan’s Science Advisor, Dr. William Graham, who chaired a blue-ribbon congressional commission on the EMP threat, has calculated that within a year of the U.S. electrical grid being devastated by such a phenomenon, nine out of ten Americans would be dead.
Related:
Matthew Stein 2/16/12: When Technology Fails
My EMP Dream (10/23/08): All Cars Suddenly Stopped From Electromagnetic Pulse Weapon?
Our senators traitors? Senate dumps strategy to prevent EMP damage
Wayne Madsen: China Fired Missile Seen In Southern California
China Builds Secret Nuclear Submarine Base in South China Sea
Coincidence “Missile” Fired Off California Coast On Same Day That Chinese Sub Surprised US Carrier Group
EXCELLENT AUDIO from Radio Liberty!
Katherine Albrecht puts the Ed Snowden NSA revelations into spiritual perspective. I enthusiastically transcribed this quote:
“He very specifically told me what He has in mind for me, Katherine Albrecht — that my job is going to be to stand up and speak out, and tell the world that the Mark of the Beast, prophesied in the Book of Revelation by John is coming to pass now in our lifetime.
That all of the pieces are being built. The infrastucture is being put in place brick by brick — that it is emerging before our very eyes.
And in 1989, when I had this extraordinary spiritual experience, I founded CASPIAN, the consumer privacy organization…. I’ve been on CNN, BBC, NPR, you name it, Fox News, blah, blah, blah. I’ve been everywhere. Not because I’m some kind of an amazing public speaker [she is though – Jeff], but the Lord God Himself has said: ‘This is what I want you to talk about.’
So right now, … the veil has been pulled back from what our government is doing….”
Audio also available at GCN Live: http://archives2013.gcnlive.com/Archives2013/jun13/RadioLiberty/0612132.mp3
Audio
Dr. Stanley Monteith’s Radio Liberty Audio Archives
| Date: 06-12-13 | |
| Hour: 1 | |
| 3:00: Bob Fletcher – Current Events | |
|
|
| Hour: 2 | |
| 4:00: Dr. Katherine Albrecht – “StartPage” Is the Answer to Surveillance | |
|
|
| Hour: 3 | |
| 8:00: Open Lines | |
|
|
|
| Hour: 4 | |
| 9:00: Stephen Frank – Current Events in California | |
|
|
|
| Date: 06-11-13 | |
“They will eventually get voting rights, and that’s the kicker,
that’s the cardiac arrest of America, the coup de grâce.”
“We’re being suicided.”
“With their control of the mainstream media,
which will not allow a voice like mine not even on anymore on Fox News anymore,
because Rupert Murdoch of News Corp is right there next to Bloomberg on this….”
~William Geen
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske
* * *
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=end6EtaiC4Y]Will Rand Paul’s Amnesty Support Cost Him 2016?
Published on Jun 14, 2013
[IRS criticized for payment of $4B to illegals]
J. Russell George, the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration, has concerns with the IRS’ payment of more than $4 billion in 2010 to illegal immigrants.
The IRS’ payment of more than $4 billion in 2010 to illegal immigrants under a program allowing workers not legally in the U.S. to claim tax credits for dependent children has been criticized roundly by the Treasury Department’s office of the inspector general, which noted Thursday that while some corrective actions have since been taken, additional improvements still are needed. http://www.alipac.us/content/irs-crit…
http://www.alipac.us/content/
http://www.williamgheen.com/
“The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife’s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.”
7:11
“Even if you’re not doing anything wrong, you’re being watched and recorded. The storage capability of these systems increases every year, consistently, by orders of magnitude, to where it’s getting to the point where you don’t have to have done anything wrong, you simply have to eventually fall under suspicion from somebody, even by a wrong call, and then they can use this system to go back in time and scrutinize every decision you’ve ever made, every friend you’ve ever discussed something with, and attack you on that basis, to sort of derive suspicion from an innocent life and paint anyone in the context of a wrongdoer.
10:46
The great fear that I have regarding the outcome for America of these disclosures is that nothing will change. People will see in the media all of these disclosures, they’ll know the lengths that government is going to to grant themselves powers, unilaterally, to create greater control over American society and global society. But they won’t be willing to take the risks necessary to stand up and fight to change things, to force their representatives to actually take a stand in their interests. And in the months ahead, the years ahead, it’s only going to get worse. Until eventually there will be a time where policies will change because the only thing that restricts the activities of the surveillance state are policy. They’ll say that… because of the crisis, the dangers that we face in the world, some new and unpredicted threat, we need more authority, we need more power, and there will be nothing the people can do at that point to oppose it. And it will be turnkey tyranny.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yB3n9fu-rM]NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: ‘I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things’
Published on Jun 9, 2013
“China, according to the Pentagon report, will likely build several indigenous aircraft carriers, now, over the next 15 years. These kinds of estimates are what make me believe this major world war is still 8-10 years away. They won’t necessarily have to wait the full 15 years before they’ve got a full blue water navy, but they certainly got to get a lot more than what they have now.”
– Joel Skousen
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske
* * *
Audio
(China discussed at minute-36):
Dr. Stanley Monteith’s Radio Liberty Audio Archives
| Date: 05-09-13 | |
| Hour: 1 | |
| 3:00: | |
|
|
| Hour: 2 | |
| 4:00: Joel Skousen – World Affairs Brief | |
|
|
| Hour: 3 | |
| 8:00: Steve Day – Help for Chronic Diseasewww.homeforhealth.net | |
|
|
|
| Hour: 4 | |
| 9:00: Dr. True Ott – Weather Modification | |
|
|
|
* * *
World Affairs Brief, May 10, 2013 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World. Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)
This Week’s Analysis:
Israeli Attack on Syria Not About Lebanon
CIA’s Benghazi Secrets
China Aggressiveness Continues in the Face of US Concessions
Armed March on DC an Unwise Provocation
Nothing is Private with Government
Kickstarting Part II of Key Liberty Film
[…]
CHINA AGGRESSIVENESS CONTINUES IN THE FACE OF US CONCESSIONS
China always gives the impression that it is a broker for peace in North Korea. Bill Gertz, America’s foremost China watcher wrote this week:
The clearest example of Chinese influence on Pyongyang was the latest report by U.S. intelligence agencies, indicating that two road-mobile Musudan intermediate-range ballistic missiles that had been readied for test launch on North Korea’s east coast were removed recently.
But at what price in concessions?
[US Sec. Of State] Mr. Kerry brought a carrot that Beijing apparently found hard to resist. He offered to cancel the planned deployment of 14 additional ground-based interceptors at U.S. missile defense bases in Alaska and California if China did more to stifle North Korean bellicosity. The deployments were announced recently in response to North Korean missile threats.
The deployment of such extra Anti-ballistic missiles (somewhat ineffective without any warheads) always makes Americans think they are protected. But the US doesn’t really intend to defend America against a massive nuclear strike. The various ABM systems the US has deployed are probably capable of interdicting a few missiles, but not the volley of thousands China and Russia are preparing for some future time.
Mr. Kerry’s accommodation of China in standing down the extra ABM deployment, is par for the course in US-NK relationships—always backing down from the toughest sanctions any time NK offers even the most minuscule retreat. Compare that to the US treatment of Iran where the US will eventually attack a much less aggressive nation with no proven nuclear weapons capacity.
Meanwhile, China continues developing its military and projecting power in the China Sea. James Dunnigan reports that,
More and more Filipino fishermen are complaining to the government that they are being chased away from their traditional fishing areas off the Filipino coast by Chinese coast guard ships. This is particularly bad at Scarborough Shoal. This is in violation of a deal made last June with the Chinese. Not only did Chinese patrol boats soon return to Scarborough Shoal but Chinese fishing boats are again operating there and even erected a flimsy barrier (with rowboats, rope, and fishing nets) across the entrance to the lagoon and forcibly preventing Filipino fishing boats from entering. Scarborough Shoal is in waters the Philippines claim (according to international law).
The shoal is only 250 kilometers from the Philippines and 1,200 kilometers from China. Despite this, China claims ownership of Scarborough Shoal but has not yet used deadly force to assert that claim. What China is apparently doing is sending patrol boats from their fishery protection service to “protect their fishermen.” According to China they are in compliance with the June deal, as they never agreed that Chinese fishing boats could not operate around Scarborough Shoal. The Philippines does not agree but has refrained from sending warships to the shoal and chasing the Chinese fishing boats away. To Filipinos this is another example of China saying one thing and doing another.
This is typical of how China muscles in on weaker nations. The US is currently pressuring the Philippines not to engage Chinese patrol boats, but this permissiveness will only embolden China until someday even US force won’t be enough to defend Philippine claims without it leading to war.
Meanwhile, China continues its military buildup on all fronts—army, naval and air forces—in anticipation of the inevitable (to them) confrontation with the West. This year’s annual Pentagon report to Congress on Chinese military modernization for 2013 has many more details than last year. It doesn’t tell all, but the growth and sophistication of China’s military modernization is ominous.
Naturally, China is using a variety of espionage techniques to accelerate its acquisition of US military technology:
a) industrial espionage (front companies that order military grade parts from around the world),
b) educational (the US foolishly allows thousands of Chinese students to study at major technical universities) and
c) economic espionage (requiring companies who build parts in China to share their technology). –all this hoping to cut its reliance on foreign arms makers, even Russian arms, which provided China its first high tech weapons.
Bill Gertz of the Washington Free Beacon summarizes much of the report:
China is building two new classes of missile submarines in addition to the eight nuclear missile submarines and six attack submarines being deployed as part of an arms buildup that analysts say appears to put Beijing on a war footing… China has yet to conduct an underwater test firing of its submarine-launched missiles but is deploying new missile submarines and planning advanced versions.
The Pentagon’s latest annual report to Congress also includes new details of China’s deployment of an aircraft carrier-killing ballistic missile, two new stealth jet fighters, and a new road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile in addition to three other new ICBMs.
The Chinese military is also developing cyber warfare capabilities that can be used in preemptive attacks, the 92-page report states. Of particular concern to the Pentagon is the deployment near Taiwan of a precision-guided DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile, according to the report.
“We’re concerned about the ability of China to develop missiles that can project its military power with precision at great distances from China—obviously something that can hold at risk large surface ships, including aircraft carriers, is something that we pay attention to, but we put it in the context of a number of China’s military developments, again, that we characterize as anti-access and area denial,” However, [the Pentagon report] noted that no single weapons system is the problem. Instead, he said, “it’s the integration and overlapping nature of these weapons system into a regime that can potentially impede or restrict free military operations in the Western Pacific.”
Additionally, the report confirms, China is building a new road-mobile ICBM that is likely capable of being armed with a multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle (MIRV)… New road mobile missiles deployed in recent years include DF-31 and DF-31A mobile ICBMs and the JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missile. The DF-31A has a range of about 7,000 miles.
“This administration is reluctant to just come out and say it [covering for the Chinese threat], but this report makes clear that China is preparing for small-scale and then large-scale wars against the United States and its friends and allies,” said Richard Fisher, a China military analyst with the International Assessment and Strategy Center.
Beijing is also rapidly building new radar-evading stealth fighter-bombers known as the J-20 and J-31… the Pentagon does not expect either the J-20 or the J-31 “to achieve an effective operational capability before 2018.” The first test flight of the J-20 took place two years ago and surprised the U.S. military. It was tested during the visit of then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who was criticized for canceling F-22 production.
The full report can be read here: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/2013_China_Report_FINAL.pdf
The US has been systematically disarming or limiting arms capable of combating a traditional two ocean world war threat, while wasting most of our military resources on Middle East intervention. The US will regret the limiting of the F-22 now that the F-35 replacement has been shown to be way too costly and filled with technical problems.
China’s surface naval forces are also expanding rapidly with deployment of several new types of warships, including the first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning… the carrier conducted its first aircraft launch and recovery operations in November with J-15 fighters… [and] will spend the next three to four years on training and integration before achieving an operationally effective aircraft carrier capability… China will likely build several indigenous aircraft carriers over the next 15 years.
These kinds of estimates are what make me believe this major world war is still 8-10 years away.
The report also discusses China’s assertions of territorial and maritime claims that are upsetting stability in the region… China is claiming most of the South China Sea as its territory and is disputing Japan’s claims to the Senkaku Islands. Both areas are said to have large deposits of undersea gas and oil to which energy-hungry states in the region seek access.
China’s government routinely protests the annual report, claiming it is part of a Pentagon campaign to hype the threat from China.
Fisher, the IASC military analyst, said the latest report is far more useful than the truncated 43-page report from 2012. “The first ever report disclosure of development of the Type 096 SSBN raises the prospect of a new submarine launched missile that also may be multiple warhead capable,” Fisher said. “As the Administration presses for additional reductions in U.S. nuclear warhead levels and shows reluctance to fund U.S. nuclear arsenal modernization, it is doubly important that Congress be informed about the size and growth of China’s nuclear forces.”
Fisher said the report failed to address China’s transfer of strategic missile technology to North Korea, specifically the transporter-erector launchers for Pyongyang’s new KN-08 road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missile disclosed for the first time during a military parade in April 2012.
“A failure to chastise and sanction China’s action will only serve to undermine confidence in American security guarantees and increase interest by our allies in their own nuclear deterrents,” he said.
All of the last comments reinforce my view that the US is intentionally downplaying the China threat. Incredibly, the chief of naval operations told Congress on Tuesday that he is vigilant of, but not worried by, China’s large-scale naval buildup, including the Pentagon’s disclosure on Monday that Beijing is building two new classes of missile submarines. That’s what happens when you purge out all the Pattons and MacArthurs from the military and advance only yes-men.
It must be also noted that the Pentagon doesn’t even put out a similar threat paper on Russian nuclear forces which are well ahead in numbers and quantity than the Chinese. That is a crucial omission, and has been going on for decades.
What is gained by downplaying the threat of Russia and China? It keeps the American public ignorant of the real threats. By not alerting us to the future danger it makes sure Americans don’t demand a change in our military strategy and posture, or prepare themselves for the war the government knows is coming. That’s the reason our government is building deep underground bunker systems. We need to start focusing on the real global threats, not simply the Muslim threat—which is largely manufactured and exacerbated by the phony war on terror. This is no harmless diversion. It is a deadly time to be asleep and passive.
Has some shadowy group of scary bearded men with turbans really caused the American population to cower in fear at the first sign of a homemade explosive anywhere in the country? Or has the government and their cronies in the media primed the population to be afraid of something that, statistically, is less likely to kill someone on American soil than a bee sting?
– James Corbett
* * *
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK2w_FdHYV8]The War On Terror Is Over. America Lost.
Published on Apr 24, 2013
TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=7320
It has often been observed that the war on terror is unwinnable. After all, how could a war on an abstract noun ever have its “Mission Accomplished” moment? It is, according to this wisdom, meant to drag on forever. Just because a war can’t be won, however, doesn’t mean it can’t be lost. The truth is that the war on terror is over. And America has lost.
* * *
From: corbettreport.com
The War On Terror Is Over. America Lost.
By James Corbett
corbettreport.com
April 24, 2013
It has often been observed that the war on terror is unwinnable. After all, how could a war on an abstract noun ever have its “Mission Accomplished” moment? It is, according to this wisdom, meant to drag on forever.
Just because a war can’t be won, however, doesn’t mean it can’t be lost. The truth is that the war on terror is over. And America has lost.
Just look at the images of the Watertown lockdown. A city under a supposedly “voluntary” lockdown that was in fact enforced by bands of roving SWAT team members going door to door, forcibly removing people from their own homes at gunpoint. Whatever the use of the word “voluntary” might mean in this case, I defy anyone to differentiate these images from a martial law scenario.
And yet, amazingly, the media does not show us images of enraged Bostonians. It does not interview those who were treated this way by the SWAT teams. It does not ask those people directly affected what they think, or report on dissent. Instead, we are shown images of mindless celebrations orchestrated to the score of that age-old chant of the mob that has lost all capacity to reason critically: “USA! USA! USA!” Surely it is a mob far under the hypnotic spell of the mainstream fear programming that can cheer the destruction of their own rights. It is even more perverse that this destruction is being done in the name of two bumbling college-age boys who, it must be stressed, have yet to be proven guilty of anything.
The irony seems to be lost on much of the American population that scenes like these are precisely what the all-pervasive “terrorist” boogeymen supposedly want: a people so enslaved to the fear of their own shadow that the actions of two hapless misfits can cause such chaos and the disruption of so many people’s lives. This irony is certainly NOT lost on a government that has tried its utmost to make people afraid of the so-called terrorist threat over the past decade.
Yes, the terrorists hate you for your freedom. So who are the terrorists? And who is trying to take away your freedoms?
If terrorism is the use of violence to further political ends, then the real terrorists by definition are the ones who are ramping up the fear after each and every incident in order to shape the public’s perception. Has some shadowy group of scary bearded men with turbans really caused the American population to cower in fear at the first sign of a homemade explosive anywhere in the country? Or has the government and their cronies in the media primed the population to be afraid of something that, statistically, is less likely to kill someone on American soil than a bee sting?
In the end, the questions answer themselves. All that is needed is reflection over what we have witnessed play out over the past week: an Orwellian two minutes of hate directed not at these boys– about whom almost nothing is known except for their previous contact with the FBI–but at the ghost that has been haunting America’s nightmares ever since the Bush Administration conjured them into existence.
These ghosts will continue to haunt the American population until they, and their like-minded allies around the world, choose to wake up from the nightmare. After all, you can’t win a fight against a ghost. You can lose one, however. The events of the past week have proven that much.