[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bJyAKRQazc]Proof The Whole War on Terror is A Joke
Published on Sep 9, 2014
Reporter James O’Keefe joins Alex to discuss his recent report on how easy and unguarded the US Canada and Us Mexico Border is. How anyone especially ISIS can just walk or boat in with chemical warfare and know one even notices.
Related:
(video) Man Crosses U.S. Border Dressed as ISIS Terrorist, Simulates Beheading
Just one of the MANY ways the US is being destroyed on purpose so the one-world government can go into effect:
– –
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BZVMNV4ycs]Man Crosses U.S. Border Dressed as ISIS Terrorist, Simulates Beheading
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
-Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence
* * *
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrmC7N_mCz8]President Woodrow Wilson Admits Illuminati Plan
“Most recent presidents are puppets to an insidious globalist conspiracy of power to subvert liberty, culture, morality and national sovereignty—and that isn’t going away simply by electing another controlled Republican to office in 2016—who won’t undo any of what Obama has done.”
* * *
| Date: 07-03-14 | |
| Hour: 1 | |
| 3:00: Randy Thomasson – Why Christians Should Vote! | |
 |
|
| Hour: 2 | |
| 4:00: Joel Skousen – World Affairs Brief | |
|
|
| Hour: 3 | |
| 8:00: Deborah Tavares – Current Events esp. Climate Action Plan | |
|
|
|
| Hour: 4 | |
| 9:00: Cheryl Hancock – Israel Update | |
|
|
|
World Affairs Brief, July 4, 2014 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)
This Week’s Analysis:
Why Illegals Rarely Get Deported
Hobby Lobby Decision and its Possible Effects
Iraq—Joint Task Force: Russia, Iran and US?
TSA’s New Security Scare Tactics
Climate Change Propaganda Discredited Again
What’s Really Behind Fusion Centers?
Happy 4th-The NSA is Still Spying and Government Still Lying
Outrageous Speaking Fees of Hillary Clinton
Japan Changes Passivist Constitution
Preparedness Tip: Strategic Relocation Realty Website
WHY ILLEGALS RARELY GET DEPORTED
Flooding Europe with Muslims and America with Latinos is a key part of the globalist agenda to create ethnic conflict, overwhelm traditional conservative voting patterns and take advantage of immigrants’ far higher birth rate to permanently alter Western culture. This is NOT an exclusively Democratic Party agenda. Both the Obama administration and the Bush administration before it invoked a secret policy of using executive authority to deter the effectiveness of the Border Patrol. Putting more agents on the border is pointless if their arrests are negated by a system that only gives the illegals a future court date and then releases back into society. 95% don’t appear for their day in court, preferring to hide out until amnesty arrives. Predictably, Obama offered to sign pending “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” legislation as a solution, but this form of amnesty is the magnet, not the solution. Obama is also demanding that Congress increase deficit spending another $2B to handle the “humanitarian” crisis, when $2.5B would complete the fence and stop the problem—but that’s not what they want. On this 4th of July, let us concentrate on the accelerating dangers to our liberty rather than mindless flag waving and fireworks, which only tend to keep people wedded to the establishment view of events.
A local CBS station in Arizona covered how Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says he wants to know why the immigrants he turns over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) keep coming back
“I want an explanation and investigation as to why 3,800 of the people in my jails that are charged with state and local crimes are here illegally,” Arpaio told Newsmax TV. “We turn them over to ICE and they keep coming back over and over again.” Arpaio stated that he has sent a letter to Homeland Security demanding an answer. “How come they’re not deported, or if they are, why do they keep coming back across the border?” Arpaio questioned.
He’s got a point, and Arizona taxpayers should be hopping mad at the revolving door the feds and the courts have created. The administration will keep claiming they are doing their best and they can’t stop it, but it’s not true. They won’t stop it because of the conflict creation agenda that I mentioned above. Here’s an accurate description by Brandon Darby of Breitbart.com of the policies being employed by the Bush and Obama administrations that ensure the illegals keep coming:
The illegal immigrants who cross as incomplete family units simply enter the U.S. illegally, turn themselves in to U.S. Border Patrol agents, are processed, and then are released with a notice to appear at a future date for court proceedings. U.S. taxpayers then fund bus tickets for the illegal immigrants to go to the U.S. city of their choosing. Approximately 95 percent of the illegal immigrants never return as promised for court proceedings, according to Hector Garza, a Border Patrol agent and spokesperson for the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) Local 2455.
“The majority of these people crossed the border illegally and were then dropped off here at the bus station, so they could continue to their final destination, and that destination is an American city near you,” said Garza. “This right here is border insecurity at its best. Our border is not patrolled, it’s not being secured… our federal government is releasing thousands and thousands of illegal aliens into our communities.”
A double layer border fence would halt illegal immigration by at least 95%, but even though every piece of current reform legislation contains provisions for “securing the border” we know from past experience that the fence will never be completed. It’s just a gimmick to pacify the opposition. In 2006, Republicans passed the “Secure Fence Act of 2006”, with a vote of 283–138, but the Bush administration quit building after a year and refused to fund it to completion
Critics keep harping on how ineffective and costly the fence is. Of course it is ineffective—it isn’t finished and illegals simply go around the existing double fenced portions. The current border fence is more gaps than fence, and much of the fence is there only to bar vehicle crossings. Illegals can simply step over the low barrier.
All administrations have sabotaged the cost aspect by permitting crony contractors to overcharge for products and services. The Bush administration wasted much of the fence allocation by diverting billions to a horribly conceived “high-tech electronic surveillance fence” that was supposed to eliminate a physical fence, but never worked.
And, when you spend $2B on emergency humanitarian aid for illegals who the administration refuses to deport, it doesn’t take long to see that the fence, even if it costs $4B, is a bargain because it’s not a recurring cost, but a permanent fix.
Worse, in the past year the current administration, in collusion with Latino TV and radio networks, created incentives for thousands of unaccompanied minors to cross into the US by advertizing the various strategies illegals can take advantage of to subvert the law. It’s no secret that the Obama administration refuses to deport them once they arrive. Here’s a report from one of my subscribers on the Latino propaganda beating the drums of illegal immigration:
Most Hispanics get there news and information from Univision, which is very liberal in how they portray the news that deals with politics. They are also constantly bombarding the audience with amnesty propaganda.
Most of their news is focused on the immigration issue. Yet, lately it seems as if they have been more aggressive about it. They had a segment about the bodies (belonging to immigrants that had attempted to cross the border illegally but had failed) that were buried in a Texan cemetery. Their point was that it was very inhuman the way that they were buried-with no respect according to them (because the remains are unidentified). They ended that segment by showing a woman crying and saying that it is not fair nor humane for these people to be buried as undocumented. She then says that we should fix our situation so that nobody has to come into this country undocumented.
The next segment was about two boys from Honduras who had come illegally and had been in one of these “detention centers” for some time. They were released and reunited with their families in the US. The story is about how much they suffered during their travels, how much they suffered in the detention center and how happy they now are. I wanted to point out some parts of the video. They quote one of the boys as saying “That it was like a nightmare”. They then show him saying why. The boy laughs as he’s saying “Because we had to suffer hunger, because I was really bored and because-I don’t know-I didn’t like the food”. Later on they must have asked him if he wanted to say something to his parents (and maybe even to the president) because the same boy said, “To my parents, that I love them; and to Obama, thank you”. Here is the link to the actual video.
Who told the boy from Honduras that it was thanks to Obama that he was able to “fulfill his dream” (as Univision called it)? It seems like maybe these kids are coming into this country, and they are giving them this idea of seeing Obama as this benevolent leader who can make/change laws and fulfill dreams. These children come, already thinking that they are entitled to receive care from the government. These children, without knowing, are being brought really into servitude and it is us who have to pick up the check. And while we do, they now have more leverage to further their goals. These children don’t come learning about the Constitution or freedom, but they do come in learning of how kind Obama is and that the government is there to take care of you.
The article that is included in the link that I sent you is about Obama telling Central American parents to not send their children to the United States or they would be sent back. Yet, as my source noted, the article ends by saying that, in contrast to undocumented children from Mexico, illegal children “from Central America cannot be sent back immediately. That authorities have to provide sanitary assistance and basic necessities before releasing them to their parents (in the States) or foster parents while they wait for their court date. It almost seems as if they’re telling the people that though President Obama said this, it’s still safe to come.”
What to do? First finish the fence. Customs and Border Protection spent $2.4 billion between 2006 and 2009 to complete 670 miles of border fence. Estimates are now up over $3-4B simply because the government wants to deter Congress from voting to finish it—and even if they would authorize that amount, the courts would keep ruling in favor of environmental challenges to stop it.
Second, penalize Mexico by deporting all people back to Mexico who entered from there. Mexico is presently issuing cross-through visas to these foreign nationals whose purpose (it must be clear by now) is to break US law.
Finally, Americans on the border are getting fed up with busing these illegals around and releasing them into their communities. This week we saw what I hope will become a common precedent for civil disobedience against this evil government agenda that is sweeping the country. Protestors in Murrieta California blocked buses bringing immigrants into their community from Texas for processing (and releasing). As the NY Daily News wrote,
Angry locals in Murrieta, Calif., packed a 750-seat high school gym for a town hall meeting Wednesday night, a day after protesters blocked the streets to prevent the arrival of 140 immigrants from overcrowded Texas facilities.
“Send them back! Send them back!” the crowd shouted at Murrieta officials and federal Border Patrol agents trying to address the meeting, as hundreds of residents stood outside unable to enter the crowded assembly. Concerned residents asked about public health, safety, and what happens once the immigrants are processed and released to the community.
Loud booing erupted as Chief Border Patrol Agent Paul Beeson revealed that four of the 140 immigrants destined for Murrieta — but rerouted to a nearby Border Patrol station in Chula Vista given the street protest — had been hospitalized for scabies and fevers. Another wave of immigrants is set to arrive in Murrieta for processing on Friday, the Fourth of July.
Scabies is an itchy, highly contagious skin disease caused by an infestation of the mite Sarcoptes scabiei. But the disease issue goes beyond lice and scabbies as these illegals are being often transported on airlines and buses used by other Americans. The risk of contamination from lice, scabbies and other infectious disease residues on seat backs is high. Fox News wrote an horrendous story about how medical workers at a Texas hospital are being threatened if they leak anything about the horrific condition these kids are in, and it’s all being levied on American taxpayers:
A government-contracted security force threatened to arrest doctors and nurses if they divulged any information about the contagion threat at a refugee camp housing illegal alien children at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, sources say.
In spite of the threat, several former camp workers broke their confidentiality agreements and shared exclusive details with me about the dangerous conditions at the camp. They said taxpayers deserve to know about the contagious diseases and the risks the children pose to Americans.
“There were several of us who wanted to talk about the camps, but the agents made it clear we would be arrested,” a psychiatric counselor told me. “We were under orders not to say anything.” The sources said workers were guarded by a security force from the BCFS, which the Department of Health and Human Services hired to run the Lackland Camp.
The sources say security forces called themselves the “Brown Shirts.” [a knowing reference to NAZI civilian thugs in Germany] “It was a very submissive atmosphere,” the counselor said. “Once you stepped onto the grounds, you abided by their laws – the Brown Shirt laws.” She said the workers were stripped of their cellphones and other communication devices. Anyone caught with a phone was immediately fired. “Everyone was paranoid,” she said. “The [illegal] children had more rights than the workers.”
She said children in the camp had measles, scabies, chicken pox and strep throat as well as mental and emotional issues. “It was not a good atmosphere in terms of health,” she said. “I would be talking to children and lice would just be climbing down their hair.”
A former nurse at the camp told me she was horrified by what she saw. “We have so many kids coming in that there was no way to control all of the sickness – all this stuff coming into the country,” she said. “We were very concerned at one point about strep going around the base.”
“When they found out the kids had scabies, the charge nurse was adamant – ‘Don’t mention that. Don’t say scabies,’” the nurse recounted. “But everybody knew they had scabies. Some of the workers were very concerned about touching things and picking things up. They asked if they should be concerned, but they were told don’t worry about it.”
The nurse said the lice issue was epidemic – but everything was kept “hush-hush.” The nurse told me she became especially alarmed because their files indicated the children had been transported to Lackland on domestic charter buses and airplanes.
Finally, the staff of The Daily Bell commented on Obama being the key to all that is going wrong with America: President Obama has changed the way US citizens receive health care and now he is convulsing the nation’s southern border by deliberately abrogating its security. Love him or hate him, if Obama succeeds in changing US immigration policies, he should go down in history as one of the more effective and powerful presidents in US history.
But they are only partly right. He is not actually “the worst president in six decades.” Most recent presidents are puppets to an insidious globalist conspiracy of power to subvert liberty, culture, morality and national sovereignty—and that isn’t going away simply by electing another controlled Republican to office in 2016—who won’t undo any of what Obama has done.
Related:
Nick tells ‘WHY’ at minute-55 — agreeing with Joel Skousen.
“They look at the U.S. mineral resource and base as a safety deposit box. They can leave this stuff undeveloped while they exploit everyone else in the world until they get thrown out or nationalized. And then pull back into the United States and develop those resources at the point at which we’re dumbed down and numbed down….” —Nick Begich (transcribed by me)
Joel Skousen goes even further. Joel believes the coming EMP and nuclear invasion from Russia/China is the main way they’ll numb US down — and what they’re really saving our resources for — including the 2,000 years of coal Alaska has.
Why isn’t there a train connecting Alaska to the lower-48, Nick asks?
It’s good to hear the positive examples which Nick tells about his brother, Senator Mark Begich, but I’ve seen Mark’s voting record, and from what I’ve seen he mostly votes with the globalists. It’s clear to me that Nick should have ran for Alaska Senator, instead. Nick is a man of integrity who can’t be bought, and who would not have compromised so unconstitutionally much.
“What a great guy; what a fabulous guy!” — Alex Jones says about Nick in closing.
I know Nick personally, and I fully agree!!!
* * *
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI2d_XEz5ys]Alaskan Tribal Lands: Another Govt Land Grab
Published on May 16, 2014
Alex is joined by Dr. Nick Begich who talks about an effort by the feds to use tribal sovereignty to move land held by government into trust. http://www.earthpulse.com/src/categor…
http://www.infowarsshop.com/Angels-St…
http://www.infowarsshop.com/Angels-Do…
I’ve been listening to Stan Deyo since the ’90s, and I like him a lot! Here Stan brings out a very important point that few are. The globalists are mostly foreign. Perhaps we focus too much on the globalists within our borders.
– –
“I think at the moment, that the United States is a pain in the backside of the New World Order. A lot of the elitists are not in the United States and are elsewhere, as you know. And they need to take us out as a military power, whether we would do what they want or not. They need to weaken us to the point that the United States won’t interfere with middle-east operations, and operations in Australia and other countries that the elitists want to do.
They want to take us down to remove us as a threat. Russia and China know that our military guys could probably break with the Pentagon, or with the White House, anyway, and make counterattacks in the event of a nuclear war starting. So they have to neutralize our military and our will to fight. …
They’ve pushed every button from the White House. They’ve pushed every button they could to bring America into civil disorder and to collapse the economy here. I don’t think they’ve left anything undone or unplanned to tear this country apart.”
– Stan Deyo
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske from:
Related:
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
Skousen: Analysis of Strategic Threats in the Current Decade
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZQUluJLmaY]Fake Feminists Attack Kirsten Dunst For Pro-Woman Beliefs
Published on Apr 18, 2014
At a time when femininity has lost its value and motherhood has become a dirty word, exposing the feminist movement as nothing more than a top-down exploitation of the female vote is vital to reclaiming true female empowerment.
World Affairs Brief, April 11, 2014 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)
THIS WEEK’S ANALYSIS:
Will Putin Invade Eastern Ukraine?
US Keeps Disarming in the Face of Russian Aggression
NSA Exploitation of Internet Security
Nevada Cattle Rancher’s Standoff with the Feds
Bad Cops Keep Getting Judicial Support
Bad Analysis on the Yuan as New Reserve Currency
Preparedness Tip: First Aid
[…]
US CONTINUES DISARMING IN THE FACE OF RUSSIAN AGGRESSION
The Defense Department just announced its intent to remove 50 additional Minuteman missiles from their silos at 3 bases. They claim the empty silos will remain in warm status, meaning that they can be reloaded if needed. However, the US isn’t building any more missiles and they will be using up these missiles in tests over time. Their storage locations will be known to the Russians and thus can easily be destroyed if they still exist when war comes.
The Wall Street Journal reported on the fact that our government has finally acknowledged that the Russians violated the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which bans the testing, production and possession of nuclear missiles with a range between 310 and 3,400 miles:
Russia has tested at least three missiles—the R-500 cruise missile, the RS-26 ballistic missile and the Iskander-M semi-ballistic missile—that run afoul of the proscribed range limits.
But, rather than use this as an excuse to stop further US compliance with treaties, the US continues to disarm unilaterally. As I reported earlier in the WAB, “Russia has increased its counted deployed strategic nuclear forces over the past six months, while at the same time America’s stockpile of warheads and launchers has declined.”
As the WSJ further reports, Obama has dismissed Russia as a regional power, and he is maneuvering the US closer to a position of absolute nuclear inferiority to Russia.
Russia has seized Crimea and has 50,000 troops as a potential invasion force on the border with eastern Ukraine. The Kremlin is also abrogating the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, in which Kiev agreed to give up its nuclear arsenal—at the time the third largest in the world—in exchange for guarantees of its territorial integrity from Russia, the U.S. and U.K. That memorandum has now proved to be as much of a scrap of paper to the Kremlin as Belgium’s neutrality was to Berlin in the summer of 1914.
The Kremlin is also violating the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which bans the testing, production and possession of nuclear missiles with a range between 310 and 3,400 miles. Russia has tested at least three missiles—the R-500 cruise missile, the RS-26 ballistic missile and the Iskander-M semi-ballistic missile—that run afoul of the proscribed range limits.
The Obama Administration has suspected for years that Vladimir Putin was violating the INF Treaty, which supporters hail as the triumph of arms control. The Russians were boasting of their new missile capabilities in open-source literature as far back as 2007. Yet as defense analysts Keith Payne and Mark Schneider noted in these pages in February, “since 2009, the current administration’s unclassified arms-control compliance reports to Congress have been mum on the Russian INF Treaty noncompliance.”
At a minimum, Congress should call on Rose Gottemoeller, confirmed last month as under secretary of state for arms control over strenuous objections from Florida Senator Marco Rubio, to explain what the Administration knew, and what it disclosed, about Moscow’s INF violations when she negotiated New Start. [The US has always refused to publicize or acknowledge Russian treaty violations].
Ms. Gottemoeller has been publicly noncommittal on this point, perhaps because she knew New Start would never have won a two-thirds Senate majority if Russia’s INF cheating had been widely known. The episode reminds us of why people like former Arizona Senator Jon Kyl were right to oppose the ratification of New Start.
Mr. Obama has dismissed Russia as a regional power, but he is maneuvering the U.S. closer to a position of absolute nuclear inferiority to Russia. The imbalance becomes even worse when one counts tactical nuclear weapons, where Russia has a four-to-one numerical advantage over the U.S.
To the surprise of defense analysts, the Pentagon will make the sharpest cuts in the submarine and bomber legs of the nuclear triad, while mostly preserving the silo-based Minuteman ICBMs. This means that the U.S. will maintain a stationary, and vulnerable, nuclear force on the ground while largely dismantling what remains of our second-strike capability at sea and in the air. A crucial part of deterrence is convincing an adversary that you can survive a first strike. It does not help U.S. security to dismantle the most survivable part of the U.S. arsenal.
This is even more pernicious when you factor in PDD-60, the 1997 Presidential Decision Directive directing our missile forces to “not rely on launch on warning” but to prepare to retaliate after absorbing a nuclear first strike. That dumb nuclear doctrine is still in force, and has never been repealed, even by that nominal Republican president, George W. Bush.
That first strike would wipe out all of our silos if they were not allowed to launch on warning—and though our Missileers still believe they are going to get the order to launch on warning, I’m betting that order will never come. Without the command codes from the White House, they can’t launch. By cutting the rest of our strategic nuclear triad, we make sure the impact of that first strike cannot be recovered from. And don’t forget that in 1998 Clinton agreed to keep 50% of our missile subs in port to make sure they were more vulnerable—to assure Russia that we posed no threat to it. The WSJ concludes:
It’s fashionable in the West to dismiss this as “Cold War thinking,” but it appears that Vladimir Putin hasn’t given up on such thinking or he wouldn’t be investing in new nuclear delivery systems.
Cold War or no, recent events are providing daily reminders that the great-power rivalries of previous centuries are far from over. They have also offered the grim lesson that nations that forsake their nuclear deterrent, as Ukraine did, do so at considerable peril. After the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979 the Senate refused to ratify Jimmy Carter’s SALT II Treaty. Any serious response to Russia’s aggression in Ukraine should include a formal and public U.S. demarche about Russian cheating on the INF treaty, while promising to withdraw from New Start if the cheating continues.
Nuclear arsenals aside, the timing of Mr. Obama’s nuclear dismantling couldn’t be worse as Mr. Putin contemplates his next moves in Ukraine and sizes up a possible Western response.
Related:
(audio) Joel Skousen: Timing of the Russia/China invasion of U.S.A. — Full readiness in 6-8 years!
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
Josh Owens is the reporter/photographer with David Knight, right now, on the ground with the Ranchers vs BLM in Nevada. Apparently, this was his contest submission which got him a job at INFOwars. Nice!
– –
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2TKr9zE-s](Infowars Reporter Contest) You Are The Enemy: The Anatomy of The Fed
Published on Apr 26, 2012
We live in a world where so much of what we are told, and therefore what we believe, is a lie. Not only that, but many of us believe so strongly in these lies that we are willing to fight and sometimes die for something that we don’t even understand. With technology now placing a world of information at our fingertips you would assume we would be more informed and less confused. This however is not the case. There is so much conflicting information on complex issues that it has forced us to become apathetic and complacent. Instead of researching and taking the time to find the truth, an overwhelming majority of us have given up. We are experiencing an information overload. What this means is that we stubbornly choose to believe something without factual backing, half-truths are distorted and embellished in the interest of those conveying them, or we just simply don’t care because we do not have the time to wade through the mass amount of propaganda and indoctrination to see the truth. This is why I have decided to take an extremely important topic, go back to its inception and clearly illustrate what it is they do, how they do it, and why it is so important to eliminate it. Infowars posts articles everyday that are in someway, if not directly, related to the Federal Reserve and those who control it. If we fully understand this debt machine that has enslaved America for almost 100 years, we cannot deny its dangers and we can begin expanding our minds to new ways of defeating these disgusting technocratic scumbags.
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”― Carl Sagan
Related:
“Putting your head in the sand will not save your backside”
Willful Ignorance: Actively Resisting the Truth & Truth-tellers
[WordPOWER!] 2 Peter 3: BEWARE, in the LAST DAYS People Will Be WILLINGLY IGNORANT
From Willful Ignorance through Cognitive Dissonance to “Could I Be Wrong?”
[FreedomQuote] ”I Would Rather Know The Ugly Truth Than A Beautiful Lie”
[FreedomQuote] “It’s hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear.”
Gandhi: Widespread Belief Doesn’t Make an Error True
“Truth … lies in the depth where few are willing to search for it.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXEGht3hRRc
From: robertscottbell.com
“Shocker: Comparing deaths from medical drugs, vitamins, all US wars”
by Jon Rappoport
“In 27 years, there have been 3 million deaths from taking prescription drugs -as- prescribed.” (JPEG)
As I’ve been documenting for years, the medical cartel has been engaged in massive criminal fraud, presenting their drugs as safe and effective across the board—when, in fact, these drugs have been killing and maiming huge numbers of people, like clockwork.
I’ve cited the review, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?”, by Dr. Barbara Starfied (Journal of the American Medical Association, July 26, 2000), in which Starfield reveals the American medical system kills 225,000 people per year—106,000 as a direct result of pharmaceutical drugs.
I’ve now found another study, published in the same Journal, two years earlier: April 15, 1998; “Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.” It, too, is mind-boggling.
The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following fate:
Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.
Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.
The authors write: “…Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and and administered.”
So this study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people killed who were admitted to hospitals. It didn’t begin to tally all the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of the drugs, without being admitted to hospitals.
I found the link to this study at the Dr. Rath Health Foundation, in the middle of a very interesting article by Dr. Aleksandra Niedzwiecki: “Commentary on the Safety of Vitamins.”
Here are two key quotes from her article:
“In 2010, not one single person [in the US] died as a result of taking vitamins (Bronstein, et al, (2011) Clinical Toxical, 49 (10), 910-941).”
“In 2004, the deaths of 3 people [in the US] were attributed to the intake of vitamins. Of these, 2 persons were said to have died as a result of megadoses of vitamins D and E, and one person as a result of an overdose of iron and fluoride. Data from: ‘Toxic Exposure Surveillance System 2004, Annual Report, Am. Assoc. of Poison Control Centers.’”
Summing up:
No deaths from vitamins (2011), and three deaths (2004) from vitamins/iron/fluoride.
106,000 deaths every year from pharmaceutical drugs (Starfield).
Between 76,000 and 137,000 deaths from pharmaceutical drugs every year in hospitalized patients (Lazerou).
The FDA and its “quack-buster” allies go after vitamins, demean “unproven remedies,” and generally take every possible opportunity to warn people about “alternatives,” on the basis that they aren’t scientifically supported.
Meanwhile, the very drugs these mobsters are promoting, and certifying as safe and effective, are killing and maiming people at a staggering rate.
The masses are treated to non-stop PR on the glories of the US medical system.
In the Wikipedia entry, “US military casualties of war,” the grand total of all military deaths in the history of this country, starting with the Revolutionary War, is 1,312,612.
In any given 10 years of modern medical treatment? 2,250,000 deaths (Starfield).
Consider how much suppression is necessary to keep the latter number under wraps.
Related:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Abm6lnz_jg]Top Medical Conspiracy Facts
Published on Mar 22, 2014
LeeAnn McAdoo reports: recent studies show that nearly half of all Americans believe in at least one medical “conspiracy theory”. We take a deeper look and separate fact from fiction, answering questions like “Did the CIA inject African American males with the AIDS virus”. If you are wearing a tin-foil hat, you’re not alone. In fact, doubting the official government narrative could just save your life.
Follow Alex on TWITTER – https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
Like Alex on FACEBOOK – https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme…
Infowars on G+ – https://plus.google.com/+infowars/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.net/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv
http://www.InfowarsNews.com
Related:
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxbmvLX8Bms]Why is the Washington Monument an Egyptian Obelisk, Instead of a Statue of George Washington?
Published on Mar 17, 2014
Why is the Washington Monument an Egyptian Obelisk, Instead of a Statue of George Washington?
Subscribe to http://www.YouTube.com/MarkDice
http://www.Facebook.com/MarkDice
http://www.Twitter.com/MarkDice
Related:
Very well said!
Church history in most Christian schools and seminaries has been altered too.
––
“What if I told you that the version of History you were taught in school, was heavily revised to favor your own nations’ agenda while hiding its crimes and in doing so fostered an unrealistic sense of false patriotism used to manufacture your allegiance to a corporate entity masquerading as your government?”
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXRj0GQvI2k]Big Money Is Feeding Us Plastic
Vani “The Food Babe” Hari discovered that Subway makes bread with an ingredient called azodicarbonamide. It can be found in almost all the breads at Subway restaurants here in North America, but not in Europe, Australia or other parts of the world.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rR2b2cTz7as]GMO Labeling Must Happen Now!
TheAlexJonesChannel | Published on Feb 4, 2014
Alex invites “Food Babe” Vani Hari to break down the victories she’s acquired in her crusade to label GMO foods, and also to discuss her latest GMO labeling initiatives, including her recent Subway petition.
Audio From:
Dr. Stanley Monteith’s Radio Liberty Audio Archives
Joel begins discussing Russia at minute-28
| Date: 01-16-14 | |
| Hour: 1 | |
| 3:00:Paul McGuire – A Prophecy of the Future of America | |
|
|
| Hour: 2 | |
| 4:00:Joel Skousen – World Affairs Brief | |
|
|
| Hour: 3 | |
| 8:00:Melody Cedarstrom – Discount Gold & Silver Exchange | |
|
|
|
| Hour: 4 | |
| 9:00:Cheryl Hancock – Current Events esp. Israel | |
|
|
|
| Date: 01-15-14 | |
World Affairs Brief, January 17, 2014 Commentary and Insights on a Troubled World.
Copyright Joel Skousen. Partial quotations with attribution permitted. Cite source as Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief (http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com)
THIS WEEK’S ANALYSIS:
The Imperial Presidency
The Grand Scope of NSA Spying Revealed
With a Growing Russian Missile Threat, US is Still Disarming
US Tepid Response to China Military Might
The Real Ariel Sharon
[…]
WITH GROWING RUSSIAN MISSILE THREAT, US STILL DISARMING
It is ironic that Russia is relatively open about its military modernization. Most of today’s sources are from the “Voice of Russia,” which used to be called Radio Moscow. Although it would be naive to assume that they are telling all, it does prove my point that the US intelligence agencies are desperately trying to downplay these advances and future threats. These agencies won’t even comment on what the Russians blatantly broadcast to the world (which our media omits as well).
I think that’s because the globalists who control our government intend to continue unilateral disarmament, which I’ll cover shortly. First here’s the latest arms build-up revelation from Voice of Russia.
Russia will have built a new heavy liquid-propellant intercontinental ballistic missile by late 2018, a missile that will prove largely superior to all of its predecessors, including the world’s most powerful strategic missile Voyevoda, (NATO reporting name SS-18 Satan), in terms of combat effectiveness and the ability to penetrate the US missile defense system.
The US spent a lot of taxpayer money dismantling some of Russia’s old SS-18 missiles, (and handing back all the warheads to Russia) but only until Russia backed out of the deal last year and announced it was keeping the rest of the SS-18’s on station. That’s why this new missile is being built—to provide a replacement for these aging but powerful launch vehicles, and to provide a faster boost phase that is intended to outrun US solid fueled ABM missiles.
This came in a statement for journalists by the Commander of the Russian Strategic Missile Forces Sergei Karakayev. He pointed out that it is the deployment of the US global missile defence system, a system that grows more powerful each year that prompted Russia to think of counteraction. The missile defence system that the United States plans to deploy in Europe will be able to intercept Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles, deployed in European Russia.
The US claims the European antimissile system is designed to counter Iran’s missile threat, but Russia exposed US perfidy by offering the US a base in southern Russia closer to Iran and the US refused. Russia is the only country in Europe with ICBMs, so it rightly assumes the ABMs are aimed at them. ICBMs and submarine-based ballistic missiles are the backbone of Russia’s nuclear forces. Russia says their missiles are for “containment” of the US, but we know they are preparing for a nuclear first strike on America.
Russia is in full development of missiles capable of evading the US anti-missile defense system—which isn’t hard to do since the US ABM missiles have no warhead. The kinetic tip must make physical contact with the incoming missile to kill it, and that is extremely hard to do at the hypersonic speed of reentry. Here’s Voice of Russia again on the subject:
Under any possible scenario the Russian Strategic Missile Forces will be capable to withstand the potential of any missile defense system and to ensure fulfillment of tasks, Sergei Karakayev, Commander of the Russian Strategic Missile Forces, has told today.
The only way a ballistic missile warhead can evade is to maneuver, and you need rocket boosters to be integrated into the warhead to do that. That turns each warhead into a small guided missile, and that makes them larger and heavier—hence the need for the new and improved liquid fueled ICBMs to replace the SS-18 remaining on station. Even if the resort to movable control surfaces, that would require a longer warhead with room for a power supply and controls. But control surfaces don’t do well under hypersonic speeds.
Another problem with these larger missiles is that they are not road mobile, but they can be carried on rail cars. Nobody depends on silos anymore except the US—because they want the enemy to know where our missiles are. The US is engaging in nuclear suicide.
According to Colonel-General Karakaev, the Russian Strategic Missile Forces has six types of missile launches, both stationary and mobile, including the fifth generation Yars and Topol-M launchers, in arsenal. Karakaev noted that effectiveness of any strike force suggests a sustainable resistance to any outer impact, including a nuclear one.
The Forces account for two thirds of Russia’s nuclear weapons. Possessing a big arsenal of intercontinental ballistic missiles, they are capable of hitting any target anywhere in the world with pinpoint accuracy.
Their arsenal consists of six missile types – three, based in silos, and three, mounted on rail platforms or trucks. Importantly, the US does not possess truck- or rail-mounted missiles.
Dr Igor Korotchenko is Editor-in-Chief of the Natsionalnaya Oborona, or National Defence, journal: The might of Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces safeguards a secure future for our country. The latest addition to this might is the RS-24 Yars intercontinental ballistic missile, which can be positioned in a silo or on the back of a heavy truck. A missile of this type carries six independently targeted nuclear warheads of 150 kilotons TNT each. The Forces also possess another truck-mounted intercontinental missile, the Topol-M. It carries a single powerful nuclear warhead, which is capable of wiping out a megacity.
The Russians complain about the US backing out of the ABM treaty, which we should never have signed—since Russia never abandoned her arsenal of ABMs.
The Forces are taking on a new strategic dimension as the Americans, having withdrawn from the 1972 ABM limitation treaty, continue to refuse to extend binding guarantees that no US missile defense installation on European soil will compromise Russia’s deterrence capability. Powerful missiles capable of smashing through missile defenses are a guarantee in themselves.
But the Russian complaint conveniently omits telling that Russia backed out of the INF treaty (Intermediate Nuclear Forces) after it was found to be violating it, after the cold war ended (a carefully crafted deception). Russia never pulled their INF missiles out of Eastern Europe when the US destroyed its Pershing missiles, and the supposed anti-communist government of the Czech Republic never told the US the missiles were still there.
But with all this Russian cheating, the US steadfastly continues disarming as if it is required to by INF treaty that is already in shambles by Russia cheating. We are regaled almost weekly in the US by stories of Missiliers (Missile Launch Officers) moral being low, implicated in drugs scandals, and cheating on operational readiness exams. We are continually reminded how many billions are spent, hinting that this is a place to cut, now that the “cold war is over.”
Over 10 years, the estimated cost is $24 billion for ICBMs; $82 billion for nuclear submarines; and $40 million for nuclear bombers, as well as $11 billion for other activities, including DOD research related to nuclear forces that the Congressional Budget Office couldn’t directly attribute to one of the legs of the triad. –Great Falls Tribune
Well, the cold war never was over and new a hot war is coming to this country, probably in the next decade. So, it’s no time to disarm, but that’s where we are headed. The Great Falls (MT) Tribune put out this little propaganda piece entitled: “Navy may reduce nuke numbers: Move would give ICBMs breathing room” The essence is that, “if the Navy gives up some of their submarine missiles, the US won’t have to destroy as many land based missiles in our home town.” Is this a jobs issue, or one of National Survival? With thinking like this, we’ve got real problems.
A recent report from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists indicated the Navy will begin reducing the total number of deployed submarine launched ballistic missiles by 56. Though there has been no formal announcement by the Navy, the expected reduction could give the current intercontinental ballistic missile force some breathing room.
Especially when coupled with the reductions that will come from eliminating 50 unused Minuteman III silos in the Malmstrom Air Force Base missile field and 51 empty Peacemaker silos assigned to F.E. Warren AFB in Wyoming and Vandenberg AFB in California.
The Peacekeeper was the largest and most powerful missile the US ever produced. It was dismantled, but not destroyed. The missile guidance and rocket bodies are being stored at Hill AFB and in the West desert of Utah. But if they destroy the silos, these missiles won’t be able to be put back into commission when needed most—as Russian cheating becomes more obvious. The Department of Defense is expected to start implementing the New START plan in May or June of this year (also from the Great Falls Tribune):
According to a Congressional Research Service report from July 2013, with the launcher reduction on Trident submarines and the elimination of decommissioned silos, as well as the conversion of nuclear bombers to non-nuclear and the elimination of the last nuclear B-52G just before Christmas, the Air Force could potentially retain all 450 silos with only 400 containing missiles at any given time. Montana congressmen in particular have pushed back against an environmental study of ICBMs [to force yet more unilateral disarmament]
The New START treaty, ratified by the Senate in 2010, limits the United States and Russia to no more than 1,550 deployed warheads; 800 deployed and nondeployed ICBM launchers; submarine-launched ballistic missile launchers and heavy bombers; and to have reduced their deployed ICBMs, SLBMs and heavy bombers equipped for nuclear armaments to no more than 700.
According to data from the State Department, the U.S. has 809 deployed ICBMs, SLBMs and heavy bombers; Russia has 473. The U.S. has 1,688 warheads on deployed ICBMs, SLBMs and nuclear warheads counted for deployed heavy bombers; Russia has 1,400. The U.S. has 1,015 deployed and nondeployed launchers of ICBMs, SLBMs and heavy bombers; Russia has 894. The deadline to reach those limits is February 2018.
The last B-52G accountable under New START was destroyed just before Christmas by sawing off the plane’s tail, rendering it useless.
The truth is, the State Department and CIA are lying about Russian numbers. They simply don’t know, and are putting out numbers assuming the Russians are in compliance with all former treaties—which they are not. Our inspectors have never been allowed into the full range of Russian weapons factories or depots—the largest of which is the huge underground complex at Yamantau Mountain in the Urals, east of Moscow. And, the US isn’t counting all the new missiles Russia is building, either. Russia specifically backed out of the Nunn Lugar deal last year, which provided US aid in dismantling old toxic weapons in exchange for inspections, specifically because they didn’t want any more inspections. Go figure!
We haven’t built a new missile in a couple of decades and have no intention of doing so, while the Russians are building at least 12 per year. Nobody knows how many the Chinese are building. And, why should we be disarming at all—even if Russia were complying—when you’ve got China building huge missile forces. Disarmament only works if it is verifiable and if all parties to nuclear missiles are taking part and in equal compliance. We haven’t even suggested to China that she engage in disarmament talks!
It’s not hard to see where this is headed—weakening our nuclear triad in order to induce a growing enemy to remove any fear of striking. The third World War is inevitable and it will put the final nail in the coffin of US liberty and national sovereignty.
Related:
(audio) Joel Skousen: Timing of the Russia/China invasion of U.S.A. — Full readiness in 6-8 years!
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDkyeYUUSyM]Charlotte Iserbyt on The Perils of Common Core
Published on Jan 3, 2014
Alex invites former Senior Policy Advisor for the U.S. Department of Education, Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, to analyze how socialism is subtly promoted in American schools and textbooks. She’ll also divulge who is actually behind the complete internationalization of education. We’ll also cover the Obamacare meltdown and take your calls on this worldwide broadcast.
http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com
Related:
(video) Charlotte Iserbyt: Federalizing and Corporatizing All of The Schools
The man who is fixing my computer, Anchorage computer tech, Joe Lenox told me about his recent dream of the U.S., including Alaska getting nuked by China. He wrote it down, and is allowing me to post it. Thanks, Joe!
The China/Russia invasion of the U.S. has been prophesied by Dumitru Duduman, Henry Gruver, others, and now Joe. And Joel Skousen has analyzed it from a geopolitical perspective, giving us about 8-10 years before China will have its above water fleet ready. Articles linked below.
Joe writes:
Date: November 28th 2013 @ around 0400 hrs
I went to sleep normally, without even thinking about wars, WWIII, or anything else for that matter.
At around the time mentioned above, I woke up from a disturbing dream. The dream was so vivid, it became “Lucid” meaning, I became aware that I was in a dream state.
I’ve witnessed at least 40% of United States blown up by a Nuclear Bomb from China. I couldn’t determine the time and date, but what I saw was so vivid; it was inconceivable for me to comprehend; even Alaska went under.
Related:
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
The globalists are intentionally setting US up to get nuked, which Dumitru Duduman and others have prophesied will happen — links below. Joel Skousen thinks we still have 8-10 years, because China’s above water navy needs further development. It will be a joint Russia/China attack. The globalist-owned mainstream media is intentionally as silent as these submarines.
– –
From: The Truth Wins
New Russian Submarines Are So Silent That The U.S. Navy Calls Them “Black Holes”
Did you know that Russia is building submarines that are so quiet that the U.S. military cannot detect them? These “black hole” submarines can freely approach the coastlines of the United States without fear of being detected whenever they want. In fact, a “nuclear-powered attack submarine armed with long-range cruise missiles” sailed around in the Gulf of Mexico for several weeks without being detected back in 2012. And now Russia is launching a new class of subs that have “advanced stealth technology”. The U.S. Navy openly acknowledges that they cannot track these subs when they are submerged. That means that the Russians are able to sail right up to our coastlines and launch nukes whenever they want. But instead of trying to find a way to counteract this potential threat, the Obama administration has been working very hard to dismantle the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal. In the end, we could potentially pay a great price for this utter foolishness.
A recent RT article discussed these new super silent “black hole” submarines. To say that they are impressive would be a massive understatement…
Russia has launched its new state-of-the-art Novorossiysk submarine, which set sail from a St Petersburg shipyard to become the first of six diesel-electric stealth subs delivered to the Russian Black Sea fleet in the next two years.
The Novorossiysk belongs to the Varshavyanka-class (Project 636), which is characterized by advanced stealth technology, making it virtually undetectable when submerged.
“Our potential opponents call it the ‘Black Hole’ due to the very low noise emission and visibility of the submarine,”Konstantin Tabachny, captain of the Novorossiysk, told Channel One TV. “To be undetectable is the main quality for a submarine. And this whole project really fits its purpose.”
Of course Russia has been building “near silent” submarines for quite some time. In fact, their nuclear submarines are already far quieter than anything the U.S. currently has…
Russia recently launched its near silent nuclear submarine following several years of development.
The Borey Class submarine, dubbed Vladimir Monomakh, has a next generation nuclear reactor, can dive deeper than 1,200 feet, and carries up to 20 nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM).Each of these “Bulava” ICBM’s can carry ten detachableMIRV warheads, what they call “re-entry vehicles,” capable of delivering 150 kiloton yields per warhead
And as I mentioned above, these submarines have the ability to approach the coastlines of the United States without the U.S. military ever even knowing that they were there.
In addition, Russia has been working feverishly to upgrade other elements of their strategic arsenal as well. For example, it was recently announced that Russia will soon begin work on a new strategic bomber…
Russia will begin the full-scale R&D work on its future strategic bomber in 2014, a senior aircraft-manufacturing industry official said Thursday.
The project, known as PAK-DA (an acronym meaning “future long-range aircraft”), has been in the works for several years but was given the formal go-ahead by the Russian leadership last year.
The Russians are also working very hard to modernize their nuclear forces…
[…]
Sadly, most Americans have no idea that any of this is going on.
Most Americans just assume that “the Cold War is over” and that Russia will never be a threat to us ever again.
If only that was actually true.
Today, Russia is stronger both economically and militarily than it has ever been before.
And as you just read about, Russia is rapidly preparing for a potential future conflict with the United States.
If the Cold War truly is over, then why does Russia have more spies inside the U.S. today than it did at any point during the Cold War?
The American people need to wake up.
As all of this has been going on, Barack Obama has been working relentlessly to dismantle the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal. The following is an excerpt from one of my previous articles…
—–
Back in 1967, the U.S. military had more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads.
Since that time, the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal has been reduced by about 95 percent.
Related:
(video) Joel Skousen’s ‘Red Dawn’ Warning to America — Russia will lead the attack…
Dumitru Duduman: Wake Up America
[2-hour audio] Henry Gruver with Steve Quayle: Visions of War – Visions of Heaven
[mp3 audio] Henry Gruver’s Vision of America being invaded by Russia
[47-minute audio] Henry Gruver: Russian Invasion of America
Skousen: U.S. Intentionally Vulnerable to Nuclear Attack from China/Russia
All 100+ of my Joel Skousen posts (10 posts per page; latest appear first)
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcBKMLiy2XE]The Roots of Technocracy with Expert Patrick M. Wood
Published on Nov 15, 2013
Alex welcomes to the broadcast The August Forecast & Review Editor Patrick M. Wood to discuss how the global elite within the Trilateral Commission are replacing capitalism with their own technocracy in order to create a New International Economic Order. http://www.augustforecast.com
From: Infowars
The Video That Proves a Conspiracy to Kill JFK?
Were Secret Service agents told to stand down?
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
November 22, 2013
While many are familiar with the Zapruder film, the footage below is less well known. It shows the Secret Service agent nearest to JFK apparently being told to stand down moments before Kennedy’s assassination in Dealey Plaza 50 years ago today.
As the narrator describes, the clip appears to show Secret Service agent Emory Roberts standing up and ordering Donald Lawton and Clint Hill, the two Secret Service bodyguards on either side of the presidential vehicle, to stand down, therefore preventing them from doing their job as human shields to the president.
The instruction appears to cause confusion inside the follow up car and most noticeably with Lawton himself, who seems perplexed that he has been called off the vehicle.
The narrator makes the point that the behavior seems slapdash and bizarre for an agency that sends an advance team a month prior to any location in order to iron out security procedures.
Analysis suggests that the absence of the bodyguards ensured that whoever was firing at Kennedy was not obstructed and had a clear shot. During a visit to Tampa four days earlier, Lawton was pictured riding on the right rear bumper of the limousine.
During an October 2013 C-Span interview (28:50), Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent seen on the left hand side of JFK’s car (and the one who subsequently ran after the car and reached out to Jackie Kennedy), claimed that Donald Lawton was actually just going off-duty to eat his lunch, and that he told the other agents, “OK you guys, I am going to lunch, have a good trip.”
This explanation hardly seems plausible given the nature of the situation in addition to Lawton’s body language. He clearly shrugs his shoulders and outstretches his arms three times as if baffled at something and asking for answers.
Secret Service agents claimed that it was Kennedy himself who had given an order four days earlier to call off the bodyguards because he wanted to be more accessible to the people, describing the Secret Service agents as “Ivy League Charlatans”. However, Congressman Sam Gibbons, who often rode alongside Kennedy, stated, “I rode with Kennedy every time he rode. I heard no such order.”
What do you think? Does this video represent proof that at least one Secret Service member was in on the plot to kill JFK and ordered a stand down?
For more analysis, see Gerald Blaine and the Kennedy Detail – Was the Secret Service ‘Stood Down’ in Dallas?
Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.
From: theeconomiccollapseblog.com
Federal Reserve Whistleblower Tells America The REAL Reason For Quantitative Easing
By Michael Snyder, on November 12th, 2013
A banker named Andrew Huszar that helped manage the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program during 2009 and 2010 is publicly apologizing for what he has done. He says that quantitative easing has accomplished next to nothing for the average person on the street. Instead, he says that it has been “the greatest backdoor Wall Street bailout of all time.” And of course the cold, hard economic numbers support what Huszar is saying. The percentage of working age Americans with a job has not improved at all during the quantitative easing era, and median household income has actually steadily declined during that time frame. Meanwhile, U.S. stock prices have doubled overall, and the stock prices of the big Wall Street banks have tripled. So who benefits from quantitative easing? It doesn’t take a genius to figure it out, and now Andrew Huszar is blowing the whistle on the whole thing.
From 2009 to 2010, Huszar was responsible for managing the Fed’s purchase of approximately $1.25 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities. At the time, he thought that it was a dream job, but now he is apologizing to the rest of the country for what happened…
I can only say: I’m sorry, America. As a former Federal Reserve official, I was responsible for executing the centerpiece program of the Fed’s first plunge into the bond-buying experiment known as quantitative easing. The central bank continues to spin QE as a tool for helping Main Street. But I’ve come to recognize the program for what it really is: the greatest backdoor Wall Street bailout of all time.
When the first round of quantitative easing ended, Huszar says that it was incredibly obvious that QE had done very little to benefit average Americans but that it had been “an absolute coup for Wall Street”…
Trading for the first round of QE ended on March 31, 2010. The final results confirmed that, while there had been only trivial relief for Main Street, the U.S. central bank’s bond purchases had been an absolute coup for Wall Street. The banks hadn’t just benefited from the lower cost of making loans. They’d also enjoyed huge capital gains on the rising values of their securities holdings and fat commissions from brokering most of the Fed’s QE transactions. Wall Street had experienced its most profitable year ever in 2009, and 2010 was starting off in much the same way.
You’d think the Fed would have finally stopped to question the wisdom of QE. Think again. Only a few months later—after a 14% drop in the U.S. stock market and renewed weakening in the banking sector—the Fed announced a new round of bond buying: QE2. Germany’s finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, immediately called the decision “clueless.”
That was when I realized the Fed had lost any remaining ability to think independently from Wall Street.
Of course the fact that the Fed cannot think independently from Wall Street should not be a surprise to any of my regular readers. As I have written about repeatedly, the Federal Reserve was created by the Wall Street bankers for the benefit of the Wall Street bankers. When the Federal Reserve serves the interests of Wall Street, it is simply doing what it was designed to do. And according to Huszar, quantitative easing has been one giant “subsidy” for Wall Street banks…
Having racked up hundreds of billions of dollars in opaque Fed subsidies, U.S. banks have seen their collective stock price triple since March 2009. The biggest ones have only become more of a cartel: 0.2% of them now control more than 70% of the U.S. bank assets.
But Huszar is certainly not the only one on Wall Street that acknowledges these things. For example, just check out what billionaire hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller told CNBC about quantitative easing…
“In my view, I think that the financial sector, this financial industry, this international banking industry, if you want to call it, the cartel now is in total control. The government is its lapdog. Once you get that picture in your mind all of these mysterious things suddenly are answered. That’s why it’s happening, because these guys have literally captured our government.
We think that the government is the regulator of the banks, but the banks are the masters of the regulators.”
“I think we’re coming right down to the endgame.”
“A lot of … people … say we’ve got to have more regulation, not realizing it’s that very government regulation that allows monopolies and cartels to survive, because without it they’ll start to compete with each other….”
– G. Edward Griffin
Transcribed by Jeff Fenske
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nngocEuPIMc]G Edward Griffin on The 100 Yr Old Creature from Jekyll Island
Published on Nov 12, 2013
Filmmaker and author G Edward Griffin talks about the history of the secret cabal known as the ‘Federal Reserve’ — how it came about, what it’s done and what we can do about it. He also offers his opinion on Bitcoin and Carbon Credit schemes like those being offered by ‘Blood & Gore’.
From: Infowars
Papers produced by global education corporation; Part of ‘No Child Left Behind’ program
Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Oct 29, 2013
A parent of a ten year old was shocked to discover a grammar and writing test paper that their child brought home from school reads more like document from an authoritarian country such as China.
The parent sent a portion of the test paper to Infowars, revealing that it contains sentences such as “The commands of government officials must be obeyed by all.”
The paper uses such sentences and asks school children to replace certain words in order to make the sentence contain a possessive noun.
Others within the paper include:
“The job of a president is not easy.”
“He makes sure the laws of the country are fair”
“The wants of an individual are less important than the needs of a nation”
Here is the portion of the paper Infowars received:
Upon further investigation it appears that the paper is part of a set produced by Pearson Education, a global corporation that provides education publishing and assessment services to schools in the US and the rest of the world. Pearson is the world’s largest for-profit education business.
The particular sentence about everyone obeying government commands appears in other Pearson papers, such as this fifth grade grammar test.
“A lot of our post-war boom was funded by Nazi money.”
* * *
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgkE9kmUAW0]Obamacare was Written to Bankrupt America
Published on Sep 30, 2013
This ground breaking book reveals information that has largely been hidden from the American people since the 1960s. Meticulously researched and fully documented, Who Really Killed Kennedy? is the definitive source for those truth seekers who wish to truly understand how and why JFK was assassinated. http://www.infowarsshop.com/Who-Reall…
Who Really Killed Kennedy?
Your Price $19.95
Alex is joined via Skype by Dr Jerome Corsi to discuss the train wreck that is Obamacare and how the program itself is written to bankrupt America.
Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal owns the largest chunk of News Corp. stock outside the Murdoch family.
Rupert Murdoch, the main owner of Fox News is wonderful too:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFUne1vsscQ]Why You Can’t Trust Corporate Media
TheAlexJonesChannel | Published on Sep 24, 2013
The Associated Press has now shown they are just as malleable as CNN & FOX news when pressured by wealthy Saudis. Threatening to get AP reporter fired for a story that reported Saudi connections to chemical weapons supplied to Syrian Al Qaeda, it appears that the Saudis have now made good on their threat.
Related:
Fox News Rupert Murdoch key pornographer selling women’s body parts!
Bill O’Reilly Flips Out — Truly ‘Fair and Balanced’ People Don’t Do This
Bill O’Reilly to Judge Napolitano: “I don’t care about the Constitution … Don’t be a pinhead”
Analyzing O’Reilly’s body language—Anger, Personal Space
O’Reilly Lies About FOX Being “Fair & Balanced”
[updated] FOX News Illustrated: “We Spin, We Decide” — Because Sometimes You Can’t Handle the Truth
Fox News: Take Ron Paul Out Of The Debates!
Related at ONEcanhappen (my spiritual freedom site):
RADIO ALERT TONIGHT: Jerome Corsi, a two-time New York Times No. 1 bestselling author will be a guest on “Coast to Coast AM” with George Noory from 1 a.m. to 2 a.m. Eastern Time Tuesday night/Wednesday morning. A list of radio stations carrying the program can be found here.
From: WND
DID GEORGE H.W. BUSH WITNESS JFK ASSASSINATION?
FBI files, newspaper ad and curious photos raise questions
NEW YORK – Despite his claims to the contrary, there is documentary evidence that George H. W. Bush was in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963, and was affiliated at that time with the CIA, despite protests that he was not associated with the agency until President Gerald R. Ford appointed him director in 1976.
Two FBI memos and a photograph of a man standing outside the Texas School Book Depository are among the intriguing items addressed in Jerome Corsi’s new book “Who Really Killed Kennedy”.
The evidence is significant as Corsi broaches the question asked by some researchers of the assassination: Was John F. Kennedy the first presidential victim of the emerging “New World Order” championed by former CIA directors Allen Dulles and George H. W. Bush?
This is what I’ve been thinking and saying too:
Our military is being used by the globalists to take out independent countries that resist the control of their banks and government.
– –
“This is all about America being the muscle for a global empire.”
– Alex Jones
* * *
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfWTGS7Rnb4]Will Obama Strike Syria This Saturday?
Published on Aug 29, 2013
Alex exposes evidence that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against its own citizens — pointed to by U.K. and U.S. governments as the rationale to impose strikes against Syria — as being flimsy, at best. Once described as “undeniable,” so-called proof that the Assad regime used chemical weapons is now being heavily contested at both the parliamentary and congressional levels.
Stay in the know – Follow Alex on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
‘Like’ Alex on FACEBOOK – https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme…
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.net/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén
